Dominic solanke

Longsidejono · Post by **Longsidejono** » Tue May 30, 2017 6:09 pm

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/ ... om-chelsea

Reckon they will get around 3m tribunal Liverpool at it again was suppose to be one of the hot prospects from Chelsea and only didn't get a chance cause drogba was there.

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Tue May 30, 2017 6:11 pm

Liverpool at what again?

cricketfieldclarets · Post by **cricketfieldclarets** » Tue May 30, 2017 6:14 pm

More fool liverpool. This is the lad who wanted 50k a week before he had even played regular for the u23s.

cutsy123 · Post by **cutsy123** » Tue May 30, 2017 6:20 pm

Looks a good signing

TheFamilyCat · Post by **TheFamilyCat** » Tue May 30, 2017 6:25 pm

Even if they get away with paying tuppence ha'penny in compo, the wages alone are a huge investment in someone who is unproven (assuming they meet his reported £50k a week demand).

Re the OP: only didn't get a chance at Chelsea because of Drogba? It's two years since Drogba left? What's happened since then?

Longsidejono · Post by **Longsidejono** » Tue May 30, 2017 6:57 pm

ClaretTony wrote:Liverpool at what again?

Trying to get 'good' players for next to nothing due to age and contract situations

Longsidejono · Post by **Longsidejono** » Tue May 30, 2017 7:00 pm

TheFamilyCat wrote:Even if they get away with paying tuppence ha'penny in compo, the wages alone are a huge investment in someone who is unproven (assuming they meet his reported £50k a week demand).

Re the OP: only didn't get a chance at Chelsea because of Drogba? It's two years since Drogba left? What's happened since then?

Diego costa happened since then

TVC15 · Post by **TVC15** » Tue May 30, 2017 7:02 pm

Longsidejono wrote:Trying to get 'good' players for next to nothing due to age and contract situations

Sounds like a pretty good strategy to me

cutsy123 · Post by **cutsy123** » Tue May 30, 2017 7:06 pm

Guarantee hel make some major profit in years to come. Great signing if uask me

Longsidejono · Post by **Longsidejono** » Tue May 30, 2017 7:09 pm

TVC15 wrote:Sounds like a pretty good strategy to me

Yeah it is very good, especially if you want good results, just thought Liverpool were targeting more than good that's all, winning premier leagues and champions leagues. Hardly a deadly strike force of solanke and origi

CnBtruntru · Post by **CnBtruntru** » Tue May 30, 2017 8:20 pm

No it wasn' t Drogba it was our mate Patrick (£30,000) a week Bamford who was on fire

RocketLawnChair · Post by **RocketLawnChair** » Tue May 30, 2017 8:36 pm

Longsidejono wrote:Yeah it is very good, especially if you want good results, just thought Liverpool were targeting more than good that's all, winning premier leagues and champions leagues. Hardly a deadly strike force of solanke and origi

I could be wrong but I don't think this signing will conclude Liverpools business for the summer !

ClaretTony · Post by **ClaretTony** » Tue May 30, 2017 10:03 pm

Longsidejono wrote:Trying to get 'good' players for next to nothing due to age and contract situations

No different than any other club including us. We've had clubs taking us to tribunals in the same situation.

Longsidejono · Post by **Longsidejono** » Tue May 30, 2017 10:31 pm

ClaretTony wrote:No different than any other club including us. We've had clubs taking us to tribunals in the same situation.

Excellent. Other teams have also kicked a football do they get a mention?.

scouseclaret · Post by **scouseclaret** » Tue May 30, 2017 11:00 pm

When teams like Chelsea buy up all the young talent, keep them in the reserve teams and send them out on loan while filling the first team with overseas signings, they can hardly complain when stuff like this happens. Sadly for the lad, he's probably swapping one premier league reserve team for another - he'd be far better off coming to Burnley!

Dominic solanke

Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke

Re: Dominic solanke