Page 1 of 2
Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:50 pm
by Steve1956
Got dogs abuse at half time from the CFS ...responded by rubbing his fingers and thumb together indicating he was loaded...WTF was all that about?
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:51 pm
by bfccrazy
"You'll always be a bast*rd"
He responded with.
'Yeah, a rich bast*rd'
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:52 pm
by cricketfieldclarets
Haha it was you will always be a ******* was ringing out so he replied with yes a rich *******. Thought it was comical myself and showed we got to him. And joe allen the scheming two hat.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:52 pm
by cricketfieldclarets
Haha it was you will always be a ******* was ringing out so he replied with yes a rich *******. Thought it was comical myself and showed we got to him. And joe allen the scheming two hat.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:52 pm
by BennyD
I don't like him, never have and never likely to either. He struck me as being a bit sniffy in his post match interview. File under 'Prick'.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:53 pm
by Turfsnore1
All about the money for mark, lost his passion and it reflects in his team now.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:56 pm
by Pstotto
The arrogance of his pre-match BBC interview, where he said along the lines of 'We're going to win because we have to have 9th position' and when he's out shopping 'Of course I don't want to be paying much for it.........'
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:56 pm
by Steve1956
As Spurs where the best team to visit the Turf this season Stoke where the worst by a long way...awful team
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 10:58 pm
by taio
Steve1956 wrote:Stoke where the worst by a long way...awful team
Definitely not
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:00 pm
by dougcollins
You must have missed the Sun'land game.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:02 pm
by JohnDearyMe
Who is the most dour man out of Hughes and Moyes?
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:03 pm
by duncandisorderly
Nowhere near the worst team. Not by a million miles.
But Mark Hughes is a proper charlatan. His middle-aged housewife look seems to grant him media reprieve from the nasty, snide, sniping, tugging, pulling, elbowing, pushing, barely-within-the-rules football that he promotes.
He's a relic and not a good one. He's not the turin shroud, he's Hitler's left testicle.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:04 pm
by Steve1956
dougcollins wrote:You must have missed the Sun'land game.
No,I was there. Stoke are worse than Sunderland,there tactics when that lanky streak of Pizz came on where absymal.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:04 pm
by Steve1956
Hoof Hoof Hoof Hoof
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:04 pm
by Quickenthetempo
Steve1956 wrote:As Spurs where the best team to visit the Turf this season Stoke where the worst by a long way...awful team
Stoke could of beat us by 5 today, carved us up easier than any team this season. Luckily our confidence come back after the goal.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:09 pm
by KRBFC
Steve1956 wrote:Hoof Hoof Hoof Hoof
The irony..... We're the biggest hoofers in the league.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:09 pm
by Steve1956
Quickenthetempo wrote:Stoke could of beat us by 5 today, carved us up easier than any team this season. Luckily our confidence come back after the goal.
Ok mate I beg to differ.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:10 pm
by Steve1956
KRBFC wrote:The irony..... We're the biggest hoofers in the league.
No ....Stoke are.

Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:14 pm
by taio
Absolutely no chance Stoke were worse than Sunderland - not even close
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:15 pm
by Quickenthetempo
Steve1956 wrote:Ok mate I beg to differ.
Watch the highlights and give your honest opinion.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:17 pm
by duncandisorderly
taio wrote:Absolutely no chance Stoke were worse than Sunderland - not even close
Or Leicester, for that matter. Or even Boro, at a push.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:18 pm
by charlyt
Semi decent player.
Lousy manager...!
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:18 pm
by Imploding Turtle
Steve1956 wrote:Got dogs abuse at half time from the CFS ...responded by rubbing his fingers and thumb together indicating he was loaded...WTF was all that about?
Sounds fair enough. It's funny when people give terrible abuse to people but get outraged when they get some back so I assume you're not one of them.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:21 pm
by Lord Beamish
They had six minutes of injury time and had Peter Crouch on the pitch and failed to get a single decent ball near our six yard box.
They were pretty poor today. Not as bad as Sunderland, or Leicester, but they were pretty dire. We scored from the best chance created. Y either team.
Onwards and upwards.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:22 pm
by Goodclaret
I thought it was extremely ironic that Hughes (and most of the Stoke players tbh) and their fans seemed disgusted with our timewasting tactics. Seemed fine down at Stoke earlier this season when even their ball boys were cheating.
Nasty club. Hughes a very good fit with them. Hell, even Wee Joe Allen has turned in to a little cheating piece of crap. How many times did he get fatally injured tonight?
In true Inbetweeners stylee; Stoke can F**k off!
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:26 pm
by Leisure
Quickenthetempo wrote:Stoke could of beat us by 5 today, carved us up easier than any team this season. Luckily our confidence come back after the goal.
I hope that you're being sarcastic there!
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:29 pm
by Vegas Claret
Stoke could have comfortably been 2 or 3 up at half-time, fortunately for us Donowtavich did nowt
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:29 pm
by quoonbeatz
old woman
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:33 pm
by MT03ALG
could HAVE
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:33 pm
by martintheaker
Quickenthetempo wrote:Stoke could of beat us by 5 today, carved us up easier than any team this season. Luckily our confidence come back after the goal.
I'll of a pint have what you of been drinking if you think Sjoke could of scored 5.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:35 pm
by cricketfieldclarets
Arnautovic could have had three himself to be fair.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:37 pm
by tim_noone
Steve1956 wrote:Got dogs abuse at half time from the CFS ...responded by rubbing his fingers and thumb together indicating he was loaded...WTF was all that about?
He was just letting you know.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:42 pm
by tim_noone
KRBFC wrote:The irony..... We're the biggest hoofers in the league.
No stoke city were tonight.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Tue Apr 04, 2017 11:51 pm
by john'sroseyspecs
"plethora of ****." Was the summing up of Hughes and stoke according to their forum. I like the thought that's gone into that
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 10:45 am
by Steve1956
Stoke must hold the record for hoofing the ball on the Bob Lord stand roof,one even went out of the ground completely ..I stand by opinion ...worst team to visit us this season by miles.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 10:50 am
by NottsClaret
Watford were the worst team we've played at the Turf, all round. Sunderland just had a comical defence.
Stoke were exactly as you'd expect, physical, niggly with a few class players. Hughes seems an entirely joyless person these days.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 10:57 am
by Walton
Not much love for Hughes from the Stoke fans. And he's a tosser who looks like an old woman.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 10:59 am
by cricketfieldclarets
Dyche would be outstanding for Stoke. Lets hope they dont replace hughes in summer. Obviously only interested in money now.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:11 am
by Quicknick
I don't think Dyche would be a popular appointment at Stoke. It would be perceived as a step back to the Pulis era. Mind you, I'd rather have Pulis at Burnley than Hughes, and WBA are above Stoke in the table.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:16 am
by willsclarets
Unless a manager has the decency to praise almighty Burnley and say how deserving we were of the points, they get a load of abuse and filed as "prick". It's absolutely nailed on. And funny. On the rare occasion a manager has conceded we were the better side, it's "I've always like him, top bloke". Ha!
What does that even mean to say Stoke are "a nasty club"..?
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:30 am
by John Johnson 1605
Stoke are exactly the sort of club we should be trying to emulate. Well run both on and off the pitch, British managers, English owned, a cup final and top ten finishes in recent seasons. Like us they have an unfashionable tag but have consolidated into a club that are regarded as PL mainstays and also been able to sign some very good players.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:35 am
by WestMidsClaret
Is an old woman lookalike prick!
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:48 am
by jlup1980
There are a large number of managers who just can't praise an opponent and Hughes is one of them. Out of the current PL managers i like Conte, Pochettino, Koeman and amazingly Pulis. Klopp is ok. These are the only ones who come out and give an honest assessment most of the time.
Listening to Koeman and Mourinho last night was chalk and cheese. One was respectful of the other club even though he was clearly disappointed at losing a lead in the last minute. The other should have been the happier of the two yet he came across as an arrogant prick again. It's getting boring listening to Jose at the moment. His comments are so wide of the mark it's laughable.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 11:55 am
by bob-the-scutter
NottsClaret wrote:Watford were the worst team we've played at the Turf, all round. Sunderland just had a comical defence.
Stoke were exactly as you'd expect, physical, niggly with a few class players. Hughes seems an entirely joyless person these days.
Yes, by a country mile Watford with their undefeasibly silly shorts were the worst team we`ve had at home this season.

Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 12:05 pm
by TheFamilyCat
First thing he did at the final whistle was to walk in the pitch and speak to Barnes. Interesting to know the details of that conversation.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:38 pm
by minnieclaret
TheFamilyCat wrote:First thing he did at the final whistle was to walk in the pitch and speak to Barnes. Interesting to know the details of that conversation.
"What will you want to come on board? I need a man instead of these pussies."
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:39 pm
by minnieclaret
As posted above. If Arnautovich had worn his boots on the correct feet we were toast by HT.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:42 pm
by IanMcL
I would suspect that he appreciated what Barnes did in such a short time.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:46 pm
by NottsClaret
minnieclaret wrote:As posted above. If Arnautovich had worn his boots on the correct feet we were toast by HT.
I wouldn't worry about that line of argument too much, it's basically saying if their players were better than they actually are they'd have beaten us.
Doesn't really mean a lot does it.
Re: Hughes
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 1:51 pm
by Sarum
TheFamilyCat wrote:First thing he did at the final whistle was to walk in the pitch and speak to Barnes. Interesting to know the details of that conversation.
"Well played Ashley, you've obviously been studying videos of how I made my fortune". Possibly.