REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
ClaretTony
Posts: 77351
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37844 times
Has Liked: 5750 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Feb 05, 2017 4:52 pm


NRC
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
Been Liked: 908 times
Has Liked: 107 times
Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC

Re: REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by NRC » Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:04 pm

Just out of interest Tony, do you check the match thread to get the reaction of those on there that have the benefit of watching television? We all had a clear reaction to the correctness of the decision, that those at the ground wouldn't necessarily have in real time, and at a distance from the incident?

ClaretTony
Posts: 77351
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37844 times
Has Liked: 5750 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Feb 06, 2017 11:59 am

NRC wrote:Just out of interest Tony, do you check the match thread to get the reaction of those on there that have the benefit of watching television? We all had a clear reaction to the correctness of the decision, that those at the ground wouldn't necessarily have in real time, and at a distance from the incident?
No, but always watch the television coverage myself before reporting.

beddie
Posts: 6302
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:10 pm
Been Liked: 1762 times
Has Liked: 662 times

Re: REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by beddie » Mon Feb 06, 2017 12:37 pm

Good Report CT.
I have to say it was disappointing the way we conceded the first. I expected Lowton to at least make some sort of challenge on Deeney.

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3937
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 1167 times
Has Liked: 1899 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by BleedingClaret » Mon Feb 06, 2017 1:32 pm

In real time at the game I was sure Hendrick had stayed on his feet and that it was a one footed miss the ball catch the man booking.
My mate immediately text'd me that it was a red.
My mind with the help of Guinness would not have it.
At half time everyone said that they'd been told it was a red.
I then sensed a conspiracy and eyed those around me with suspicion.
I got home and watched match of the day
Have to be honest
Never touched him! Diving *******! Booooooo!
Claret tinted glasses still intact....

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3937
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 1167 times
Has Liked: 1899 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by BleedingClaret » Mon Feb 06, 2017 1:34 pm

beddie wrote:Good Report CT.
I have to say it was disappointing the way we conceded the first. I expected Lowton to at least make some sort of challenge on Deeney.
Lowton ducked as if he didn't know that Deeney was there!
How you miss that lump i don't know

FCBurnley
Posts: 11531
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2266 times
Has Liked: 1369 times

Re: REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by FCBurnley » Mon Feb 06, 2017 1:50 pm

The Niang tackle on Ward in first minute was also a straight red imo. Maybe like Watford our players need to start rolling around for 10 minutes after tackles. Had Ward reacted like the Watford player did after Hendricks tackle then Niang would have also seen red. On such decisions are games won or lost and relegations decided.
I am also surprised that more was not made of a clear penalty on Barnes when he was blocked by an arm when through on goal.

ClaretTony
Posts: 77351
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37844 times
Has Liked: 5750 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Feb 06, 2017 2:04 pm

FCBurnley wrote:The Niang tackle on Ward in first minute was also a straight red imo. Maybe like Watford our players need to start rolling around for 10 minutes after tackles. Had Ward reacted like the Watford player did after Hendricks tackle then Niang would have also seen red. On such decisions are games won or lost and relegations decided.
I am also surprised that more was not made of a clear penalty on Barnes when he was blocked by an arm when through on goal.
No way was the Niang one a red card - not even gone in with his feet. If you start giving reds for those you will finish with five a side.

FCBurnley
Posts: 11531
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 2266 times
Has Liked: 1369 times

Re: REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by FCBurnley » Mon Feb 06, 2017 3:08 pm

ClaretTony wrote:No way was the Niang one a red card - not even gone in with his feet. If you start giving reds for those you will finish with five a side.
If Ward had collapsed in a heap the ref would have shown red. You dont need feet to seriously injure an opponent. How injured was Cholobas after his theatrics ?

ClaretTony
Posts: 77351
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37844 times
Has Liked: 5750 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: REPORT: More travel sickness for Clarets

Post by ClaretTony » Mon Feb 06, 2017 3:35 pm

FCBurnley wrote:If Ward had collapsed in a heap the ref would have shown red. You dont need feet to seriously injure an opponent. How injured was Cholobas after his theatrics ?
Ward was down in a heap but it's only just about a yellow. Holebas has blood on shin, no intent to injure by Hendrick but a clear red card. Both decisions from Oliver absolutely spot on.

Post Reply