Sink, Keane or Gibson

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Burnley Ace
Posts: 3945
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 727 times
Has Liked: 3222 times

Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by Burnley Ace » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:16 am

Which one is the first target for the "big" clubs this summer? Would Keane want to go to a club knowing he wasn't their first option?

Burnley Ace
Posts: 3945
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:03 pm
Been Liked: 727 times
Has Liked: 3222 times

Re: Dikj, Keane or Gibson

Post by Burnley Ace » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:17 am

Should be Dijk!

frankinwales
Posts: 413
Joined: Fri Feb 12, 2016 10:22 am
Been Liked: 88 times
Has Liked: 904 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by frankinwales » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:18 am

Or swim...............


Up the Clarets.........

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by Sidney1st » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:20 am

Define big clubs first.

Most of them will shop abroad anyway.

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:24 am

Keane is a real prospect. And excellent with the ball at his feet as well as in the air.

But Van Dijk is the ultimate defender. I wasnt actually that impressed with him at The Turf. But overall this season he has been outstanding. He is so dominating as a defender, one that you really would fancy in a battle even between Lukaku or Costa.
This user liked this post: minnieclaret

NottsClaret
Posts: 4295
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2925 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by NottsClaret » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:25 am

Dijk is the No.1 target for the top clubs, best centre half I've seen this season.

DCWat
Posts: 9964
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:04 am
Been Liked: 4495 times
Has Liked: 3912 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by DCWat » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:26 am

I'd guess that Van Dijk will be the one that commands the biggest fee, he looks a little way ahead of the others at present and is definitely the strongest of that group.

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19767
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4198 times
Has Liked: 2245 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by Quickenthetempo » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:26 am

Dijk was the best defender in the league before his injury, he might have to prove he can come back with no long term effects. But the other two are performing well and will be seen with lots of potential.

taio
Posts: 12811
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3580 times
Has Liked: 404 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by taio » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:29 am

It's obvious what he means by big clubs

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by Sidney1st » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:37 am

Utd, Liverpool, Arsenal, Chelsea, Spurs or City?

Just wanted to check due to the "big" part of the question.

They'll be busy fighting over some foreign defender.

If they buy Keane I'm sure he wont be fussed to know he wasn't their first option.

Personally I think it will be Everton.

Sutton-Claret
Posts: 1498
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 392 times
Has Liked: 166 times
Location: York

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by Sutton-Claret » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:40 am

I thought Van Dijk was amazing in Mary Poppin's but not really performed since.

minnieclaret
Posts: 6842
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 2012 times
Has Liked: 2287 times
Location: lismore co. waterford

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by minnieclaret » Fri Apr 14, 2017 10:42 am

Van Dijk is the top man but morning papers valuing Gibson at £30m is excellent news. He's no Michael Keane.

JimmyRobbo
Posts: 3491
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
Been Liked: 683 times
Has Liked: 1246 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by JimmyRobbo » Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:05 am

I think it's pretty obvious that Van Dijk, Keane and Gibson is the correct order.

I have nagging doubts about a giant like Van Dijk's future re injuries. He hasn't had many but you often wonder about how joints recover..ie. knees and ankles. They tend to become more fragile rather than stronger into later 20s.

Central defence is highly dependent upon partnerships. Keane offers a pretty much injury free 12 months. He might not be the glamour pick but injury records are vital down the spine of a team. I would hope we re-sign MK rather than sign VVD!

In any case, Gibson being valued so highly can only be good news for us. MK deserves his shot at the big time. He has performed and behaved very professionally for us despite interest from elsewhere.

KRBFC
Posts: 19164
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3995 times
Has Liked: 1079 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by KRBFC » Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:09 am

Van Dijk the best centre half i've seen in a long while, I said so after we played them too. He's a level above the other two right now.

clarethomer
Posts: 3265
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:24 am
Been Liked: 991 times
Has Liked: 420 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by clarethomer » Fri Apr 14, 2017 11:37 am

I read yesterday that a price of£55m for Dijk was thought to be what it would take..

not saying there is any truth in that but if there was then keane is not going for anything less that £35m

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by TVC15 » Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:04 pm

Might not be that easy to make comparisons of valuations as there is the matter of how long is left on Keane's contract to take into account - is it only a year left ? That could be significant and reduce the fee by easily £10m.
On a level playing field and if all 3 players having at least a couple of years left on their contracts I'd say current valuations are :

Van Djyk - £60m (he is at least £10m better than Mustafi !)
Keane - £35m (£25m if he only has a year left)
Gibson - £20m to £25m

I do like Gibson and if we did get £35m for Keane I would be happy to spend £20m on Gibson. I think he would likely go to a bigger club than us though - "mid tier" more established Premier team such West Ham, Stoke, West Brom, Southampton etc. I know these teams are currently near us in the league but I'm talking about buying power for transfer fees and wages being at least 50% higher than Burnley will be for the next couple of years.

Colburn_Claret
Posts: 9135
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Been Liked: 3454 times
Has Liked: 5701 times
Location: Catterick N.Yorks

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by Colburn_Claret » Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:32 pm

Van Dijk and David Louis were both excellent on the Turf this season. That should be what MK aspires to.

Gibson looked very good against us the other day, and I would definitely like him here if needed, but I do think he is behind Keane at the moment.

IanMcL
Posts: 34715
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6935 times
Has Liked: 10343 times

Re: Sink, Keane or Gibson

Post by IanMcL » Fri Apr 14, 2017 12:34 pm

Gibson will be in a relegated team, so first on the move.

Post Reply