Starting 11 to seriously compete?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
The Shire Claret
Posts: 1078
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2023 11:17 am
Been Liked: 352 times
Has Liked: 266 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by The Shire Claret » Sat Aug 02, 2025 10:17 pm

Forest lost to Birmingham today

It was a friendly people

LincsWoldsClaret
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
Been Liked: 188 times
Has Liked: 103 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by LincsWoldsClaret » Sat Aug 02, 2025 11:52 pm

Just the question marks to fill in before the first game -

?
Walker ? Esteve Hartmann
Cullen
Edwards ? Hannibal Anthony
?

KRBFC
Posts: 19143
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3987 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by KRBFC » Sun Aug 03, 2025 12:22 am

boatshed bill wrote:
Sat Aug 02, 2025 10:15 pm
This thread is really sad. The level of expectancy in respect of who's good enough for Burnley is borderline ridiculous.
We’re in the PL now and our finances require us to stay there, as much as I think Josh Laurent is a great lad and did a cracking job last season, I don’t think he’s of the required level needed to stay up.

Footballs a ruthless game, no time for sentiment, it works both ways too, the players would F us off in a heartbeat if a better contract was put infront of them by another club.

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 393 times
Has Liked: 218 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by JarrowClaret » Sun Aug 03, 2025 12:58 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sat Aug 02, 2025 7:00 pm
The thing that concerns me, is Cullen seems a dead cert starter for us.

I really rate him but at this level I don’t think he should be a certain starter.

I would like to think we sign 2 CMs with Cullen fighting for a spot
Surely our captain would be expected to start when he is available!

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13203
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1958 times
Has Liked: 385 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Sun Aug 03, 2025 8:08 am

JarrowClaret wrote:
Sun Aug 03, 2025 12:58 am
Surely our captain would be expected to start when he is available!
That’s kind of my point. He’s a really good player for us, but I don’t think at this level he should be a certain starter.

wadeswondergoal
Posts: 277
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2024 3:54 pm
Been Liked: 121 times
Has Liked: 28 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by wadeswondergoal » Sun Aug 03, 2025 8:11 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sun Aug 03, 2025 8:08 am
That’s kind of my point. He’s a really good player for us, but I don’t think at this level he should be a certain starter.
This was my argument about re-signing Brownhill. He was club captain and offering him improved terms when he wasn’t at the level to start every week in the PL didn’t make sense to me.

GrahamBranchsPerm
Posts: 271
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2017 4:17 pm
Been Liked: 104 times
Has Liked: 160 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by GrahamBranchsPerm » Sun Aug 03, 2025 8:33 am

I think Josh Cullen, with the right people around him, is a good enough footballer for the Prem. Of course he might struggle against top 8, but with pace around him, out ball options (maybe Walker and Q if we play 5 at the back, for example), he will be one of the least of our problems.

He finished the Prem last time very well.

Football is all about opinions and I do understand the concerns, but we have bigger priorities, including finding him a suitable partner, as well as the GK.

I think we will plug the relevant gaps too. No point ALK 'half investing' - we need to have a solid team and see how we go.

UTC
This user liked this post: Foshiznik

CharlieinNewMexico
Posts: 3524
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:53 am
Been Liked: 942 times
Has Liked: 582 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by CharlieinNewMexico » Sun Aug 03, 2025 9:08 am

GrahamBranchsPerm wrote:
Sun Aug 03, 2025 8:33 am
I think Josh Cullen, with the right people around him, is a good enough footballer for the Prem. Of course he might struggle against top 8, but with pace around him, out ball options (maybe Walker and Q if we play 5 at the back, for example), he will be one of the least of our problems.

He finished the Prem last time very well.

Football is all about opinions and I do understand the concerns, but we have bigger priorities, including finding him a suitable partner, as well as the GK.

I think we will plug the relevant gaps too. No point ALK 'half investing' - we need to have a solid team and see how we go.

UTC
I’ve never , ever , had a problem with Cullen. People just need to understand what he is and his limitations (as you pointed out)

He’s a metronome, he keeps us ticking along at pace. Does he spray 40 yard balls. No. Is he physically sound in a 2 man? No. Does he keep moving the ball to good areas? Yes. Would he benefit from a minder alongside? Yes.

Just needs help IMO
These 2 users liked this post: GrahamBranchsPerm Foshiznik

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 393 times
Has Liked: 218 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by JarrowClaret » Sun Aug 03, 2025 10:52 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Sun Aug 03, 2025 8:08 am
That’s kind of my point. He’s a really good player for us, but I don’t think at this level he should be a certain starter.
He is 1 of our best players, does all the dirty stuff that nobody notices and tends to dictate our play. Whether he is good enough or not, I suspect with the right people next to him he is, he will play most games and deservedly so because he is tactically sound and he gives maximum effort. He isn’t a world beater and isn’t going to be in anyone’s team of the season but he is a vital cog for us.
This user liked this post: Foshiznik

brexit
Posts: 1897
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
Been Liked: 276 times
Has Liked: 66 times
Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by brexit » Sun Aug 03, 2025 12:15 pm

KRBFC wrote:
Sun Aug 03, 2025 12:22 am
We’re in the PL now and our finances require us to stay there, as much as I think Josh Laurent is a great lad and did a cracking job last season, I don’t think he’s of the required level needed to stay up.

Footballs a ruthless game, no time for sentiment, it works both ways too, the players would F us off in a heartbeat if a better contract was put infront of them by another club.
The title of the thread says it all.
I agree with KRBFC no place for sentiment.
The requirement for the coming season is 17th place.
I believe that we will not sign any more permanent players. I think we may get an experienced CM on loan with option to buy. Happy to be proved wrong.
If this is the case, can a starting 11 out of the existing squad gain 17th place?
I sincerely believe that survival will depend on the tactics adopted by SP, team work ethic and a vast improvement in free kick approach.
I have always said to other football fans that Burnley's DNA is to be a greater sum from weaker parts.
I hope this season we will see, dare I say, a return to Dyche era pragmatic football?

AlargeClaret
Posts: 4986
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1248 times
Has Liked: 213 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by AlargeClaret » Mon Aug 04, 2025 1:45 pm

123EasyasBFC wrote:
Sat Aug 02, 2025 8:11 pm
It would be a brave call from us to put responsibility on Hannibal but in the same breath it might be the responsibility he needs. Hannibal seemed a different player in the last couple of months of the season when it really mattered.
Yeah , Hannibal is a tricky one , he’s clearly a talent and he might really “ take off” . He did improve and mature later in the season , let’s hope he can push on as he just might be very good indeed . He’ll be a target though and I hope we can dig deep for a prem experienced MF too .
This user liked this post: 123EasyasBFC

Foshiznik
Posts: 3186
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 924 times
Has Liked: 2588 times
Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Foshiznik » Mon Aug 04, 2025 3:44 pm

equinox wrote:
Sat Aug 02, 2025 7:18 pm
Go on then....
1. Lack of a goalscorer
2. Lack of centre midfielders besides Cullen who are good enough to play in the Premier League in 2 weeks time
3. Goalkeeper
4. Right Centre back
5. Quality of Squad depth

equinox
Posts: 1542
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 382 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by equinox » Mon Aug 04, 2025 4:37 pm

Foshiznik wrote:
Mon Aug 04, 2025 3:44 pm
1. Lack of a goalscorer
2. Lack of centre midfielders besides Cullen who are good enough to play in the Premier League in 2 weeks time
3. Goalkeeper
4. Right Centre back
5. Quality of Squad depth
1. Borja
2. Ugochukwu
3. Weiss
4.Kyle Walker
5.Subjective
This user liked this post: KateR

boyyanno
Posts: 2188
Joined: Fri May 27, 2016 7:25 pm
Been Liked: 747 times
Has Liked: 165 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by boyyanno » Mon Aug 04, 2025 4:58 pm

The way I judge the window is not- Is our squad somehow now on par with the other PL teams (it's not going to be).

But did we do everything in our power to give ourselves the best opportunity to stay up.

With the rumours of Broja, a Keeper and the New CM we're only 1 or 2 away at a maximum of being in that position imo.
These 2 users liked this post: CoolClaret Spike

Foshiznik
Posts: 3186
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 924 times
Has Liked: 2588 times
Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Foshiznik » Mon Aug 04, 2025 5:20 pm

equinox wrote:
Mon Aug 04, 2025 4:37 pm
1. Borja
2. Ugochukwu
3. Weiss
4.Kyle Walker
5.Subjective
It’s all subjective. But you asked me to name 5 things more concerning than Cullen starting. I did. Picking an unproven young keeper, midfielder and right back at centre back is more of a concern than a player already here playing in their correct position and with experience with the club. Kinda proved my point

CoolClaret
Posts: 9994
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3158 times
Has Liked: 3152 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by CoolClaret » Mon Aug 04, 2025 8:17 pm

boyyanno wrote:
Mon Aug 04, 2025 4:58 pm
The way I judge the window is not- Is our squad somehow now on par with the other PL teams (it's not going to be).

But did we do everything in our power to give ourselves the best opportunity to stay up.

With the rumours of Broja, a Keeper and the New CM we're only 1 or 2 away at a maximum of being in that position imo.
I was thinking similar myself — agreed. We've given ourselves a fighting chance.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13203
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1958 times
Has Liked: 385 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:20 am

The proposed new additions certainly make our side competitive at this level.

Dubravka
Walker, Tuanzebe, Esteve, Hartmann
Cullen, Lesley, Hannibal
Edwards, Broja, Anthony

KRBFC
Posts: 19143
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3987 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by KRBFC » Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:33 am

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:20 am
The proposed new additions certainly make our side competitive at this level.

Dubravka
Walker, Tuanzebe, Esteve, Hartmann
Cullen, Lesley, Hannibal
Edwards, Broja, Anthony

Agree with that 11, looks considerably better with the 2 Chelsea lads in there.

I still think we need a centre half to play alongside Esteve though, Tuanzebe likely won’t play over 50% of the games and he’s no real track record of performing in central defence at any level.

In his 50 PL appearances, only 12 of those were at centre back. 21 of his 22 appearances for Ipswich were at full back.

I’d like either another midfielder, one who can score a few or another wide man capable of scoring a few.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13203
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1958 times
Has Liked: 385 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:42 am

KRBFC wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:33 am
Agree with that 11, looks considerably better with the 2 Chelsea lads in there.

I still think we need a centre half to play alongside Esteve though, Tuanzebe likely won’t play over 50% of the games and he’s no real track record of performing in central defence at any level.

In his 50 PL appearances, only 12 of those were at centre back. 21 of his 22 appearances for Ipswich were at full back.

I’d like either another midfielder, one who can score a few or another wide man capable of scoring a few.
I do agree but I guess it depends what Parker thinks of Worrall and Beyer. If they are remotely fit enough then Parker might think we have enough there.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10970
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1342 times
Has Liked: 890 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Jakubclaret » Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:49 am

Foshiznik wrote:
Mon Aug 04, 2025 3:44 pm
1. Lack of a goalscorer
2. Lack of centre midfielders besides Cullen who are good enough to play in the Premier League in 2 weeks time
3. Goalkeeper
4. Right Centre back
5. Quality of Squad depth
It's a policy fraught with danger.

Bacchus
Posts: 1053
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 732 times
Has Liked: 183 times
Contact:

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Bacchus » Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:51 am

The prevailing wisdom on this board seems to be that 2 years ago Kompany 'ripped apart' the team that won promotion, thus ensuring our relegation before a ball had been kicked.

Over the corse of this summer I think I've seen every one of our players other than Estève being dismissed as not being good enough and needing replacing to give us a chance.

Funny how opinions can change.
These 3 users liked this post: Darnhill Claret NewClaret Holtyclaret

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 3230
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 834 times
Has Liked: 297 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Jakubs Tash » Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:53 am

I still think we could do with more creativity/pace. Edwards and Anthony are quick but not lightening fast. A Tella or Doak from Liverpool type signing would fill this void.

Also another midfielder who likes to have possession. A Berge type.

There’s going to be numerous outgoings and it wouldn’t surprise me if some of them aren’t expected ones.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13203
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1958 times
Has Liked: 385 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:53 am

Bacchus wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:51 am
The prevailing wisdom on this board seems to be that 2 years ago Kompany 'ripped apart' the team that won promotion, thus ensuring our relegation before a ball had been kicked.

Over the corse of this summer I think I've seen every one of our players other than Estève being dismissed as not being good enough and needing replacing to give us a chance.

Funny how opinions can change.
I don’t think VK ripping the team up had much to do with anything.

It was style of play and lack of physicality which were the key issues. I think that was pretty well acknowledged as the main reason we went down. And in his defence (similar to Parker) there are things out of there control like the loans not staying for the prem under VK and the lads being out of contract this season for Parker

Foshiznik
Posts: 3186
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 924 times
Has Liked: 2588 times
Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Foshiznik » Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:54 am

Bacchus wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:51 am
The prevailing wisdom on this board seems to be that 2 years ago Kompany 'ripped apart' the team that won promotion, thus ensuring our relegation before a ball had been kicked.

Over the corse of this summer I think I've seen every one of our players other than Estève being dismissed as not being good enough and needing replacing to give us a chance.

Funny how opinions can change.
I don’t think we are dismissing players, just that we needed to add more quality than we currently have due to departures of CJ, Trafford and Brownhill in particular

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 3230
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 834 times
Has Liked: 297 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Jakubs Tash » Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:55 am

Bacchus wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:51 am
The prevailing wisdom on this board seems to be that 2 years ago Kompany 'ripped apart' the team that won promotion, thus ensuring our relegation before a ball had been kicked.

Over the corse of this summer I think I've seen every one of our players other than Estève being dismissed as not being good enough and needing replacing to give us a chance.

Funny how opinions can change.
I agree to an extent but you could also argue that last year’s team wasn’t as good as the team that won promotion two years ago.

NewClaret
Posts: 17651
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3970 times
Has Liked: 4929 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by NewClaret » Tue Aug 05, 2025 12:05 pm

Jakubs Tash wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:55 am
I agree to an extent but you could also argue that last year’s team wasn’t as good as the team that won promotion two years ago.
Not sure about that. I’d say we are much stronger defensively now which is the basic foundation on which any form of successful season (for us) would be built on.

We had a more flair and a better attacking set-up last time, but that was always likely to be exposed in a league several levels above.

We lost three big players then due to loans without options, learnt from that this time, but lost exactly the same due to contracts expiring and promises made/PSR requirements (probably).

Similar situations with slightly different circumstances, I’d say.

NewClaret
Posts: 17651
Joined: Tue Dec 31, 2019 9:51 am
Been Liked: 3970 times
Has Liked: 4929 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by NewClaret » Tue Aug 05, 2025 12:14 pm

Bacchus wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:51 am
The prevailing wisdom on this board seems to be that 2 years ago Kompany 'ripped apart' the team that won promotion, thus ensuring our relegation before a ball had been kicked.

Over the corse of this summer I think I've seen every one of our players other than Estève being dismissed as not being good enough and needing replacing to give us a chance.

Funny how opinions can change.
Excellent post, completely agree.

The way I see it, Kompany and the club were always right to strengthen in the way they did. I never bought in to ‘ripped apart’ argument at all.

The problem was that they bought the wrong players - no experience, wrong profile of technical players and not enough physicality, etc.

Fortunately, we seem to be learning from those mistakes this time. Hope when we start losing the posters that are saying we need to sign 4-5 players in different positions aren’t complaining we ‘ripped apart’ the team though.

Jakubs Tash
Posts: 3230
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 834 times
Has Liked: 297 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Jakubs Tash » Tue Aug 05, 2025 12:24 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 12:05 pm
Not sure about that. I’d say we are much stronger defensively now which is the basic foundation on which any form of successful season (for us) would be built on.

We had a more flair and a better attacking set-up last time, but that was always likely to be exposed in a league several levels above.

We lost three big players then due to loans without options, learnt from that this time, but lost exactly the same due to contracts expiring and promises made/PSR requirements (probably).

Similar situations with slightly different circumstances, I’d say.
Much stronger defensively but not as much flair and better attacking set up - so, could be argued it was better.

Some people might call it ripping it up, but we all know we need players to come in that are better than what we have - and as many as we can afford - to give us a chance.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13203
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1958 times
Has Liked: 385 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Tue Aug 05, 2025 12:44 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:20 am
The proposed new additions certainly make our side competitive at this level.

Dubravka
Walker, Tuanzebe, Esteve, Hartmann
Cullen, Lesley, Hannibal
Edwards, Broja, Anthony
I just looked at both Leeds and Sunderland’s proposed teams for the first game and I must admit I think we are going in to the season with the strongest starting eleven. Could this be the season where it all clicks and we become a premier league consistent team again

CoolClaret
Posts: 9994
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3158 times
Has Liked: 3152 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by CoolClaret » Tue Aug 05, 2025 1:53 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 12:14 pm
Fortunately, we seem to be learning from those mistakes this time. Hope when we start losing the posters that are saying we need to sign 4-5 players in different positions aren’t complaining we ‘ripped apart’ the team though.
It was more like signing Zeki and stock-piling wingers rather than signing Tella then doing things like playing AAD right-back and Delcroix left-back against Villa, just a bit mad.

Anyway, like you say, I think we're getting the right profile and mix of experience this time around. I think we will put up a much better showing.

LincsWoldsClaret
Posts: 738
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2024 5:35 pm
Been Liked: 188 times
Has Liked: 103 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by LincsWoldsClaret » Tue Aug 05, 2025 2:22 pm

Newcastleclaret93 wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 11:20 am
The proposed new additions certainly make our side competitive at this level.

Dubravka
Walker, Tuanzebe, Esteve, Hartmann
Cullen, Lesley, Hannibal
Edwards, Broja, Anthony
That may well be the team we’ll end up with but for the first few games, I think Parker will use as much of last season’s squad as possible - so Worrall/Ekdal, Laurent and Foster may start

equinox
Posts: 1542
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 382 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by equinox » Tue Aug 05, 2025 2:34 pm

In my opinion, Anthony is walking a very thin tightrope, he'll start and desrveredly so but if he continues to be as wasteful with his final ball, finishing and general decision making then he's an impact sub. for me, at best.

equinox
Posts: 1542
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2022 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 382 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by equinox » Tue Aug 05, 2025 2:36 pm

...the trouble is Parker thinks the sun shines out of his backside.

BigGaz
Posts: 1142
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2022 6:24 pm
Been Liked: 465 times
Has Liked: 219 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by BigGaz » Tue Aug 05, 2025 2:49 pm

What ****** us last time, or certainly played it's part, is that there was "no room for sentiment". The lot that got us up were either not signed or cast aside and we were starting PL matches with at points less than half the team that got us up.

We do have to iterate, and we do have to sign better players but there is a tipping point with morale, squad size and, familiarity with tactics. Cullen in that regard is therefore probably one of the last players we should be phasing out at this point. Maybe if we stay up you start thinking about it.
This user liked this post: JarrowClaret

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 393 times
Has Liked: 218 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by JarrowClaret » Tue Aug 05, 2025 3:23 pm

BigGaz wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 2:49 pm
What ****** us last time, or certainly played it's part, is that there was "no room for sentiment". The lot that got us up were either not signed or cast aside and we were starting PL matches with at points less than half the team that got us up.

We do have to iterate, and we do have to sign better players but there is a tipping point with morale, squad size and, familiarity with tactics. Cullen in that regard is therefore probably one of the last players we should be phasing out at this point. Maybe if we stay up you start thinking about it.
Agreed we need as much continuity as possible, nobody we sign is going to be top end prem ready unless we are lucky and we are better with someone who knows the system and tactics already. Clearly we need to improve in certain areas GK (now), CM and up front are most likely but we have plenty of options as we are. Not all of them will be good enough but all will give everything and that is all we can ask for now.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3241
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 544 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by ClaretPete001 » Tue Aug 05, 2025 3:33 pm

NewClaret wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 12:14 pm
Excellent post, completely agree.

The way I see it, Kompany and the club were always right to strengthen in the way they did. I never bought in to ‘ripped apart’ argument at all.

The problem was that they bought the wrong players - no experience, wrong profile of technical players and not enough physicality, etc.

Fortunately, we seem to be learning from those mistakes this time. Hope when we start losing the posters that are saying we need to sign 4-5 players in different positions aren’t complaining we ‘ripped apart’ the team though.
It's very difficult to replace the whole team because the players are not necessarily available. And the upshot is - having done so - quite a number of those players are still on the books.

This time we start from a more solid base so the number of additions is fewer and can be more easily targeted but we do not now have £90 million to spend.

Ironically I think we have two teams that could compete to win the Championship but less sure whether we have 17 or so PL quality players that can compete for a season bolstered by top end championship players. Saying that we only need to be better than 3 teams.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10970
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1342 times
Has Liked: 890 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Jakubclaret » Tue Aug 05, 2025 4:29 pm

ClaretPete001 wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 3:33 pm
It's very difficult to replace the whole team because the players are not necessarily available. And the upshot is - having done so - quite a number of those players are still on the books.

This time we start from a more solid base so the number of additions is fewer and can be more easily targeted but we do not now have £90 million to spend.

Ironically I think we have two teams that could compete to win the Championship but less sure whether we have 17 or so PL quality players that can compete for a season bolstered by top end championship players. Saying that we only need to be better than 3 teams.
Effectively we are banking on 1 or 2 of the more established teams having a disastrous season & capitalising on that that's our only hope & Sunderland & Leeds will be thinking along them lines. I actually think it's possible with the right sort of luck for 2 promoted teams to stop up whether we are 1 I'm not sure.

JarrowClaret
Posts: 1713
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:04 pm
Been Liked: 393 times
Has Liked: 218 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by JarrowClaret » Tue Aug 05, 2025 4:51 pm

3 seasons ago all 3 stopped up can’t say apart from Forrest if any brought in lots of new players or had lots of luck.

For me luck come into it of course for example a favourable start, catching big teams after a European game etc. fir me though the main criteria is sensible recruitment (not necessarily spending lots of money although that may be needed as well), tactical awareness and hard work. On top of that you need ability as well but them 3 can take a team a long way in this league.

Darnhill Claret
Posts: 3130
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:55 pm
Been Liked: 689 times
Has Liked: 2454 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Darnhill Claret » Tue Aug 05, 2025 6:57 pm

Having a home game against a team returning from a long midweek trip in Europe.

alwaysaclaret
Posts: 1742
Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 292 times
Has Liked: 609 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by alwaysaclaret » Wed Aug 06, 2025 11:19 pm

Now with Ugochukwu through the door, and seemingly almost done Dubravka to follow, I'm feeling curious what people's idea of a starting 11 is looking like, really not sure personally, so many changes again.

Also get a feeling Broja won't be in it, get the feeling he won't be joining us.

Ampth7
Posts: 1352
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2017 5:12 pm
Been Liked: 307 times
Has Liked: 269 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Ampth7 » Thu Aug 07, 2025 12:36 am

BigGaz wrote:
Tue Aug 05, 2025 2:49 pm
What ****** us last time, or certainly played it's part, is that there was "no room for sentiment". The lot that got us up were either not signed or cast aside and we were starting PL matches with at points less than half the team that got us up.

We do have to iterate, and we do have to sign better players but there is a tipping point with morale, squad size and, familiarity with tactics. Cullen in that regard is therefore probably one of the last players we should be phasing out at this point. Maybe if we stay up you start thinking about it.
No doubt we lost continuity from the team that got us promoted and in particular, loanees such as Maatsen and Tella were cheat codes in the championship that we were sadly unable to sign. Losing Beyer to a serious injury also didn’t help followed by Foster’s illness when he seemed to have started the season well.

I have to say that Parker’s signings this time around are slowly but surely stacking up quite well despite the loss of 3 key players from last season. Most of them have some experience in this league/at this level which I also think seriously hindered us two years ago.

However, I still think we need another centre mid, on top of the new striker and keeper we appear ready to sign in Broja and Dubravka.

Grimsdale
Posts: 699
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:44 am
Been Liked: 620 times
Has Liked: 94 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Grimsdale » Thu Aug 07, 2025 12:53 am

If we do manage to get Eriksen, I think this is looking rather good:

Image

The right centre back position could also be any of Ekdal, Worral or Humphreys when fit, right wing could be JBL. Lots of options off the bench too.

AlargeClaret
Posts: 4986
Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
Been Liked: 1248 times
Has Liked: 213 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by AlargeClaret » Thu Aug 07, 2025 6:29 pm

That ( for us ) would be a cracking starting XI with bench options like JBL , the Napoli guy, Hannibal etc . With the likes of Humphries and Beyer to come back it’s shaping up to be a very tidy looking unit .

boatshed bill
Posts: 17304
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3555 times
Has Liked: 7801 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by boatshed bill » Thu Aug 07, 2025 6:41 pm

Is Tuanzebe definitely PL fit?
Are we likely to sign Eriksen? I think it's doubtful.
Broja still has to be a doubt.
But it's not a bad line-up, although probably still be very near the bottom.

Spike
Posts: 3276
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 695 times
Has Liked: 1622 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Spike » Thu Aug 07, 2025 7:00 pm

Anthony deserves a crack at after his performances in the last few months of last season . Unless another signing comes in who is much better . That player isn’t here so far

Boss Hogg
Posts: 3928
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
Been Liked: 1016 times
Has Liked: 1204 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by Boss Hogg » Thu Aug 07, 2025 7:02 pm

Think Eriksen is probably unlikely and maybe Broja. We still look far better equipped than under VK though already.

ClaretPete001
Posts: 3241
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2022 11:39 am
Been Liked: 544 times
Has Liked: 189 times

Re: Starting 11 to seriously compete?

Post by ClaretPete001 » Thu Aug 07, 2025 8:18 pm

Look an exciting line up for sure......

Post Reply