Page 1 of 2

Lukey Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:03 pm
by ClaretTony
I told you he was good

Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:03 pm
by MrTopTier
just scored against Blackburn

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:03 pm
by Colburn_Claret
Get in , I hope he celebrated appropriately

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:04 pm
by Vegas Claret
haha good lad Claret legend

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:05 pm
by KRBFC
Yeah he's world class, 40 games 0 goals is a remarkable achievement. I can't believe any Burnley fan dared to criticise him for the way he paid back the £2M he cost.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:08 pm
by cutsy123
KRBFC wrote:Yeah he's world class, 40 games 0 goals is a remarkable achievement. I can't believe any Burnley fan dared to criticise him for the way he paid back the £2M he cost.
Funny postin whilst on the game

Oh wait...

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:10 pm
by IndigoLake
Good player - just not a Premier League player. Not yet anyway. Things might have been different with us if he'd scored early on. Championship is a competitive level as we know (increasingly difficult, in my opinion) and he's doing very well there. Good for him.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:11 pm
by randomclaret2
Training at Gawthorpe paying off for Birmingham

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:13 pm
by ElectroClaret
Let's hope he gets a Hattie....

Stanley down to ten men already.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:14 pm
by ecc
All that matters today is he buried the penalty and put Birmingham ahead.


UTC

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:29 pm
by KRBFC
cutsy123 wrote:Funny postin whilst on the game

Oh wait...
On the game?
We play tomorrow numpty

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:38 pm
by ecc
Wigun winning 2-0 so Rovers are 23rd as it stands right now.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:45 pm
by minnieclaret
How did that stinking pile of doggy dooda beat the Mags twice? They'd already be down without them 6 points.

Mulgrew off injured early on is a bonus.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 3:56 pm
by ClaretAndJew
1-1 now.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:06 pm
by Right_winger
Was a disaster for us but doing reasonable so far at brum.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:21 pm
by bartons baggage
KRBFC wrote:Yeah he's world class, 40 games 0 goals is a remarkable achievement. I can't believe any Burnley fan dared to criticise him for the way he paid back the £2M he cost.
What a sad unfulfilled life you must lead 3057 post of negativity.
That's 59 post a week of pure bile.
8 post a day on pointless piffle.
Get a job,get a girlfriend and get a life. :lol:

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:25 pm
by bfccrazy
Even just get to Colne Rd and get your end away even :lol:

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:26 pm
by KRBFC
bartons baggage wrote:What a sad unfulfilled life you must lead 3057 post of negativity.
That's 59 post a week of pure bile.
8 post a day on pointless piffle.
Get a job,get a girlfriend and get a life. :lol:
32 games 0 goals (stats taken from wikipedia though)

Argue with the stats, not me.
I'm just the one providing the stats, if you want to claim that's negative then that's your insecurities nothing to do with me.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:27 pm
by Rileybobs
KRBFC wrote:32 games 0 goals (stats taken from wikipedia though)

Argue with the stats, not me.
I'm just the one providing the stats, if you want to claim that's negative then that's your insecurities nothing to do with me.
To be fair you did provide wildly inaccurate stats.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:27 pm
by KRBFC
bfccrazy wrote:Even just get to Colne Rd and get your end away even :lol:
I thought you're asian? :lol: you shouldn't be talking about sex. Naughty muslim

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:28 pm
by bfccrazy
KRBFC wrote:I thought you're asian? :lol: you shouldn't be talking about sex. Naughty muslim
Isn't that all us muslims do?

Talk about the virgins we're due?

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:28 pm
by KRBFC
Rileybobs wrote:To be fair you did provide wildly inaccurate stats.
I did say the stats were taken from wikipedia, I couldn't be arsed to dig deeper, all I know is he played a lot of games and didn't score.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:29 pm
by KRBFC
bfccrazy wrote:Isn't that all us muslims do?

Talk about the virgins we're due?
I've no idea, you tell me.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:29 pm
by bfccrazy
KRBFC wrote:I've no idea, you tell me.
We love Juke scoring against the ba*tards too :)

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:35 pm
by KRBFC
bfccrazy wrote:We love Juke scoring against the ba*tards too :)
Same, doesn't mean I'm going to act like he's world class like some on here have done since he left. There was absolutely no defending Juke on here when he played for us now he doesn't he's all of a sudden a superstar. Every time Juke scores for Birmingham, a thread appears on here, quite embarrassing.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:37 pm
by bfccrazy
KRBFC wrote:Same, doesn't mean I'm going to act like he's world class like some on here have done since he left. There was absolutely no defending Juke on here when he played for us now he doesn't he's all of a sudden a superstar. Every time Juke scores for Birmingham, a thread appears on here, quite embarrassing.
Think people just like seeing what our ex players are doing - Just as the "Saturday matches" threads usually have mentions of any ex player scoring/getting a red etc.

And when an ex player scores against ba*trds - It'll always bring a smile to my face .... Especially when they're in the position theyre in.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:12 pm
by John Johnson 1605
KRBFC wrote:Same, doesn't mean I'm going to act like he's world class like some on here have done since he left. There was absolutely no defending Juke on here when he played for us now he doesn't he's all of a sudden a superstar. Every time Juke scores for Birmingham, a thread appears on here, quite embarrassing.
Where've you been ?

Many Burnley fans supported Juke right up to his transfer. I was at Accrington and the vast majority were routing for him.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:17 pm
by KRBFC
John Johnson 1605 wrote:Where've you been ?

Many Burnley fans supported Juke right up to his transfer. I was at Accrington and the vast majority were routing for him.
I think every Burnley fan wanted him to score every time he played but he never did...

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:32 pm
by Caernarfon_Claret
KRBFC wrote:I think every Burnley fan wanted him to score every time he played but he never did...
apart from in friendlies of course.

You need to qualify your statement so it is a true statement.

He never scored for Burnley is an untruth.

He didn't score for Burnley in a competitive game is the truth.

I know more than a hundred characters is a lot these days for most people but it's fairly easy to get this one right.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:42 pm
by Devils_Advocate
Can someone tell me why the likes Juke, Sordell, Wallace, Grant etc get so much well wishes as ex clarets when players like Eagles, Edgar and McDonald who gave it all for the club and was part of a glorious few years seem to get hammered by the site editor and his cronies?

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:47 pm
by IanMcL
:o Did not mean the like above. Press for Home and missed! :shock:

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:49 pm
by Holtyclaret
Really pleased for him, will always remember the gargantuan effort he put in for the first 10-12 games last time in the prem. he didn't score but the effort and intent were there. JJJJJJJUUUUUUUKKKEEEEEE

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:51 pm
by Holtyclaret
Still laughing at your mard arsed post devils!

:lol:

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:52 pm
by Devils_Advocate
IanMcL wrote::o Did not mean the like above. Press for Home and missed! :shock:
Thats ok fancy giving credit to any of Coyles boys despite them being the catalyst for everything that we are today

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:53 pm
by KefkaClaret
Don't know why people have so much fond memories of Juke, he was bloody useless.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:56 pm
by Holtyclaret
He gave his all for a start, was a thoroughly good bloke by all accounts and now a 'cult' figure due to his prowess in friendlies!

I watch out for all ex Clarets, including the three above that unfortunately didn't have the skill/motivation/will to succeed.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 7:58 pm
by Devils_Advocate
Holtyclaret wrote:Still laughing at your mard arsed post devils!

:lol:
Glad ive entertained you :) and in return i ask you to answer a simple question. In your opinion who has contributed more to Burnley, The Juke or Edgar?

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:00 pm
by KRBFC
Caernarfon_Claret wrote:apart from in friendlies of course.

You need to qualify your statement so it is a true statement.

He never scored for Burnley is an untruth.

He didn't score for Burnley in a competitive game is the truth.

I know more than a hundred characters is a lot these days for most people but it's fairly easy to get this one right.
Getting desperate if you're counting friendlies against pub teams

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:07 pm
by Caernarfon_Claret
KRBFC wrote:Getting desperate if you're counting friendlies against pub teams

Not at all. You're quite right he was a complete and utter failure.

Despite you being absolutely correct and having all the facts to back you you still mamaged to speak falsehood well done.

It was a bit like Juke himself actually

You had the ball in front of an empty net and you hit the post.

All you had to do was include the fact he'd never scored in a competitive match for Burnley and it would have been a triumph - a brilliantly argued and reasoned post - exposing one of Mr. Dyche's many transfer failures (and yes there have been quite a few)

Instead it makes it look as if you can't be bothered to properly argue and reason your case with the use of the many reliable facts there are out there.

Also I think those goals he scored in the pre-season friendlies might be the reason why some defended him for so long - they'd built him up a bit and then thought if things had fallen his way he might have gone on a hot streak (I don't buy that by the way.)
The only reason we bought him was because of Vokes' long term injury.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:19 pm
by Holtyclaret
I'd say neither ripped up any trees. Edgar had the odd very good game but some very poor ones and his games were few and far between.

I'd say the Juke but that would have been more conclusive if he wasn't injured as much.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:24 pm
by BennyD
Devils_Advocate wrote:Can someone tell me why the likes Juke, Sordell, Wallace, Grant etc get so much well wishes as ex clarets when players like Eagles, Edgar and McDonald who gave it all for the club and was part of a glorious few years seem to get hammered by the site editor and his cronies?
I presume it's because S, W, G are doing well in other teams whereas E, E, M aren't. It's a foible of Burnley supporters so don't worry about it.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:25 pm
by Devils_Advocate
Edgar cost us pretty much nothing and played nearly 100 games

Juke cost us 7 figures played around 30 games and contributed hardly anything but in the scheme of this message board its Edgar who gets all the criticism despite him being a real popular character in the dressing room (Steven Reid anyone!)

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:28 pm
by Shore claret
IanMcL wrote::o Did not mean the like above. Press for Home and missed! :shock:
Thank god for that , I was worried one of the better posters liked a post from that clown

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:34 pm
by Devils_Advocate
BennyD wrote:I presume it's because S, W, G are doing well in other teams whereas E, E, M aren't. It's a foible of Burnley supporters so don't worry about it.
Haha what rubbish. Edgar played nearly 100 games for us, Kev McD continued to have a good career at Sheff U and Wolves and Eagles played at a much higher level in the years after leaving Burnley than Sordell has done. Until this season Grant has done sweet FA

Your post really does prove the point that you just stupidly follow the editorial narrative of the owners of this site and lack any critical intelligence

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:40 pm
by minnieclaret
He also didn't play 32 games for us. He made 32 appearances, some of them for very few minutes. If he'd got the pens he deserved at Leeds and home to Brum things might have been different.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:45 pm
by Frenchclaret
As usual, a perfectly good topic ruined by KRBFC adding his bile and stupid people rising to the bait. IGNORE him !
It is either that or this forum descends to the level of so many others and the rest of us leave it alone.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:51 pm
by Devils_Advocate
Come on the original thread was just a throwaway comment that Juke scored against the bastards. The thread would have just died an early death had KRBFC not poked the fire. If you dont like it just ignore it but dont pretend KRBFC somehow ruined an interesting topic

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:52 pm
by Holtyclaret
Edgar only played that many games, which included a considerable amount of sub appearances because Howe fancied him, we had no one else and couldn't afford better. Most also in a much much poorer squad. Super Marv was a cheap gamble and McDonald, marv and Edgar dropped one or two leagues.

Again if juke wasn't injured so much and had a titchy bit of luck, be it with pens or a raggy goal it could have been very different.

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 8:53 pm
by Holtyclaret
Whose stupid French?

Re: Juke

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2017 9:00 pm
by Devils_Advocate
So Edgar only played because the manager picked him...shock horror when has that ever happened before!!

The point is Edgar offered much more to Burnley FC than Juke or Sordell ever did but because he was a Coyle signing and the editor of this site is like a jilted 14 year old school girl when it comes to Coyle and Howe the reality is twisted beyond belief and the sheep who make up most of the message board just dutifully follow