Width
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Width
Dont know if its instructions. But against a team of slow full backs we have absolutely zero width. Lennon should be taking this to them
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: Width
He didn't beat a man on Thursday why should he start now?
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Width
Because hes been doing it for 15 years.piston broke wrote:He didn't beat a man on Thursday why should he start now?
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: Width
He's been good for us so I'm not dissing him but Thursday and 1st half he's been well short(no pun intended) and the bigger boys have bullied him.cricketfieldclarets wrote:Because hes been doing it for 15 years.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Width
Think we will take it to them this half.
-
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 724 times
Re: Width
A big part of our five game winning streak. Persist and support him!
This user liked this post: Rowls
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Width
AbsolutelyClaretmatt4 wrote:A big part of our five game winning streak. Persist and support him!
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Width
Due a goal mind.Claretmatt4 wrote:A big part of our five game winning streak. Persist and support him!
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 11:30 am
- Been Liked: 1 time
Re: Width
I noticed that our wingers, especially Lennon, quite often pull the opposing player inside to create space for Ward and Lowton to get down the wing. This has been working well all season - think about Ward’s goal against Chelsea. He was able to get in down the left completely unchallenged. It also makes space for the quick ball down the line to the strikers - think Lowton’s wonder ball for Barnes against Everton (?).
Can’t believe more hasn’t been made of this - mind you the punditry on Burnley is pretty one dimensional.
Can’t believe more hasn’t been made of this - mind you the punditry on Burnley is pretty one dimensional.
This user liked this post: Goodclaret
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Width
Lad i was with at the game did mention thats what he wqs doing yesterday. So a fair observation.Claret in the Ninch wrote:I noticed that our wingers, especially Lennon, quite often pull the opposing player inside to create space for Ward and Lowton to get down the wing. This has been working well all season - think about Ward’s goal against Chelsea. He was able to get in down the left completely unchallenged. It also makes space for the quick ball down the line to the strikers - think Lowton’s wonder ball for Barnes against Everton (?).
Can’t believe more hasn’t been made of this - mind you the punditry on Burnley is pretty one dimensional.
-
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2016 10:53 pm
- Been Liked: 237 times
- Has Liked: 1283 times
Re: Width
They were going inside to create space. It was just a lot of the time neither Ward nor Lowton overlapped or was in a position to overlap, particularly in the first half.Claret in the Ninch wrote:I noticed that our wingers, especially Lennon, quite often pull the opposing player inside to create space for Ward and Lowton to get down the wing. This has been working well all season - think about Ward’s goal against Chelsea. He was able to get in down the left completely unchallenged. It also makes space for the quick ball down the line to the strikers - think Lowton’s wonder ball for Barnes against Everton (?).
Can’t believe more hasn’t been made of this - mind you the punditry on Burnley is pretty one dimensional.
-
- Posts: 6401
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3167 times
- Has Liked: 150 times
Re: Width
It is also a function of us moving back to 442 - we keep the wide players narrower to help us keep control of midfield. Whenever we've played 442 it's been to the detriment of the wide players, who have had to sacrifice themselves a bit. It doesn't help when we struggle to control the midfield, as against Watford, Leicester and Chelsea, and by all accounts the first half yesterday.
-
- Posts: 5113
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Re: Width
The narrower you play, the more solid you are in defense. That is one of the reasons why we regularly make statistics for blocks and have managed to hold on in so many games.
Sadly it means we are less effective in attack.
Sadly it means we are less effective in attack.
-
- Posts: 1186
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:44 pm
- Been Liked: 582 times
- Has Liked: 1777 times
Re: Width
This is exactly why both AL and JBG tucked in. A few people near us yesterday were going ballistic at them for not giving us width but they were doing their job correctly in our system. It gives the opposition defense a lot to think about as our strikers can either move wide for balls down the wing or, as stated, our full backs get forward and put some great crosses in. It works pretty well I think.Claret in the Ninch wrote:I noticed that our wingers, especially Lennon, quite often pull the opposing player inside to create space for Ward and Lowton to get down the wing. This has been working well all season - think about Ward’s goal against Chelsea. He was able to get in down the left completely unchallenged. It also makes space for the quick ball down the line to the strikers - think Lowton’s wonder ball for Barnes against Everton (?).
Can’t believe more hasn’t been made of this - mind you the punditry on Burnley is pretty one dimensional.