For the airship fans

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
PhilC
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 40 times
Has Liked: 26 times

For the airship fans

Post by PhilC » Mon May 22, 2017 3:44 pm

On my travels yesterday I spotted the attached .... think it had just flown or they were preparing for a flight today.
20170521_192354.jpg
20170521_192354.jpg (2.7 MiB) Viewed 3078 times
These 2 users liked this post: BertiesBeehole evensteadiereddie

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: For the airship fans

Post by Sidney1st » Mon May 22, 2017 3:53 pm

I've read about this one.

Aren't they really struggling to get it going for any sort of distance?

bob-the-scutter
Posts: 1303
Joined: Mon Feb 29, 2016 4:25 pm
Been Liked: 420 times
Has Liked: 995 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by bob-the-scutter » Mon May 22, 2017 4:29 pm

Are they filming the new Bond film? :roll:

dougcollins
Posts: 9158
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
Been Liked: 2374 times
Has Liked: 2347 times
Location: Yarkshire

Re: For the airship fans

Post by dougcollins » Mon May 22, 2017 4:56 pm

Is it the Goodyear blimp repainted?

Herts Clarets
Posts: 4464
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
Been Liked: 1949 times
Has Liked: 506 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by Herts Clarets » Mon May 22, 2017 4:57 pm

That's Caddington, just south of Bedford.

Rick_Muller
Posts: 6786
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
Been Liked: 2856 times
Has Liked: 7024 times
Location: -90.000000, 0.000000

Re: For the airship fans

Post by Rick_Muller » Mon May 22, 2017 5:01 pm

Drive past it most days towards Bedford, they had a long flight a couple of weeks ago. I must say, up close it is majestic to see

CrispyClaret
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:11 pm
Been Liked: 123 times
Has Liked: 2 times
Location: Ealand

Re: For the airship fans

Post by CrispyClaret » Mon May 22, 2017 5:10 pm

Herts Clarets wrote:That's Caddington, just south of Bedford.
Or for those wanting to look at the hangers on google maps, try Cardington instead.
This user liked this post: BennyD

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4397
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1619 times
Has Liked: 694 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by LoveCurryPies » Mon May 22, 2017 5:12 pm

Can we hire it to fly over Blackburn?

ClaretEngineer
Posts: 1719
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:39 am
Been Liked: 690 times
Has Liked: 406 times
Location: Chalfont St. Giles

Re: For the airship fans

Post by ClaretEngineer » Mon May 22, 2017 5:13 pm

You don't realise just how big those Hangars are until you actually see them!

Great to see them still being used, as Vickers and Barnes Wallis would have wanted.

bedfords
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 4:50 pm
Been Liked: 121 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by bedfords » Mon May 22, 2017 5:18 pm

Sidney1st wrote:I've read about this one.

Aren't they really struggling to get it going for any sort of distance?
You must be reading nonsense, then posting about it......

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 938 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by Hipper » Mon May 22, 2017 5:54 pm

There's a whole thread on it here:

http://www.pprune.org/military-aviation ... ht=airship" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

including some interesting pictures!

Image

PhilC
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:37 pm
Been Liked: 40 times
Has Liked: 26 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by PhilC » Mon May 22, 2017 5:58 pm

I'm off back there tonight if it's still out I'll try and get some better pictures. The hangers are massive buildings and I'd love to have a look inside one day.

Herts Clarets
Posts: 4464
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:18 pm
Been Liked: 1949 times
Has Liked: 506 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by Herts Clarets » Mon May 22, 2017 6:21 pm

My mistake, it is Cardington.

BennyD
Posts: 3603
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 1338 times
Has Liked: 757 times
Location: Nantwich

Re: For the airship fans

Post by BennyD » Mon May 22, 2017 7:00 pm

There is a reason the concept was largely abandoned in the 30s. Too big, too clumsy, too vulnerable, too just about everything apart from good. It begs the question, why?

Adeola Friday
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 6:25 pm
Been Liked: 4 times
Has Liked: 2 times
Location: I'm behind you

Re: For the airship fans

Post by Adeola Friday » Mon May 22, 2017 7:14 pm

Imagine if it got a hole in it though and couldn't fly.




It'd be a massive let down...
This user liked this post: Rick_Muller

bedfords
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 4:50 pm
Been Liked: 121 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by bedfords » Mon May 22, 2017 7:46 pm

BennyD wrote:There is a reason the concept was largely abandoned in the 30s. Too big, too clumsy, too vulnerable, too just about everything apart from good. It begs the question, why?
One major application is for supplying aid etc to disaster zones i.e. earthquakes. Small landing zone required, huge lift capacity, incredibly low fuel usage.

The design creates it's own lift as well as the gas providing lift so it's completely unique. That is why......
These 2 users liked this post: Rick_Muller BertiesBeehole

BennyD
Posts: 3603
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 1338 times
Has Liked: 757 times
Location: Nantwich

Re: For the airship fans

Post by BennyD » Mon May 22, 2017 8:42 pm

However, in a lot of cases (because of its low ground speed), you are going to need a big fixed-wing cargo lifter to transport it to where it's needed. Provided you can get one this will need a major runway somewhere close to where it's needed. Either that or hope the country that's affected can afford to buy a blimp just in case they may need one. However, that country will, almost certainly, already have helicopters which can do the same job but get backwards and forwards a lot quicker.

bedfords
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 4:50 pm
Been Liked: 121 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by bedfords » Mon May 22, 2017 9:10 pm

BennyD wrote:However, in a lot of cases (because of its low ground speed), you are going to need a big fixed-wing cargo lifter to transport it to where it's needed. Provided you can get one this will need a major runway somewhere close to where it's needed. Either that or hope the country that's affected can afford to buy a blimp just in case they may need one. However, that country will, almost certainly, already have helicopters which can do the same job but get backwards and forwards a lot quicker.
I'm sure that helicopters will still be used. It will be a useful addition. Also, I think the plan will be to manufacture more than one.

BennyD
Posts: 3603
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 1338 times
Has Liked: 757 times
Location: Nantwich

Re: For the airship fans

Post by BennyD » Mon May 22, 2017 9:35 pm

I took that as read, but I'm pretty sure not every country liable to earthquakes will buy one. Also, where are you going to put the huge lift capacity? Not inside, and you would have to have hard points on the outside which would probably neccesitate a manually released load. Whilst it is a good make-over of old technology I can't see a role which would make it preferable to existing delivery systems.

Zesty
Posts: 245
Joined: Sun May 07, 2017 7:20 pm
Been Liked: 49 times
Has Liked: 31 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by Zesty » Mon May 22, 2017 10:12 pm

It's the one we lost, they've just re painted it

john'sroseyspecs
Posts: 1042
Joined: Sat Jul 02, 2016 9:14 pm
Been Liked: 364 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by john'sroseyspecs » Mon May 22, 2017 10:25 pm

Hipper wrote:There's a whole thread on it here:

http://www.pprune.org/military-aviation ... ht=airship" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

including some interesting pictures!

Image
What's a picture of my ex wife doing on here?

bedfords
Posts: 477
Joined: Tue May 31, 2016 4:50 pm
Been Liked: 121 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: For the airship fans

Post by bedfords » Mon May 22, 2017 10:57 pm

BennyD wrote:I took that as read, but I'm pretty sure not every country liable to earthquakes will buy one. Also, where are you going to put the huge lift capacity? Not inside, and you would have to have hard points on the outside which would probably neccesitate a manually released load. Whilst it is a good make-over of old technology I can't see a role which would make it preferable to existing delivery systems.
Best to read up about it on Hybrid Air Vehicles website and other resources. There are lots of answers to your points.

Post Reply