Charlie Taylor

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
CFS
Posts: 1859
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 235 times
Has Liked: 120 times

Charlie Taylor

Post by CFS » Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:22 pm

Looks some player having a good half v Liverpool on SS1.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 11235
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3626 times
Has Liked: 2234 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:28 pm

I see Mariner is the referee. One of his assistants just flagged a Leeds player offside. In his own half.
They really are embarrassing at times.
These 2 users liked this post: lrac Rumpelstiltskin

chekhov
Posts: 3323
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
Been Liked: 878 times
Has Liked: 1676 times
Location: France

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by chekhov » Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:31 pm

Bordeauxclaret wrote:I see Mariner is the referee. One of his assistants just flagged a Leeds player offside. In his own half.
They really are embarrassing at times.
Don't agree. That was an incorrect decision but they get them right more often than not.

CFS
Posts: 1859
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:46 am
Been Liked: 235 times
Has Liked: 120 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by CFS » Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:32 pm

Leeds look decent to be fair.

Woodleyclaret
Posts: 8635
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 1862 times
Has Liked: 2228 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Woodleyclaret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:38 pm

Taylor looks a good prospect we need an upgrade at fullback and he's worth a bid.Marriner is a crap referee .Dirty Leeds up to their usual hacking .Aided and abetted by Marriners dithering.Hopefully the scallies will hammer them in second hald

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2752
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 658 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Winstonswhite » Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:44 pm

Just been listening to talksport for once, and they had a bit of a go at Klopp (and other managers tbf), for not playing a full side. I agree!

Do away with Leeds, they're then two games from Wembley, and a trophy. It's not as if they're in Europe.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 11235
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3626 times
Has Liked: 2234 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:49 pm

chekhov wrote:Don't agree. That was an incorrect decision but they get them right more often than not.
I should hope they do get more right than not.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34691
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12654 times
Has Liked: 6298 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 8:59 pm

we won't be able to afford Taylor, shame cause he looks very good

minnieclaret
Posts: 6842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2012 times
Has Liked: 2287 times
Location: lismore co. waterford

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by minnieclaret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:00 pm

chekhov wrote:Don't agree. That was an incorrect decision but they get them right more often than not.
That was Jimmy Hills argument but his 95% was based on the easy ones. Tight ones would be 70-30 at best.

chekhov
Posts: 3323
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
Been Liked: 878 times
Has Liked: 1676 times
Location: France

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by chekhov » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:00 pm

so what I'm saying is the linesmen usually do a good job on their offside decisions. You may disagree.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20485
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4532 times
Has Liked: 2039 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by ElectroClaret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:01 pm

Just shown that dirty khunt Hunter in the crowd.

Bastid.
These 3 users liked this post: bobinho roamingclaret ecc

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2752
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 658 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Winstonswhite » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:08 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:we won't be able to afford Taylor, shame cause he looks very good
Are you taking the p!ss?

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34691
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12654 times
Has Liked: 6298 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:18 pm

no, are you ?

jdrobbo
Posts: 10643
Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
Been Liked: 5414 times
Has Liked: 1034 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by jdrobbo » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:26 pm

Top player

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2752
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 658 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Winstonswhite » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:27 pm

As if we couldn't afford him. Bournemouth bought their best player in July for 6 million. Even if he was double that we could easily afford it.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34691
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12654 times
Has Liked: 6298 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:28 pm

so you expect us to outbid Everton and West Ham ? haha

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19754
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4198 times
Has Liked: 2243 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Quickenthetempo » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:35 pm

Isn't he out of contract in the summer? Looks decent with a bit of pace and a good cross to boot.

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2752
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 658 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Winstonswhite » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:35 pm

F@ck me when would we ever outbid anyone? It doesn't mean we can't afford them.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34691
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12654 times
Has Liked: 6298 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:37 pm

Winstonswhite wrote:F@ck me when would we ever outbid anyone? It doesn't mean we can't afford them.
well it does really, if west ham technically bid 100 million for him, we can't afford him ! I take your point 100%, just can't see us bidding more than 5-7 million for him which I doubt would be anywhere near enough :(

taio
Posts: 12791
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3577 times
Has Liked: 403 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by taio » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:41 pm

5m-7m is the price range being rumoured. Whether that turns out to be the case is another matter.

Winstonswhite
Posts: 2752
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
Been Liked: 658 times
Has Liked: 337 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Winstonswhite » Tue Nov 29, 2016 9:46 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:well it does really, if west ham technically bid 100 million for him, we can't afford him ! I take your point 100%, just can't see us bidding more than 5-7 million for him which I doubt would be anywhere near enough :(
"Can't see us bidding" is completely different from "can't afford". Which is why I asked are you taking the p!ss.

He's exactly the sort of player we should be going in for. Good young Championship talent from clubs that aren't cash rich like Derby and Brighton for instance!!!!

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34691
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12654 times
Has Liked: 6298 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Vegas Claret » Tue Nov 29, 2016 10:35 pm

Yeah very good, but if West Ham or whoever bid 100 million we can't afford it, simple as that

DCWat
Posts: 9957
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4494 times
Has Liked: 3907 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by DCWat » Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:14 pm

It could depend on the lad himself - if we are still interested, he might see us as a good option for first team football in the top division and little to no relocating.

If I were him, I'd pick Burnley :)
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera

bumba
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 945 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by bumba » Tue Nov 29, 2016 11:18 pm

Would love this guy signed, Taylor left back Flanagan right back yes please

Rowls
Posts: 14708
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 11:00 pm
Been Liked: 5667 times
Has Liked: 5895 times
Location: Montpellier, France

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Rowls » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:06 am

We can easily afford this guy but that is no longer the question.

The question is, 'Can we persuade him to come to us?' and 'Who is willing to pay more for him?'

claretdom
Posts: 3741
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:53 am
Been Liked: 1694 times
Has Liked: 193 times
Location: Got a ticket from a mashed up bloke in Camden Town

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by claretdom » Wed Nov 30, 2016 7:52 am

The logic at times on here is staggering and stupid.

"shame we can't afford him" when explained we can becomes "not if West Ham bid 100million simple as that"

I can see something that is simple
This user liked this post: Rileybobs

ClaretTony
Posts: 77359
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37849 times
Has Liked: 5751 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by ClaretTony » Wed Nov 30, 2016 9:31 am

Bordeauxclaret wrote:I see Mariner is the referee. One of his assistants just flagged a Leeds player offside. In his own half.
They really are embarrassing at times.
Correct decision - introduced in June this year and has twice come into play at Burnley this season with Mike Jones and Andre Marriner getting some stick from the crowd.

The Law now states that the indirect free kick for offside can be taken in the player’s own half.

A player CAN NOT be in an offside POSITION in their own half
A player CAN commit an offside OFFENCE in their own half if they go back into their own half from an offside position

IanMcL
Posts: 34682
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6926 times
Has Liked: 10324 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by IanMcL » Wed Nov 30, 2016 10:49 am

The player was not part of the move which led to the ball at the feet of his own team mate. When the teammate looked up, he made his run (from within his own half). He was still in his own half when the ball was sent towards him. Onside.

Blackrod
Posts: 5114
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 12:41 pm
Been Liked: 1348 times
Has Liked: 608 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Blackrod » Wed Nov 30, 2016 12:51 pm

Whilst cash appears to be a players main priority a stable club with a stable manager who is loyal to players must be attractive. Joining a club where the manager is likely to change and you could be a benchwarmer won't appeal to all footballers.
This user liked this post: Veals

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 945 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Hipper » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:10 pm

There needs to be some way to split threads into two or more sub-threads!

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by FactualFrank » Wed Nov 30, 2016 1:12 pm

If we were going to get him, the bid would need to be in January, as I reckon Leeds could be playing in the Premier League next season, unfortunately.

Bordeauxclaret
Posts: 11235
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
Been Liked: 3626 times
Has Liked: 2234 times

Re: Charlie Taylor

Post by Bordeauxclaret » Sat Feb 18, 2017 10:53 am

ClaretTony wrote:Correct decision - introduced in June this year and has twice come into play at Burnley this season with Mike Jones and Andre Marriner getting some stick from the crowd.

The Law now states that the indirect free kick for offside can be taken in the player’s own half.

A player CAN NOT be in an offside POSITION in their own half
A player CAN commit an offside OFFENCE in their own half if they go back into their own half from an offside position
Not sure why this notification only just came through but it certainly wasn't a correct decision.

Post Reply