our " framework "
-
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:08 am
- Been Liked: 446 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
our " framework "
just wanted to hear what everyones views are on this for next season.
I think this framework is the reason for our success this season at home at least.
next season though we are up against the 2nd season syndrome and I cannot help
but think that teams will work us out better than they did this season....for me
we simply have to get more fire power up front and stating the bleeding obvious
have to get 3 or 4 away wins as I cannot see fortress turf moor returning as many
points as this season...utc.
I think this framework is the reason for our success this season at home at least.
next season though we are up against the 2nd season syndrome and I cannot help
but think that teams will work us out better than they did this season....for me
we simply have to get more fire power up front and stating the bleeding obvious
have to get 3 or 4 away wins as I cannot see fortress turf moor returning as many
points as this season...utc.
-
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 170 times
- Has Liked: 45 times
Re: our " framework "
The key word for what Dyche has done with us is this- 'evolution'.
The team has slowly, but continually, evolved over his time with us; all the time making the most out of what he had available to him. This will continue this summer when we see some players moving on and others coming in.
Dyche will have a plan for how the team will evolve and will be identifying the players to help this happen. As the personnel change then so too will the 'framework'....
The team has slowly, but continually, evolved over his time with us; all the time making the most out of what he had available to him. This will continue this summer when we see some players moving on and others coming in.
Dyche will have a plan for how the team will evolve and will be identifying the players to help this happen. As the personnel change then so too will the 'framework'....
This user liked this post: Sidney1st
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: our " framework "
Yes its evolved into a side where skill has been replaced by endeavour.
Re: our " framework "
And that has allowed us to retain our place in the Premier League!ablueclaret wrote:Yes its evolved into a side where skill has been replaced by endeavour.
This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 5075
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 638 times
Re: our " framework "
We are a very good side without possession - all we need to do now is become a good team with possession. Improve our play between phases so we can score goals when teams are at their weakest and not be susceptible when we lose possession.
-
- Posts: 34815
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12695 times
- Has Liked: 6314 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: our " framework "
as frustrating as it can be sometimes, I think it's fair to say more often than not Dyche has got things right. He's a young manager too and is learning as he goes with us. He's said on many occasion we need to improve the quality so as is usual it's now over to the board, the scouting and recruitment teams
Last edited by Vegas Claret on Sun May 14, 2017 4:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: our " framework "
We'll never know because we just don't do skill and entertainment anymore.
-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 pm
- Been Liked: 433 times
- Has Liked: 377 times
- Location: On a crazy train
Re: our " framework "
Framework will be similar. Especially away, and against the bigger clubs. I'd expect us to be planning on 'going for it' more than we have done this season in some games though
-
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 4:24 pm
- Been Liked: 134 times
- Has Liked: 156 times
Re: our " framework "
You got all this from MOTD?ablueclaret wrote:Yes its evolved into a side where skill has been replaced by endeavour.
-
- Posts: 821
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
- Been Liked: 405 times
- Has Liked: 182 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: our " framework "
I've been to every home game this year and been entertained at most of them.Have you not been entertained at the games you've been to.I trust Hull and West Ham fans were entertained today and Hull will entertain there fans in the CHAMPIONSHIP next year.ablueclaret wrote:We'll never know because we just don't do skill and entertainment anymore.
These 2 users liked this post: Wilsdenclaret Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: our " framework "
He said early this season on TV that he's limited in what style we could play due to the players we had.
He made a point of saying that he wasn't knocking the players he's got, he just played to their strengths.
Big Sam does the same if you look at it.
Gets the dirty work done to stay in the PL and then starts adding better quality players.
Hughes is doing the same to Pulis' old Stoke squad, but WBA are on course to finish above them ironically.
WBA play some good football too, but survival was always key first.
This is the issue some of our fans have it would appear, they want the fancy free flowing football first and foremost.
We all know some of our lads aren't that technically gifted or the players behind them may not be that defensively solid so something's have to be sacrificed for the greater good.
If we were to have this conversation next summer and we hadn't changed our style then it will show that Dyche maybe too ridged or limited, but if we've survived again then again its about what is more important in the short term?
Stoke spent 7 years playing Pulis football BUT it worked and has made them an established PL club which meant they could attempt to kick on.
It's easier to attract better quality players if they know you wont be sucked straight into a relegation fight.
He made a point of saying that he wasn't knocking the players he's got, he just played to their strengths.
Big Sam does the same if you look at it.
Gets the dirty work done to stay in the PL and then starts adding better quality players.
Hughes is doing the same to Pulis' old Stoke squad, but WBA are on course to finish above them ironically.
WBA play some good football too, but survival was always key first.
This is the issue some of our fans have it would appear, they want the fancy free flowing football first and foremost.
We all know some of our lads aren't that technically gifted or the players behind them may not be that defensively solid so something's have to be sacrificed for the greater good.
If we were to have this conversation next summer and we hadn't changed our style then it will show that Dyche maybe too ridged or limited, but if we've survived again then again its about what is more important in the short term?
Stoke spent 7 years playing Pulis football BUT it worked and has made them an established PL club which meant they could attempt to kick on.
It's easier to attract better quality players if they know you wont be sucked straight into a relegation fight.
-
- Posts: 77613
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 37985 times
- Has Liked: 5767 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: our " framework "
Some of your comments are so ridiculous they can't even be described as stupid. Can't you go and find somewhere else to play?ablueclaret wrote:Yes its evolved into a side where skill has been replaced by endeavour.
-
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:08 am
- Been Liked: 446 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: our " framework "
You probably remember West Brom away....one of the few times our framework wasnt used...it was on the back of some decent results and we went and had a go at them.....a fine example of why we need the framework...albeit it needs to steadily evolve.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: our " framework "
I'm sure you could see to that Tony.
-
- Posts: 12965
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: our " framework "
Thats rubbish, the decent results you refer to such as Everton, Palace, Bournemouth and Watford was achieved with the same attacking approach as we took at West Brom except at West Brom we played badly.happyclaret17 wrote:You probably remember West Brom away....one of the few times our framework wasnt used...it was on the back of some decent results and we went and had a go at them.....a fine example of why we need the framework...albeit it needs to steadily evolve.
It would be fair to state the open approach didnt work away from home but then to be honest up until the Palace game away the rigid framework approach was barely any better
-
- Posts: 1363
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2017 10:17 pm
- Been Liked: 381 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
- Location: Blackburn
Re: our " framework "
The key to our second season has to be to add some players that offer the same work ethic with more creativity. Granted that's not an easy thing to achieve.
-
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2016 3:24 pm
- Been Liked: 189 times
- Has Liked: 130 times
- Location: York
Re: our " framework "
From the last two games with Keane and Mee both missing I don't know about anyone else but the goals we have conceded in those two games show where our weakness is. Thats got to be a priority signing, hopefully early on so Mee can get used to controlling defence with another.
Re: our " framework "
Hopefully!ablueclaret wrote:I'm sure you could see to that Tony.
This user liked this post: TomtheClaret
-
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:08 am
- Been Liked: 446 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: our " framework "
....Devils_Advocate wrote:Thats rubbish, the decent results you refer to such as Everton, Palace, Bournemouth and Watford was achieved with the same attacking approach as we took at West Brom except at West Brom we played badly.
It would be fair to state the open approach didnt work away from home but then to be honest up until the Palace game away the rigid framework approach was barely any better
with respect devils advocate and without being as ignorant as you by saying you are talking rubbish...at least 3 of those games you referred to were at home....our home form isnt being questioned is it ? we abandoned our usual away mentality at West Brom....no, I wasnt there but tv is a wonderful thing
the away game before that we parked the bus at utd and they had a record amount of chances without scoring.
West brom was bordering on schoolboy stuff.
-
- Posts: 12965
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: our " framework "
You do know we play half our games at home and this season and we have won 4 lost 2 playing the West Brom formation and we have W6 D3 L3 playing the rigid 4-4-2 framework
We have done better at home without the framework and thats not even including the fact that we used the framework for our 4 easiest home matches.
Personally I would have played 4-5-1 at home and been more rigid away however if you take away the bore draws at the bottom three teams the Utd result was the only away point we managed before the Palace game so there is every chance that given a better run out away from home the 4-5-1 could have got us more points
One of the reasons people have been critical of the framework is because earlier in the season when Dyche was a lot more flexible with his approach balancing the two formations we seemed to do better and played some great football.
We have done better at home without the framework and thats not even including the fact that we used the framework for our 4 easiest home matches.
Personally I would have played 4-5-1 at home and been more rigid away however if you take away the bore draws at the bottom three teams the Utd result was the only away point we managed before the Palace game so there is every chance that given a better run out away from home the 4-5-1 could have got us more points
One of the reasons people have been critical of the framework is because earlier in the season when Dyche was a lot more flexible with his approach balancing the two formations we seemed to do better and played some great football.
Last edited by Devils_Advocate on Sun May 14, 2017 7:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 11244
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3632 times
- Has Liked: 2236 times
Re: our " framework "
Same here. Been some great entertainment at the Turf this year.Jimscho wrote:I've been to every home game this year and been entertained at most of them.Have you not been entertained at the games you've been to.I trust Hull and West Ham fans were entertained today and Hull will entertain there fans in the CHAMPIONSHIP next year.
Plus another shed load of money earned for an excellent manager to improve it again next season.
-
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:08 am
- Been Liked: 446 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: our " framework "
have a chill pill
what a load of twaddle....the original post was exactly what I wrote/meant and I have never posted anything on here to start an argument but if someone like you gets in my face I will tell you where to get off.... most posters understood the post and it would seem that its just you who has a problem.
we will see what next season brings but I, like someone said on here earlier trust Dyche to have a plan
watching the golf now...have a good night.
what a load of twaddle....the original post was exactly what I wrote/meant and I have never posted anything on here to start an argument but if someone like you gets in my face I will tell you where to get off.... most posters understood the post and it would seem that its just you who has a problem.
we will see what next season brings but I, like someone said on here earlier trust Dyche to have a plan
watching the golf now...have a good night.
-
- Posts: 12965
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2016 2:43 pm
- Been Liked: 5501 times
- Has Liked: 961 times
Re: our " framework "
Fair enough apologies for going off on one and it wasnt your original post I was replying too as thats a decent post. It was post #13 which I though was misleading/wrong but you are right prob didnt warrant my level of response so i'll leave it there
-
- Posts: 5075
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:53 am
- Been Liked: 1490 times
- Has Liked: 638 times
Re: our " framework "
When was the last time we did Skill & Entertainment? 1975?ablueclaret wrote:We'll never know because we just don't do skill and entertainment anymore.
-
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:08 am
- Been Liked: 446 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: our " framework "
fair enough devils advocate
top man
no worries.
top man
no worries.
-
- Posts: 17337
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3563 times
- Has Liked: 7816 times
Re: our " framework "
For what it's worth, happyclaret,
I doubt the basic framework will change very much next season, why should it?
We may have more technically gifted players available, but the system has worked for us (and SD)
We've been shown as an example of how to organise two rows of four on many occasions. I sometimes wonder what people expect!!!
I doubt the basic framework will change very much next season, why should it?
We may have more technically gifted players available, but the system has worked for us (and SD)
We've been shown as an example of how to organise two rows of four on many occasions. I sometimes wonder what people expect!!!
-
- Posts: 1332
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:08 am
- Been Liked: 446 times
- Has Liked: 14 times
Re: our " framework "
I completely agree boatshed bill about the framework but we simply must hurt teams more next season....I have to admit that 2 or 3 years ago I questioned our policy in including players like barnes in our team but I was wrong...for me I think his value to the team as a whole is greater than gray or vokes.....it would be great though to have a real 12-15 goals a season striker along side him though....I love Andre's ability to strike an early ball without a touch and vokes's ability to get near post flick on goals but we need a striker that is confotable doing both....along side barnes doing the dirty work.
-
- Posts: 2531
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:31 am
- Been Liked: 890 times
- Has Liked: 11161 times
Re: our " framework "
Mr abc you're a bore.ablueclaret wrote:Yes its evolved into a side where skill has been replaced by endeavour.
-
- Posts: 3148
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
- Been Liked: 403 times
- Has Liked: 50 times
Re: our " framework "
Well 81-82 was a great season with a number of less than great players Andy Wharton being one, plus of course Trevor Steven, playing Roy of the Rovers stuff that was wonderful to watch, memories of the match at Southend come flooding back, as of course was OC's tenure, but all along we have had players whose individual skill could unlock defences. Even in SD 's time when we had Ings in the side there was always the possibility of magic. I'm not saying that our present side does not have players of skill, to play at that level you have to be talented, but there is no -one who you know when they get the ball gives you that feeling that something special could happen. Boyd Arfield Gray even Hendrick occasionally have their moments but they are too few and far between to have you on the edge of your seat.
For most on here playing at the pinnacle of English football brings the excitement and I can understand that but for me watching a side in which individual flair and magic have their place is what makes watching football worthwhile, without that spark football is worthy but ultimately tedious, at least after you have been satiated on it.
For most on here playing at the pinnacle of English football brings the excitement and I can understand that but for me watching a side in which individual flair and magic have their place is what makes watching football worthwhile, without that spark football is worthy but ultimately tedious, at least after you have been satiated on it.
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: our " framework "
The problem you have abc is you're not willing to let Dyche build some solid foundations first, your running mate KRBFC is pretty much the same.
This user liked this post: No Ney Never
-
- Posts: 8264
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2483 times
- Has Liked: 2223 times
Re: our " framework "
I'm sure you could too !ablueclaret wrote:I'm sure you could see to that Tony.
-
- Posts: 8264
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
- Been Liked: 2483 times
- Has Liked: 2223 times
Re: our " framework "
One of your better words ABC.ablueclaret wrote:tedious
You are very tedious and when you start watching the Clarets, rather than sniping at their efforts, your opinions may carry more weight.
Now, get back to your Political aspirations
