Page 1 of 1

Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 4:43 pm
by UTCAndrew123
SELL

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 4:44 pm
by ElectroClaret
Shut up, you cretin.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 4:45 pm
by Sidney1st
Thanks for that well written out post.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 4:46 pm
by NRC
Put the sign up as well against Keane for giving Dier the space ;)

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 4:56 pm
by KefkaClaret
All of them were at fault for the corner, it went through all of them dreadful.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:23 pm
by Il Duce
Thought he was better that Barton today.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 5:36 pm
by 3putt
I thought Barton had a shocker today.

Hendrick was poor for me today, he was poor in his first half dozen games, started to play consistently well and has gone backwards since returning from his ban.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:12 pm
by Belgianclaret
Not a bad player, but no central midfielder for me. Made a mistake for their first by panicking, then gave the ball away to nearly gift them with the second.

Put him on the right & Defour in the centre (does not belong on the left wing).

We're using square pegs in round holes if you ask me.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:14 pm
by Saxoman
Both him and Brady baffling signings. Relegation veterans.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:17 pm
by DCWat
How many relegations has Hendrick on his CV, please?

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:17 pm
by Winstonswhite
Saxoman wrote:Both him and Brady baffling signings. Relegation veterans.
Whose Hendrick been relegated with?

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:20 pm
by jlup1980
Thought he started well but disappeared after about 15 minutes. He owes us a performance that's for sure. They all do after that atrocious second half!

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:22 pm
by Saxoman
Winstonswhite wrote:Whose Hendrick been relegated with?
Fair point. Championship veteran..

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 6:22 pm
by DCWat
Saxoman wrote:Fair point. Championship veteran..
Yawn

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 8:12 pm
by diamondpocket
Unfortunately, he's being used much more defensively with Joey in the middle and the 2 of them are hardly ever over the halfway line when we attack. When he was playing well, he was bombing forward supporting Vokes when we played one up or making runs in the channels with the 2 up (the wonder goal); we are relying on Arfield and Boyd to support the attack and unfortunately, they both lack severe quality at this level hence no win in a while. I hope Jeff gets instructions to play more box-box than he is doing now and getting involved further up the pitch; think today he, amongst others, was too much in away mode.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:17 pm
by evensteadiereddie
Bang on, diamond - at last, someone who actually watches the player to gauge his overall contribution to the game. Hendrick grafted his wotsits off today but just as you expected him to get his head down, take someone on and go for it, he almost pulled up and then looked for a safe pass. He's clearly been instructed to do this against the likes of Spurs especially.
I would hope for a bit more venom v. Stoke.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sat Apr 01, 2017 9:22 pm
by Pimlico_Claret
Played like he was full of venom today, it had knocked him out ,very very poor

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 9:15 am
by evensteadiereddie
Made to look poor against a pretty classy outfit. His partner, Barton, folded.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 9:55 am
by claretspice
Belgianclaret wrote:Not a bad player, but no central midfielder for me. Made a mistake for their first by panicking, then gave the ball away to nearly gift them with the second.

Put him on the right & Defour in the centre (does not belong on the left wing).

We're using square pegs in round holes if you ask me.
Of course he's a central midfielder. Man of the match there according to Sky in our game at Liverpool a couple of weeks ago. The mistake for the first goal was unfortunate but it was nothing to do with him being a central midfielder or not. Ironically the very fact he was in that position is indicative of his importance to us as a physical presence who is decent in the air.

Im not averse to seeing him on the right and Defour in the centre, although Defour's 15 minutes yesterday was far worse than anything Hendrick produced.

Barton was the midfield weak link yesterday.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:11 am
by cricketfieldclarets
The problem with all of our midfield is that all of them would be better in a 5.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:13 am
by Quickenthetempo
claretspice wrote:Of course he's a central midfielder. Man of the match there according to Sky in our game at Liverpool a couple of weeks ago. The mistake for the first goal was unfortunate but it was nothing to do with him being a central midfielder or not. Ironically the very fact he was in that position is indicative of his importance to us as a physical presence who is decent in the air.

Im not averse to seeing him on the right and Defour in the centre, although Defour's 15 minutes yesterday was far worse than anything Hendrick produced.

Barton was the midfield weak link yesterday.
Who was responsible for picking up Dele Ali out of the defensive midfielders Spice?

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:27 am
by cricketfieldclarets
Quickenthetempo wrote:Who was responsible for picking up Dele Ali out of the defensive midfielders Spice?
Our system yesterday wasnt set up to deal with them. Should have had 5 in midfield to nullify a side with two world class attacking middielders.

With Brady, Defour and Arfield would still have had enough in fact more creativity.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 10:42 am
by claretspice
Quickenthetempo wrote:Who was responsible for picking up Dele Ali out of the defensive midfielders Spice?
The strict answer is we were zonal as usual so noone per se. Depends where he was on pitch. But to try and answer:

First half, the full backs were responsible for that. Spurs set had the same set up as against Chelsea so same rules would apply.

Second half, either Barton or Hendrick or the centre halves depending where he was on the pitch. But Barton was the deeper midfielder, so he'd be in his zone more often.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 1:35 pm
by Pstotto
How to clear a ball from danger. It's been going on for 125 years. Why wasn't Hendrick trained to boot the ball over the other side of the pitch rather than back out towards the centre circle?

Not Hendrick's fault entirely, he should have the training of knowing what to do. OK the ball might have bobbled and he could have scored an own goal, but the chances are, if he'd booted it straight, it would have gone for a throw-in, over by the Bob Lord stand.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 3:30 pm
by ClaretTony
Belgianclaret wrote:Put him on the right & Defour in the centre (does not belong on the left wing).

We're using square pegs in round holes if you ask me.
And then you suggest playing Hendrick wide which is very much a square peg in a round hole

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 3:35 pm
by Quickenthetempo
claretspice wrote:The strict answer is we were zonal as usual so noone per se. Depends where he was on pitch. But to try and answer:

First half, the full backs were responsible for that. Spurs set had the same set up as against Chelsea so same rules would apply.

Second half, either Barton or Hendrick or the centre halves depending where he was on the pitch. But Barton was the deeper midfielder, so he'd be in his zone more often.
Sounds a bit Sunday league that Spice. We must have had a strict plan for picking up the best goal scoring midfielder in the league.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:22 pm
by Belgianclaret
ClaretTony wrote:And then you suggest playing Hendrick wide which is very much a square peg in a round hole
If we're insistant on playing 4-4-2, then yes

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Sun Apr 02, 2017 7:51 pm
by claretspice
Im not averse to Hendrick playing wide in a midfield 4 - he's done it for Ireland and it does make more sense than Defour playing there.

But it is a fair point that his best and main position is as a central midfielder, and he's been pretty good there this season.

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:14 pm
by Vegas Claret
UTCAndrew123 wrote:SELL
Image

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:16 pm
by ClaretMoffitt
KEEP

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:16 pm
by IndigoLake
SELL

(For a world record fee)

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:17 pm
by Claretmatt4
BELL

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:22 pm
by Giftonsnoidea
Great piece of skill tonight, more of the same please Jeff!

Re: Jeff Hendrick

Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:45 pm
by Hedontplayforyou
Simply logged on to say that Saxo is a complete bell end