What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
After we'd drawn with currently the best team in the country (by quite a way) everyone was overflowing with pride.
We'd given a defensive masterclass, limiting them to zero chances after they'd scored. Our players could do no wrong, looking like an established PL side, even having chances to win the match.
Everyone was adamant we were on the up.
Yet, after today's result many of the same players are now being accused of not being good enough for the Premier league, with poor control, despite it being a one-off game. It's seems the pendulum from glory to disaster swings very easily on here.
The Premier league is a brutal place and hard work alone counts for very little. We must have something about us to be 10 points clear of relegation in 12th place.
We'd given a defensive masterclass, limiting them to zero chances after they'd scored. Our players could do no wrong, looking like an established PL side, even having chances to win the match.
Everyone was adamant we were on the up.
Yet, after today's result many of the same players are now being accused of not being good enough for the Premier league, with poor control, despite it being a one-off game. It's seems the pendulum from glory to disaster swings very easily on here.
The Premier league is a brutal place and hard work alone counts for very little. We must have something about us to be 10 points clear of relegation in 12th place.
This user liked this post: addisclaret
-
- Posts: 5829
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2493 times
- Has Liked: 1477 times
- Location: On the high seas chasing Pirates
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
A great feeling of an underwhelming performance today after last weeks game.. People were expecting more than a game of up n under for 90 minutes
-
- Posts: 1450
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:33 pm
- Been Liked: 603 times
- Has Liked: 542 times
- Location: bonlah
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
It's called being fickle mixed with being thickle.Spijed wrote:After we'd drawn with currently the best team in the country (by quite a way) everyone was overflowing with pride.
We'd given a defensive masterclass, limiting them to zero chances after they'd scored. Our players could do no wrong, looking like an established PL side, even having chances to win the match.
Everyone was adamant we were on the up.
Yet, after today's result many of the same players are now being accused of not being good enough for the Premier league, with poor control, despite it being a one-off game. It's seems the pendulum from glory to disaster swings very easily on here.
The Premier league is a brutal place and hard work alone counts for very little. We must have something about us to be 10 points clear of relegation in 12th place.

This user liked this post: Cooperclaret
-
- Posts: 2334
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:03 pm
- Been Liked: 973 times
- Has Liked: 638 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
What's changed?
Darikwa for Lowton
Flanagan for Ward
Vokes for Barnes
Arfield for Brady
Darikwa for Lowton
Flanagan for Ward
Vokes for Barnes
Arfield for Brady
This user liked this post: ontario claret
-
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:39 am
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 406 times
- Location: Chalfont St. Giles
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
I think it's something to do with the quality of the opposition and the way they play. We are used to a certain style of play each week, a different style tonthat played in other Leagues.
We didn't play with the same intensity, as the intensity wasn't present in the opposition. We simply didn't know what to do.
That and some very poor finishing from Gray and Arfield.
We simply weren't all there today.
All credit goes to Lincoln for getting the result.
We didn't play with the same intensity, as the intensity wasn't present in the opposition. We simply didn't know what to do.
That and some very poor finishing from Gray and Arfield.
We simply weren't all there today.
All credit goes to Lincoln for getting the result.
-
- Posts: 3454
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:07 am
- Been Liked: 881 times
- Has Liked: 1089 times
- Location: Newcastle upon Tyne
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
4 very good reasons there Vintage Claret.
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
I think we missed Ward more than anybody. He calms everything down. We fell into the "frantic" trap.
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
I unfortunately changed my lucky underpants which I have worn unbroken since our unbeaten run at the Turf started. The club know why I bring a can of febreeze on with me for the comfort of the people to my right and left, front and back and let me pass the stewards unfettered. The damned George mediums actually disintegrated after the whistle versus Chelsea on my way back to the car. The TK max special gentlemens mediums have been ceremonially burnt in the garden after todays debacle. I'm off to George in the morning. I take full responsibility, nothing to do with poor players and tactics.
These 3 users liked this post: Right_winger Juan Tanamera ontario claret
-
- Posts: 2105
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 9:28 pm
- Been Liked: 492 times
- Has Liked: 411 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Attitude more than anything else.
Don't think Dyche will be too disappointed, he hates cup competitions
Don't think Dyche will be too disappointed, he hates cup competitions
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Dyche did not do his home work on Lincoln. Lincoln play narrow just like we do and get in the face of the opposition, we could simply not cope playing against a mini Burnley.
He should have played with more width today and pushed his full backs up.He set his team out as if we were playing Chelsea.
The only player who came out of that game with any credit for us was Tarks
He should have played with more width today and pushed his full backs up.He set his team out as if we were playing Chelsea.
The only player who came out of that game with any credit for us was Tarks
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
One thing that seems to have changed as well is the opinion that after the Chelsea game we were pretty much safe. Now it seems, we are far from it.
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Lots of changes.
-
- Posts: 4401
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1620 times
- Has Liked: 696 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Today was like a group of football lookalikes turned up. But the spirit & determination was at home. Hugely disappointing.
-
- Posts: 1411
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:51 pm
- Been Liked: 267 times
- Has Liked: 660 times
- Location: Starbug
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
I hope Dyche will be very disappointed with that display,cup or not.Right_winger wrote:Attitude more than anything else.
Don't think Dyche will be too disappointed, he hates cup competitions
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Got the feeling today that Dyche set us up to try and out muscle them rather than out play them. Should have been the other way round. Also getting Barton to screen Rhead all game was an error of judgement as it took Barton out of the game for the most part
This user liked this post: Shore claret
-
- Posts: 4401
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
- Been Liked: 1844 times
- Has Liked: 933 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Lincoln opened a window and let our an air of complacency.
-
- Posts: 8753
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 3:50 pm
- Been Liked: 3122 times
- Has Liked: 2158 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Attitude and inability to play with the ball - too much possession for us today I'm afraid.
-
- Posts: 10318
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2016 4:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2637 times
- Has Liked: 2798 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
What's changed!?
Nowt we're still 12th in the premier league!
Nowt we're still 12th in the premier league!
This user liked this post: RammyClaret61
-
- Posts: 3066
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
- Been Liked: 1092 times
- Has Liked: 557 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Too many changes and we couldn't get away with it against a side playing similar to ourselves, especially when they totally out committed us all over the pitch. They ran harder, faster, and defended like their life depended on it. Play them tomorrow and we'd batter them, but this was their day.
That's how we normally play, but a bit of arrogance crept in today, as though we had a Devine right to beat them. Our stats were better(you don't win on paper as we all know), but our endeavour lacking by quite some distance.
That's how we normally play, but a bit of arrogance crept in today, as though we had a Devine right to beat them. Our stats were better(you don't win on paper as we all know), but our endeavour lacking by quite some distance.
This user liked this post: CombatClaret
-
- Posts: 6799
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1985 times
- Has Liked: 508 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Assuming the question is about why the fans are so negative for a one off defeat, I think it's something to do with being on the wrong end of one of the top upsets in over a century.
Even for those of us who want to focus on the league, that feeling of humiliation isn't something we want associated with our club, and this will be remembered long after the country forgets where we finish this season.
We've already done something uniquely bad as a top division side in 1975 - and now we've done it twice.
Even for those of us who want to focus on the league, that feeling of humiliation isn't something we want associated with our club, and this will be remembered long after the country forgets where we finish this season.
We've already done something uniquely bad as a top division side in 1975 - and now we've done it twice.
-
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:16 am
- Been Liked: 1507 times
- Has Liked: 400 times
- Contact:
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Your season ticket is in the bin, there's one differenceSpijed wrote:My season ticket is going in the bin!



Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
If you want to win a game you put the best team out that's available. I really don't understand why we didn't do that.
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
CrosspoolClarets wrote:Assuming the question is about why the fans are so negative for a one off defeat, I think it's something to do with being on the wrong end of one of the top upsets in over a century.
Even for those of us who want to focus on the league, that feeling of humiliation isn't something we want associated with our club, and this will be remembered long after the country forgets where we finish this season.
We've already done something uniquely bad as a top division side in 1975 - and now we've done it twice.
I think you're missing the point. It's only a big upset because we are such a good team. These things happen.
And however many football fans I've talked to about our 1975 defeat (I don't live in Burnley), no-one knew about it.
No-one will care about yesterday's upset next year and we'll still be a good team. I think it's a great story and I wish Lincoln well.
-
- Posts: 6507
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
- Been Liked: 2106 times
- Has Liked: 984 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
The players brought in not being good enough is the simple reason. Roll on Saturday.
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
Your right, rovers fans won't be going on about it 20 years later ala trelleborgs..Guich wrote:I think you're missing the point. It's only a big upset because we are such a good team. These things happen.
And however many football fans I've talked to about our 1975 defeat (I don't live in Burnley), no-one knew about it.
No-one will care about yesterday's upset next year and we'll still be a good team. I think it's a great story and I wish Lincoln well.
-
- Posts: 873
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 10:56 pm
- Been Liked: 289 times
- Has Liked: 501 times
Re: What's changed between the Chelsea game & this evening?
I agree. Perhaps it wasn't a priority - which is a shame as a run to Wembley wasn't out of the question.beddie wrote:If you want to win a game you put the best team out that's available. I really don't understand why we didn't do that.
When you pick a weakened team, with the best will in the world, I don't think you can avoid the message of the game not being *that* important getting into the player's heads.
Having said that - the Lincoln game exposed a weakness that particular line-up had with possession and passing. Our full line-up - with Hendrick, Brady and Defour available - can move the ball much better than the rather basic hoofball we produced yesterday.