He is our second highest goal scorer this season (Brownhill being top) so with that in mind unlikely that he wouldn't be included in a team!
Team for the run in?
Re: Team for the run in?
-
- Posts: 3883
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1138 times
- Has Liked: 1867 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: Team for the run in?
That’s my point, my ‘Flemming?’ was in reply to a poster that listed players that shouldn’t play again this season and Flemming was on that list
-
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: Team for the run in?
I won't even pretend to know who has the final say on our signings now but off that list Pires and Foster definitely aren't Parkers signings, Sonne said it nearly happened in the summer so was he picked by Parker?
Flemming we've scouted and shown interest before was he Parkers or Paces choice?
I really don't know anymore.
-
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: Team for the run in?
I keep reading this, but who do you think signed these players? And if SP didn't want them why does he pick them?bumba wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:20 pmI won't even pretend to know who has the final say on our signings now but off that list Pires and Foster definitely aren't Parkers signings, Sonne said it nearly happened in the summer so was he picked by Parker?
Flemming we've scouted and shown interest before was he Parkers or Paces choice?
I really don't know anymore.
-
- Posts: 9820
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3110 times
- Has Liked: 3105 times
Re: Team for the run in?
Recruitment in football is pretty far removed from what it was heck even 10 years ago.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:24 pmI keep reading this, but who do you think signed these players? And if SP didn't want them why does he pick them?
I'm not 100% sure how it works at Burnley, some teams the 'manager' is entirely removed from the recruitment process, other teams they have a veto vote on a prospect, then in other setups they're far more hands on.
SP no doubt vouched and wanted Anthony, Laurent and perhaps even Worrall, but a lot of the other signings I don't think he had much to do with.
Why does he pick them? Well, who else can he pick?
-
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: Team for the run in?
CoolClaret wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 11:01 pmRecruitment in football is pretty far removed from what it was heck even 10 years ago.
I'm not 100% sure how it works at Burnley, some teams the 'manager' is entirely removed from the recruitment process, other teams they have a veto vote on a prospect, then in other setups they're far more hands on.
SP no doubt vouched and wanted Anthony, Laurent and perhaps even Worrall, but a lot of the other signings I don't think he had much to do with.
Why does he pick them? Well, who else can he pick?
Well, at the start of the season he could have picked a team with none of this season's signings in it, and he has shown preference for the new signings in most positions.
As you say, recruitment is different these days, but I'd be surprised if any club signed a player the manager really didn't want.
-
- Posts: 9820
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3110 times
- Has Liked: 3105 times
Re: Team for the run in?
Did he? Where are Sambo and Houtondji right now?boatshed bill wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 9:13 amWell, at the start of the season he could have picked a team with none of this season's signings in it, and he has shown preference for the new signings in most positions.
As you say, recruitment is different these days, but I'd be surprised if any club signed a player the manager really didn't want.
You may well be surprised then, Bill. A manager that needs players for his squad can hardly turn his nose up to new signings to fill those positions, but there are definitely instances where a recruitment team gets players that the manager didn't necessarily 'want'.
Re: Team for the run in?
The fact we're still having to play Flemming up front shows the mess we're in. I don't particularly rate the guy, but at least he has a goal threat.
We really are at the point where we need to think about what Foster brings to the table. Is he better than Barnes if played as a striker? Is he better than any of our other wide options? I'd argue not.
The only question for me is CM. Brownhill should be a guaranteed starter, but I think the Cullen, Laurent, Hannibal midfield works well. Add to this how poor JB was at the weekend and it's a tough call to drop either Laurent or Hannibal for him. For me...
Trafford
Roberts CJ Esteve Pires
Cullen Laurent
Edwards Hannibal Anthony
Flemming
We really are at the point where we need to think about what Foster brings to the table. Is he better than Barnes if played as a striker? Is he better than any of our other wide options? I'd argue not.
The only question for me is CM. Brownhill should be a guaranteed starter, but I think the Cullen, Laurent, Hannibal midfield works well. Add to this how poor JB was at the weekend and it's a tough call to drop either Laurent or Hannibal for him. For me...
Trafford
Roberts CJ Esteve Pires
Cullen Laurent
Edwards Hannibal Anthony
Flemming
-
- Posts: 9820
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3110 times
- Has Liked: 3105 times
Re: Team for the run in?
... And Brownhill just scored from a late run into the box once again!Overseascricketer wrote: ↑Sun Mar 02, 2025 5:49 pmI think we’ll have to agree to disagree. He wouldn’t get into Leeds team so can’t be the best in the division at that. Has he scored a goal this year by making a late run into the box, or has he already been in the right position? If he has I can’t remember it. Recovery runs are not his strong point, relies on Cullen to mop up all the time which will go unnoticed. Much better team without him in it
Re: Team for the run in?
Not actually sure who Parker has signed at a guess I'd say Anthony and Worral but Pires and Hountondji were signed by VK or Pace, even the Barnes signings was Pace I believe.boatshed bill wrote: ↑Mon Mar 03, 2025 10:24 pmI keep reading this, but who do you think signed these players? And if SP didn't want them why does he pick them?
Isn't Parker just our head coach??
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Mon Jun 10, 2019 9:49 pm
- Been Liked: 18 times
- Has Liked: 64 times
Re: Team for the run in?
Good goal. But I think you need to look at what a late run into the box is. Can it ever be a late run into the box when he’s already on the penalty spot when Anthony picks the ball up?CoolClaret wrote: ↑Tue Mar 04, 2025 8:05 pm... And Brownhill just scored from a late run into the box once again!
-
- Posts: 2458
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
- Been Liked: 424 times
- Has Liked: 336 times
Re: Team for the run in?
For all those who don't want Brownhill to be in the lineup, please tell me who's going to score the goals we need?
This user liked this post: boatshed bill
-
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: Team for the run in?
Well, if you are right, it could only have been AP as VK left in May.
-
- Posts: 9820
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3110 times
- Has Liked: 3105 times
Re: Team for the run in?
Wasn't a classic 'late run into the box', but he's attacking the box from a deeper position, isn't picked up and gets himself into a great area and slots home... Classic Josh Brownhill.Overseascricketer wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 9:02 amGood goal. But I think you need to look at what a late run into the box is. Can it ever be a late run into the box when he’s already on the penalty spot when Anthony picks the ball up?
11 goals now for the season for Josh, I don't think any other midfielder comes close to that?
- Attachments
-
- BrownhillGoal.png (1.09 MiB) Viewed 693 times
This user liked this post: Overseascricketer
Re: Team for the run in?
VK signed Pires and Hountondji before he left, they were already agreedboatshed bill wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 10:06 amWell, if you are right, it could only have been AP as VK left in May.
-
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
-
- Posts: 9146
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2373 times
- Has Liked: 2344 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: Team for the run in?
Is there a boat in your shed, Bill?
-
- Posts: 17192
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3527 times
- Has Liked: 7718 times
Re: Team for the run in?
Not this week, Doug

Re: Team for the run in?
Dear oh dear. The value of Josh Brownhill to the side should be obvious even to folks who are full of opinions but don’t really understand football. For example, his last two goals have shown a high level of technical skill in the finish and put him well ahead of any other player in the league playing in an advanced midfield position.
He’s far more effective played there. Recognise his strengths and play to them. There are others better suited to a deeper role. He is very good when played in the right position.
He’s far more effective played there. Recognise his strengths and play to them. There are others better suited to a deeper role. He is very good when played in the right position.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2025 4:31 pm
- Been Liked: 3 times
Re: Team for the run in?
Anybody who would not have Brownhill in their team is clueless. I'm sorry but you don't know your football if you aren't picking him. You lack any football knowledge and any common sense. Him and Cullen are 2 of the first names on the teamsheet. This is basic stuff.
Re: Team for the run in?
Yes they signed on those dates but the deals had been agreed way before that by VKboatshed bill wrote: ↑Wed Mar 05, 2025 8:54 pmActually they signed on the 16th and 17th of July, but I get your point about VK being instrumental.
-
- Posts: 9820
- Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
- Been Liked: 3110 times
- Has Liked: 3105 times
Re: Team for the run in?
I think this season yes, it's clear to say that JB is integral to our success - his goals probably account for more match winning points than any other player in the side.williamw1331 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:17 pmAnybody who would not have Brownhill in their team is clueless. I'm sorry but you don't know your football if you aren't picking him. You lack any football knowledge and any common sense. Him and Cullen are 2 of the first names on the teamsheet. This is basic stuff.
The argument I think people are making is, 'could our balance be better without JB in the XI', which is a fair argument.
I mean, how many people would have thought we'd have performed better after selling Charlie Austin?
-
- Posts: 3883
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1138 times
- Has Liked: 1867 times
- Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson
Re: Team for the run in?
I think just his goals in a team without prolific goal scorers makes him a first 11 playerwilliamw1331 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 07, 2025 1:17 pmAnybody who would not have Brownhill in their team is clueless. I'm sorry but you don't know your football if you aren't picking him. You lack any football knowledge and any common sense. Him and Cullen are 2 of the first names on the teamsheet. This is basic stuff.