Are Burnley a bigger Club now than the Seventies?

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Grimsby Claret
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 38 times
Has Liked: 59 times
Location: Grimsby Lincolnshire

Are Burnley a bigger Club now than the Seventies?

Post by Grimsby Claret » Sat Jan 28, 2017 6:48 pm

Are we a bigger Club now than past decades.
This is the only period of time I can remember We don't have to sell our best players.

Paul Waine
Posts: 10199
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2416 times
Has Liked: 3329 times

Re: Are Burnley a bigger Club now than the Seventies?

Post by Paul Waine » Sat Jan 28, 2017 6:52 pm

Grimsby Claret wrote:Are we a bigger Club now than past decades.
This is the only period of time I can remember We don't have to sell our best players.
There's no doubt that not having to sell on one or two top players every season will make a difference.

We could have been "top 4" if we didn't have to sell Ralph Coates, Martin Dobson, Dave Thomas - who were all England players.

UTC

hampsteadclaret
Posts: 3235
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:25 am
Been Liked: 1110 times
Has Liked: 802 times

Re: Are Burnley a bigger Club now than the Seventies?

Post by hampsteadclaret » Sat Jan 28, 2017 6:54 pm

In terms of potentially winning trophies...no

(You are asking two different questions there I would say...)

In terms of money/ debt/ facilities...a definite yes

In terms of crowds..probably not

In terms of world-wide profile...definite yes

In terms of ability to attract players...a difficult one..varies

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 944 times

Re: Are Burnley a bigger Club now than the Seventies?

Post by Hipper » Sat Jan 28, 2017 7:02 pm

The only reason we are financially viable at the moment is firstly because of the massive Sky support for football - this simply did not exist in the 1970s - and top management by the BFC board. It is the latter that means we don't have to sell our best players for financial reasons, but our best players will still depart for 'bigger' clubs because we can't afford to pay them as much as they do.

After the removal of the maximum wage in the early sixties all Burnley could do was sell to survive. Once that happened, and there was more competition for developing young players, the outcome was inevitable although the clubs decline went beyond what it should have done because of poor management.

In terms of support I would say we are not 'a bigger club'.

Grimsby Claret
Posts: 159
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 4:49 pm
Been Liked: 38 times
Has Liked: 59 times
Location: Grimsby Lincolnshire

Re: Are Burnley a bigger Club now than the Seventies?

Post by Grimsby Claret » Sat Jan 28, 2017 7:40 pm

Excellent Explanation of how you see it posters.
Crowds are debatable. 20,000 average gates now. With average away support about 1500.
I can remember Gates as low as 14,000 in the late Sixties and mid seventies.
But also With Mass away support from Clubs Like Utd,City, Liverpool, Everton, and Leeds 30,000-40,000.

Post Reply