The long throw
The long throw
Not working is it. Seems to be one of the smaller long throws I've seen. Should we go back to throwing the ball to feet for the return pass and cross?
I think so.
Got a couple of throws tonight in good positions where we could have tried to play it in and cross a ball but instead they just seemed wasted. I don't think I've seen it work successfully for us once yet.
Thoughts?
I think so.
Got a couple of throws tonight in good positions where we could have tried to play it in and cross a ball but instead they just seemed wasted. I don't think I've seen it work successfully for us once yet.
Thoughts?
These 2 users liked this post: MT03ALG bobinho
-
- Posts: 3573
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1266 times
- Has Liked: 911 times
Re: The long throw
It’s the poorest aspect of our game atm. They just need to put a defender halfway between six yard box and the edge of the box and it’s an easy clearance.
-
- Posts: 4931
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1252 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
Re: The long throw
Complete waste of time and just gives the ball away. Needs to be either improved or abandoned.
-
- Posts: 2909
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:21 am
- Been Liked: 1872 times
- Has Liked: 3260 times
Re: The long throw
Rather than being a Rory Delap style "missile" it's a very slow, looping throw that doesn't reach the danger area....ie it's a bit of a waste of time. By the time the ball has slowly completed it's arc the defender marking our designated "flicker-on" has had plenty of time to adjust his position to make sure he wins the header. Even if not the fact the ball has no pace on it means it just gets flicked on very slowly, again giving defenders and keeper plenty of time to read it's trajectory.
These 2 users liked this post: wilks_bfc IanMcL
-
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 12:01 pm
- Been Liked: 10 times
- Has Liked: 9 times
Re: The long throw
It's absolutely crap.
However, our 'normal' throw-in's aren't much better. Lost count of how many times we throw it to someone's stomach/thigh/chest when it needs to be to feet.
However, our 'normal' throw-in's aren't much better. Lost count of how many times we throw it to someone's stomach/thigh/chest when it needs to be to feet.
-
- Posts: 13297
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
- Been Liked: 3732 times
- Has Liked: 2149 times
- Contact:
Re: The long throw
When I first heard about Roberts long throw I was expecting something like Delaps which was a low trajectory and fast, but Connor, although he has the distance, also seems to get a lot of higher on it so it ends up being “floated” in making it easy for the defender.
If used correctly it could be effective, but for it to be effective, you don’t do it every single time.
If used correctly it could be effective, but for it to be effective, you don’t do it every single time.
This user liked this post: MT03ALG
Re: The long throw
Not exactly Rory Delap or David Challinor is he.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro
Re: The long throw
It's weird but I've always thought we were crap at throw in's.
The "long one" is not working at all though.
The "long one" is not working at all though.
-
- Posts: 3573
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 5:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1266 times
- Has Liked: 911 times
-
- Posts: 1681
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
- Been Liked: 735 times
- Has Liked: 152 times
Re: The long throw
Just watched a compilation of the Delap throws. What a weapon that was. Still not seen anything come close to that.
-
- Posts: 34930
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12717 times
- Has Liked: 6322 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: The long throw
the mistake I keep seeing is it's Tarks trying to win the first ball and not Weghorst
-
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 1197 times
- Has Liked: 289 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: The long throw
Look at how quickly Leicester return the ball into play, they expect it to be thrown in quickly and are on the move before we are set.
We are slow and ponderous meaning we end up either throwing it backwards from a positive position on the field or persisting with the aimless long throw.
We are slow and ponderous meaning we end up either throwing it backwards from a positive position on the field or persisting with the aimless long throw.
-
- Posts: 5510
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1478 times
- Has Liked: 3255 times
- Location: 'Turf
-
- Posts: 7593
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:03 am
- Been Liked: 2301 times
- Has Liked: 4095 times
Re: The long throw
It's stretching a point to call it "long" tbf. Bin it.
Re: The long throw
Do you mean in terms of a flick on?Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 11:21 pmthe mistake I keep seeing is it's Tarks trying to win the first ball and not Weghorst
If so, I’d rather Weghorst was awaiting the flick on to try and get a shot away. Weghorst also isn’t massively effective in the air, especially considering his size.
-
- Posts: 34930
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12717 times
- Has Liked: 6322 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: The long throw
yes the flick on, fully get what you are saying but Tarks doesn't seem to be winning them. It's surprisingly ineffective
-
- Posts: 1540
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:31 pm
- Been Liked: 191 times
- Has Liked: 154 times
- Location: Santa Clarita, LA
Re: The long throw
Weghorst was really poor today with his heading ability
Like you say isn’t massively effective
For a big guy you would be expecting better from him
-
- Posts: 18776
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
- Been Liked: 7701 times
- Has Liked: 1593 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: The long throw
Tonight I convinced myself that it’s deliberately under-thrown in the hope that the defender’s headed clearance lands at the feet of Westwood to put the cross in whilst the big men are up. I’m not being sarcastic, I genuinely think this may be the case. Either way it’s terrible and I reckon I could probably get a similar distance.
-
- Posts: 34930
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12717 times
- Has Liked: 6322 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: The long throw
It has to be tactical - unless my memory fails me (it often does) there were videos knocking about of Roberts taking throw ins for Swansea that were comfortably reaching the penalty spot
-
- Posts: 876
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:48 pm
- Been Liked: 255 times
- Has Liked: 363 times
- Location: Sandbach
Re: The long throw
I really don’t like floaters. Have a second look.
-
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3569 times
- Has Liked: 7848 times
Re: The long throw
I detest the flick on.Vegas Claret wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:11 amyes the flick on, fully get what you are saying but Tarks doesn't seem to be winning them. It's surprisingly ineffective
It turns possession into a 50/50 at the very best.
-
- Posts: 34930
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12717 times
- Has Liked: 6322 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: The long throw
it does the way we are trying to do it !boatshed bill wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:53 amI detest the flick on.
It turns possession into a 50/50 at the very best.
-
- Posts: 5120
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 6:04 pm
- Been Liked: 1046 times
- Has Liked: 739 times
Re: The long throw
This. We do it the same way as we float free kicks into the box: to win the second ball.Rileybobs wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 12:21 amTonight I convinced myself that it’s deliberately under-thrown in the hope that the defender’s headed clearance lands at the feet of Westwood to put the cross in whilst the big men are up. I’m not being sarcastic, I genuinely think this may be the case. Either way it’s terrible and I reckon I could probably get a similar distance.
Our throws are terrible and it's even worse when Lowton takes them. Roberts can actually pick out a man with a quick throw and he can help make some ground against top teams defensively too.
He admitted himself you can't control exactly where the ball lands with his throws but personally I'd rather see them than us just throwing it backwards like Taylor and Lowton do because they're so slow.
-
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
- Been Liked: 1092 times
- Has Liked: 557 times
Re: The long throw
It would help if any of our players could win a header. Unfortunately our 6’ 5” striker doesn’t jump, and isn’t very clever in the air. That’s just not his game. Wood was better in the air.
-
- Posts: 11841
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 1:59 pm
- Been Liked: 4804 times
- Has Liked: 57 times
Re: The long throw
Roberts long throw was the best part of his game last night and the throws were dross
-
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2020 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 1016 times
- Has Liked: 1205 times
Re: The long throw
Completely ineffective so far.
-
- Posts: 8591
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2018 2:19 am
- Been Liked: 2687 times
- Has Liked: 2377 times
Re: The long throw

Re: The long throw
Not Delay, stated by other posters.
Not long, no accuracy....little point.
Not long, no accuracy....little point.
-
- Posts: 9401
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2439 times
- Has Liked: 2413 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: The long throw
A couple of times he's thrown it long down the line, which was way more effective - though his teammates were a bit slow on the uptake.
-
- Posts: 10674
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:48 pm
- Been Liked: 4658 times
- Has Liked: 7308 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: The long throw
Yep, it's weak. Fulledge Colts could defend it....
-
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2018 8:02 pm
- Been Liked: 92 times
- Has Liked: 261 times
Re: The long throw
Not easy when you have to run uphill on the Longside/Cricket Field Stand end.
-
- Posts: 922
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2017 8:39 pm
- Been Liked: 188 times
- Has Liked: 116 times
Re: The long throw
It's a mid length throw. I can't really recall us winning a clean flick on from one. It's always short of where we are attacking from.
Put it away or use it as a decoy to create space for someone to have time to cross
Put it away or use it as a decoy to create space for someone to have time to cross