6th Nuclear test causing an earthquake. Not looking good

Naughty, Naughty, very Naughty

They might be just fracking

They're fracking mental!

Good old yanks...

This all appears to be heading to a very bad ending.

Our only hope appears to be China putting a stop to this idiot.

If not its going to be the west verses China . Not good

It appears Russia seem to be supportive of NK also.

Could be a real mess this.

Idiotic maniac put in a position of authority. He's not got much else to do other than eat, build weapons and kill people that disagree with him.

Just read this was a hydrogen bomb.
10 times more powerful than the last NK test.
They believe it was around 10 kilotons, the Hiroshima bomb was 16kt.

not good, how the hell do we stop this idiot without flattening his whole country and killing lots of innocent brain washed people.

you isolate completely with sanctions, and remove them from all international relations..

i think he thinks this is a negotition position, with the bomb , just remove that and he has nothing...eventually someone from within will topple them

Are we talking about Trump ?

It certainly is concerning, more so as Trump is the antagonist.

You sit down with Putin .He is a totally maniac and that's what you need when dealing with nutters.
A bully who is prepared to stop this idiot .We need to talk to him and the Chinese .No one survives a nuclear war and I for one want to see my granddaughters graduate from university.

Blackrod wrote:Idiotic maniac put in a position of authority. He's not got much else to do other than eat, build weapons and kill people that disagree with him.

Enough about Trump, what are we doing about Kim...?

Expect Blue Trawden Labrador along shortly, explaining how it's all
linked in to an international Zionist conspiracy......

All the Jews are going to be forewarned as to when the Button is to be pressed and will be ready with their Factor 5000000 sun cream.

See, we don't need that keane replacement after all

NK has 1.5 full time military and 9.5 people military trained. Can't imagine anyone wanting to invade.

11 people?? Send Barnes over pronto

Thought this was gonna be a thread about the moderation of this messageboard

If it's going to happen, it's a shame he didn't do it at 4.00 three weeks ago.

The world could have ended with Burnley too of the Premier League.

What we need is a megalomaniac as PM...

Anyone know what Blair is up too?

Sidney1st wrote:What we need is a megalomaniac as PM...

Anyone know what Blair is up too?

Flicking through the channels the other day I found him gushing about Dear Dead Diana.

Other than that, I think he's sorting out the Middle East situation isn't he?

TheFamilyCat wrote:Flicking through the channels the other day I found him gushing about Dear Dead Diana.

Other than that, I think he's sorting out the Middle East situation isn't he?

I know he was given that job to sort out he Middle East, as Peace Envoy.

I think he's done a stellar job so far to date...

How about a scouting network there? Cheap as chips and will be used to rigid frameworks.

I have just read they are now saying 50-60 kilotons.

That 4 times the Hiroshima bomb, big enough to flatten the whole of London with one bomb.

Scary times.

It's not really scary, feels normal to me.

Our Ashley'll sort him out

Lowbankclaret wrote:I have just read they are now saying 50-60 kilotons.

That 4 times the Hiroshima bomb, big enough to flatten the whole of London with one bomb.

Scary times.

Not quite the whole of London.

60 kt airburst over the closest thing to a favourable target would create a fireball about 310m in radius, a 20psi air blast radius of 1.1km. 5 psi @ up to 2.72 km
It would likely wake the inhabitants of London Zoo.

You seem to know a lot about this Imploding. Perhaps you should change your username to Exploding Turtle.

LoveCurryPies wrote:You seem to know a lot about this Imploding. Perhaps you should change your username to Exploding Turtle.

Some nuclear explosions start with an implosion.

Imploding Turtle wrote:Not quite the whole of London.

60 kt airburst over the closest thing to a favourable target would create a fireball about 310m in radius, a 20psi air blast radius of 1.1km. 5 psi @ up to 2.72 km
It would likely wake the inhabitants of London Zoo.

That's OK, Stamford Bridge and Wembley out of range so we don't lose any points.

LoveCurryPies wrote:NK has 1.5 full time military and 9.5 people military trained. Can't imagine anyone wanting to invade.

And people thought we had a bad transfer window

IT, not sure where your getting your info from.

Due to crosswind, the bomb missed the aiming point, the Aioi Bridge, by approximately 800 ft (240 m) and detonated directly over Shima Surgical Clinic[143] at 34.39468°N 132.45462°E. It released the equivalent energy of 16 kilotons of TNT (67 TJ), ± 2 kt.[135] The weapon was considered very inefficient, with only 1.7% of its material fissioning.[144] The radius of total destruction was about 1 mile (1.6 km), with resulting fires across 4.4 square miles (11 km2).[145]

So if the Hiroshima bomb caused total destruction for 1 mile, this bomb would cause total destruction for 5 miles and fires over 22 sq miles.

A little more than you seem to thing. I think you need to reconsider your estimates.

Lowbankclaret wrote:A little more than you seem to thing. I think you need to reconsider your estimates.

I'd imagine IT isn't using his own "estimates" but instead using a simple website to estimate destructive power. He'd have no way of knowing if the info was correct or not without gaining a lot of extra knowledge about nuclear explosions.

Lowbankclaret wrote:IT, not sure where your getting your info from.

Due to crosswind, the bomb missed the aiming point, the Aioi Bridge, by approximately 800 ft (240 m) and detonated directly over Shima Surgical Clinic[143] at 34.39468°N 132.45462°E. It released the equivalent energy of 16 kilotons of TNT (67 TJ), ± 2 kt.[135] The weapon was considered very inefficient, with only 1.7% of its material fissioning.[144] The radius of total destruction was about 1 mile (1.6 km), with resulting fires across 4.4 square miles (11 km2).[145]

So if the Hiroshima bomb caused total destruction for 1 mile, this bomb would cause total destruction for 5 miles and fires over 22 sq miles.

A little more than you seem to thing. I think you need to reconsider your estimates.

That'll be down to construction materials. Many heavy masonry structures survived inside the area of "total destruction".



Infact some of those buildings that survived are very close to the origin of the blast - which makes some sense since it was an air burst and a downward blast is easier for buildings to surviva than a lateral blast - but even some other buildings that will have been hit at about 60-45 degrees survived not too far from the blast.

You can infer from that picture and this one how close those buildings in the top left quarter of the above image were from the blast origin.

Rowls wrote:I'd imagine IT isn't using his own "estimates" but instead using a simple website to estimate destructive power. He'd have no way of knowing if the info was correct or not without gaining a lot of extra knowledge about nuclear explosions.

It doesn't have to be nuclear explosions. Explosions are explosions. There's no real difference in the blast effects of a 60 kt yield nuclear explosion and a 60 kt TNT explosion. If there was then we wouldn't be measuring nuclear yields in tons of TNT.

Also a 5 mile blast radius would be 78.54 sq miles. Not that you can simply multiply blast radii by the result of dividing the two yields.

I strongly disagree with your views Turtle, where is the proof!!

it's in his pudding

Most of the Buildings destroyed were built from wood and paper by the way!!

Slightly irrelevant what the bulding were built of, any humans wouls still be dead.

My point at the end of the day is this bomb is 5 times larger than the last one used on humans and that was devastating.

I think IT's 310 m kind of trivailises the effects it had.

The blast kills the lucky ones, the ones who survive and die of radiation sickness or the horific burns are the one's who really suffer.

Fiddlesticks

Lowbankclaret wrote:Slightly irrelevant what the bulding were built of, any humans wouls still be dead.

My point at the end of the day is this bomb is 5 times larger than the last one used on humans and that was devastating.

I think IT's 310 m kind of trivailises the effects it had.

The blast kills the lucky ones, the ones who survive and die of radiation sickness or the horific burns are the one's who really suffer.

You understand that "fireball" and "blast radius" are two different things, right?

A 60 ton equivalent airburst detonation wouldn't be good for Burnley at all!
https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

bfcmik wrote:A 60 ton equivalent airburst detonation wouldn't be good for Burnley at all!
https://nuclearsecrecy.com/nukemap/

Parking for home games would be easier.

We're OK anyway, Saint Theresa has criticised this latest test very, very strongly so they'll either be cacking or pi££ing themselves too much to be able to press the button again. Phew, praise be !

The 1.4 tonne British bomb was found on a building site on Wednesday.
Police helicopters carrying heat detecting cameras scoured the area as bomb disposal experts began their task. Police are guarding empty houses and apartments from burglars.
The evacuation area includes 20 retirement homes, an opera house, and Germany's central bank where half the country's gold reserves are stored.

Not being a military tactician or anything but wouldn't a swat team sort this mess out
Fat flat head I'm on about or does that not narrow it down much

This is going to go down sooner or later.....Might put in an order for some of those Eclipse Sun viewing google things so I can watch safely whilst eating my popcorn..... Wouldn't want to hurt my eyes with the bright blast as my face is melting.....!!!! It's time like this when Amazon prime 1 day delivery comes in handy