Page 1 of 1
Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:46 pm
by ontario claret
Scored 3 goals for Aston Villa lat weekend. I've been saying for 2 years now that he'd look better in our version of claret and blue, especially with Hendrick now injured. We're a wealthier club than Villa these days, so why not go for him?
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:48 pm
by Bin Ont Turf
ontario claret wrote: so why not go for him?
Defour
Westwood
Cork
Arfield
And obviously Tarkowski
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:50 pm
by Sidney1st
Nah, if it ain't that fella they signed from forest then I'm not interested.
I miss those threads about that bloke.
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:54 pm
by ontario claret
Tarkowski is not a midfielder, and it never hurts to have extra bodies in the midfield.
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:55 pm
by ontario claret
And right now, Hourihane is a better player than at least 2 of them.
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:56 pm
by Goobs
We already got the only former Forest people that matter Sid!
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:58 pm
by Bin Ont Turf
ontario claret wrote:And right now, Hourihane is a better player than at least 2 of them.
Stick to the snow sports.

Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 8:59 pm
by colne-claret
Westwood, Hendrick, Cork, Defour, Arfield & Marney is plenty I feel now. We just need a central defender and a pacy winger/forward.
Remember when had Marney, Jones and Arfield? God, we've come a long way.
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:01 pm
by Sidney1st
Ah the good old days of trying to work out who'd have to play cm as cover..
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:04 pm
by Bin Ont Turf
Sidney1st wrote:Ah the good old days of trying to work out who'd have to play cm as cover..
And Marvin Bartley would still be 4th choice.

Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:07 pm
by Silkyskills1
ontario claret wrote:And right now, Hourihane is a better player than at least 2 of them.
At least which two?
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:13 pm
by Deardeary
No he's not
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:17 pm
by boatshed bill
I reckon we should be in for anyone who can score a hat-trick....common sense.
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:17 pm
by Zesty
I was watching the highlights the other day and one of them looked good, possibly called Andre ?? Young one they have brought through think he was a striker.
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:18 pm
by Reecey1987
Zesty wrote:I was watching the highlights the other day and one of them looked good, possibly called Andre ?? Young one they have brought through think he was a striker.
Andre green
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2017 9:22 pm
by bobinho
ontario claret wrote:Tarkowski is not a midfielder, and it never hurts to have extra bodies in the midfield.
Some ******* on here thinks he is...

Re: Hourihane
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 1:32 am
by dsr
Bin Ont Turf wrote:And Marvin Bartley would still be 4th choice.

Now that's what
would make Tarkowski look like a midfielder.
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 6:12 am
by ExistentialWanderer
How many midfielders do we need?
Re: Hourihane
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2017 9:09 pm
by ontario claret
If you're going to overstock one position, then midfield is it. It's like pitching in baseball. You can never have too much of it. There's more wear and tear in the midfield than anywhere else.