Number 10 required

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:19 pm

simple as that

Woodleyclaret · Post by **Woodleyclaret** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:30 pm

Why what's happened to Ash Barnes?

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 5:36 pm

if we are playing one up top he should be the one, we don't have anyone good enough to link the midfield to Barnes, not rocket science

bfc-sparta · Post by **bfc-sparta** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:11 pm

Jay rod

jojomk1 · Post by **jojomk1** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:19 pm

Given our current squad just can't understand why Barnes is not played as the No 10 with Hendrick out wide left

Iloveyoubrady · Post by **Iloveyoubrady** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:23 pm

jojomk1 wrote:Given our current squad just can't understand why Barnes is not played as the No 10 with Hendrick out wide left

Maybe for the reason that Barnes is a striker and is not creative enough to be a No 10 and Hendrick would be worse out left than he is in his current position.

summitclaret · Post by **summitclaret** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:26 pm

He's not wrong (the OP). Just 23 games too late. Blindingly obvious that we have needed a proper nr. 10. Hopefully ,even happy clappers will finally agree.

jojomk1 · Post by **jojomk1** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:28 pm

How can Hendrick be any worse out left than in his current position - it's just not working for him in a role he has never played before

beddie · Post by **beddie** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:38 pm

"Number 10 required" I think that we have being saying that for sometime.

CFS · Post by **CFS** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:40 pm

That no.10 we require would not work in the way dyche likes to play.

Vegas Claret · Post by **Vegas Claret** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:51 pm

CFS wrote:That no.10 we require would not work in the way dyche likes to play.

of course it would, we just need competition for Hendrick because at the moment he is a shoe in regardless of form (I think Hendrick had a very good start to the season but in the last 10 games he's gone off the boil, it's coincided with Brady getting injured)

Rightfoot · Post by **Rightfoot** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 6:54 pm

Woodleyclaret wrote:Why what's happened to Ash Barnes?

Nothing hes just not good enough, Look at the goals scored amongst all our strikers tells you we need better

frankel · Post by **frankel** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 7:19 pm

It's our only position where we don't have 2 players pushing for the 1 spot.
A marquee signing in the no 10 role is the missing link in this great side of ours ..

tiger76 · Post by **tiger76** » Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:57 pm

I don't think our strikers are that bad the problem is we aren't creating many chances so Harry Kane could be up front for us and still struggle.This new loan signing looks promising so may give us another outlet,and of course Brady is a big miss.

maidenover · Post by **maidenover** » Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:04 pm

I can’t understand why Defour isn’t in the number 10 role instead of Hendricks. I would switch them around because Defour is far more creative - (like a Peter Noble for older posters).

billyhamilton82 · Post by **billyhamilton82** » Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:13 pm

Danny Ings would fit in seamlessly and add the pace and nouse we require in that position.

Shame he won't be coming back.

Rumbletonk · Post by **Rumbletonk** » Sun Jan 14, 2018 1:09 pm

tiger76 wrote:I don't think our strikers are that bad the problem is we aren't creating many chances so Harry Kane could be up front for us and still struggle.This new loan signing looks promising so may give us another outlet,and of course Brady is a big miss.

Nailed it

Number 10 required

Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required

Re: Number 10 required