Interesting…
The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
-
- Posts: 3341
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
- Been Liked: 882 times
- Has Liked: 1684 times
- Location: France
The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Latest video from HITCSevens (Alfie Potts-Hamer).
Interesting…
Interesting…
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2025 3:03 pm
- Been Liked: 19 times
- Has Liked: 74 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
-
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 251 times
- Has Liked: 228 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
A lot of comments on there from people who have ignored the fixtures played so far and just had a quick look at the current table.
This user liked this post: chekhov
-
- Posts: 3341
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:54 am
- Been Liked: 882 times
- Has Liked: 1684 times
- Location: France
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Thanks, Claretfanatic!Claretfanatic1982 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 3:31 pmIt would be if we could see the video![]()
https://youtu.be/48_3EIohoQA?si=LnaHPXRTUEcXjr4B
-
- Posts: 11105
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 901 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Or people carefully considering what our relegation rivals have done so far against the same fixtures we have played. You can't have it both ways play the hard fixture card while ignoring what the likes of brentford & bournemouth have done. If we want to stay in this division all this will come to reckoning not now but at the end.ollieclarets8 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 4:01 pmA lot of comments on there from people who have ignored the fixtures played so far and just had a quick look at the current table.
-
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 251 times
- Has Liked: 228 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
As this is all about Leeds, Sunderland and Burnley, in what world have Sunderland and Leeds had the same fixtures that we have played?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 5:30 pmOr people carefully considering what our relegation rivals have done so far against the same fixtures we have played.
-
- Posts: 11105
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 901 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
It doesn't make a difference brentford & bournemouth are in that same pool & I'd add wolves west ham before nuno. It's extremely important we take care of our own results but when other teams match & above it needs to be considered. It's not all about Leeds & Sunderland because there's every possibility other teams will feature. Even if we are trying to discredit them & align them with our fixtures both have so far done equally as good & measurably better. A point at palace & 3 away to forest which is good & 3 at home & 3 away. Talking about hard fixtures where is our away win that the other 2 have achieved.ollieclarets8 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 6:51 pmAs this is all about Leeds, Sunderland and Burnley, in what world have Sunderland and Leeds had the same fixtures that we have played?
-
- Posts: 9584
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 12:23 am
- Been Liked: 2496 times
- Has Liked: 2443 times
- Location: Yarkshire
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
We're the worst performing of the three, so far.
-
- Posts: 11105
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 901 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
We are but let's not dress it up with the hard fixture bo**ocks.
-
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 251 times
- Has Liked: 228 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
The whole thread and video is literally about us, Leeds and Sunderland. It's regarding the 3 promoted clubs.
-
- Posts: 8860
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2352 times
- Has Liked: 1308 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Appreciate fixtures have been tough for us but they were three seasons ago under VK. We had a hard run of really tough initial fixtures then, but when easier games came along there was little or no improvement.
-
- Posts: 11105
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 901 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
I'm not interested in Leeds & Sunderland. I've looked at all the fixtures & results & performances & drawn my own conclusions.ollieclarets8 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:14 pmThe whole thread and video is literally about us, Leeds and Sunderland. It's regarding the 3 promoted clubs.
-
- Posts: 1201
- Joined: Mon May 19, 2025 3:44 pm
- Been Liked: 251 times
- Has Liked: 228 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?

These 4 users liked this post: Juan Tanamera Enola Gay THEWELLERNUT70 evensteadiereddie
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
If you’re putting in the same “pool” as teams that finished in the top 10 last season, you’re in for a pretty disappointing season.
-
- Posts: 11105
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 901 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Exact same script eerily almost identical, faith was held on some of a upturn but nothing positive happened. But then wood had left & some sort of misguided resurgence on the scoring front was left to WW. I don't need to say anymore good evening.warksclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:17 pmAppreciate fixtures have been tough for us but they were three seasons ago under VK. We had a hard run of really tough initial fixtures then, but when easier games came along there was little or no improvement.
-
- Posts: 9615
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
- Been Liked: 2838 times
- Has Liked: 2824 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
How often did Wood and Weghorst play for Kompany, ablue?Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 7:28 pmExact same script eerily almost identical, faith was held on some of a upturn but nothing positive happened. But then wood had left & some sort of misguided resurgence on the scoring front was left to WW. I don't need to say anymore good evening.

This user liked this post: Juan Tanamera
-
- Posts: 17442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3578 times
- Has Liked: 7863 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Started watching it but got bored 

-
- Posts: 11105
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 901 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
I agree but previously upon forum discussion bournemouth were mentioned amongst the likes of palace as possible relegation candidates it's not me personally placing them in that pool. That considering it's fair to list them.
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
I genuinely think we are the best of the 3. There's been periods in every game where we've moved the ball with real quality and intensity. Our fixtures have just been ridiculous.
We need a win now so we don't lose confidence, if we can get one soon then I think we might just be OK. Could do with more goals in the side though. I think Brownhill is a huge miss for us. He creates, scores and presses really well. We haven't replaced those assets.
We need a win now so we don't lose confidence, if we can get one soon then I think we might just be OK. Could do with more goals in the side though. I think Brownhill is a huge miss for us. He creates, scores and presses really well. We haven't replaced those assets.
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
How come we struggled against Spurs when Wolves, without a point, nearly got a win?
Looking like we gave them too much respect.
Looking like we gave them too much respect.
-
- Posts: 11105
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 901 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Word of caution it's only acceptable to talk about Leeds & Sunderland nobody else are relegation candidates & seemingly it's irrelevant what anybody else does.
-
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:55 am
- Been Liked: 755 times
- Has Liked: 833 times
- Location: Galactic Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
It’s irrelevant in the context of a thread literally entitled “The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?”Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Wed Oct 01, 2025 10:14 pmWord of caution it's only acceptable to talk about Leeds & Sunderland nobody else are relegation candidates & seemingly it's irrelevant what anybody else does.
Unless you’re lacking in comprehension skills or being wilfully obtuse.
Neither of which is a particularly good look.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 3277
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 943 times
- Has Liked: 2659 times
- Location: Computer matrix, IP not found- current code: 00101110100101001100100 1011101010100010101101010100100
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Sunderland have genuinely impressed. I don’t think anyone can argue that but many of the comments on the video suggest that both them and Leeds will comfortably stay up and we will be relegated because of how poor we’ve been, without context of the opposition faced. I think that’s what most on this thread are saying and fairly so. If the current table order is the same in 10 games time then maybe they will be right but as of now, it’s harsh.
-
- Posts: 11105
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 901 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Like it's realistically achievable or expected within the context of relegation not to deviate elsewhere in discussing other teams. But let's rigidly discuss Sunderland & Leeds who actually look a cut above (so far) than the likes of wolves.
-
- Posts: 3430
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 8:03 pm
- Been Liked: 869 times
- Has Liked: 579 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
You are STILL not getting it are you? This is a thread about the relative merits of the three promoted clubs. Presumably based on stats showing we are making a better fist of it than most in the last 10 years. Where does it say it is a relegation discussion? So you have got the subject matter completely wrong and it's not the context. It's not rigidly sticking to Leeds and Sunderland it is precisely what the OP wanted to discuss. It's not all about you.Jakubclaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 5:04 amLike it's realistically achievable or expected within the context of relegation not to deviate elsewhere in discussing other teams. But let's rigidly discuss Sunderland & Leeds who actually look a cut above (so far) than the likes of wolves.
These 2 users liked this post: Guller Bull evensteadiereddie
-
- Posts: 11105
- Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2016 10:47 pm
- Been Liked: 1358 times
- Has Liked: 901 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
In all fairness I know exactly what the discussion entails which is clearly indicated by my comments regarding Sunderland & Leeds results. I just don't see how picking 4 PTS up against palace & forest in 2 away games is easier than UTD or Spurs on current form guide & talking about Leeds who also have collected 2 wins 1 being away. Will that do you? & no mention of relegation & no mention of 17 other teams apart from palace & forest where Sunderland collected the points. It's not about me I never said it was you did!Somethingfishy wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 6:38 amYou are STILL not getting it are you? This is a thread about the relative merits of the three promoted clubs. Presumably based on stats showing we are making a better fist of it than most in the last 10 years. Where does it say it is a relegation discussion? So you have got the subject matter completely wrong and it's not the context. It's not rigidly sticking to Leeds and Sunderland it is precisely what the OP wanted to discuss. It's not all about you.
-
- Posts: 3469
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 10:06 am
- Been Liked: 1142 times
- Has Liked: 324 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
I thought Sunderland were very much second best against us, but they've had some great results. Still expect them and Leeds to be in the relegation mix. For all our positives, we've not taken points where we should. As Spurs found out, there are no easy games. So while our fixture list has been tough, it's not the case that we'll pick up the points we expect elsewhere. As Sean always said, fine margins. I actually think there's very little between the 3 promoted sides, and it'll be those moments in games where you grab points or walk away with nothing.
So far, in those definitive moments, we've come up short. You never really know which teams will give you opportunities for 1 or 3 points, but regardless of the opposition you have to be ready to take them.
So far, in those definitive moments, we've come up short. You never really know which teams will give you opportunities for 1 or 3 points, but regardless of the opposition you have to be ready to take them.
This user liked this post: RVclaret
-
- Posts: 5360
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 1540 times
- Has Liked: 1507 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
A tug of the shirt here, turning your back in the penalty area there. Silly errors that can be eliminated or a sign that we have a naivety that will haunt us all season? You decide.
Sunderland's bubble will eventually burst but when? Looking forward to their game at Old Trafford at the weekend so some kind of comparison can be made.
Leeds survival, not unlike ours,will more than likely depend on their home form.
I still think 2 of the 3 are actually good enough to survive
Sunderland's bubble will eventually burst but when? Looking forward to their game at Old Trafford at the weekend so some kind of comparison can be made.
Leeds survival, not unlike ours,will more than likely depend on their home form.
I still think 2 of the 3 are actually good enough to survive
-
- Posts: 4388
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1410 times
- Has Liked: 510 times
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
I still think Sunderland go down. They have been incredibly lucky with the fixtures and more specifically when those games were played. They should have lost points to Brentford who missed a pen and Palace who missed an open goal. They beat West Ham with about 0.6 xg. They played Forest after a European trip in the midweek before and scored from a non free kick. Their best performance was with ten men against a poor Villa. They haven’t played a big 6 team whilst we have played 4.
No doubt they will get to play the big teams after European trips where we have had Liverpool and City after free weeks or international breaks or a season opener with a new manager (Spurs). They couldn’t have hand picked the start to the season any better.
No doubt they will get to play the big teams after European trips where we have had Liverpool and City after free weeks or international breaks or a season opener with a new manager (Spurs). They couldn’t have hand picked the start to the season any better.
Re: The three promoted clubs. Are the actually good?
Chris Wood missed an open goal for Forest as well.Hibsclaret wrote: ↑Thu Oct 02, 2025 10:10 pmI still think Sunderland go down. They have been incredibly lucky with the fixtures and more specifically when those games were played. They should have lost points to Brentford who missed a pen and Palace who missed an open goal. They beat West Ham with about 0.6 xg. They played Forest after a European trip in the midweek before and scored from a non free kick. Their best performance was with ten men against a poor Villa. They haven’t played a big 6 team whilst we have played 4.
No doubt they will get to play the big teams after European trips where we have had Liverpool and City after free weeks or international breaks or a season opener with a new manager (Spurs). They couldn’t have hand picked the start to the season any better.