Brighton v Forest

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 936 times
Has Liked: 1794 times
Location: Lincoln

Brighton v Forest

Post by DAVETHEVICAR » Sun Sep 22, 2024 2:17 pm

Chris Wood penalty gives Forest lead

kentonclaret
Posts: 7949
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1196 times
Has Liked: 245 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by kentonclaret » Sun Sep 22, 2024 2:47 pm

Forest have a tree rooted to the spot in goal. :lol:

Commy
Posts: 4249
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 757 times
Has Liked: 60 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Commy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 2:48 pm

That was some free kick. It went in like a rocket.

DAVETHEVICAR
Posts: 3434
Joined: Sat Jan 02, 2016 11:33 pm
Been Liked: 936 times
Has Liked: 1794 times
Location: Lincoln

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by DAVETHEVICAR » Sun Sep 22, 2024 2:50 pm

Amazing turn round just before half time

Foulthrow
Posts: 2312
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2017 11:48 am
Been Liked: 708 times
Has Liked: 1528 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Foulthrow » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:46 pm

Now, you’ll be surprised to hear this, but Rob Jones is the centre of attention.

Commy
Posts: 4249
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 757 times
Has Liked: 60 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Commy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:49 pm

He showed 3 reds I think but I am sure Hendrick got a straight red for one of those tackles at Watford a few years ago, which wasn't even as bad. It doesn't matter if he won the ball, he could have broken both legs there.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:50 pm

Here we are..a perfect example of where the game is going soft. Gibbs-White sent off for a second yellow with what was a perfectly good ball winning tackle. He clearly wins the ball but because it was deemed "intense" he sees a second yellow. Rob Jones initially signalled he had got the ball but then for some reason changed his mind. That reason being 4th official Anthony Taylor. Disgraceful decision. No wonder Nuno was furious and got sent off.

The game really is heading the wrong way.

Commy
Posts: 4249
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 757 times
Has Liked: 60 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Commy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:51 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:50 pm
Here we are..a perfect example of where the game is going soft. Gibbs-White sent off for a second yellow with what was a perfectly good ball winning tackle. He clearly wins the ball but because it was deemed "intense" he sees a second yellow. Rob Jones initially signalled he had got the ball but then for some reason changed his mind. That reason being 4th official Anthony Taylor. Disgraceful decision. No wonder Nuno was furious and got sent off.

The game really is heading the wrong way.
Those 'scissor' tackles have always been a sending off. Like I said above, Hendrick was sent off at Watford for one that was nowhere near as bad.

morninbob
Posts: 792
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2024 5:00 pm
Been Liked: 147 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by morninbob » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:52 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:50 pm
Here we are..a perfect example of where the game is going soft. Gibbs-White sent off for a second yellow with what was a perfectly good ball winning tackle. He clearly wins the ball but because it was deemed "intense" he sees a second yellow. Rob Jones initially signalled he had got the ball but then for some reason changed his mind. That reason being 4th official Anthony Taylor. Disgraceful decision. No wonder Nuno was furious and got sent off.

The game really is heading the wrong way.
He doesn't get the ball, it was as bad as the pne sending off.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:53 pm

Commy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:49 pm
He showed 3 reds I think but I am sure Hendrick got a straight red for one of those tackles at Watford a few years ago, which wasn't even as bad. It doesn't matter if he won the ball, he could have broken both legs there.
In a word..B***ocks. He won the ball with a hard but fair tackle. He misses it's a different story. He didn't. We never used to see yellows when the ball was won only in exceptional circumstances..and that wasn't one of them. It's heading the wrong way.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18550
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7611 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:55 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:50 pm
Here we are..a perfect example of where the game is going soft. Gibbs-White sent off for a second yellow with what was a perfectly good ball winning tackle. He clearly wins the ball but because it was deemed "intense" he sees a second yellow. Rob Jones initially signalled he had got the ball but then for some reason changed his mind. That reason being 4th official Anthony Taylor. Disgraceful decision. No wonder Nuno was furious and got sent off.

The game really is heading the wrong way.
Gibbs-White was very lucky to not see a straight red for that. A yellow card was soft and regardless of how they got there he was correctly dismissed. Winning the ball is irrelevant.

That said, does the 4th official have any jurisdiction to advise the ref on on-field incidents?

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:55 pm

morninbob wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:52 pm
He doesn't get the ball, it was as bad as the pne sending off.
He doesn't get the ball?? Are you watching the same game? :lol:

Commy
Posts: 4249
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 757 times
Has Liked: 60 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Commy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:56 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:53 pm
In a word..B***ocks. He won the ball with a hard but fair tackle. He misses it's a different story. He didn't. We never used to see yellows when the ball was won only in exceptional circumstances..and that wasn't one of them. It's heading the wrong way.
It isn't B***ocks. The laws of the game have changed no matter what we think. It is now a sending off.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:56 pm

Rob Jones deemed he had got the ball. Anthony Taylor has intervened and said it was too intense and dangerous. That is what has happened and that is what I disagree with.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:58 pm

Commy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:56 pm
It isn't B***ocks. The laws of the game have changed no matter what we think. It is now a sending off.
Exactly..and it's wrong. As i say it's heading the wrong way.

ClaretTony
Posts: 76640
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 37346 times
Has Liked: 5703 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by ClaretTony » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:58 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:55 pm
Gibbs-White was very lucky to not see a straight red for that. A yellow card was soft and regardless of how they got there he was correctly dismissed. Winning the ball is irrelevant.

That said, does the 4th official have any jurisdiction to advise the ref on on-field incidents?
When it’s Jones with the whistle I reckon some bloke sat at the back of the stand should have jurisdiction.

Taylor clearly told him to get the cards out.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:58 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:53 pm
In a word..B***ocks. He won the ball with a hard but fair tackle. He misses it's a different story. He didn't. We never used to see yellows when the ball was won only in exceptional circumstances..and that wasn't one of them. It's heading the wrong way.
Winning the ball in what you deem to be fair pales secondary to endangering an opponent.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18550
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7611 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:06 pm

ClaretTony wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 3:58 pm
When it’s Jones with the whistle I reckon some bloke sat at the back of the stand should have jurisdiction.

Taylor clearly told him to get the cards out.
:D

According to the FA the 4th official can advise the referee on situations that are happening outside of their view. So it’s possible that Taylor was entitled to advise Jones if he had a better view of the incident.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:09 pm

I think judging by how many of you think that that challenge justifies a straight red shows how brainwashed we have become to this soft side of the game. Maybe it is my age but i remember that challenge being common place and would receive rapturous applause for commitment and the skill of the tackle.
Graeme Souness loved that kind of challenge. Roy Keane. Could go on. They'd struggle in todays game.
There was a challenge in The Palace/Man Utd game yesterday by Martinez where he jumped in with 2 feet and landed on the ball. Now because the player was the other side of the ball he got away with it. Now that was reckless so how does he get away with that?

Commy
Posts: 4249
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:53 pm
Been Liked: 757 times
Has Liked: 60 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Commy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:12 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:09 pm
I think judging by how many of you think that that challenge justifies a straight red shows how brainwashed we have become to this soft side of the game. Maybe it is my age but i remember that challenge being common place and would receive rapturous applause for commitment and the skill of the tackle.
Graeme Souness loved that kind of challenge. Roy Keane. Could go on. They'd struggle in todays game.
There was a challenge in The Palace/Man Utd game yesterday by Martinez where he jumped in with 2 feet and landed on the ball. Now because the player was the other side of the ball he got away with it. Now that was reckless so how does he get away with that?
It isn't being brainwashed. I personally think the game has gone soft but those tackles are now a sending off. There is nothing we can do about it so we just have to get on with it.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:14 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:09 pm
I think judging by how many of you think that that challenge justifies a straight red shows how brainwashed we have become to this soft side of the game. Maybe it is my age but i remember that challenge being common place and would receive rapturous applause for commitment and the skill of the tackle.
Graeme Souness loved that kind of challenge. Roy Keane. Could go on. They'd struggle in todays game.
There was a challenge in The Palace/Man Utd game yesterday by Martinez where he jumped in with 2 feet and landed on the ball. Now because the player was the other side of the ball he got away with it. Now that was reckless so how does he get away with that?
Do you not think players get injured enough as it is & some seem to be forever on the treatment table it's football not UFC. Regarding martinez think it was coote he interpreted it as not that bad & as I recall (think it was kamada) he was a distance away.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:16 pm

Commy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:12 pm
It isn't being brainwashed. I personally think the game has gone soft but those tackles are now a sending off. There is nothing we can do about it so we just have to get on with it.
There is nothing we can do about it but you can disagree and think it's a bag of sh**e surely? As i said at the start..its another example of the game going the wrong way.

burnmark
Posts: 3269
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:50 am
Been Liked: 830 times
Has Liked: 629 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by burnmark » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:20 pm

Jones is such a poor referee and whether it was Taylor or not who told him to give a second yellow, the right decision was made. Gets the ball but his trailing leg follows through in that ‘scissors’ motion. Gibbs-White knows what he’s doing.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:23 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:14 pm
Do you not think players get injured enough as it is & some seem to be forever on the treatment table it's football not UFC. Regarding martinez think it was coote he interpreted it as not that bad & as I recall (think it was kamada) he was a distance away.
That's fine if he had flying kicked him, gone in high or two footed. None of those happened in this case. EVERY tackle endangers an opponent. It's a contact sport. Do we ban tackling?
That tackle doesn't get a yellow in non league football. I've been to watch Bury and Padiham a few times recently and they get stuck in..but fairly. The fans appreciate it too.

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Jakubclaret » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:30 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:23 pm
That's fine if he had flying kicked him, gone in high or two footed. None of those happened in this case. EVERY tackle endangers an opponent. It's a contact sport. Do we ban tackling?
That tackle doesn't get a yellow in non league football. I've been to watch Bury and Padiham a few times recently and they get stuck in..but fairly. The fans appreciate it too.
It's what deemed as fair. For sure there's a degree of risk involved in every tackle but there's also a distinct difference in every tackle how that risk is interpreted & the intent involved. I'd rather more focus went into stamping out the really hard tackles & keeping players fit. In some cases you could let a lot go for sure. I won't get drawn in comparisons with non league football I wouldn't know where to start.

Goody1975
Posts: 3304
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 1150 times
Has Liked: 279 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Goody1975 » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:37 pm

burnmark wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:20 pm
Jones is such a poor referee and whether it was Taylor or not who told him to give a second yellow, the right decision was made. Gets the ball but his trailing leg follows through in that ‘scissors’ motion. Gibbs-White knows what he’s doing.
I think the correct decision was made, however if Taylor or Oliver were the referee would a junior fourth official have overruled them?

The Premier League is turning into the Taylor & Oliver show
This user liked this post: burnmark

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:48 pm

Jakubclaret wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:30 pm
It's what deemed as fair. For sure there's a degree of risk involved in every tackle but there's also a distinct difference in every tackle how that risk is interpreted & the intent involved. I'd rather more focus went into stamping out the really hard tackles & keeping players fit. In some cases you could let a lot go for sure. I won't get drawn in comparisons with non league football I wouldn't know where to start.
Well that's the problem right there isn't it? All about interpretation. My concern is what was deemed a good hard fair tackle is being stamped out especially at the top end of the game. It's a sliding scale and every challenge is different. Some more clear cut than others.
The "scissor challenge" is a funny one. A true scissor challenge in my mind involves both feet off the ground and the opponents leg going inbetween. I think many are too quick to call a lot of challenges a scissor tackle. Another problem is satisfying the intent part. Many get called but in a lot of cases the defender has nowhere to put his trailing leg..it moves naturally with him in most cases. A good example being the Ben Mee incident with Wesley a few years ago. Villa fans livid and calling it a scissor tackle but Mee clealry wins the ball but has nowhere to put his trailing leg. No intent we all said and rightly so.
So when i see some of our fans calling this challenge today as a scissor challenge and a straight red I just chuckle to myself.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18550
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7611 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:51 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:48 pm
So when i see some of our fans calling this challenge today as a scissor challenge and a straight red I just chuckle to myself.
Yet you are seemingly the only person who's posted that thinks it wasn't at the very least a yellow card offence. That challenge has warranted at least a yellow card for a very long time.

Somethingfishy
Posts: 3281
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
Been Liked: 852 times
Has Liked: 573 times
Location: Padiham

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Somethingfishy » Sun Sep 22, 2024 5:00 pm

Rileybobs wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:51 pm
Yet you are seemingly the only person who's posted that thinks it wasn't at the very least a yellow card offence. That challenge has warranted at least a yellow card for a very long time.
I stand by that too. Whether it is warranted by the laws of the game or not doesn't alter my opinion that he wins the ball in a hard but fair way. I recognise that it often receives a yellow. My argument is that the law as it stands is an ass and that slowly but surely the game is going soft at the top level.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18550
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7611 times
Has Liked: 1582 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Rileybobs » Sun Sep 22, 2024 5:09 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 5:00 pm
I stand by that too. Whether it is warranted by the laws of the game or not doesn't alter my opinion that he wins the ball in a hard but fair way. I recognise that it often receives a yellow. My argument is that the law as it stands is an ass and that slowly but surely the game is going soft at the top level.
I agree that the game is going softer in terms of allowable contact between players, but I don’t think this particular incident is a good example. I doubt any fans want to see their best player out for a season with a serious injury and their clubs certainly don’t. Gibbs-White tackle was reckless and endangered the safety of his opponent, I think most football fans would prefer such tackles to be illegal.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5233
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2943 times
Has Liked: 829 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by quoonbeatz » Sun Sep 22, 2024 11:19 pm

Good tackle from gibbs-white and jones got the decision right first time. What we can be sure of is that if it hadn’t been overturned by whoever, nobody would have been screaming for a sending off.

Officiating has ruined the PL, so glad we’re not in it. Imagine being so weak as a referee you let the 4th official make decisions for you.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34429
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Vegas Claret » Mon Sep 23, 2024 2:01 am

Have Forest put a tweet out about it yet ? Are they considering options again ?

Jakubclaret
Posts: 10827
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
Been Liked: 1319 times
Has Liked: 864 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Jakubclaret » Mon Sep 23, 2024 6:38 am

quoonbeatz wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 11:19 pm
Good tackle from gibbs-white and jones got the decision right first time. What we can be sure of is that if it hadn’t been overturned by whoever, nobody would have been screaming for a sending off.

Officiating has ruined the PL, so glad we’re not in it. Imagine being so weak as a referee you let the 4th official make decisions for you.
Kind of makes the idea of going for promotion pretty pointless. It's unlikely the officiating will be changing anytime soon.

quoonbeatz
Posts: 5233
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
Been Liked: 2943 times
Has Liked: 829 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by quoonbeatz » Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:35 am

Jakubclaret wrote:
Mon Sep 23, 2024 6:38 am
Kind of makes the idea of going for promotion pretty pointless. It's unlikely the officiating will be changing anytime soon.
Well yeah, it is pretty pointless on the whole, surely everyone knows that by now? The only real point to going up is the money means you can have a fun year or two when you inevitably come back down.

No teams are going up to compete these days. At best they might tread water for a few years but it’s a money league, not a football league.
This user liked this post: Jakubclaret

scamander
Posts: 294
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:56 pm
Been Liked: 65 times
Has Liked: 34 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by scamander » Mon Sep 23, 2024 9:02 am

Several things can be true at the same time. You can think the game has gone soft but also appreciate what now qualifies as a yellow card.

It was a stupid tackle to make on two counts, one because it was highly likely you were getting a yellow. The other that the situation didn't merit that kind of risk.

One of the things I can't get my head around is when players pick up a cheap yellow. You are very much walking a fine line from then on. Agsinst Rovers there was one player who theatrically hit the floor when Hannibal ran behind him - obviously to try and milk a second yellow.

randomclaret2
Posts: 7745
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 3054 times
Has Liked: 4796 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by randomclaret2 » Mon Sep 23, 2024 9:11 am

quoonbeatz wrote:
Mon Sep 23, 2024 8:35 am
Well yeah, it is pretty pointless on the whole, surely everyone knows that by now? The only real point to going up is the money means you can have a fun year or two when you inevitably come back down.

No teams are going up to compete these days. At best they might tread water for a few years but it’s a money league, not a football league.
I have to say I am beginning to come around to this view. Its a conundrum ...
These 2 users liked this post: scamander quoonbeatz

Raconteur
Posts: 600
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 161 times
Has Liked: 295 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Raconteur » Mon Sep 23, 2024 12:45 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:09 pm

Graeme Souness loved that kind of challenge
The kind of challenges that Souness liked were outlawed 20 years ago

Raconteur
Posts: 600
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:31 pm
Been Liked: 161 times
Has Liked: 295 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Raconteur » Mon Sep 23, 2024 12:48 pm

Somethingfishy wrote:
Sun Sep 22, 2024 4:09 pm

Graeme Souness loved that kind of challenge. Roy Keane. Could go on. They'd struggle in todays game.
Rightly so!
Some of the challenges them 2 put in could have been career ending.

But the games going soft :roll:

Swizzlestick
Posts: 4813
Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2016 9:40 pm
Been Liked: 1741 times
Has Liked: 658 times

Re: Brighton v Forest

Post by Swizzlestick » Mon Sep 23, 2024 1:07 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:
Mon Sep 23, 2024 2:01 am
Have Forest put a tweet out about it yet ? Are they considering options again ?
Did Forest ever get punished for essentially accusing a match official of being a biased cheat?

Post Reply