Bid rejected for chris wood

ClaretAL · Post by **ClaretAL** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 7:59 pm

Or any of these....

https://youtu.be/TR6_W7O5tKs

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 8:10 pm

with the amount of balls we put into the box I would expect him to get double figures that's for sure

claretspice · Post by **claretspice** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:05 pm

If it is two from Wood, Andone, and Long, then I'd like to think Wood is the back up plan - because although I think he's a good player, I think Andone and Long might cover more of our requirements (forward to add something different to Vokes and Barnes, option of pace out wide). But Wood is still a really good plan B, and it sounds as though he's keen to come, which counts for plenty.

mkmel · Post by **mkmel** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:08 pm

Spot on Spice

boatshed bill · Post by **boatshed bill** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:08 pm

claretspice wrote:If it is two from Wood, Andone, and Long, then I'd like to think Wood is the back up plan - because although I think he's a good player, I think Andone and Long might cover more of our requirements (forward to add something different to Vokes and Barnes, option of pace out wide). But Wood is still a really good plan B, and it sounds as though he's keen to come, which counts for plenty.

One from the three surely, Spice.

claretspice · Post by **claretspice** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:13 pm

Possibly Boatshed -but I think it is quite likely we're after 2, particularly if one is Andone. We've needed someone to fill in on the right hand side all summer, and both Nixon and Boden have consistently indicated we want a winger. But nothing appears to be coming to fruition in that regard, so one of the attractions of Long might well be that he can play wide right as well as centrally, especially in a 4-5-1. In which case, there'd still be a role for another striker.

Bacchus · Post by **Bacchus** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:14 pm

I'd hope 2. I felt we needed another striker before Gray left. If we were to end up with a choice between Wood, Barnes, Vokes & Walters we'd be pretty one dimensional.

boatshed bill · Post by **boatshed bill** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:25 pm

claretspice wrote:Possibly Boatshed -but I think it is quite likely we're after 2, particularly if one is Andone. We've needed someone to fill in on the right hand side all summer, and both Nixon and Boden have consistently indicated we want a winger. But nothing appears to be coming to fruition in that regard, so one of the attractions of Long might well be that he can play wide right as well as centrally, especially in a 4-5-1. In which case, there'd still be a role for another striker.

If we were to land any two of the three I would be more than happy. If one was Andone I would be positively delighted!

Steddyman · Post by **Steddyman** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:26 pm

claretspice wrote:If it is two from Wood, Andone, and Long, then I'd like to think Wood is the back up plan - because although I think he's a good player, I think Andone and Long might cover more of our requirements (forward to add something different to Vokes and Barnes, option of pace out wide). But Wood is still a really good plan B, and it sounds as though he's keen to come, which counts for plenty.

I suspect Wood is the replacement for Barnes and would certainly be an upgrade. Then Andone and Long to replace Andre and add pace. All three would be perfect.

summitclaret · Post by **summitclaret** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:46 pm

As if we are going to get 2. Seriously. Just get someone with pace. So not wood. Sam, ash and Walters are fine for the big lads.

CaptainClaret · Post by **CaptainClaret** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 9:50 pm

Wood has never really impressed me when I've seen him play (despite his impressive tally last season) and I can honestly say I'd much prefer to stick with Vokes as our target man. Barnes will never be prolific but offers plenty in holding the ball up and bringing others into play (as well as being a fantastic nuisance). In my opinion we should only be focusing on landing a mobile, pacy forward that can finish - and ideally one that can offer something out wide.

Steddyman · Post by **Steddyman** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:58 pm

Nixon tweeted that he expects we will get the deal done for Wood and there will be something in the paper tomorrow.

Sounds promising.

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Fri Aug 18, 2017 11:59 pm

Looks as though we've got him. Daily Mirror reporting that he's leaving the Leeds camp in the North East (they play at Sunderland tomorrow) to travel down for his medical.

RVclaret · Post by **RVclaret** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:04 am

I will be pleased with this signing if we can couple it with either Long/Andone. He's a good player but we are crying out for someone that can run the channels with pace/craft. Unless Dyche plans on using 4-5-1 in the majority this season...

CrosspoolClarets · Post by **CrosspoolClarets** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:08 am

Excellent news. If we can get an upgrade on Vokes / Barnes we cannot say no even if a quick Gray replacement is also a priority.

Plenty of big lads have gone on to be excellent Premier League players, probably the best I can recall is Sheringham but even recently there are examples although strikers tend to be buys from overseas who haven't got Championship history.

KlyBfc · Post by **KlyBfc** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:11 am

To add to the above. A mate of mine (who has contacts in both camps) has also told me tonight that it's a done deal and Wood is signing. I scoffed suggesting he was winding me up and hoping it wasn't true, as he was suggesting it will rise to 20m, but hey ho my judgement is reserved until I see him play for us.

Slurpy · Post by **Slurpy** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:14 am

If we are in for another forward Ashleys time could be up. If we aren't going for another Clucas type then Dyche might switch to 4-4-2 if one of the central midfielders get's injured. That or we are going to play 4-4-2 at home.

tiger76 · Post by **tiger76** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:15 am

If we can get him for 15 Million plus add-on's i will be

,even if he doesn't work out we should break even,if he scores circa 15 goals over the season, we could well turn a decent profit. Just need a CB replacement for Keano now, and we are well set for a good season.

Slurpy · Post by **Slurpy** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:18 am

£15m is a good price considering Leeds fans were demanding £25m+. They seem to be suggesting Wilson, Deeney and Austin as viable replacements.

burnmark · Post by **burnmark** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:24 am

Slurpy wrote:£15m is a good price considering Leeds fans were demanding £25m+. They seem to be suggesting Wilson, Deeney and Austin as viable replacements.

That delusion never wanes does it! Saying that, just had a very civilised conversation on twitter with a Leeds fan. He seems to think Wood didn't play in their first round League Cup tie with Port Vale so could be available on Wednesday.

Quicknick · Post by **Quicknick** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:28 am

Slurpy wrote:£15m is a good price considering Leeds fans were demanding £25m+. They seem to be suggesting Wilson, Deeney and Austin as viable replacements.

Deeney or Austin at Leeds?!

Quickenthetempo · Post by **Quickenthetempo** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:34 am

Slurpy wrote:£15m is a good price considering Leeds fans were demanding £25m+. They seem to be suggesting Wilson, Deeney and Austin as viable replacements.

I would rather have any of them 3.

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:35 am

Just a few words on site based on the Mirror article

http://www.uptheclarets.com/wood-deal-moves-closer" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Quicknick · Post by **Quicknick** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:36 am

Quickenthe tempo, but we wouldn't get them, let alone little Leeds.

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:36 am

Quickenthetempo wrote:I would rather have any of them 3.

We'd have no chance of getting them - I can only imagine what sort of money Austin is on

KefkaClaret · Post by **KefkaClaret** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:41 am

I'm not entirely against the signing, I'm just a little confused as to why we are signing someone so similar to Vokes.

Quicknick · Post by **Quicknick** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:42 am

Because he isn't that similar.

HiroshimaClaret · Post by **HiroshimaClaret** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:45 am

Slurpy wrote:If we are in for another forward Ashleys time could be up. If we aren't going for another Clucas type then Dyche might switch to 4-4-2 if one of the central midfielders get's injured. That or we are going to play 4-4-2 at home.

It`d be a sad day if Barnes left us. He adds something with his unique skill set which often leads to free-kicks and he ruffles the feathers of the best defenders. Has the knack of scoring important goals too. He also has good link-up play and the ball certainly sticks. I for one think it would be a big mistake to lose this. There is no suggestion he wants to leave, is there?

mybloodisclaret · Post by **mybloodisclaret** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:46 am

He signs Monday. (According to cutsy)
Still would like Andone or Long for a bit of speed.

Quickenthetempo · Post by **Quickenthetempo** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:47 am

I know we wouldn't but it's a good list of replacements by the Leeds fan.

Steddyman · Post by **Steddyman** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:53 am

If you want a laugh, search for Burnley on twitter. Leeds fans are not happy right now.

Quicknick · Post by **Quicknick** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:53 am

I'll be delighted if we get Woods. And the Inter centre half. Andone would be a real bonus.

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:53 am

We are desperate for pace, not knocking Wood in the slightest, but if he is the only attack minded player we bring in it will be daft.

Quicknick · Post by **Quicknick** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:54 am

[quote="Steddyman"]If you want a laugh, search for Burnley on twitter. Leeds fans are not happy right now.[/

As a Skipton Claret, it makes me laugh.

KRBFC · Post by **KRBFC** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:56 am

Did they not reject £16M from the unnamed PL club? Sounds strange they would accept less.

mybloodisclaret · Post by **mybloodisclaret** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 12:59 am

Signs tomorrow would be available for Ewood. Not bad to have the championships top scorer from the season rovers went down probably on our bench. That's the difference, that's the gap, that's how far we have come. For a little more context, top scorer in the league above where they are now in the relegation zone!!!

Commy · Post by **Commy** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 1:14 am

KRBFC wrote:Did they not reject £16M from the unnamed PL club? Sounds strange they would accept less.

No point keeping an unhappy player.

Walton · Post by **Walton** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 1:49 am

Can't wait for Barnes to leave.

RVclaret · Post by **RVclaret** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 1:54 am

Walton wrote:Can't wait for Barnes to leave.

I think he will only leave if we are still in for Long/Andone.

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 3:01 am

Walton wrote:Can't wait for Barnes to leave.

I'll be gutted. I couldn't give a rats about Andre but Barnes is worth his weight in gold

LoveCurryPies · Post by **LoveCurryPies** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 3:34 am

Steddyman wrote:If you want a laugh, search for Burnley on twitter. Leeds fans are not happy right now.

3.30am. Totally agree....Leeds fans in disbelief. Their love of Burnley is obvious

agreenwood · Post by **agreenwood** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 4:53 am

If true, I'm glad Dyche got his man.

Just hope there's a more mobile/pacey alternative coming in too.

Right_winger · Post by **Right_winger** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 4:57 am

agreenwood wrote:If true, I'm glad Dyche got his man.

Just hope there's a more mobile/pacey alternative coming in too.

Don't count on it. Wood is looking like Grays replacement, unless someone else leaves?

jackmiggins · Post by **jackmiggins** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 5:09 am

Whoever has said that you can't play two target men upfront? Think it's a brilliant option to change a game, either from the start or second half option.

Tinribs · Post by **Tinribs** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:21 am

good signing and cheap at todays prices.We have replaced one Championship top scorer with another and made 3 million
this one though can hold the ball up and play a bit.

John Johnson 1605 · Post by **John Johnson 1605** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:32 am

Bitterly disappointing.

Tinribs · Post by **Tinribs** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:49 am

its a safe signing,Lad who knows the English game well
better than a punt on a fancy name from deportivo ,or that preville bloke? Can you see either of them two scraping ice off a windscreen in December.

John Johnson 1605 · Post by **John Johnson 1605** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 6:59 am

For the figure quoted I'm not even sure it's a safe signing.

Blyclaret · Post by **Blyclaret** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:05 am

Can't see the problem people have with wood
He can play as lone striker,holds ball up,physical 6 3
Very good header of ball, great right foot,penalty taker
And as just scored 30 goals last year.
We have got top scorer and made 3 million.
Again fantastic business by Burnley football club
Congratulations to all concerned.

John Johnson 1605 · Post by **John Johnson 1605** » Sat Aug 19, 2017 7:19 am

The problems are that we have signed a relatively limited footballer for an awful lot of money. I doubt he'll add anything more than Vokes can do and it suggests our forward line will be based on balls into the box rather than artistry. It is an uninspiring signing and poses further questions of our scouting/recruitment team.