Discuss.

I agree with most of what you've said, but in regards to the slapping each time it would just make the kid more determined to cause more aggravation.FactualFrank wrote:It's a lose-lose situation. The police can't do much due to his age. The 13 year old would probably learn not to do it again if he did get a slap each time he was caught. Yet, that's not allowed. The end result is that he continues to do it as he gets older, just changing his crimes to something else.
Therein lies the problem - little thugs and scrotes, of that age, can act like they do with impunity knowingFactualFrank wrote:It's a lose-lose situation. The police can't do much due to his age. The 13 year old would probably learn not to do it again if he did get a slap each time he was caught. Yet, that's not allowed. The end result is that he continues to do it as he gets older, just changing his crimes to something else.
It never would be dealt with. He could take it to the Prime Minister and it still wouldn't be dealt with. The police claim they don't have time, and the courts don't see throwing tomato sauce as a valid use of their time. If a child, even a teenage child, wants to spend his time spraying tomato sauce about, nobody will legally stop him.Rick_Muller wrote:The correct action would have been to report the issue to the police, over and over and over again, and if the police dont act accordingly, take it higher up the chain until it is dealt with. For a grown man to consider it OK to hit a child is not acceptable, and he deserved to be sacked.
the question was regarding the correct action to take, which I answered. It is a sad reflection on society that you think that nothing would get done about it, I believe that the police would have taken action, but that is my opinion. To have no faith in the police is a poor reflection of yourself and not a valid view of the police.dsr wrote:It never would be dealt with. He could take it to the Prime Minister and it still wouldn't be dealt with. The police claim they don't have time, and the courts don't see throwing tomato sauce as a valid use of their time. If a child, even a teenage child, wants to spend his time spraying tomato sauce about, nobody will legally stop him.
Lancashire police is stretched to the max, they deal in crime numbers for insurance rather than trying to catch the culprits. They don't even come out for burglaries/car break ins in the main.Rick_Muller wrote:the question was regarding the correct action to take, which I answered. It is a sad reflection on society that you think that nothing would get done about it, I believe that the police would have taken action, but that is my opinion. To have no faith in the police is a poor reflection of yourself and not a valid view of the police.
I don't know one single child from my generation that would of told their parents that they were up to no good in a bid to get the pizza boss in trouble.ClaretEngineer wrote:I'd be interested to hear the parents take on this. I mean none of us are saints (i certainly wasn't), but a clip round the ear from the guy in the shop would have been preferable to the bollocking off my parents (I was never hit as a child, but i knew i was in the sh1t)
I'd have accepted the slap in good faith and that would have been the end of it.
What I was getting at was the Parents view of the whole matter, it being in the paper and a man losing his job because some lads foolish behaviour.Quickenthetempo wrote:I don't know one single child from my generation that would of told their parents that they were up to no good in a bid to get the pizza boss in trouble.
A little slap would of been the least of your worries.
"The court was told that Mr Sadiq, of Abel Street, had rung the police several times over harassment from youngsters throwing sauce and eggs about in the shop. Officers had never been to see him about his complaints"Rick_Muller wrote: ...To have no faith in the police is a poor reflection of yourself and not a valid view of the police.