Here follows an exidence-based assessment which proves that Jeremy Corbyn is a fascist.

You might think that Fascism was defined in the 30s when it was at its peak but you'd be wrong. It was most definitively defined in 2003 when some guy wrote a definitive definition of definite definitiveness. The dude was Dr Lawrence Britt and he definitely defined THE FOURTEEN TENETS OF FASCISM which is the definitive definition used here in this evidence-based definitive proof that Jeremy Corbyn is a fascist.

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism.
Jeremy Corbyn has spent his political career decrying faceless supra-national organisations. Globalisation, international capitalism and the EU have all come under fire from Jeremy Corbyn in favour of a continuing nationalism.

2.Disdain for the recognition of Human Rights.
Jeremy is close friends with Hamas and has regularly attended and supported events organised by anti-semitic groups. Although he speaks very well about the need for human rights, he tends to look the other way when engaging with these particular friends who are not afforded the same "rights" as people such as David Cameron, who he refused to share a platform with.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause.
You've only got to hear him speak for 1 minute to spot this glaring sign of fascism. Who's fault is it Jeremy? Depending on what time of day it is "the Tories", "the Blairites" or "Isreal" (which is his code word for "the Jews").

4. Supremacy of the Military.
OK, so Jeremy doesn't actually like the British army. But he's very keen on some other armies. One of them is Irish Republican Army - also known as the IRA. Jeremy appointed a man who spoke on record applauding their murders as his right arm man.

5. Rampant Sexism.
Even members of Jeremy's own political party have called him out for his rampant sexism. Whereas the Conservative Party are on their second female Prime Minsiter, Labour have yet to even have a lady elected as leader.
Evidence-based evidence of the evidence of Jeremy Corbyn's RAMPANT SEXISM is definitively available here:
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/fe ... exism-left" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

6. Controlled Mass Media.
OK, so the wicked mainstream media think he's a beardy old boob who is as useless as leader as he was as a backbencher but they are just the MSM. Jeremy has set up his own Controlled Mass Media which spews out tweet after tweet after tweet. They're called "Momentum" and you can follow them on Twitter if you can stomach the giggles.

7. Obsession with National Security.
Jeremy Corbyn is obsessed with National Security. He wants us to get rid of it and he is obsessed with this aim. He's been going on CND marches since before his beard was but bum-fluff.

etc etc.

It's late but I can't be bothered to finish this... It's not like it's funny or accurate.

Suffice to say, the evidence is all there and I can now re-refer back to this to re-reference my evidence in strictly controlled evidence-based arguments.

So is our prime minister

Who isn't a facist these days? Or a Racist or Hitler?

Rowls - your post simply proves you are a complete d1cik-head who will twist reality into any which way to prove your point. It's late, and perhaps you're a little stoned or drunk, but really...

http://www.rense.com/general37/char.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Totally agree with Rowls. Corbyn is a fascist. I've said it all along. Its extremely late and I can't elaborate now but if this thread is still going tomorrow I will then.

If all that's true then that means you can vote for him now.

Post 4

Recognise tongue in cheek when you see it.

Quite humorous.

Some people live on a totally different planet inside their own heads. Baffling really...

I'm not sure about fascist, but I think Comrade Jezza is a grade A cockwomble.

When I was a kid the only people we were allowed to call fascists were the police. Now anyone can be a fascist. It's the death of political correctness.

The OP has used a list compiled by someone apparently called "Dr. Lawrence Britt" that defines 14 characteristics of fascism, yet i can't find anything on the so-called doctor online. No credentials, no education, nothing. Either he doesn't exist, or he's so inconsequential in the world of political science that there's no one in the world that has ever referenced anything else he's ever written, said, or telepathically projected from the alternate reality he inhabits. Oh, wait, it's just Lawrenec Britt. Not a PhD at all. I wonder if he's friends with Prof. Paul Nuttall.

This is why it's important to check the information you're going to use, especially if you're trying to make a snarky post. Unfortunately the OP is a walking case study in the Dunning-Kruger effect, and is incapable of even the most basic level of critical thinking and fact checking.

Jokes

Left around a circle = communism. Right around a circle = fascism.
You end up at the same place = totalitarianism.
All three = madness.

IT uses much bigger words than me but I think he's trying to say "Rowls, you are a dick"

WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSHHHHHHHHH

Rowls did finish with this

It's late but I can't be bothered to finish this... It's not like it's funny or accurate.

Some people eh.

Corky wrote:Rowls did finish with this

It's late but I can't be bothered to finish this... It's not like it's funny or accurate.

Some people eh.

You don't understand what Rowls is trying to do when he makes shitposts like this. He's lost the argument about Trump so now he's trying to make light of it by calling other people fascists in an attempted humourous manner. He's deflecting and denying. He does this so often after he's been embarrassed that it's best to just take his post seriously, because on some level he's trying to make a serious point. It's not a good point, but he's still trying to make it.

Minnie hits the nail on the head.
Communist or Fascist. One just wears a slightly sillier hat than the other.

Fail.

The origins of the excidence of fascist was actually written by Umberto Eco. Eco wrote “Ur-Fascism” in 1995, an essay on how to recognize fascism, a piece dismally topical in the face of Daisy May lour current PM. For every point about Corbyn read May, and substitute your own alternative definitions.
However, a favourite quote by Eco is: "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth."― Umberto Eco.

Good book that. As good as it's sequel 'Everyone I don't like is a Remoaner'.

Dismiss every single example, no matter how valid or how well argued, of someone calling someone else a fascist and you'll miss those times when it was actually relevent and important, and you'll wish you hadn't played the fool as well as you are doing right now.

There's nowt relevant or important on here, Charlie. We're all just screaming into the void.

Never agreed with much of Rowls' take on life but post 15 is worthy of repitition. Definitely a big fat WHHOOOOOSSHHH going on here.

Imploding Turtle is like the coolest guy in school who slips on a banana skin in front of all the girls and falls on his arse.

"Nothing to see here, and anyway I meant to do it"

Imploding Turtle wrote:The OP has used a list compiled by someone apparently called "Dr. Lawrence Britt" that defines 14 characteristics of fascism, yet i can't find anything on the so-called doctor online. No credentials, no education, nothing. Either he doesn't exist, or he's so inconsequential in the world of political science that there's no one in the world that has ever referenced anything else he's ever written, said, or telepathically projected from the alternate reality he inhabits. Oh, wait, it's just Lawrenec Britt. Not a PhD at all. I wonder if he's friends with Prof. Paul Nuttall.

This is why it's important to check the information you're going to use, especially if you're trying to make a snarky post. Unfortunately the OP is a walking case study in the Dunning-Kruger effect, and is incapable of even the most basic level of critical thinking and fact checking.

"LOLZ".

Particularly as it was me who taught you about the Dunning-Kruger effect.

Imploding Turtle wrote:You don't understand what Rowls is trying to do when he makes shitposts like this. He's lost the argument about Trump so now he's trying to make light of it by calling other people fascists in an attempted humourous manner. He's deflecting and denying. He does this so often after he's been embarrassed that it's best to just take his post seriously, because on some level he's trying to make a serious point. It's not a good point, but he's still trying to make it.

Yet more "LOLZ".

I haven't even engaged in an argument about Trump. We were talking about talking about Trump.

Who honestly gives a toss about politics? probably the most boring topic of conversation ever. They're all wet wipes IMO

Imploding Turtle wrote:Dismiss every single example, no matter how valid or how well argued, of someone calling someone else a fascist and you'll miss those times when it was actually relevent and important, and you'll wish you hadn't played the fool as well as you are doing right now.

Yes, well when Trump has conquered the UK and he's marching us off to the gas chambers I will apologize and be soooo sorry. Until that day....

The genuinely sad thing is that if the anti-Trump Brigade got it into their heads that screaming "Fascist!" simply isn't going to work then they'd be able to come up with a much more effective strategy of tackling the moron.

I say 'genuinely sad' but what I really mean is 'genuinely sad for America'. I'm not including all the British berks who choose to curtain twitch at US domestic politics.

Presumably those "British berks" include all the top Tories collectively wanking themselves into a frenzy on the idea that a trade deal with a president who is screaming "USA first, in everything" will solve any post-Brexit difficulties.

Lancasterclaret wrote:Presumably those "British berks" include all the top Tories collectively wanking themselves into a frenzy on the idea that a trade deal with a president who is screaming "USA first, in everything" will solve any post-Brexit difficulties.

Nope. They're actually involved in politics and that's their job. Doesn't really fall under the category of 'curtain twitching' does it?

edit - And of course, a trade deal for the UK is hardly "US domestic politics" is it? It's UK politics.

H Schumacher
Pinochet
Blair
Mussollini
Amin
Bush
Hitler
Trialist
Corbyn
Pot
Antonescu

The trialist is thought to be a traffic warden in Nelson.

From both world wars and moving forward the yanks have always pulled Britain's pants down through them over the table and screwed them up the arse.
They rebuilt Japan and Germany whilst Britain, who stood alone, repaid them for the privilege.

Ah, being concerned because a total loon is in charge of the worlds most powerful country is "curtain twitching".

I think you might be under qualified to be a barman in all honesty Rowls. You make IDS look like the lights are on.

minnieclaret wrote:From both world wars and moving forward the yanks have always pulled Britain's pants down through them over the table and screwed them up the arse.
They rebuilt Japan and Germany whilst Britain, who stood alone, repaid them for the privilege.

Or rather, never repaid them for the privilege.

And although I'm always first to support the destruction that Germany and Japan bought upon themselves from the US, we never got that as part of the deal. Naturally America played it for all they could. We'd have done the same and we should be appropriately grateful for the democracy and prosperity they helped us secure.

Lancasterclaret wrote:Ah, being concerned because a total loon is in charge of the worlds most powerful country is "curtain twitching".

It's like the "Serenity Prayer" Lancs. Google it.

Lancasterclaret wrote:I think you might be under qualified to be a barman in all honesty Rowls. You make IDS look like the lights are on.

Thanks.

Bordeauxclaret wrote:Good book that. As good as it's sequel 'Everyone I don't like is a Remoaner'.

Theres a new one coming out too pretty soon, "everyone who doesn't follow my political worldview is a white nationalist/supremacist"

Watch this space, its going to be the new go to slur of 2017 when they realize "fascist" isn't sticking.

I'm a bit worried, about this Doctor no.....
Witch doctor is it?
Dr who?

Am l a fascist too?

Is it going to be as good as "Don't take offense, its just banter"?

Lancasterclaret wrote:Is it going to be as good as "Don't take offense, its just banter"?

Is what going to be like your quote?

Rowls wrote:Here follows an exidence-based assessment which proves that Jeremy Corbyn is a fascist.

You might think that Fascism was defined in the 30s when it was at its peak but you'd be wrong. It was most definitively defined in 2003 when some guy wrote a definitive definition of definite definitiveness. The dude was Dr Lawrence Britt and he definitely defined THE FOURTEEN TENETS OF FASCISM which is the definitive definition used here in this evidence-based definitive proof that Jeremy Corbyn is a fascist.

1. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism.
Jeremy Corbyn has spent his political career decrying faceless supra-national organisations. Globalisation, international capitalism and the EU have all come under fire from Jeremy Corbyn in favour of a continuing nationalism.

2.Disdain for the recognition of Human Rights.
Jeremy is close friends with Hamas and has regularly attended and supported events organised by anti-semitic groups. Although he speaks very well about the need for human rights, he tends to look the other way when engaging with these particular friends who are not afforded the same "rights" as people such as David Cameron, who he refused to share a platform with.

3. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause.
You've only got to hear him speak for 1 minute to spot this glaring sign of fascism. Who's fault is it Jeremy? Depending on what time of day it is "the Tories", "the Blairites" or "Isreal" (which is his code word for "the Jews").

4. Supremacy of the Military.
OK, so Jeremy doesn't actually like the British army. But he's very keen on some other armies. One of them is Irish Republican Army - also known as the IRA. Jeremy appointed a man who spoke on record applauding their murders as his right arm man.

5. Rampant Sexism.
Even members of Jeremy's own political party have called him out for his rampant sexism. Whereas the Conservative Party are on their second female Prime Minsiter, Labour have yet to even have a lady elected as leader.
Evidence-based evidence of the evidence of Jeremy Corbyn's RAMPANT SEXISM is definitively available here:
http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/fe ... exism-left" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

6. Controlled Mass Media.
OK, so the wicked mainstream media think he's a beardy old boob who is as useless as leader as he was as a backbencher but they are just the MSM. Jeremy has set up his own Controlled Mass Media which spews out tweet after tweet after tweet. They're called "Momentum" and you can follow them on Twitter if you can stomach the giggles.

7. Obsession with National Security.
Jeremy Corbyn is obsessed with National Security. He wants us to get rid of it and he is obsessed with this aim. He's been going on CND marches since before his beard was but bum-fluff.

etc etc.

It's late but I can't be bothered to finish this... It's not like it's funny or accurate.

Suffice to say, the evidence is all there and I can now re-refer back to this to re-reference my evidence in strictly controlled evidence-based arguments.

I've read some bullshit in my time but this takes the biscuit! Suffice to say I wont be wasting any more of my time in reply as I've got some paint to watch dry.

Imploding Turtle wrote:Dismiss every single example, no matter how valid or how well argued, of someone calling someone else a fascist and you'll miss those times when it was actually relevent and important, and you'll wish you hadn't played the fool as well as you are doing right now.

It was nice and peaceful on here from 15-23th (except for Saxo who took your place). Maybe you two are one ?

and to think people wanted Saxo, not to post on here because of his inane drivel.

ClaretMoffitt wrote:Theres a new one coming out too pretty soon, "everyone who doesn't follow my political worldview is a white nationalist/supremacist"
Watch this space, its going to be the new go to slur of 2017 when they realize "fascist" isn't sticking.

I fear this may actually be prophetic. There's a lot of guff on twitter about "white men", "white women" etc. etc. Nobody polite would consider it anywhere near acceptable to post about other races in this manner but it is widespread.

Yeah, its very tough being white these days.

Solidarity brothers and sisters

Lancasterclaret wrote:Yeah, its very tough being white these days.
Solidarity brothers and sisters

Missing the point here Lancs which is, "Why treat different races differently?" You'll note there was no complaint about anything being "very tough".

And what was your earlier question about?

Potential book titles

Sorry Rowls, I agree that you should treat different races the same, but the general trend of white people who moan (based on my feed on twitter) is that they are not too fond of black, yellow and brown people not knowing their place.

Lancasterclaret wrote:Sorry Rowls, I agree that you should treat different races the same, but the general trend of white people who moan (based on my feed on twitter) is that they are not too fond of black, yellow and brown people not knowing their place.

Well thank goodness we're back to a strictly evidence-based approach to forming our beliefs. Thank goodness we've done away with sly insinuations, eh?

Its ok Rowls, just going to put it on the side of a bus......problem solved

Bin Ont Turf wrote:H Schumacher
Pinochet
Blair
Mussollini
Amin
Bush
Hitler
Trialist
Corbyn
Pot
Antonescu

The trialist is thought to be a traffic warden in Nelson.

#

I'm not sure about the formation here. I guess Blair would be playing left back rather than centre half where he'd be about as useful as he was as a PM. You also seem to have Corbyn playing on the right. He's sh1t on the left, but would be better there than on the right. He has absolutely no right foot. Personally I'd drop him to the bench. He isn't a team player.