• Snodgrass

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:53 am**

We've had a £10m bid ACCEPTED!

WOOOOOOOOOO

https://twitter.com/SkySportsNewsHQ/sta ... 7156228097" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:53 am**

Burnley have had a bid of around £10million accepted for Hull's Robert Snodgrass.

West Ham have had lower bids rejected, and we also understand there is a second offer on the table from Middlesbrough.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:54 am**

According to SkySports.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:54 am**

Hope this is true. He would be a great signing for us.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:55 am**

Great News if true! Can't be the only one who would slightly prefer Brady but if the board think Norwich want too much than I'm not bothered.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:57 am**

I've just merged the three threads

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:57 am**

Woop woop. Great times
Hull's given up

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:59 am**

Talksport also saying.

Tony cascarino saying" if he goes to burnley , you've got to ask, Hull, what are you doing!?"

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 10:59 am**

Hull Mail reporting it.

But also saying that 'Boro and West Ham remain keen.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:00 am**

Are West Ham still interested?

If so they know exactly how much is needed to buy him and if they want him they can offer him considerably more money.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:00 am**

If Hull have a choice of us or Boro as buyers they would probably prefer he came to us rather than a relegation rival.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:00 am**

If Boro and the Hammers match the bid, I don't think he'll be coming here.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:01 am**

Tall Paul wrote:If Boro and the Hammers match the bid, I don't think he'll be coming here.

West Ham yes, but Boro are far more likely to relegated than we are.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:02 am**

If this is true and we can pull it off and Snodgrass comes to us
then it will be the best bit of transfer news clarets fans have had
and will be a huge fillip for the team too.

Let's hope he's A OK and arrives raring to go.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:04 am**

Boyd going in other direction

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:04 am**

Tall Paul wrote:If Boro and the Hammers match the bid, I don't think he'll be coming here.

$10 m seems a snip when you look at what average championship players go for these days- come to Burnley Robert youll defo start every game and youll enjoy the club for what it is..............

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:05 am**

I hope this happens

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:06 am**

Spijed wrote:West Ham yes, but Boro are far more likely to relegated than we are.

They'll both be able to offer higher wages though.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:06 am**

If we can get this one done he should be a terrific signing. We really do seem to mean business.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:06 am**

Come on Dyche ...get the dinner on.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:06 am**

pushpinpussy wrote:Boyd going in other direction

Don't say that, my mate will be starting his car ready to take him

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:08 am**

This is massive if it comes off. A quality player with options may well have chosen us. Bring on the set pieces .

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:08 am**

You'd assume that we've already chatted with his representatives and worked out the wages.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:09 am**

You'd assume that we've already chatted with his representatives and worked out the wages.

thats illegal. called tapping up

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:12 am**

Hopefully West Ham don't fancy matching it or he'll probably end up there.

Good work though Burnley.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:13 am**

Definitely the quality we need but the age is a concern.

Have we shelved the Brady bid now?

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:13 am**

pushpinpussy wrote:You'd assume that we've already chatted with his representatives and worked out the wages.

thats illegal. called tapping up

Yeah I bet that never ever happens in this multi million pound head hunting game!

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:13 am**

It might well be Push, but we know what he wants and he'll know what we are offering.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:14 am**

Can we have him and Brady!?

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:15 am**

Fingers crossed. This guys a lot better option than Brady. However I remain sceptical until he's holding the Claret shirt in front of the James Hargreaves Stand.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:15 am**

I would've preferred Brady personally, and £10m for someone approaching 30. Football has gone mad.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:15 am**

Fair play to the board for showing ambition and a real financial commitment to staying in the Premier League.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:17 am**

Whats to say we're not still in for Brady too?

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:17 am**

ITV showing it as a done deal.
http://www.itv.com/news/calendar/2017-0 ... grass-bid/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:18 am**

claptrappers_union wrote:I would've preferred Brady personally, and £10m for someone approaching 30. Football has gone mad.

Unfortunately 10 million is bugger all these days for a Premier league player

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:18 am**

ITV not showing its done deal
Same story as Sky that offer accepted

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:18 am**

Very happy with this if it comes off just the sort of player we need

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:18 am**

Would still like Brady as well.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:18 am**

ashtonlongsider wrote:Fingers crossed. This guys a lot better option than Brady.

I'd take either or both but if only one I'd go for Brady

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:19 am**

Will only believe it when I see the empty dinner plate

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:21 am**

ClaretTony wrote:I'd take either or both but if only one I'd go for Brady

Both would be perfect.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:22 am**

While Brady probably the better option long term in the short and medium term getting in a player of Snodgrass's quality and at the same time weakening a rival is amazing business.

Please get it over the line Burnley!

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:22 am**

This has got my heart beating a little faster. Just what I need.

UTC

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:24 am**

Brilliant news if true. As it is Burns Night, presumably Sean has been working on his Chieftain of the Pudding Race to get tnis one over the line.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:24 am**

Possible that both parties are using each other as leverage? Burnley trying to force the hand of Norwich and Snodgrass trying to get one last pay day from West Ham?

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:24 am**

Suggestions are that we are a long, long way from getting him. We've had an offer accepted but nothing more as yet.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:24 am**

TVC15 wrote:ITV not showing its done deal
Same story as Sky that offer accepted

Yes you are right to correct me, I was just reflecting what ITV were saying. There is many a slip, but at least we are top of the queue. Its a done deal when there is something on the Club Website - which at present there isn't.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:25 am**

Finally Garlicks beginning to learn from previous windows.

I still think West Ham are ahead of us in the pecking order.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:26 am**

"West Ham are expected to make an improved offer." - Daily Mail

Selling price is out there now, I expect Hull will be waiting by the phone rather than rushing to get pen to paper.

Posted: **Wed Jan 25, 2017 11:26 am**

I wonder who leaked this news?

Could it be his agent to ensure the likes of West Ham know what's required?

Snodgrass

Snodgrass

Bid Accepted According to Sky

£10m bid accepted for Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass

Re: Snodgrass