This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
-
RVclaret
- Posts: 16416
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
- Been Liked: 4527 times
- Has Liked: 3046 times
Post
by RVclaret » Tue Aug 26, 2025 12:19 pm
aggi wrote: ↑Tue Aug 26, 2025 12:12 pm
Obviously Spurs had a much better strike force but there seemed to be much more confidence with the back 4 than the 3. Maybe just a matter of more training but if it doesn't offer us any more defensive solidity you've got to wonder whether we'll persist with the 3.
Well it’s a case of being pragmatic in different circumstances. The back 3/4 thing has been discussed elsewhere on here, but for large parts it was still a back 5 v Sunderland when defending deep (the new term being the ‘rest defence’) with JBL at RWB.