Sign Jay now

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Steve1956
Posts: 17884
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3069 times
Location: Fife

Sign Jay now

Post by Steve1956 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:04 pm

Southampton spending £20 million on a new striker,get in for Jay now please.

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8257
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2929 times
Has Liked: 508 times
Location: Earth

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ClaretAndJew » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:06 pm

With what? He'd easily command £20 million.

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by TVC15 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:07 pm

who is he ?

SGr
Posts: 4424
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1029 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by SGr » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:12 pm

Jay on loan? Yes please!

CombatClaret
Posts: 4400
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:09 pm
Been Liked: 1843 times
Has Liked: 933 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by CombatClaret » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:17 pm

They still need squad depth. Long, JayRod and Redmond out of position their only options up top.

If we signed a striker I doubt we'd loan out Vokes.

South West Claret.
Posts: 5904
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:55 pm
Been Liked: 788 times
Has Liked: 511 times
Location: Devon

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by South West Claret. » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:19 pm

No need to sign him.

Steve1956
Posts: 17884
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3069 times
Location: Fife

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Steve1956 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 8:24 pm

TVC15 wrote:who is he ?
:D

Steve1956
Posts: 17884
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3069 times
Location: Fife

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Steve1956 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:17 pm

ClaretAndJew wrote:With what? He'd easily command £20 million.
Money isn't a problem,scoring goals which Jay would do for us is paramount in this league,if we wanna stay in this league why not splash the cash.

Spijed
Posts: 17932
Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 12:33 pm
Been Liked: 3028 times
Has Liked: 1324 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Spijed » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:20 pm

Steve1956 wrote:Money isn't a problem,scoring goals which Jay would do for us is paramount in this league,if we wanna stay in this league why not splash the cash.

We've already got someone who scores goals.
This user liked this post: RalphCoatesComb

RalphCoatesComb
Posts: 8256
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2016 2:38 pm
Been Liked: 2482 times
Has Liked: 2222 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by RalphCoatesComb » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:22 pm

I'm going to upset some on here... Not sure he would give us anything that we don't have.

His years away have not necessarily covered him in glory !

There, said it.

I like Jay Rod but, we don't need him... especially at inflated wages.
This user liked this post: evensteadiereddie

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by TVC15 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:22 pm

Steve1956 wrote::D
Seriously who is he ?

Is he related to Maxi Rodriguez ?
This user liked this post: Duffer_

Steve1956
Posts: 17884
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3069 times
Location: Fife

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Steve1956 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:25 pm

TVC15 wrote:Seriously who is he ?

Is he related to Maxi Rodriguez ?
I ain't got a clue mate.somebody reckons he'd cost us 20 million though.

Steve1956
Posts: 17884
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3069 times
Location: Fife

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Steve1956 » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:27 pm

RalphCoatesComb wrote:I'm going to upset some on here... Not sure he would give us anything that we don't have.

His years away have not necessarily covered him in glory !

There, said it.

I like Jay Rod but, we don't need him... especially at inflated wages.
He's been unlucky with injuries,would love to see him paired with Gray.

bf2k
Posts: 1437
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2016 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 337 times
Has Liked: 1519 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by bf2k » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:32 pm

I don't see the same player that I saw before he was injured 3 years ago. He didn't look great last night.

I'd much prefer to see Defoe who guarantees goals but as has already been said it's not goals we're short of. Wingers, Full backs, Midfield first. it's not as though we're struggling if we don't sign in this window though is it?

Sidney1st
Posts: 15478
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
Been Liked: 3548 times
Has Liked: 5594 times
Location: Oxfordshire

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Sidney1st » Thu Jan 26, 2017 9:59 pm

Who're Southampton signing then?

IanMcL
Posts: 34403
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6900 times
Has Liked: 10238 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by IanMcL » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:23 pm

Would be a classy addition and a welcome homecoming.

Dano1bfc
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2016 11:37 am
Been Liked: 79 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Dano1bfc » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:30 pm

When (not if) we're more established a distinct possibility maybe .Still too soon I reckon.

dsr
Posts: 16197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by dsr » Thu Jan 26, 2017 10:36 pm

Steve1956 wrote:He's been unlucky with injuries,would love to see him paired with Gray.
When someone is unlucky with injuries for three years without a break, I start to doubt whether he'll ever be fit.

I would have liked to see him in the League Cup semi last night, but I only watched the second half, and he'd already been subbed. Injured.

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ontario claret » Thu Jan 26, 2017 11:31 pm

20,000,000? A drop in the bucket. We're getting 200,000,000 from Sky this year, and have spent next to nothing of it.

MT03ALG
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:50 pm
Been Liked: 461 times
Has Liked: 4991 times
Location: COTTON TREE

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by MT03ALG » Thu Jan 26, 2017 11:40 pm

200,000,000 ? Source ?

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ontario claret » Thu Jan 26, 2017 11:44 pm

Well known fact. All prem teams getting 200,000,000 from Sky this year. It's called television rights. Do you think they get to telecast and sell advertising time for free?

Clarettintedlense
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:03 pm
Been Liked: 52 times
Has Liked: 58 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Clarettintedlense » Thu Jan 26, 2017 11:49 pm

How can a striker who averages 5 goals a season be worth 20m ffs. And that average is mainly thanks to one good season in 5!

Too expensive. Too injury prone. Not the player we expected him to be.

ClaretAndJew
Posts: 8257
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:08 am
Been Liked: 2929 times
Has Liked: 508 times
Location: Earth

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ClaretAndJew » Thu Jan 26, 2017 11:50 pm

Not to **** off our most ardent posters but if Rodriguez wasn't from Burnley town we'd not even be discussing this. We'd be calling him a crocked player with dodgy legs with a strike rate of 1 in 4.
This user liked this post: Clarettintedlense

Clarettintedlense
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:03 pm
Been Liked: 52 times
Has Liked: 58 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Clarettintedlense » Thu Jan 26, 2017 11:56 pm

Spot on c and j. We are in a much better place than when we sold him. He was good for us then. But he hasnt progressed and we need better than him.

Braindead
Posts: 1513
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:59 pm
Been Liked: 987 times
Has Liked: 1056 times
Location: Yavin 4

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Braindead » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:00 am

I would say that a fully fit and injury free Jay Rodriguez would he exactly what we and probably at least half of the current Premier league would need and want.
He is quality and to say we need better than him is laughable.

Clarettintedlense
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:03 pm
Been Liked: 52 times
Has Liked: 58 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Clarettintedlense » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:07 am

But hes never fully fit and injury free.

If we were to take a rarely fit ex burnley current southampton forward it should be austin. Neither are going to happen. But at least Austin would bag every other game if we got him.

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ontario claret » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:07 am

Better than JayRod and available at that price? OK, go ahead and start naming them.

MrHungry
Posts: 93
Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 9:37 pm
Been Liked: 32 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by MrHungry » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:12 am

Aye.... charlie austin out of the two for me!
This user liked this post: JohnMac

Clarettintedlense
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2017 11:03 pm
Been Liked: 52 times
Has Liked: 58 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Clarettintedlense » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:14 am

ontario claret wrote:Better than JayRod and available at that price? OK, go ahead and start naming them.
20m? Well we got Grey for a third of that and hes already matched his total in his first season at this level in half the games.

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ontario claret » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:24 am

But who is available? That's the point. And at that money. Don't think you'd get Austin at that price IF (and that's a big IF), he was available.

Paul Waine
Posts: 10172
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2411 times
Has Liked: 3315 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Paul Waine » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:24 am

ontario claret wrote:20,000,000? A drop in the bucket. We're getting 200,000,000 from Sky this year, and have spent next to nothing of it.
Hi Ontario,

I guess you mean 200,000,000 Canadian Dollars?

UTC

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ontario claret » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:26 am

We got Gray because he was playing at a lesser club who desperately needed the funds in order to build a new stadium. Even then 9,000,000 was more than other teams were willing to pay for him.

Paul Waine
Posts: 10172
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:28 pm
Been Liked: 2411 times
Has Liked: 3315 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Paul Waine » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:26 am

ontario claret wrote:But who is available? That's the point. And at that money. Don't think you'd get Austin at that price IF (and that's a big IF), he was available.
We should get 4 Charlie Austins, maybe 5 at £20 million. He's out injured, yet again. Shame, because he does know how to score a goal or two.

UTC

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ontario claret » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:27 am

Paul, all figures quoted are British pound sterling, which were worth more before the Brexit vote.

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by KRBFC » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:28 am

The obsession with Jay continues, he's crap and has been crap for years.

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ontario claret » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:29 am

But who knows for sure, Paul? You can speculate, and players DO recover from injury, and some actually play better after coming back from injury.

ontario claret
Posts: 5459
Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
Been Liked: 697 times
Has Liked: 1725 times
Location: Brooklin

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ontario claret » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:30 am

OK. I'll shut up now. The defining comment has just been made.

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11136
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 823 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:57 am

KRBFC wrote:The obsession with Jay continues, he's crap and has been crap for years.

If you aren't being paid to post on here then it's time that you were. You want to be having a word with someone.

The hours and effort that you've put into being a controversial bellend on here is quite remarkable.

Only ClaretTony and Dibraidio have put more work into this site than you have.
This user liked this post: fidelcastro

fidelcastro
Posts: 9266
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:45 pm
Been Liked: 2748 times
Has Liked: 2740 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by fidelcastro » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:14 am

KRBFC wrote:The obsession with Jay continues, he's crap and has been crap for years.
I've read some bolloxios from KRBFC on here but that's his best one yet! :lol:

KRBFC
Posts: 19078
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:18 am
Been Liked: 3973 times
Has Liked: 1078 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by KRBFC » Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:28 am

Bin Ont Turf wrote:If you aren't being paid to post on here then it's time that you were. You want to be having a word with someone.

The hours and effort that you've put into being a controversial bellend on here is quite remarkable.

Only ClaretTony and Dibraidio have put more work into this site than you have.
How many league goals has he scored since he left Burnley 5 years ago?
I don't see it as controversial to suggest a player who has averaged around 4 goals a season for the past 5 years is crap.

HendricksHair
Posts: 350
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:20 pm
Been Liked: 104 times
Has Liked: 67 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by HendricksHair » Fri Jan 27, 2017 3:18 am

KRBFC wrote:How many league goals has he scored since he left Burnley 5 years ago?
I don't see it as controversial to suggest a player who has averaged around 4 goals a season for the past 5 years is crap.
He's scored 25 goals in 94 league games for Southampton, 34 in 114 for all comps... Consider the fact he was also used as a left winger for many games aswell, not a bad return really

RVclaret
Posts: 16207
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:30 am
Been Liked: 4469 times
Has Liked: 3009 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by RVclaret » Fri Jan 27, 2017 3:27 am

And the fact he's been out for over a season and half with serious injuries. He probably would have been on the plane to Brazil with England before that ACL injury. Class player and would definitely improve our forward line.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 34427
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 12536 times
Has Liked: 6262 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Vegas Claret » Fri Jan 27, 2017 5:20 am

Let's ignore the fact he's been starting games ahead of Shane long and he's got a Wembley final looming.......... We've got zero chance

TVC15
Posts: 8211
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 3322 times
Has Liked: 601 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by TVC15 » Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:01 am

Everybody is sh-it according to KRBFC
Existing Burnley players
Ex Burnley players
Burnley manager
Burnley Board
Burnley fans

But yet he's still a Burnley fan !

Seriously has a screw loose

MACCA
Posts: 15627
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4376 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by MACCA » Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:08 am

I'd love to be as crap as jay.

Play for your home town team.... at Wembley

Play in europe

Possibly win a trophy at Wembley

Aayy I don't know, if we were all as crap as Jay eh, how crap life would be...

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 937 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by IndigoLake » Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:16 am

I don't think anybody is seriously suggesting Jay is crap or not a good player (I don't think KRBFC believes half of what he writes). Jay Rodriguez was excellent in the 2013-14 season and has unfortunately been plagued by injuries since. That doesn't make him crap, that makes him injury prone. I still think he's a good football player but would I sign him? Probably not. His injury record suggests it would be a waste of a wage and possibly hefty transfer fee.

Edit - Here are a few players who are/were rather unjury prone. Are they/were they all crap?

Jack Wilshere
Nemanja Vidic
Arjen Robben
Sergio Aguero
Robin Van Persie

I can go on and on :) Point is, just because someone is injury prone, doesn't make them a bad player.

Steve1956
Posts: 17884
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
Been Liked: 6634 times
Has Liked: 3069 times
Location: Fife

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Steve1956 » Fri Jan 27, 2017 8:57 am

Clarettintedlense wrote:But hes never fully fit and injury free.

If we were to take a rarely fit ex burnley current southampton forward it should be austin. Neither are going to happen. But at least Austin would bag every other game if we got him.
Excuse me! Isnt Austin injured? .... again! :)

dsr
Posts: 16197
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 4855 times
Has Liked: 2580 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by dsr » Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:15 am

We need to sign them both. Then get the medical team to synchronise their injuries so they're never both injured at the same time, and we're sorted - play the fit one.

ablueclaret
Posts: 3148
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:05 am
Been Liked: 403 times
Has Liked: 50 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by ablueclaret » Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:16 am

Jay had huge potential, and before the serious injuries continued to develop, thought he might become a prolific striker with his all round game but hasn't really managed that.
Austin always was a wonderful poacher of goals, just one thing on his mind, although being a very different player with a very different approach and skill set Gray has some similarities he does know where the net is and hits the ball with venom.
This user liked this post: Clarettintedlense

Tall Paul
Posts: 7392
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:07 am
Been Liked: 2636 times
Has Liked: 728 times

Re: Sign Jay now

Post by Tall Paul » Fri Jan 27, 2017 9:29 am

dsr wrote:We need to sign them both. Then get the medical team to synchronise their injuries so they're never both injured at the same time, and we're sorted - play the fit one.
Surely if they're synchronised they'll always be injured at the same time.

Post Reply