For the airship fans
For the airship fans
On my travels yesterday I spotted the attached .... think it had just flown or they were preparing for a flight today.
These 2 users liked this post: BertiesBeehole evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: For the airship fans
I've read about this one.
Aren't they really struggling to get it going for any sort of distance?
Aren't they really struggling to get it going for any sort of distance?
-
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 420 times
- Has Liked: 995 times
Re: For the airship fans
Are they filming the new Bond film? 

-
- Posts: 9158
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2374 times
- Has Liked: 2347 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: For the airship fans
Is it the Goodyear blimp repainted?
-
- Posts: 4464
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1949 times
- Has Liked: 506 times
Re: For the airship fans
That's Caddington, just south of Bedford.
-
- Posts: 6786
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2856 times
- Has Liked: 7024 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: For the airship fans
Drive past it most days towards Bedford, they had a long flight a couple of weeks ago. I must say, up close it is majestic to see
-
- Posts: 314
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:11 pm
- Been Liked: 123 times
- Has Liked: 2 times
- Location: Ealand
Re: For the airship fans
Or for those wanting to look at the hangers on google maps, try Cardington instead.Herts Clarets wrote:That's Caddington, just south of Bedford.
This user liked this post: BennyD
-
- Posts: 4397
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
- Been Liked: 1619 times
- Has Liked: 694 times
Re: For the airship fans
Can we hire it to fly over Blackburn?
-
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:39 am
- Been Liked: 690 times
- Has Liked: 406 times
- Location: Chalfont St. Giles
Re: For the airship fans
You don't realise just how big those Hangars are until you actually see them!
Great to see them still being used, as Vickers and Barnes Wallis would have wanted.
Great to see them still being used, as Vickers and Barnes Wallis would have wanted.
Re: For the airship fans
You must be reading nonsense, then posting about it......Sidney1st wrote:I've read about this one.
Aren't they really struggling to get it going for any sort of distance?
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 938 times
Re: For the airship fans
There's a whole thread on it here:
http://www.pprune.org/military-aviation ... ht=airship" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
including some interesting pictures!

http://www.pprune.org/military-aviation ... ht=airship" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
including some interesting pictures!

Re: For the airship fans
I'm off back there tonight if it's still out I'll try and get some better pictures. The hangers are massive buildings and I'd love to have a look inside one day.
-
- Posts: 4464
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
- Been Liked: 1949 times
- Has Liked: 506 times
Re: For the airship fans
My mistake, it is Cardington.
-
- Posts: 3603
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
- Been Liked: 1338 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
- Location: Nantwich
Re: For the airship fans
There is a reason the concept was largely abandoned in the 30s. Too big, too clumsy, too vulnerable, too just about everything apart from good. It begs the question, why?
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 6:25 pm
- Been Liked: 4 times
- Has Liked: 2 times
- Location: I'm behind you
Re: For the airship fans
Imagine if it got a hole in it though and couldn't fly.
It'd be a massive let down...
It'd be a massive let down...
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller
Re: For the airship fans
One major application is for supplying aid etc to disaster zones i.e. earthquakes. Small landing zone required, huge lift capacity, incredibly low fuel usage.BennyD wrote:There is a reason the concept was largely abandoned in the 30s. Too big, too clumsy, too vulnerable, too just about everything apart from good. It begs the question, why?
The design creates it's own lift as well as the gas providing lift so it's completely unique. That is why......
These 2 users liked this post: Rick_Muller BertiesBeehole
-
- Posts: 3603
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
- Been Liked: 1338 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
- Location: Nantwich
Re: For the airship fans
However, in a lot of cases (because of its low ground speed), you are going to need a big fixed-wing cargo lifter to transport it to where it's needed. Provided you can get one this will need a major runway somewhere close to where it's needed. Either that or hope the country that's affected can afford to buy a blimp just in case they may need one. However, that country will, almost certainly, already have helicopters which can do the same job but get backwards and forwards a lot quicker.
Re: For the airship fans
I'm sure that helicopters will still be used. It will be a useful addition. Also, I think the plan will be to manufacture more than one.BennyD wrote:However, in a lot of cases (because of its low ground speed), you are going to need a big fixed-wing cargo lifter to transport it to where it's needed. Provided you can get one this will need a major runway somewhere close to where it's needed. Either that or hope the country that's affected can afford to buy a blimp just in case they may need one. However, that country will, almost certainly, already have helicopters which can do the same job but get backwards and forwards a lot quicker.
-
- Posts: 3603
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
- Been Liked: 1338 times
- Has Liked: 757 times
- Location: Nantwich
Re: For the airship fans
I took that as read, but I'm pretty sure not every country liable to earthquakes will buy one. Also, where are you going to put the huge lift capacity? Not inside, and you would have to have hard points on the outside which would probably neccesitate a manually released load. Whilst it is a good make-over of old technology I can't see a role which would make it preferable to existing delivery systems.
Re: For the airship fans
It's the one we lost, they've just re painted it
-
- Posts: 1042
- Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:14 pm
- Been Liked: 364 times
Re: For the airship fans
What's a picture of my ex wife doing on here?Hipper wrote:There's a whole thread on it here:
http://www.pprune.org/military-aviation ... ht=airship" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
including some interesting pictures!
Re: For the airship fans
Best to read up about it on Hybrid Air Vehicles website and other resources. There are lots of answers to your points.BennyD wrote:I took that as read, but I'm pretty sure not every country liable to earthquakes will buy one. Also, where are you going to put the huge lift capacity? Not inside, and you would have to have hard points on the outside which would probably neccesitate a manually released load. Whilst it is a good make-over of old technology I can't see a role which would make it preferable to existing delivery systems.