vokes surplus to requirements?
-
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
- Been Liked: 276 times
- Has Liked: 66 times
- Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg
vokes surplus to requirements?
“Sam has been a good servant to the club and he deserved that. He is maturing into a very good player, so I’m pleased for him and the club today."
The above quote from Mr D. feels to me like he might be moving Sam on in the summer.
The above quote from Mr D. feels to me like he might be moving Sam on in the summer.
This user liked this post: SGr
-
- Posts: 7699
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1923 times
- Has Liked: 4277 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
How do you come to that conclusion based on that quote?brexit wrote:“Sam has been a good servant to the club and he deserved that. He is maturing into a very good player, so I’m pleased for him and the club today."
The above quote from Mr D. feels to me like he might be moving Sam on in the summer.
This user liked this post: bobinho
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
I think there's always a place in the squad for good reserves. We can;t just rely on 11 men for the whole season.
-
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
- Been Liked: 276 times
- Has Liked: 66 times
- Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
The good servant bit troubles me.
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 37 times
- Has Liked: 12 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Players of Sam's ilk don't tend to reach their peak till late twenty's cos they don't rely on pace. I'd be amazed if Sam is allowed to leave in the near future.
-
- Posts: 7699
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:06 pm
- Been Liked: 1923 times
- Has Liked: 4277 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
That tag never seemed to trouble Brian Miller or his employers.brexit wrote:The good servant bit troubles me.
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Sam is not a premier league standard centre forward... but he is damn close.
He is strong, good in the air and not that shoddy on the ground but still not quite the stellar player that inhabits the Prem.
As 3rd or 4th choice he is absolutely fine and his defensive skill means there are games where his heading in his own box is useful.
He is strong, good in the air and not that shoddy on the ground but still not quite the stellar player that inhabits the Prem.
As 3rd or 4th choice he is absolutely fine and his defensive skill means there are games where his heading in his own box is useful.
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 37 times
- Has Liked: 12 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
dsr. We don't have any reserves! We have a squad of players!!
-
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
- Been Liked: 37 times
- Has Liked: 12 times
- Location: Accrington
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
If we chose to play a five man midfield he is our best option up front!
-
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:14 pm
- Been Liked: 364 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Balls ******** big hairy love sack. You are talking all of them.brexit wrote:“Sam has been a good servant to the club and he deserved that. He is maturing into a very good player, so I’m pleased for him and the club today."
The above quote from Mr D. feels to me like he might be moving Sam on in the summer.
-
- Posts: 4401
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1844 times
- Has Liked: 933 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Vokes is always learning and has a great football brain I agree with Bash's comment on when he'll peak. When he had his run in up front in I heard him discussed on the radio in '5 most underrated premier league players' taking his Wales games into account also.
If he's willing to stay and do a job for us I'd keep him on and see how he does, bring us something different when things need another approach.
I do think though our heads could be turned at the prospect of how much we could get from a rich championship side for a player with 35 goals over two promotion seasons.
If he's willing to stay and do a job for us I'd keep him on and see how he does, bring us something different when things need another approach.
I do think though our heads could be turned at the prospect of how much we could get from a rich championship side for a player with 35 goals over two promotion seasons.
-
- Posts: 8839
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 5:22 pm
- Been Liked: 3020 times
- Has Liked: 1864 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
tricky one because recent fans have seen him as a hero from his championship season days, he's been a firm favourite with Danny Ings ,and rightly so. Suffered injuries and fought back to full fitness, High profile for Wales as well. Really difficult to access who is and who isn't premier league status. Is Boyd? Is Arfield? is Barnes? where do we end this judgemental stuff.
Lowton? Marney? All have had flak on here. The current set up has us in 13th spot , not a wealthy club, but we are collectively doing very well.
Lowton? Marney? All have had flak on here. The current set up has us in 13th spot , not a wealthy club, but we are collectively doing very well.
-
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:20 pm
- Been Liked: 104 times
- Has Liked: 67 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
was in response to the fact that Sam's goal today was his 50th for the clubbrexit wrote:The good servant bit troubles me.
These 3 users liked this post: HunterST_BFC BertiesBeehole BFCmaj
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Isn't he our top scorer this season?
Or close to and and one of the main reasons we are where we are right now this season.
Or close to and and one of the main reasons we are where we are right now this season.
-
- Posts: 4401
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1844 times
- Has Liked: 933 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
2nd after Gray (6 & 4) which isn't massive to be fair considering we've had 13 different goal league scorers this season (Gray 6, Vokes 4, Barnes 3, Hendrick 2 and nine on 1)Sidney1st wrote:Isn't he our top scorer this season?
Or close to and and one of the main reasons we are where we are right now this season.
Last edited by CombatClaret on Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 724 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Was about to post this. It's quite simple really.HendricksHair wrote:was in response to the fact that Sam's goal today was his 50th for the club
Close the thread, silly inflammatory headline.
-
- Posts: 1893
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 12:20 am
- Been Liked: 276 times
- Has Liked: 66 times
- Location: on the gravy train in strasbourg
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Excellent I forward an opinion some posters actually bother to reply One kokshina moves to deny free speech.Claretmatt4 wrote:Was about to post this. It's quite simple really.
Close the thread, silly inflammatory headline.
-
- Posts: 3837
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 10:13 pm
- Been Liked: 1421 times
- Has Liked: 2770 times
- Location: varied
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Exactly this.HendricksHair wrote:was in response to the fact that Sam's goal today was his 50th for the club
The OP can now stop knee twitching - for now at least.

This user liked this post: HendricksHair
-
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 724 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
You're interpretation was so far off base. Nothing to do with free speech.brexit wrote:Excellent I forward an opinion some posters actually bother to reply One kokshina moves to deny free speech.
-
- Posts: 8258
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
- Been Liked: 2931 times
- Has Liked: 508 times
- Location: Earth
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Christ. First the Ravel Morrison thread and now this.
-
- Posts: 20473
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4530 times
- Has Liked: 2037 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Nonsense.
One of the mainstays of our attack and holds the ball up better than most.
Great header of the ball.
Lots of mileage (and goals) in SV yet.
UTC
One of the mainstays of our attack and holds the ball up better than most.
Great header of the ball.
Lots of mileage (and goals) in SV yet.
UTC
Last edited by ElectroClaret on Sun Jan 29, 2017 12:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 4380
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 10:39 pm
- Been Liked: 721 times
- Has Liked: 665 times
- Location: Wexford, Ireland. via Nelson.
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Just because we have got Brexit, doesn't mean we are kicking out the Welsh as well, don't forget they voted For.
-
- Posts: 934
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
- Been Liked: 212 times
- Has Liked: 72 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Vokes is here to stay, close this thread
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Never mind.Ooogeorgeorgeoghani wrote:Vokes is here to stay, close this thread
Thought he was average yesterday ( along with many ) against a poor Championship defence.
Think ( hope ) he will be 4th / 5th choice next season as that means we have progressed.
He can have most Saturdays off them to watch his beloved Southampton, and sing until his hearts content

This user liked this post: bobinho
-
- Posts: 12224
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 6021 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Ideally we would upgrade on Vokes, like most of our squad.
But finding players who are of higher quality and with the same attitude within our price range isn't easy.
The squad we have are doing a fine job at the moment but the longer we stay in this league, we are going to need better players.
But finding players who are of higher quality and with the same attitude within our price range isn't easy.
The squad we have are doing a fine job at the moment but the longer we stay in this league, we are going to need better players.
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Isn't that the case with every club who struggle to get past lower league opposition?MACCA wrote:Thought he was average yesterday ( along with many ) against a poor Championship defence.
Spurs were rubbish in their game as well. They might have made changes, but their ones still cost many millions more than our players did.
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
1. We only have three strikers
2. Vokes is our #1 when we play 4-5-1
So no
2. Vokes is our #1 when we play 4-5-1
So no
-
- Posts: 1839
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:09 pm
- Been Liked: 459 times
- Has Liked: 190 times
- Location: Manchester
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Squad game and when we play 4-5-1, Vokes is indispensable
Gray and Barnes for 4-4-2.
Also re goals scored, Vokes has 6 and Gray 7. Nothing between them
Vokes is here to stay
Gray and Barnes for 4-4-2.
Also re goals scored, Vokes has 6 and Gray 7. Nothing between them
Vokes is here to stay
-
- Posts: 10617
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4633 times
- Has Liked: 7281 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Always liked big Sam. Looked off it yesterday tho. Doesn't mean he's finished, but I would like us to kick on once we manage to become safe.
And fwiw, I think Barnes is a far better option up top on his own. Faster, stronger, and ability to hold the ball up are my reasons. Barnes holds it up on his chest brilliantly meaning he can see the support arriving. Sam wins headers most of the time, but up top on his own means there is no one picking up the scraps. Doesn't turn too well either due to his size. Sometimes looks immobile, like he's running in custard. I'd keep Sam, but only as an impact sub when trying to rescue something with long balls late on.
I'm sure that's not the "party line" but if we don't change owt, we'll stay as we are. And that spells failure at this level.
And fwiw, I think Barnes is a far better option up top on his own. Faster, stronger, and ability to hold the ball up are my reasons. Barnes holds it up on his chest brilliantly meaning he can see the support arriving. Sam wins headers most of the time, but up top on his own means there is no one picking up the scraps. Doesn't turn too well either due to his size. Sometimes looks immobile, like he's running in custard. I'd keep Sam, but only as an impact sub when trying to rescue something with long balls late on.
I'm sure that's not the "party line" but if we don't change owt, we'll stay as we are. And that spells failure at this level.
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
There are games and situations when Vokes can do better than anyone else - like the header that made Gray's goal against Middlesborough.
-
- Posts: 19745
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4197 times
- Has Liked: 2243 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Vokes is our best CF in my opinion. We didn't put a single decent cross in to him yesterday and the makeshift midfield was slow in getting up and supporting him but some of his hold up play was top notch. Helps out defensively as well which is a massive bonus.
A very tidy finish yesterday here's hoping he starts to get more starts.
A very tidy finish yesterday here's hoping he starts to get more starts.
-
- Posts: 3362
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 753 times
- Has Liked: 66 times
Re: vokes surplus to requirements?
Personally I'd be very disappointed to see him leave.
And how you get this idea from SD quote it beyond me. He's just hit a landmark tally and for me will probably get better in the next few seasons. Rotation and form...Vokesy is more than good enough for that.
And how you get this idea from SD quote it beyond me. He's just hit a landmark tally and for me will probably get better in the next few seasons. Rotation and form...Vokesy is more than good enough for that.