Sam Clucas

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Sam Clucas

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:19 pm

Bid rejected today

scouseclaret
Posts: 2699
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by scouseclaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:22 pm

£500k and a giant twix?
These 5 users liked this post: mkmel Sidney1st IndigoLake otto1959 Goddy

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:24 pm

Most likely. Apparently rejected straight away

mkmel
Posts: 6239
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:37 pm
Been Liked: 1382 times
Has Liked: 2692 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by mkmel » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:27 pm

scouseclaret wrote:£500k and a giant twix?
Logged in just to Like and comment on this

:lol: :lol:

Il Duce
Posts: 250
Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2016 11:09 pm
Been Liked: 71 times
Has Liked: 7 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Il Duce » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:28 pm

Decent player, played CM more often last season. Lack of pace but good technique.

Lancasterclaret
Posts: 23343
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
Been Liked: 8058 times
Has Liked: 4714 times
Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Lancasterclaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:29 pm

Hope we go back in for him

Duffer_
Posts: 2377
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:45 am
Been Liked: 813 times
Has Liked: 1404 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Duffer_ » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:30 pm

I will personally pay half the fee just to unstick claretspice from his obsession (no offence intended).

UTC!

claretspice
Posts: 6442
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
Been Liked: 3179 times
Has Liked: 151 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by claretspice » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:30 pm

Not sure he's what we need, unless another player (Defour) is also leaving. Its pace and dash we need.

But he's a good player.

Newcastleclaret93
Posts: 13297
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:29 pm
Been Liked: 1990 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Newcastleclaret93 » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:36 pm

I can see the reasoning. A good technical work horse untility player.
Can play LM, RM, CM

Murger
Posts: 5361
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 12:55 pm
Been Liked: 1482 times
Has Liked: 959 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Murger » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:38 pm

Although he's a decent player, I'm not sure another midfielder is what we need.

KefkaClaret
Posts: 1545
Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2016 8:47 pm
Been Liked: 489 times
Has Liked: 195 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by KefkaClaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:39 pm

I think we are fine in the centre if Defour stays. Good player though.

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 825 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:41 pm

Murger wrote:Although he's a decent player, I'm not sure another midfielder is what we need.
Remember when we used to have just Marney and Jones as centre midfielders?

Happy days.
These 4 users liked this post: IndigoLake Steve-Harpers-perm Clevedon Claret Foshiznik

colne-claret
Posts: 1482
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:54 pm
Been Liked: 415 times
Has Liked: 56 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by colne-claret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:42 pm

claretspice wrote:Not sure he's what we need, unless another player (Defour) is also leaving. Its pace and dash we need.

But he's a good player.
He's an upgrade on Arfield for me. Can play out wide and central. If we play a midfield 5 on a regular basis this season then Clucas would slot in nicely.

Central - Hendrick, Cork, Westwood, Defour, Marney, Clucas
Wingers - Arfield Brady JBG New.

That would see our midfield complete for me.

Reecey1987
Posts: 2065
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Reecey1987 » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:45 pm

Boden seems to think he wants to play cm so he cant see it happening as were already well stocked

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 295 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by SkiptonClaret » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:45 pm

Surely Tom Lawrence has to be worth a look at re a wide berth or Lookman on loan if available. Clucas would offer decent utility but not entirely sure he's what is required.

agreenwood
Posts: 4621
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:22 pm
Been Liked: 2566 times
Has Liked: 359 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by agreenwood » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:46 pm

If we signed Clucas you'd think it'd be the end of Arfield's Burnley career.

Saxoman
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 7:26 pm
Been Liked: 577 times
Has Liked: 147 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Saxoman » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:47 pm

SkiptonClaret wrote:Surely Tom Lawrence has to be worth a look .
You got a perfect look when he skied that sitter ..
These 3 users liked this post: ClaretTony Sidney1st Juan Tanamera

ClaretTony
Posts: 77768
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
Been Liked: 38055 times
Has Liked: 5775 times
Location: Burnley
Contact:

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by ClaretTony » Wed Aug 09, 2017 9:52 pm

I've just liked a Saxoman post - I enjoyed him missing that sitter
These 3 users liked this post: IndigoLake Clevedon Claret Juan Tanamera

Bin Ont Turf
Posts: 11146
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
Been Liked: 5231 times
Has Liked: 825 times
Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Bin Ont Turf » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:05 am

agreenwood wrote:If we signed Clucas you'd think it'd be the end of Arfield's Burnley career.
You'd think that it'd be close.



We love you Scotty 8-)

kentonclaret
Posts: 8026
Joined: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:06 pm
Been Liked: 1204 times
Has Liked: 249 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by kentonclaret » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:09 am

How classy a midfield do we need to lump the ball up to Walters and Vokes?

Reecey1987
Posts: 2065
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:21 pm
Been Liked: 217 times
Has Liked: 97 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Reecey1987 » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:09 am

Saxoman wrote:You got a perfect look when he skied that sitter ..
Did you not see all them belters he scored last season ?

ClaretEngineer
Posts: 1719
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:39 am
Been Liked: 690 times
Has Liked: 406 times
Location: Chalfont St. Giles

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by ClaretEngineer » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:17 am

Saxoman wrote:You got a perfect look when he skied that sitter ..
Wow. Such a fond memory.

He should have been sent off for missing that :lol:
This user liked this post: Ilkley claret

Chester Perry
Posts: 20226
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:06 am
Been Liked: 3307 times
Has Liked: 481 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Chester Perry » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:47 am

SkiptonClaret wrote:Surely Tom Lawrence has to be worth a look at re a wide berth or Lookman on loan if available. Clucas would offer decent utility but not entirely sure he's what is required.

wasn't a bid of about £18m for Lawwrence turned down at the start of the window - think it was Leicester

Goobs
Posts: 4614
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
Been Liked: 1553 times
Has Liked: 1065 times
Location: Burnley

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Goobs » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:49 am

Chester Perry wrote:wasn't a bid of about £18m for Lawwrence turned down at the start of the window - think it was Leicester
Doubt they would be trying to buy their own player :lol:
These 2 users liked this post: Quickenthetempo Chester Perry

mkmel
Posts: 6239
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:37 pm
Been Liked: 1382 times
Has Liked: 2692 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by mkmel » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:51 am

Chester Perry wrote:wasn't a bid of about £18m for Lawwrence turned down at the start of the window - think it was Leicester
I think it was £8M

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19787
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4201 times
Has Liked: 2246 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Quickenthetempo » Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:57 am

£8m from Derby

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 949 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by IndigoLake » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:19 pm

Burnley have £5m bid for Sam Clucas rejected by Hull as Sean Dyche looks to spend £18.5m Andre Gray cash

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -Hull.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Hedontplayforyou
Posts: 3435
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:01 am
Been Liked: 768 times
Has Liked: 68 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Hedontplayforyou » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:38 pm

Clucas to replace Marney? Yes please.

claretdj
Posts: 1197
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:35 am
Been Liked: 305 times
Has Liked: 182 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by claretdj » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:41 pm

Just said on sky that Hull value him @ £10m. Apparently we have offered £5m, not surprising really. Why oh why do we always make stupid offers that we know will be rejected? Utc

jedi_master
Posts: 8276
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
Been Liked: 4139 times
Has Liked: 1144 times
Location: Chesterfield

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by jedi_master » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:42 pm

IndigoLake wrote:Burnley have £5m bid for Sam Clucas rejected by Hull as Sean Dyche looks to spend £18.5m Andre Gray cash

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/footba ... -Hull.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
5 million....really?

I am not sure we need Clucas but I don't feel that is a realistic offer for him if we want him. You would need to at least double that.
This user liked this post: boatshed bill

Quickenthetempo
Posts: 19787
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
Been Liked: 4201 times
Has Liked: 2246 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Quickenthetempo » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:45 pm

Sam Clucas impressed me everytime I seen him play last year. If he signed it would be a big boost in all our midfielders would be comfortable on the ball at this level which has been a massive weakness in our previous two premier league seasons. It allowed teams to just sit back and play it around til it went to our weak link.

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 949 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by IndigoLake » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:46 pm

jedi_master wrote:5 million....really?

I am not sure we need Clucas but I don't feel that is a realistic offer for him if we want him. You would need to at least double that.
Yes, I'd have been surprised if we'd signed him for 5mil. Mind you, not sure I agree with the person who commented on the article saying that he's worth at least 20mil in today's market :lol: Probably 10mil is about right.

UpTheBeehole
Posts: 5069
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 3:14 pm
Been Liked: 1157 times
Has Liked: 496 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by UpTheBeehole » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:52 pm

He's a good player, and would arguably be our second best wide player too if Dyche chooses to play him there.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by FactualFrank » Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:58 pm

Certainly a Dyche type player. Not sure on his end product though, but he'll work his balls off, track back and help defend.

HelloHiGoodbye
Posts: 720
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 7:15 pm
Been Liked: 353 times
Has Liked: 308 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by HelloHiGoodbye » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:01 pm

This would be a brilliant signing. Immensely strengthens us out wide while also bolsters an already impressive central midfield area. 12-15 million and he's ours, I reckon.

Steve-Harpers-perm
Posts: 6539
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:52 am
Been Liked: 2122 times
Has Liked: 991 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Steve-Harpers-perm » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:01 pm

Is he in the last year of his contract?

Long Time Lurker
Posts: 1313
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2017 8:12 pm
Been Liked: 603 times
Has Liked: 420 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Long Time Lurker » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:04 pm

As a CM?

Yes please, would love to have him here, cash plus a triple choc or peanut butter Twix (they are available)

Although I'm not sure how we would fit him into a 25 man squad when Marney returns in January.

As a winger?

Not really.

scouseclaret
Posts: 2699
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by scouseclaret » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:06 pm

Not a million miles away was I???

Ooogeorgeorgeoghani
Posts: 934
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 7:47 pm
Been Liked: 212 times
Has Liked: 72 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Ooogeorgeorgeoghani » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:08 pm

I can see this happening, good addition if it does

bfcmik
Posts: 4292
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 2:03 pm
Been Liked: 1029 times
Has Liked: 1216 times
Location: Solihull Geriatric Centre

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by bfcmik » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:08 pm

claretdj wrote:Just said on sky that Hull value him @ £10m. Apparently we have offered £5m, not surprising really. Why oh why do we always make stupid offers that we know will be rejected? Utc
A couple of days ago it was reported that Watford had offered just £8M for Gray. As Gray's eventual value would appear to be £18.5M surely Watford just made an absolutely stupid offer there. At least everything ended up OK.

Rileybobs
Posts: 18768
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:37 pm
Been Liked: 7701 times
Has Liked: 1593 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Rileybobs » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:22 pm

bfcmik wrote:A couple of days ago it was reported that Watford had offered just £8M for Gray. As Gray's eventual value would appear to be £18.5M surely Watford just made an absolutely stupid offer there. At least everything ended up OK.
You're wasting your time bfcmik, some people clearly can't grasp the simple concept of negotiation.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish

Spike
Posts: 3296
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 1:07 pm
Been Liked: 699 times
Has Liked: 1639 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Spike » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:24 pm

scouseclaret wrote:£500k and a giant twix?
Why be so flippant? we all know we offer Giant Toblerones now we are a Premier League outfit!

timshorts
Posts: 2835
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2017 8:52 pm
Been Liked: 470 times
Has Liked: 356 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by timshorts » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:36 pm

He's also played LB for about half a season when Dan Jones got injured and CF after Eoin Doyle got sold for a bit. I wouldn't say CF was his best (although he was better there than the double-barrelled overweight lump that Chesterfield had there the next season), but he worked well playing off Nando. If you substitute Vokes for Nando in front of a four in a 4-4-1-1 then he'll be fine. Probably more than fine bearing in mind that Nando was every bit a Div 2 player (playing in Div 1) and Vokes is class.

summitclaret
Posts: 4566
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:39 pm
Been Liked: 1021 times
Has Liked: 1612 times
Location: burnley

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by summitclaret » Thu Aug 10, 2017 1:41 pm

If we get him I think Defour will be on his way. Otherwse we would have gone from the utter ridiculousness of just Marney and Jones to SIX specialists in the middle.

Slurpy
Posts: 406
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:37 pm
Been Liked: 79 times
Has Liked: 9 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Slurpy » Thu Aug 10, 2017 2:18 pm

People think we have too many CMs but if we play 4-5-1 we are 1 injury/suspension from playing Arfield in there or reverting back to 442. Clucas is a great Boyd Replacement.

SGr
Posts: 4424
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:46 pm
Been Liked: 1029 times
Has Liked: 307 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by SGr » Thu Aug 10, 2017 2:59 pm

summitclaret wrote:If we get him I think Defour will be on his way. Otherwse we would have gone from the utter ridiculousness of just Marney and Jones to SIX specialists in the middle.
Clucas and Defour are very different players. Although the way this window's looking it wouldn't surprise if we got rid of our creativity as well as our pace
Last edited by SGr on Thu Aug 10, 2017 3:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

scouseclaret
Posts: 2699
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2016 7:29 pm
Been Liked: 901 times
Has Liked: 273 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by scouseclaret » Thu Aug 10, 2017 3:17 pm

Isn't Clucas a winger?

BurnleyPaul
Posts: 520
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:00 am
Been Liked: 170 times
Has Liked: 45 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by BurnleyPaul » Thu Aug 10, 2017 3:19 pm

We have, as first choice CM- Cork, Westwood, Hendrick, and Defour. As "fallbacks" we have Arfield, Ulvestad and, when fit again, possibly Marney.

If we do move towards 4-5-1 as a formation then I'd say we're still light by 1 player. Especially as Ulvestad doesn't seem to be good enough and Arfield is coming into the last year of his contract and is seen as a player we should be looking at upgrading on. This isn't including injuries, suspensions to our first choice midfielders.

In fact even if we stick with 4-4-2 I'd say we want another midfielder in so that we can have effective options from the bench if we need to change things mid game.

I'd imagine that an up front fee of £7-8 million plus add-ons will see him join us.

Anybody know how close he is to Charlie Taylor? Possibility that he might be chatting to him and ncouragig him to make the move?
This user liked this post: IndigoLake

Safron
Posts: 1688
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 275 times
Has Liked: 201 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by Safron » Thu Aug 10, 2017 3:32 pm

Surely it would make more sense to go in for groseki

jurek
Posts: 1829
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 4:38 pm
Been Liked: 315 times
Has Liked: 3 times

Re: Sam Clucas

Post by jurek » Thu Aug 10, 2017 3:33 pm

If we are serious about getting Clucas in then suspect Dyche
may wish to have sufficent players available to mix up the formation/starting eleven.
Wheter it be 4-5-1 or possibly 4-3-3 or even the tried and tested 4-4-2.
Clucas could play in any of those formations and probably is an upgrade on Arfield within a 4-4-2.

Not sure we are serious but given it's Burnley I suppose the iniital bid
of 5m was to be expected as was Hull's response.
Can't see then letting him go for less than 8m with fairly substantial add-ons.

Presumably we (the club/chairman) must also realise that Hull aren't going to let him go
unless it's an offer they can't refuse. Hopefully wages wouldn't be an issue.

Be interesting to see whether we come back with a better offer?
Probably 6m + add-ons which, no doubt, will also be turned down.
Or whether Clucas is interested.

There may well be one or two other clubs who may wish to have him
and wouldn't wish to lose out on him as I do beleive he could improve the team.
This user liked this post: IndigoLake

Post Reply