Page 1 of 1
Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:41 pm
by Buxtonclaret
Jay's just put Saints 2-0 up.
Been saying it a while, Champs could go down.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:42 pm
by IndigoLake
Great minds...
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:44 pm
by Buxtonclaret
Oops.
Didn't see your Jay thread, Indigo.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:45 pm
by MACCA
That would be funny.
All got their new bumper 100k a week contracts and all the team spirit has gone.
As long as we beat them next week that's all what matters
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:48 pm
by Sidney1st
MACCA wrote:That would be funny.
All got their new bumper 100k a week contracts and all the team spirit has gone.
As long as we beat them next week that's all what matters
I think their spirit went when they got their matching BMW's.
That's when they knew they'd made it.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:51 pm
by Buxtonclaret
MACCA wrote:That would be funny.
All got their new bumper 100k a week contracts and all the team spirit has gone.
As long as we beat them next week that's all what matters
Yep. They're all big games, but next one at home is a bit bigger than most.
A win for us could really see them in the deep stuff.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:52 pm
by Buxtonclaret
Sidney1st wrote:I think their spirit went when they got their matching BMW's.
That's when they knew they'd made it.
Cynical, Sid. Very cynical.
They are a bit naff at the back though.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:58 pm
by MACCA
Sidney1st wrote:I think their spirit went when they got their matching BMW's.
That's when they knew they'd made it.
What about the matching 25k watches (not sure on exact price ) and the all expense paid holiday?
We are safe already IMO, however if we beat them we can get the bunting out and it will also put them deep in the brown stuff.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:58 pm
by Sidney1st
Buxtonclaret wrote:Cynical, Sid. Very cynical.
They are a bit naff at the back though.
They haven't got Kante protecting them and the refs have started making an effort to crack down on the wrestling defenders like Huth and Morgan used to engage in.
Kante is their biggest loss though this season, he was a different class, almost like when Makelele left Real Madrid.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:58 pm
by Redbeard
Cynical Sid would be a brilliant username, actually.
Reminds me a bit of
Psychic Steve, a nickname given to an old mate who claimed serial paranormal experiences.
Anyway - Let's deal with Arsenal and Brizzle first, eh?
And
then smash Leicester 5-0.

Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 12:59 pm
by IndigoLake
Buxtonclaret wrote:Oops.
Didn't see your Jay thread, Indigo.
No worries. To be fair mine was titled after Jay rather than the match itself

Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:02 pm
by Buxtonclaret
Sidney1st wrote:They haven't got Kante protecting them and the refs have started making an effort to crack down on the wrestling defenders like Huth and Morgan used to engage in.
Kante is their biggest loss though this season, he was a different class, almost like when Makelele left Real Madrid.
Agree there, Sid. Kante is V good.
Huth has looked ponderous every time I've seen him, this season. Morgan looks past it too.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:07 pm
by claretblue
Redbeard wrote:Cynical Sid would be a brilliant username, actually.
Reminds me a bit of
Psychic Steve, a nickname given to an old mate who claimed serial paranormal experiences.
Anyway - Let's deal with Arsenal and Brizzle first, eh?
And
then smash Leicester 5-0.

3 games at a time Admiral!

Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:15 pm
by Redbeard
That's the spirit, CB.

Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:17 pm
by Buxtonclaret
Should have been 3 then.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:32 pm
by IndigoLake
We can beat Leicester. They're dire.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:33 pm
by MACCA
Buxtonclaret wrote:Should have been 3 then.
Was it not an OG? Looked it
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:34 pm
by Barry_Chuckle
Another great decision by the officials

Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:35 pm
by Buxtonclaret
Don't know about that disallowed one, Macca.
Looked ok to me. But yes, thought it was an og.
(Though my post was that bad miss earlier)
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:41 pm
by HiroshimaClaret
MACCA wrote:What about the matching 25k watches (not sure on exact price ) and the all expense paid holiday?
We are safe already IMO, however if we beat them we can get the bunting out and it will also put them deep in the brown stuff.
...
SAFE ALREADY!!!!!!???? Please don`t say that!!!!!! Love the optimism but...
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:42 pm
by IndigoLake
Penalty Southampton. Long showing his pace there.
Tadic to take.
3-0.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:43 pm
by Buxtonclaret
Pen.
Morgan at his clumsy best.
3-0
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:43 pm
by Sidney1st
Wow, you wouldn't think Leicester were defending champions.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:45 pm
by claretblue
'...What about the matching 25k watches...'
that's inflation for yer!
I remember when you could get one for £4K!

Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:49 pm
by MACCA
Should Morgan not have gone? Would have been handy for us.
Didn't look a genuine attempt to play the ball and was certainly a goal scoring chance.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:52 pm
by tjgh25
If Leicester play like this against us reckon we have a very good chance of winning. They were pretty woeful today.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 1:52 pm
by Buxtonclaret
Easy win for Saints.
Leicester had the bounce of Christmas balloons at the end of February.
Re: Saints V Foxes
Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2017 2:05 pm
by Sidney1st
Souness was spot on.
Just because they won the title, it didn't make them great players, they're average at best the majority of them.