Page 1 of 1

Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:34 pm
by BurnleyPaul
Really???? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/fo ... w-12421926" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:38 pm
by Guller Bull
Disjointed and difficult to read. Uninteresting as the game itself. Shite journalism

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:44 pm
by RalphCoatesComb
Just wasted 2 minutes of my life trying to read that shoite.

Just as well he doesn't play football or he'd be heading for relegation from the old 4th Division !

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:53 pm
by ClaretTony
The Chronicle is the Newcastle paper,

This is the Sunderland Echo report

http://www.sunderlandecho.com/sport/foo ... -1-8322593

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 6:54 pm
by what_no_pies
How did we only ha e 2 notable chances? Vokes early, Barnes late and hit the post. That's just off the top of my head and all 3 were excellent opportunities.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:32 pm
by Man of Kent
The second (of just two!) reader comments sums up how I feel abut that article. It is a poorly constructed, juvenile, ill-conceived, poorly-spelled waste of digital space. Does anyone actually pay to read that guff?!

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:34 pm
by CleggHall
So much for local papers in the north east.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:36 pm
by dsr
I don't agree with the Chronicle reporter that it's 1-0 Moyes because "his side showed character and pluck". Character and pluck may be so rare as to need special comment for Sunderland, I suppose.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:38 pm
by Rileybobs
Some bloke wrote:Be interesting to see to what extent. To see who, then, plays.

But that is then. For now, fair play.

They wanted to win, and went for it.
I believe he's to be appointed as Poet Laureate this year.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:40 pm
by Rileybobs
I need, a lie down, I've never, seen so many, commas in, one, place,.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:13 pm
by Silkyskills1
When I was much younger I always read Granville Shackleton's report of our game in the Saturday evening 'Sports' and sometimes Alf Thornton on Blackburn games. At the end I'd always got an idea of what had gone on (away games especially). I suppose we can't stand in the way of progress though. I feel guilty of having travelled and paid to watch my favourite football team after that.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 8:48 pm
by 3putt
Dreadful report. I find it really difficult to comprehend that somebody is being paid to write such rubbish.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:20 pm
by ralphc
I think the fact that he has just over 2,000 tweets as a so called north east footballer reporter just about sums it up. Compare that to Chris Boden who keeps us well informed and has over 72k. Complete numpty.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:29 pm
by Stan Tastic
The state of this.
Burnley are renew to the Premier League
Image

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:34 pm
by ksrclaret
I think it is to be commended when local newspapers run competitions like this allowing primary school children to have their work published.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Sun Jan 08, 2017 10:58 pm
by Cirrus_Minor
A juxtapositinal interpretation of both clubs that lacks complete verisimilitude to reality.

Re: Interesting (possibly delusional!) interpretation of yesterday by the Sunderland press...

Posted: Mon Jan 09, 2017 9:25 am
by CleggHall
The Guardian too are very negative about the game - "truly appalling tie, anything to relieve the tedium etc". Not how I saw it, a decent tie between 2 evenly matched teams which Burnley definitely shaded and should have won. You sometimes wonder whether reporters actually attend and watch matches!?