Chelski v Scousers

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Carwin261
Posts: 1618
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:15 pm
Been Liked: 278 times
Has Liked: 172 times

Chelski v Scousers

Post by Carwin261 » Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:42 pm

How was that not a red for Chukwuemeka ?

Bosscat
Posts: 28956
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2018 9:51 am
Been Liked: 9673 times
Has Liked: 20840 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Bosscat » Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:49 pm

Great goal by the bin dippers

bfcjg
Posts: 14834
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:17 pm
Been Liked: 5696 times
Has Liked: 8365 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by bfcjg » Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:50 pm

Carwin261 wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:42 pm
How was that not a red for Chukwuemeka ?
Ref couldn't spell it.
This user liked this post: Bosscat

Vegas Claret
Posts: 35006
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12734 times
Has Liked: 6332 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:52 pm

some pass from Salah

kentonclaret
Posts: 8054
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1206 times
Has Liked: 252 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by kentonclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:55 pm

If the gossip rumours are to be believed Chelski will be spending £160m plus on adding the 2 midfielders also chased by Liverpool from Brighton and Southampton.

wilks_bfc
Posts: 13325
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3739 times
Has Liked: 2156 times
Contact:

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by wilks_bfc » Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:55 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 4:52 pm
some pass from Salah
As was the pass from Mac Alistair to him

Pickles
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1658 times
Has Liked: 1428 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Pickles » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:00 pm

Helter-skelter sort of game at the moment. Think we can keep the ball better than these two on this showing! The goal was very good, some excellent couple of passes. Open game, especially down Chelsea's left, Salah been free a few times.

And... He bags.

RVclaret
Posts: 16531
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3061 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by RVclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:00 pm

Chelsea look like they need to spend another 500m tbh.

Commy
Posts: 4511
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 799 times
Has Liked: 60 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Commy » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:01 pm

Chelsea could end up below us if they don't sort it out :)

CoolClaret
Posts: 10166
Joined: Sat May 06, 2017 7:39 pm
Been Liked: 3215 times
Has Liked: 3206 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by CoolClaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:02 pm

Chelsusa have spent around a billion to put together that motley crew.

Some god awful signings and have arguably weakened despite spending big bucks - mount/kovacic are better than what they have in the middle right now

Conroysleftfoot
Posts: 2484
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 426 times
Has Liked: 338 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Conroysleftfoot » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:04 pm

How long has Poch got?

taio
Posts: 12838
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3591 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by taio » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:08 pm

2-1

Jakubclaret
Posts: 11040
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1351 times
Has Liked: 898 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:09 pm

Turned it round.

taio
Posts: 12838
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3591 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by taio » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:09 pm

Offside

jos
Posts: 2047
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:02 pm
Been Liked: 322 times
Has Liked: 447 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by jos » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:10 pm

Looks like Chelsea have hologram badges on their shirts.

Probably to make it harder to fake.
Last edited by jos on Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

sjb
Posts: 1572
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2023 2:15 pm
Been Liked: 587 times
Has Liked: 536 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by sjb » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:11 pm

Just switched it on as Chelsea scored twice - 2nd disallowed - is it my eyes, my tv or have Chelsea not got any sponsor on their shirts?

Pickles
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1658 times
Has Liked: 1428 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Pickles » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:13 pm

jos wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:10 pm
Looks like Chelsea have hologram badges on their shirts.

Probably to make it harder to fake.
They've had a hologram defence for some of this half.

wilks_bfc
Posts: 13325
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3739 times
Has Liked: 2156 times
Contact:

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by wilks_bfc » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:16 pm

sjb wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:11 pm
Just switched it on as Chelsea scored twice - 2nd disallowed - is it my eyes, my tv or have Chelsea not got any sponsor on their shirts?
They have no shirt sponsor, yet
This user liked this post: sjb

Aclaret
Posts: 4556
Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2018 3:16 pm
Been Liked: 1429 times
Has Liked: 1585 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Aclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:16 pm

Maatsen on the bench for Chelsea.

Foshiznik
Posts: 3245
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
Been Liked: 940 times
Has Liked: 2637 times
Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Foshiznik » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:38 pm

First time watching a game on sky sports for a while. They have more advert breaks than when watching NFL on US TV don’t they?!

Carwin261
Posts: 1618
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:15 pm
Been Liked: 278 times
Has Liked: 172 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Carwin261 » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:48 pm

Would that have been a pen against us? I’m sure it would have.

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 740 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:49 pm

Already look a million times better Chelsea. They’ll be a force this season.

kentonclaret
Posts: 8054
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1206 times
Has Liked: 252 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by kentonclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:56 pm

PremierLeagueClass wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 5:49 pm
Already look a million times better Chelsea. They’ll be a force this season.
When they’ve invested another £150m on bringing in 2 more midfield players they’ll look one hundred and fifty million times better than they do right now. :D

Vincent'sCap
Posts: 736
Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2023 7:27 pm
Been Liked: 359 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Vincent'sCap » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:05 pm

That Chelsea kit looks really well with no sponsors blurb all over it.

Carwin261
Posts: 1618
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2022 1:15 pm
Been Liked: 278 times
Has Liked: 172 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Carwin261 » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:13 pm

Maatsen coming on,

Casper2
Posts: 2379
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:38 am
Been Liked: 476 times
Has Liked: 154 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Casper2 » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:14 pm

Maatsen coming on

summitclaret
Posts: 4580
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1023 times
Has Liked: 1614 times
Location: burnley

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by summitclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:14 pm

Before Curcuralla. Think that's that then.

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 740 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:14 pm

Maatsen on, surely time to give up and pull the trigger on one of the other LB targets.

Pickles
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1658 times
Has Liked: 1428 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Pickles » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:15 pm

summitclaret wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:14 pm
Before Curcuralla. Think that's that then.
Unless Maatsen comes on as more of a winger, which he's played in preseason.

Pickles
Posts: 4356
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:10 pm
Been Liked: 1658 times
Has Liked: 1428 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Pickles » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:17 pm

PremierLeagueClass wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:14 pm
Maatsen on, surely time to give up and pull the trigger on one of the other LB targets.
He hasn't been playing left back for Chelsea though. Chelsea bring in a left winger or two and Maatsen could be available again.

Spijed
Posts: 18074
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3055 times
Has Liked: 1327 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Spijed » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:19 pm

Fair play to Brighton for getting so much for the dud Curcuralla.

ClaretFelix
Posts: 605
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:02 pm
Been Liked: 181 times
Has Liked: 132 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by ClaretFelix » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:26 pm

I normally zone out on the games involving the so called big clubs, I tend to find the football boring, both sides side to side, standing off, too chess like, cancelling each other out.

I've enjoyed this game though, a bit of bite from both sides, actually going at each other from the off.

Agree on Chelsea looking decent, very quick and aggressive on and off the ball, Jackson looks like he'll cause teams few problems this season. Thiago Silva cruising with Pipe an slippers, he's brilliant

claretburns
Posts: 5511
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
Been Liked: 1012 times
Has Liked: 359 times
Location: Halifax

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by claretburns » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:27 pm

Maatsen handball, should be a pen for Liverpool, not given.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 35006
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12734 times
Has Liked: 6332 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Vegas Claret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:27 pm

Maatsen struggling, looks completely lost at this level, I suggest Chelsea cut their losses on him and give him to us for 2 million
These 3 users liked this post: CrosspoolClarets Guller Bull roperclaret

Bristolclaret23
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2023 2:55 pm
Been Liked: 12 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Bristolclaret23 » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:29 pm

Maatsen looking pretty sloppy so far

CrosspoolClarets
Posts: 6897
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 pm
Been Liked: 2003 times
Has Liked: 512 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by CrosspoolClarets » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:29 pm

Maatsen would have given away a pen then if it wasn’t offside.

So far he has played centre attacking midfield and right midfield in 10 minites. Missed a chance to win the game by snatching, a bit like our youngsters on Friday.

He isn’t an attacker, he is a defender who can attack, but one a bit too vulnerable for Chelsea at the back with their aspirations. So he won’t play more than 200 minutes under Poch, whereas he would get 3,000 minutes for us. Interesting to see which he feels is best for his development.

RVclaret
Posts: 16531
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4552 times
Has Liked: 3061 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by RVclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:30 pm

Maatsen been pretty poor since coming on

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 740 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:30 pm

Hasn’t done himself any favours since coming on Maatsen. Very harsh to say after should a short spell but at this level you have to take every chance you get if you want to make it. Maybe we have a chance after all :D

addisclaret
Posts: 755
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:10 pm
Been Liked: 201 times
Has Liked: 753 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by addisclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:30 pm

CrosspoolClarets wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:29 pm
Maatsen would have given away a pen then if it wasn’t offside.

So far he has played centre attacking midfield and right midfield in 10 minites. Missed a chance to win the game by snatching, a bit like our youngsters on Friday.

He isn’t an attacker, he is a defender who can attack, but one a bit too vulnerable for Chelsea at the back with their aspirations. So he won’t play more than 200 minutes under Poch, whereas he would get 3,000 minutes for us. Interesting to see which he feels is best for his development.
To be honest I don't think he would have had his hand in the air claiming for offside if it wasn't offside.

claretburns
Posts: 5511
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 9:27 pm
Been Liked: 1012 times
Has Liked: 359 times
Location: Halifax

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by claretburns » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:45 pm

addisclaret wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:30 pm
To be honest I don't think he would have had his hand in the air claiming for offside if it wasn't offside.
Surprised it has not been mentioned, but Liverpool player wasn't actually offside as the ball was played via Chelsea defender, it was a penalty.

JimmyRobbo
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
Been Liked: 684 times
Has Liked: 1258 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by JimmyRobbo » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:47 pm

Maatsen won't be making many appearances for Chelsea once the window has closed. Judging by that showing, I should imagine.

2 sloppy looking sides who are both clearly going to be in the Euro places come the end of the season. Was the grass extra long or something? Appeared to make the ball move very slugglishly instead of zipping.

JimmyRobbo
Posts: 3503
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:55 am
Been Liked: 684 times
Has Liked: 1258 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by JimmyRobbo » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:48 pm

claretburns wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:45 pm
Surprised it has not been mentioned, but Liverpool player wasn't actually offside as the ball was played via Chelsea defender, it was a penalty.
I know the rule used to be that you can't leave the field of play and come back on, like that.

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 948 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Hipper » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:54 pm

I thought Maatsen did OK, some neat close passing, took up good positions, almost scored.

Conroysleftfoot
Posts: 2484
Joined: Sat May 09, 2020 2:06 pm
Been Liked: 426 times
Has Liked: 338 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Conroysleftfoot » Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:56 pm

Hipper wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:54 pm
I thought Maatsen did OK, some neat close passing, took up good positions, almost scored.
Spot on

PremierLeagueClass
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2016 12:49 pm
Been Liked: 740 times
Has Liked: 152 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by PremierLeagueClass » Sun Aug 13, 2023 7:12 pm

The last two posts sum up the blinkered nature of some fans when it comes to “favourites”.

addisclaret
Posts: 755
Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2016 4:10 pm
Been Liked: 201 times
Has Liked: 753 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by addisclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 7:52 pm

JimmyRobbo wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:48 pm
I know the rule used to be that you can't leave the field of play and come back on, like that.
That was my thought as well so I've just downloaded the laws of the game. It's 230 pages so I'll get back to you sometime about the start of next season. :D
This user liked this post: JimmyRobbo

roperclaret
Posts: 975
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2022 10:18 pm
Been Liked: 417 times
Has Liked: 52 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by roperclaret » Sun Aug 13, 2023 8:19 pm

CrosspoolClarets wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 6:29 pm
Maatsen would have given away a pen then if it wasn’t offside.

So far he has played centre attacking midfield and right midfield in 10 minites. Missed a chance to win the game by snatching, a bit like our youngsters on Friday.

He isn’t an attacker, he is a defender who can attack, but one a bit too vulnerable for Chelsea at the back with their aspirations. So he won’t play more than 200 minutes under Poch, whereas he would get 3,000 minutes for us. Interesting to see which he feels is best for his development.
No he wouldn’t. He had his hand up because he was shouting ‘Offside’ . If the player wasn’t offside he wouldn’t have had his hand up.

Hipper
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 948 times

Re: Chelski v Scousers

Post by Hipper » Tue Aug 15, 2023 8:18 am

PremierLeagueClass wrote:
Sun Aug 13, 2023 7:12 pm
The last two posts sum up the blinkered nature of some fans when it comes to “favourites”.
I've thought about this and I can now say that 'I thought Maatsen did OK, some neat close passing, took up good positions, almost scored.'

Post Reply