Jeff Hendrick
-
- Posts: 20610
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4541 times
- Has Liked: 2047 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Shut up, you cretin.
-
- Posts: 15478
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 3548 times
- Has Liked: 5594 times
- Location: Oxfordshire
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Thanks for that well written out post.
-
- Posts: 4288
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 9:58 pm
- Been Liked: 908 times
- Has Liked: 107 times
- Location: Containment Area for Relocated Yankees, NC
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Put the sign up as well against Keane for giving Dier the space 

-
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
- Been Liked: 489 times
- Has Liked: 195 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
All of them were at fault for the corner, it went through all of them dreadful.
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Thought he was better that Barton today.
Re: Jeff Hendrick
I thought Barton had a shocker today.
Hendrick was poor for me today, he was poor in his first half dozen games, started to play consistently well and has gone backwards since returning from his ban.
Hendrick was poor for me today, he was poor in his first half dozen games, started to play consistently well and has gone backwards since returning from his ban.
-
- Posts: 2656
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 970 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Not a bad player, but no central midfielder for me. Made a mistake for their first by panicking, then gave the ball away to nearly gift them with the second.
Put him on the right & Defour in the centre (does not belong on the left wing).
We're using square pegs in round holes if you ask me.
Put him on the right & Defour in the centre (does not belong on the left wing).
We're using square pegs in round holes if you ask me.
These 3 users liked this post: DCWat boiledclaret MT03ALG
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Both him and Brady baffling signings. Relegation veterans.
Re: Jeff Hendrick
How many relegations has Hendrick on his CV, please?
-
- Posts: 2758
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:04 am
- Been Liked: 659 times
- Has Liked: 339 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Whose Hendrick been relegated with?Saxoman wrote:Both him and Brady baffling signings. Relegation veterans.
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Thought he started well but disappeared after about 15 minutes. He owes us a performance that's for sure. They all do after that atrocious second half!
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Fair point. Championship veteran..Winstonswhite wrote:Whose Hendrick been relegated with?
Re: Jeff Hendrick
YawnSaxoman wrote:Fair point. Championship veteran..
-
- Posts: 1367
- Joined: Sat Dec 10, 2016 11:18 pm
- Been Liked: 254 times
- Has Liked: 215 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Unfortunately, he's being used much more defensively with Joey in the middle and the 2 of them are hardly ever over the halfway line when we attack. When he was playing well, he was bombing forward supporting Vokes when we played one up or making runs in the channels with the 2 up (the wonder goal); we are relying on Arfield and Boyd to support the attack and unfortunately, they both lack severe quality at this level hence no win in a while. I hope Jeff gets instructions to play more box-box than he is doing now and getting involved further up the pitch; think today he, amongst others, was too much in away mode.
These 3 users liked this post: evensteadiereddie boiledclaret cblantfanclub
-
- Posts: 9825
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3231 times
- Has Liked: 10727 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Bang on, diamond - at last, someone who actually watches the player to gauge his overall contribution to the game. Hendrick grafted his wotsits off today but just as you expected him to get his head down, take someone on and go for it, he almost pulled up and then looked for a safe pass. He's clearly been instructed to do this against the likes of Spurs especially.
I would hope for a bit more venom v. Stoke.
I would hope for a bit more venom v. Stoke.
-
- Posts: 1302
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 10:08 am
- Been Liked: 614 times
- Has Liked: 680 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Played like he was full of venom today, it had knocked him out ,very very poor
-
- Posts: 9825
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 pm
- Been Liked: 3231 times
- Has Liked: 10727 times
- Location: Staffordshire
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Made to look poor against a pretty classy outfit. His partner, Barton, folded.
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Of course he's a central midfielder. Man of the match there according to Sky in our game at Liverpool a couple of weeks ago. The mistake for the first goal was unfortunate but it was nothing to do with him being a central midfielder or not. Ironically the very fact he was in that position is indicative of his importance to us as a physical presence who is decent in the air.Belgianclaret wrote:Not a bad player, but no central midfielder for me. Made a mistake for their first by panicking, then gave the ball away to nearly gift them with the second.
Put him on the right & Defour in the centre (does not belong on the left wing).
We're using square pegs in round holes if you ask me.
Im not averse to seeing him on the right and Defour in the centre, although Defour's 15 minutes yesterday was far worse than anything Hendrick produced.
Barton was the midfield weak link yesterday.
This user liked this post: cblantfanclub
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
The problem with all of our midfield is that all of them would be better in a 5.
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4200 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Who was responsible for picking up Dele Ali out of the defensive midfielders Spice?claretspice wrote:Of course he's a central midfielder. Man of the match there according to Sky in our game at Liverpool a couple of weeks ago. The mistake for the first goal was unfortunate but it was nothing to do with him being a central midfielder or not. Ironically the very fact he was in that position is indicative of his importance to us as a physical presence who is decent in the air.
Im not averse to seeing him on the right and Defour in the centre, although Defour's 15 minutes yesterday was far worse than anything Hendrick produced.
Barton was the midfield weak link yesterday.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Our system yesterday wasnt set up to deal with them. Should have had 5 in midfield to nullify a side with two world class attacking middielders.Quickenthetempo wrote:Who was responsible for picking up Dele Ali out of the defensive midfielders Spice?
With Brady, Defour and Arfield would still have had enough in fact more creativity.
These 2 users liked this post: ontario claret ontario claret
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
The strict answer is we were zonal as usual so noone per se. Depends where he was on pitch. But to try and answer:Quickenthetempo wrote:Who was responsible for picking up Dele Ali out of the defensive midfielders Spice?
First half, the full backs were responsible for that. Spurs set had the same set up as against Chelsea so same rules would apply.
Second half, either Barton or Hendrick or the centre halves depending where he was on the pitch. But Barton was the deeper midfielder, so he'd be in his zone more often.
Re: Jeff Hendrick
How to clear a ball from danger. It's been going on for 125 years. Why wasn't Hendrick trained to boot the ball over the other side of the pitch rather than back out towards the centre circle?
Not Hendrick's fault entirely, he should have the training of knowing what to do. OK the ball might have bobbled and he could have scored an own goal, but the chances are, if he'd booted it straight, it would have gone for a throw-in, over by the Bob Lord stand.
Not Hendrick's fault entirely, he should have the training of knowing what to do. OK the ball might have bobbled and he could have scored an own goal, but the chances are, if he'd booted it straight, it would have gone for a throw-in, over by the Bob Lord stand.
-
- Posts: 77740
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38038 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Jeff Hendrick
And then you suggest playing Hendrick wide which is very much a square peg in a round holeBelgianclaret wrote:Put him on the right & Defour in the centre (does not belong on the left wing).
We're using square pegs in round holes if you ask me.
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4200 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Sounds a bit Sunday league that Spice. We must have had a strict plan for picking up the best goal scoring midfielder in the league.claretspice wrote:The strict answer is we were zonal as usual so noone per se. Depends where he was on pitch. But to try and answer:
First half, the full backs were responsible for that. Spurs set had the same set up as against Chelsea so same rules would apply.
Second half, either Barton or Hendrick or the centre halves depending where he was on the pitch. But Barton was the deeper midfielder, so he'd be in his zone more often.
-
- Posts: 2656
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:41 am
- Been Liked: 970 times
- Has Liked: 176 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
If we're insistant on playing 4-4-2, then yesClaretTony wrote:And then you suggest playing Hendrick wide which is very much a square peg in a round hole
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Im not averse to Hendrick playing wide in a midfield 4 - he's done it for Ireland and it does make more sense than Defour playing there.
But it is a fair point that his best and main position is as a central midfielder, and he's been pretty good there this season.
But it is a fair point that his best and main position is as a central midfielder, and he's been pretty good there this season.
-
- Posts: 34894
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12710 times
- Has Liked: 6319 times
- Location: clue is in the title
-
- Posts: 3896
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 7:19 pm
- Been Liked: 1218 times
- Has Liked: 807 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
KEEP
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
SELL
(For a world record fee)
(For a world record fee)
-
- Posts: 3949
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:31 am
- Been Liked: 1049 times
- Has Liked: 724 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
BELL
-
- Posts: 1360
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 9:56 pm
- Been Liked: 225 times
- Has Liked: 248 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Great piece of skill tonight, more of the same please Jeff!
This user liked this post: SussexDon1inIreland
-
- Posts: 3433
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
- Been Liked: 768 times
- Has Liked: 68 times
Re: Jeff Hendrick
Simply logged on to say that Saxo is a complete bell end