Rovers demise bad for the game.

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Saxoman
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:26 pm
Been Liked: 577 times
Has Liked: 147 times

Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Saxoman » Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:46 am

Former premier league winners in league 1? Shouldn't be allowed. We should be protected like a grade listed building would be. The fa should hang their heads in shame for their neglect..
This user liked this post: turfytopper

HiroshimaClaret
Posts: 3221
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
Been Liked: 746 times
Has Liked: 927 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by HiroshimaClaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:55 am

Listing rather than listed I would have thought
This user liked this post: dsr

Saxoman
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:26 pm
Been Liked: 577 times
Has Liked: 147 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Saxoman » Fri Jan 13, 2017 4:58 am

HiroshimaClaret wrote:Listing rather than listed I would have thought
Rather tasteless naming yourself after a nuclear bombing.. :(

bartons baggage
Posts: 1429
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:33 pm
Been Liked: 597 times
Has Liked: 541 times
Location: bonlah

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by bartons baggage » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:16 am

Saxoman wrote:Former premier league winners in league 1? Shouldn't be allowed. We should be protected like a grade listed building would be. The fa should hang their heads in shame for their neglect..
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: .
You're just returning to a more natural level for a club of Rovers size.
It could be argued that Rovers are now punching above their weight,and leagues 1/2 would be a more fitting level for them.
Remember the days before uncle Jack,well they're coming back,dark days are on the horizon. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Saxoman
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:26 pm
Been Liked: 577 times
Has Liked: 147 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Saxoman » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:21 am

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Scousers scousers everywhere.. ;)

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30680
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11047 times
Has Liked: 5656 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Vegas Claret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 5:34 am

Saxoman wrote:Former premier league winners in league 1? Shouldn't be allowed. We should be protected like a grade listed building would be. The fa should hang their heads in shame for their neglect..
Image
These 3 users liked this post: bobinho MG70 Claretforever

CrispyClaret
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:11 pm
Been Liked: 123 times
Has Liked: 2 times
Location: Ealand

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by CrispyClaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:15 am

Saxoman wrote:Rather tasteless naming yourself after a nuclear bombing.. :(
His name is based on where he lives, you really should do the decent thing and leave

Shore claret
Posts: 1411
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:51 pm
Been Liked: 267 times
Has Liked: 660 times
Location: Starbug

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Shore claret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:37 am

Saxoman wrote:Rather tasteless naming yourself after a nuclear bombing.. :(
Clown, I hope you go down and play in the lowest league possible.

Darthlaw
Posts: 3088
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:08 pm
Been Liked: 1185 times
Has Liked: 418 times
Location: Death Star, Dark Side Row S Seat 666

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Darthlaw » Fri Jan 13, 2017 6:57 am

Roverrrrrs didn't win the league though, they bought it.

The FA.are rightly sending a message that cream eventually rises to the top and the dross will just fall away.

SparkyClaret
Posts: 287
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:50 pm
Been Liked: 55 times
Has Liked: 149 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by SparkyClaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:17 am

Can't say as anyone from Blackburn was thinking the same when Burnley were facing extinction, despite us having won the league some 20-odd years previous.

Think of it in those terms and you might see why no one has any sympathy for your plight.

Well, that and that it's a huge over reaction to your potential drop to the third tier.

Autobahn
Posts: 297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:01 am
Been Liked: 103 times
Has Liked: 141 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Autobahn » Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:36 am

This thread belongs in a museum.

50 shades of Grey
Posts: 591
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2016 8:38 pm
Been Liked: 332 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by 50 shades of Grey » Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:37 am

Where's the bell end 'loadsamoney' when you need him, I remember him well, coming on Claret forums with the rest of his gloating chums, where have they all gone ?

And what are we left with ? sad, lonely, saxo. Ah, what a shame. Popping up on here, cos even the fiddling bas turds on BRFC cant be doin' wi' 'im.

I think he's got a point though, I mean, I remember well all the sympathy from down the road when we nearly went out of existence. Not. So here it is saxo, we could not be happier to see you lot grovelling around with that buck tooth clown spouting his usual verbal diarrhoea, whilst you sink into oblivion. Its marvellous.

And in any case, you don't even attend any more do you ? plastic scouser, plastic bas turn. Sad.

UTC NNN.
This user liked this post: clerkenwell.claret

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Sidney1st » Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:40 am

They're slowly disappearing on FB too.
You get the odd one trying to claim all Burnley fans are bitter, but it does get pointed out to them that due to the role reversal they're the bitter ones.

They used to be around all the time, but with each passing week that we aren't in the relegation zone whilst they are, their appearances on FB are becoming further apart for a lot of them.

Imploding Turtle
Posts: 19799
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:12 am
Been Liked: 5483 times
Has Liked: 2540 times
Location: Burnley, Lancs

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Imploding Turtle » Fri Jan 13, 2017 7:45 am

Saxoman wrote:Rather tasteless naming yourself after a nuclear bombing.. :(
How do you think we got our 6th finger?
These 2 users liked this post: Sidney1st bob-the-scutter

HiroshimaClaret
Posts: 3221
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:23 pm
Been Liked: 746 times
Has Liked: 927 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by HiroshimaClaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:26 am

Saxoman wrote:Rather tasteless naming yourself after a nuclear bombing.. :(
Never minded your posts, Saxoman and a few have entertained me BUT this one HAS to be THE most non-sensical one I have ever read on this forum. It is beyond comprehension.

As a Rovers fan and continuing on your favourite subject of names, maybe you should rename yourself PAXOMAN as Rovers are pretty well stuffed.
These 2 users liked this post: Claretforever FCBurnley

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:30 am

No it isn't

A football club going bust and disappearing, leaving only memories would be the massive wake up call the game needs.

And it would be hilarious as well

Sutton-Claret
Posts: 1430
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 378 times
Has Liked: 165 times
Location: York

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Sutton-Claret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:36 am

Is the turd actually blaming the FA for the hilarious predicament they're in ??
:lol: x10,000

Sutton-Claret
Posts: 1430
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 378 times
Has Liked: 165 times
Location: York

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Sutton-Claret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:38 am

What were you doing awake at 4.46am - did you wet the bed? Cbeebies doesn't start till 6am
These 3 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie Wilsdenclaret nuttersuclan

vinrogue
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:26 am
Been Liked: 319 times
Has Liked: 184 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by vinrogue » Fri Jan 13, 2017 8:40 am

Lancasterclaret wrote:No it isn't

A football club going bust and disappearing, leaving only memories would be the massive wake up call the game needs.

And it would be hilarious as well
Totally agree, the game needs a club with a history to implode completely and I can think of no better current day example than Rovers where everything is wrong other than of course Agent Coyle. ;)

BleedingClaret
Posts: 3311
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 988 times
Has Liked: 1660 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by BleedingClaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:33 am

OP 4.46am?

NottsClaret
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2621 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by NottsClaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:36 am

I'm not sure 'the game' gives a toss either way.

It'd be bad for Blackburn and hilarious for us. Beyond that, nobody cares.
This user liked this post: Leisure

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am

Quite right Notts, which makes it even funnier for us!

ElectroClaret
Posts: 17977
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4071 times
Has Liked: 1853 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by ElectroClaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:39 am

It's bad for my ribs.

Aching so much from pi**ing me sen. :lol: :lol:
This user liked this post: mybloodisclaret

Yearofthefox
Posts: 106
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 2:05 pm
Been Liked: 16 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Yearofthefox » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:44 am

Do you think anyone would have given a toss about Burnley if we had been relegated back in 87 the former elite champions of England?

I'm afraid saxo the FA won't care

mybloodisclaret
Posts: 2242
Joined: Tue May 03, 2016 8:04 pm
Been Liked: 699 times
Has Liked: 4030 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by mybloodisclaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:44 am

ElectroClaret wrote:It's bad for my ribs.

Aching so much from pi**ing me sen. :lol: :lol:
Exactly what I was going to put!
This user liked this post: ElectroClaret

claretdom
Posts: 3741
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:53 am
Been Liked: 1693 times
Has Liked: 193 times
Location: Got a ticket from a mashed up bloke in Camden Town

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by claretdom » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:51 am

They say you don't realise how much you miss something til it has gone.


Blackburn rovers seems the perfect test case. I promise to admit I miss you when you fold... if I do.
These 2 users liked this post: mybloodisclaret Lancasterclaret

blackburnturfite
Posts: 137
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 1:44 pm
Been Liked: 63 times
Has Liked: 346 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by blackburnturfite » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:57 am

Bad for town centres BHS going under, Comet,etc, mis-management, nobody runs to their Aid, there was no sympathy in 1987 before we played Orient, so whats new. You employ a manager with 3 relegations on his CV, soon to be 4 no doubt,the ear-ache Rovers Supporters have given out Planes flying over the Turf in your Glory Days , well now you must face up to your Demise. Rovers fate lies with the owners Venkys,not good we know, but to ask for any sympathy from us, Happy Days..
This user liked this post: Leisure

Sutton-Claret
Posts: 1430
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 378 times
Has Liked: 165 times
Location: York

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Sutton-Claret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:59 am

claretdom wrote:They say you don't realise how much you miss something til it has gone.


Blackburn rovers seems the perfect test case. I promise to admit I miss you when you fold... if I do.
I suspect we will all miss them in a strange sort of way. Lets hope its a long drawn out demise - 2 or 3 years in League 1 followed by a few years in League 2. That would give us several years of comedy - after that who knows??

HatfieldClaret
Posts: 2551
Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 5:29 pm
Been Liked: 605 times
Has Liked: 346 times
Location: Hertfordshire

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by HatfieldClaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:02 am

The old saying, Saxo

Don't pi$$ on people on the way up, you may be kissing their ar$e on the way down.....

How apt. 8-)

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 10974
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5188 times
Has Liked: 804 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:06 am

I don't want them to go to the wall. Who would we take the p1ss out of then?

A good decade in the bottom division with the odd foray into the conference will do for me.

'Staying Down For Ever, Love Burnley'

LoveCurryPies
Posts: 4294
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 1600 times
Has Liked: 679 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by LoveCurryPies » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:08 am

Who said Saxoman didn't have a sense of humour! : )

BarstewardsEnquiry
Posts: 223
Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 7:42 pm
Been Liked: 44 times
Has Liked: 93 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by BarstewardsEnquiry » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:19 am

Yep..Be careful who you kick on the way to the top, because you will get kicked twice as hard on your way back down!

ecc
Posts: 4265
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:08 am
Been Liked: 1435 times
Has Liked: 1284 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by ecc » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:24 am

In fairness to loadsamoney, he did come on here on May 2 and congratulate us on going up.

Walton
Posts: 1987
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:29 am
Been Liked: 792 times
Has Liked: 242 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Walton » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:32 am

Rovers' demise is brilliant for the game.

It just shows that a club which gets elevated way above their true level based on one very rich benefactor can fall back to where they were when that money dries up.

If Sheikh Mansour dies and doesn't leave enough money to City then they'll fall back to their level of lower end of PL.
If Abramovich dies and doesn't leave enough money to Chelsea then they'll fall back to their level of middle of PL.
Jack Walker died and didn't leave enough money to Blackburn so they're falling back to their level of 2nd/3rd tier.

It may be the case that Walker did leave enough money to Blackburn, however the club frittered it away on absolute wasters on the playing staff, and substantially discounting ticket prices in a desperate attempt to keep the the fickle glory supporters they'd gained between 1992 and 1995 from going back to supporting Man United or Liverpool.

Blackburn fans love to hate the Venkys, but they're too blind to see that without the Venky's pumping in millions upon millions to keep the club going, they're pretty much screwed. Venkys are the electricity powering the life support machine on which the feeble body of Blackburn Rovers lays. If the plug gets pulled, it's game over.

It's about time their fans realised this and started supporting them, and stop acting like such ungrateful little bast*rds. If they don't like it, they should raise some money themselves, including the £40m or whatever it is the club needs each season over and above what it brings in on its own.

They're not going to do that though, because they're too thick.

Keep the 20-man lock-ins in the Blackburn End, keep the youtube videos coming, keep saying it's a conspiracy by a group of agents, keep saying you've got the paperwork which will bring it all crashing down, keep booing Coyle, keep doing whatever you want which makes you feel as though you're doing something to help your club. We love it, because you're not helping your club at all. You're sliding back down the league ladder like it was a snake, and you're not doing a single thing to turn it around.

The last few verses of No Nay Never are coming true, and it's brilliant. F*ck off Bast*rds.

Ewood's now empty, its getting knocked down,
They play their home games on a piece of waste ground,
Coyle looks round and says something's not right,
Cos there's far more players than supporters in sight.

Five years have now passed and Burnley rule supreme,
The league and the cup have been won by our team,
The b*st*rds are bankrupt and long since have died,
And Coyle sweeps up down on Burnley's Longside.
These 11 users liked this post: Lancasterclaret Sidney1st Hapag Lloyd Darthlaw randomclaret2 evensteadiereddie Paranoid Spike Walt Cheerful Greenmile

Jimscho
Posts: 815
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:34 pm
Been Liked: 404 times
Has Liked: 182 times
Location: Rawtenstall

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Jimscho » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:34 am

Might be bad for the game but it's wonderful for this forum.

MG70
Posts: 207
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:39 am
Been Liked: 75 times
Has Liked: 425 times
Location: Australia

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by MG70 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:35 am

Saxoman wrote:Rather tasteless naming yourself after a nuclear bombing.. :(
No more tasteless than naming yourself after a **** French car.
These 2 users liked this post: Mayoclaret dpinsussex

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Lancasterclaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:37 am

Standing ovation for that post Walton

NottsClaret
Posts: 3599
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 2621 times
Has Liked: 1 time

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by NottsClaret » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:43 am

Ha ha. That's great Walton.

claretdom
Posts: 3741
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:53 am
Been Liked: 1693 times
Has Liked: 193 times
Location: Got a ticket from a mashed up bloke in Camden Town

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by claretdom » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:45 am

Saxo, go be a hero and copy and paste waltons perfect post onto brfccs forum

jlup1980
Posts: 2176
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:01 pm
Been Liked: 858 times
Has Liked: 531 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by jlup1980 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:51 am

This is a joke thread right?!

Their demise is good for game. It's a great example of what can happen if you over stretch yourself as a club. Surely there are clubs up and down the land who have learnt from them. They're doing everyone else a great service.

Fireguard
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:56 am
Been Liked: 22 times
Has Liked: 2 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Fireguard » Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:01 am

Hi Saxoman, do you often throw bait to the sharks before going to bed? HaHa. UTC

dpinsussex
Posts: 3554
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1047 times
Has Liked: 1187 times
Location: Reading

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by dpinsussex » Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:08 am

Be great to have accy as our rivals.
Whens it happening Saxo. Will make sure my diary is clear to gain maximum enjoyment from the wovers demise

IanMcL
Posts: 30390
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6384 times
Has Liked: 8726 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by IanMcL » Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:09 am

Well I think it is a bad thing that small town teams have been crushed by financial muscle, rather than their real ability. This happened to us and we are fortunately back where we used to belong - now we hang on for grim death and hope. football is less about community and more about ultra funding and it has led to many once famous town teams being pushed to the lower leagues or financially crippled.

Bring back British football!

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Sidney1st » Fri Jan 13, 2017 11:21 am

claretdom wrote:Saxo, go be a hero and copy and paste waltons perfect post onto brfccs forum
I'm thinking of sticking it onto fb.

They'll just accuse us of being bitter though, but I'm not sure what about.

dsr
Posts: 15236
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4577 times
Has Liked: 2268 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by dsr » Fri Jan 13, 2017 12:14 pm

IanMcL wrote:Well I think it is a bad thing that small town teams have been crushed by financial muscle, rather than their real ability. This happened to us and we are fortunately back where we used to belong - now we hang on for grim death and hope. football is less about community and more about ultra funding and it has led to many once famous town teams being pushed to the lower leagues or financially crippled.

Bring back British football!
But Blackburn aren't being crushed by financial muscle. They've been getting £20 million per year of Venky's for years. It's financial incompetence, to a degree that beggars belief, that's crushing them.

Those accounts that they've just published - whether it's last year or the year before I don't know, but whichever it was they paid wages of £28m in a year. That's just £1m less than we paid in wages in the Premier Leage, and I suspect it's a lot more than we paid last season. Who are they paying it to? What are they getting for the money?

randomclaret2
Posts: 6903
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Been Liked: 2758 times
Has Liked: 4325 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by randomclaret2 » Fri Jan 13, 2017 12:18 pm

They also had 20 years of Premier League money. They have literally spent hundreds of millions over the last 25 years only to end up back where they were before Walker took over...bottom of the second division, broke, and playing in front of a 3/4 empty ground.

Guich
Posts: 1229
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 3:35 pm
Been Liked: 472 times
Has Liked: 598 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by Guich » Fri Jan 13, 2017 12:56 pm

Diving is bad for the game, the FA is bad for the game, the skewed impact of money is bad for the game, cheese and onion pies are bad for the game. But Rovers demise is...

Trouser wetting hilarious!
This user liked this post: Sausage

COBBLE
Posts: 1382
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 12:04 am
Been Liked: 350 times
Has Liked: 472 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by COBBLE » Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:11 pm

Tremendous. Should be worth a couple of thousand more regulars on the Turf.

dpinsussex
Posts: 3554
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:15 am
Been Liked: 1047 times
Has Liked: 1187 times
Location: Reading

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by dpinsussex » Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:27 pm

COBBLE wrote:Tremendous. Should be worth a couple of thousand more regulars on the Turf.
We havent got room for them . What with all these extra asians we are attracting too :)

ShabbaRanks
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2016 1:15 pm
Been Liked: 83 times
Has Liked: 19 times

Re: Rovers demise bad for the game.

Post by ShabbaRanks » Fri Jan 13, 2017 1:43 pm

A couple of throwaway comments and he's made a 40 comment thread.

You lot want a word with yourselves, he wouldn't keep coming back if you didn't bite harder than a saltwater crocodile.

Lemmings.
These 2 users liked this post: Lord Beamish Saxoman

Post Reply