Poor old Luton.
Just don't learm. Why did they try to park the bus? They should have kept playing as they were when they were leading. Yawn. Etc.
Match Thread - Wolves v Burnley
-
- Posts: 3437
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 668 times
- Has Liked: 1204 times
Re: Match Thread - Wolves v Burnley
My one frustration is that we've invested in young, enthusiastic and pacey talent - and yet when it comes to favoured players we've got JBG and Jay Rod. Whilst I appreciate we need experience as well, when Koleosho went off we were crying out for more pace on the wing to replace him from the likes of Zaroury or Odobert - I find the decision to bring JBG on a bit bizarre. Then to leave it so late to bring subs on, we needed changes sooner. All I'll say. We go again. COYC
This user liked this post: Somethingfishy
-
- Posts: 3281
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 852 times
- Has Liked: 573 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Match Thread - Wolves v Burnley
Choosing JBG to replace Koleosho rather than Zaroury or Odobert was the key moment for me. Once they had nothing to worry about in behind they stepped up and it became a midfield scrap and we looked toothless. A mistake shortly after and we were fighting uphill.
Performance wise not the worst but his subs..and the timing are (not for the first time) more than questionable tonight.
Performance wise not the worst but his subs..and the timing are (not for the first time) more than questionable tonight.
This user liked this post: gawthorpe_view
-
- Posts: 1730
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2016 11:51 am
- Been Liked: 291 times
- Has Liked: 600 times
Re: Match Thread - Wolves v Burnley
I get that vk has enough in the bank to be given a chance to get us back up, but is their any point just to come back to where we are now, cos by he's own admission he won't change. He goes on about individual mistakes and recognises that we need to learn, but is he including himself in that quote, because from where I see it, he's not learning, because he keeps making the same mistakes, there's glaringly obvious thing's that I just don't think he's seeing.jedi_master wrote: ↑Tue Dec 05, 2023 10:01 pmIf that’s meant to be a quote of me, you’re very much mistaken.
I felt the exact opposite to all of that, and said so repeatedly - not the last line though. It would be promotion at a canter, as long as Kompany is retained.