The great Gudmundsson debate
-
- Posts: 11146
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 825 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
The great Gudmundsson debate
Do we leave him out tomorrow?
If so who comes in for him?
Arfield? Or do we leave Arfield central and play Walters for Guddy?
It was a lot easier when it was Boyd, Marney, Jones and Arfield every week.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFO4Y6hF4UU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
If so who comes in for him?
Arfield? Or do we leave Arfield central and play Walters for Guddy?
It was a lot easier when it was Boyd, Marney, Jones and Arfield every week.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFO4Y6hF4UU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
-
- Posts: 4614
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:43 am
- Been Liked: 1553 times
- Has Liked: 1065 times
- Location: Burnley
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
?? How can Arfield come in when he already played the last game? Surely the same starting line up as Spurs?
-
- Posts: 17959
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6643 times
- Has Liked: 3097 times
- Location: Fife
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
I'd leave him out, I can't recall seeing him really earn a place in the team.. terribly overrated, although I'm more worried about a shite song for Wood that they are planning to sing.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Ok - hopefully you'll manage to get some sleep tonight.Steve1956 wrote:I'd leave him out, I can't recall seeing him really earn a place in the team.. terribly overrated, although I'm more worried about a shite song for Wood that they are planning to sing.
Best of luck
-
- Posts: 17959
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6643 times
- Has Liked: 3097 times
- Location: Fife
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
How considerate of you. ThanksTVC15 wrote:Ok - hopefully you'll manage to get some sleep tonight.
Best of luck
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 11146
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 825 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Goobs wrote:?? How can Arfield come in when he already played the last game? Surely the same starting line up as Spurs?
More bloomin questions and no answers.

-
- Posts: 219
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2016 6:00 pm
- Been Liked: 31 times
- Has Liked: 1 time
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Good player.
-
- Posts: 8276
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:33 pm
- Been Liked: 4139 times
- Has Liked: 1144 times
- Location: Chesterfield
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Personally I think JBG has been our weakest player so far this season. Arfield was great against both Blackburn and Spurs so, for me, Hendrick (if fit) should come in for JBG and Arfield be pushed wide.
This user liked this post: Steve1956
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
I'd stick with him. He deserves a run in the side after injury cut short the promise he was showing.
-
- Posts: 11146
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 825 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
I don't think that he's a bad player but he was quite poor against Spurs.
I can't see Hendrick being fit enough, so if Guddy is being left out I'd go with Arfield central and Walters wide (ish) if it's 4-5-1.
Wood up front though.
I can't see Hendrick being fit enough, so if Guddy is being left out I'd go with Arfield central and Walters wide (ish) if it's 4-5-1.
Wood up front though.
-
- Posts: 17375
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3565 times
- Has Liked: 7837 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Decent enough player, i think.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
No we dont.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Never thought he was good enough for this level. Went Spurs and Scotty was the nuts, so I would play him and leave Jbg on the bench
-
- Posts: 401
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 11:07 am
- Been Liked: 137 times
- Has Liked: 37 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
He's never had a long enough run in the side, however I really rate him and we should persevere with him, he seems only injury prone at Burnley. Even though he has (last season) still provided some cracking performances like Palace. He's also performed very well for Iceland.
I honestly don't think we have seen anywhere near the best for us yet.
I honestly don't think we have seen anywhere near the best for us yet.
-
- Posts: 5638
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2016 3:41 am
- Been Liked: 1213 times
- Has Liked: 3776 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
not sure why everyone is slagging off Gudmundsson. He works his socks off and is an intelligent player....think he's going to get better and better.
These 2 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets KlyBfc
-
- Posts: 8716
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:25 pm
- Been Liked: 1877 times
- Has Liked: 2238 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
JBG is a class act.he posses a great range of passing and assists.Who can forget last season's great exchange with Barnsey that led to the winning goal v Palace
He also a much better tackler than Scott
He also a much better tackler than Scott
Last edited by Woodleyclaret on Sat Sep 09, 2017 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
This user liked this post: KlyBfc
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
For some strange reason there always has to be at least one target. It really baffles me.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 7742
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2585 times
- Has Liked: 4176 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
I don't get the reference to JBG being 'injury prone' at all.
He suffered an injury last season as the result of a shocking challenge against Lincoln.
He suffered an injury last season as the result of a shocking challenge against Lincoln.
-
- Posts: 11146
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 825 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Not everyone is slagging him off.Taffy on the wing wrote:not sure why everyone is slagging off Gudmundsson.
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
He's not consistent enough but that doesn't mean it's his fault necessarily. He needs game time and a system that suits him. At the moment he has to be on the bench for me.
-
- Posts: 77752
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38047 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
We're only three games inbeddie wrote:He's not consistent enough
These 3 users liked this post: boiledclaret RVclaret BFCmaj
-
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 2:22 am
- Been Liked: 18 times
- Has Liked: 21 times
- Location: Lytham St. Annes
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Needs more game time is all
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:56 am
- Been Liked: 389 times
- Has Liked: 1022 times
- Location: Dnipropetrovsk
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
He seems to have taken the pressure off Tark on here. Arfield seems to have taken on 'superman' status in comparison to pre Rovers match comments.
Gud just needs a decent game or two and the confidence will come back.
Gud just needs a decent game or two and the confidence will come back.
-
- Posts: 2338
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:03 pm
- Been Liked: 977 times
- Has Liked: 639 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Like most players, I think he needs a run of games to show what he can really do.
-
- Posts: 10666
- Joined: Sun Dec 27, 2015 8:01 pm
- Been Liked: 5431 times
- Has Liked: 1039 times
- Location: Leeds
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Absolutely must be in the starting eleven. Terrific player.
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Not consistent enough, three games in, I give up.
He had a slowish start last season but his quality soon started to show. It was also against Palace last year when he got a goal and assist. Fancy him to have a stormer tomorrow.
He had a slowish start last season but his quality soon started to show. It was also against Palace last year when he got a goal and assist. Fancy him to have a stormer tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 1427
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:48 am
- Been Liked: 510 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Definite starter. Sean won't want to change the shape. Arfield to continue in the Hendrick role, Walters will only make the bench on his comeback. The team is better set-up to suit his style now so given a run of games think we'll start to see his full potential. Last season badly disrupted by injuries and the more rigid 4-4-2 didn't always maximise his attacking threat.
-
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 8:21 pm
- Been Liked: 479 times
- Has Liked: 74 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Thank god.
I was worried for a second there we'd run out of people to criticise. What with Tarks great start to the season (despite not being good enough on the back of a tiny amount of actual games), and Arfields performance at Rovers now meaning he is off the hit list.
The 'great Gudmundsson debate.' Jesus...
I was worried for a second there we'd run out of people to criticise. What with Tarks great start to the season (despite not being good enough on the back of a tiny amount of actual games), and Arfields performance at Rovers now meaning he is off the hit list.
The 'great Gudmundsson debate.' Jesus...
This user liked this post: Sidney1st
-
- Posts: 23343
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 2:09 pm
- Been Liked: 8058 times
- Has Liked: 4714 times
- Location: Riding the galactic winds in my X-wing
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Our first three games have seen three very good performances.
Why would you change it?
Why would you change it?
-
- Posts: 1112
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 12:27 pm
- Been Liked: 441 times
- Has Liked: 451 times
- Location: Mickleover, Derby
- Contact:
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Come on, we've seen enough of Arfield in the Premier League to know Gudmundsson is a better option, surely? Especially against a bottom six side at home.
-
- Posts: 5125
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 11:50 am
- Been Liked: 1127 times
- Has Liked: 1238 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Not a Gudmundsson fan but like other posts have said, you can't change a winning side. The lad really needs a fair crack of the whip, he never got going last season. **** or bust season for him. If he doesn't show something this season, I would ship him out next summer
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Couple of bizarre comments but for what it's worth I'd play both Arfield and JBG today if Hendrick isn't available.
Last edited by taio on Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6442
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3179 times
- Has Liked: 151 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Gudmundsson, like quite a few of our squad players, is good enough to play a role in the Premier League, but isn't quite good enough to really belong at this level.
Particularly in our 451 system this season, it would help enormously if we had more pace opposite Brady (whose skill set JBG largely replicates, just not quite as well).
But the window has closed and we may not have that (unless the plan is to use Wells there when fit, but as he isnt yet, we can park it). Which means that Arfield, JBG and Walters become the three options wide right for today and you can make a decent case for each (although Arfield may well end up in the middle) . Its an interesting debate, but it shouldnt be seen as all about Gudmundsson - and whoever should start today, each of these 3 will have an important role to play in deepening our squad this season.
Particularly in our 451 system this season, it would help enormously if we had more pace opposite Brady (whose skill set JBG largely replicates, just not quite as well).
But the window has closed and we may not have that (unless the plan is to use Wells there when fit, but as he isnt yet, we can park it). Which means that Arfield, JBG and Walters become the three options wide right for today and you can make a decent case for each (although Arfield may well end up in the middle) . Its an interesting debate, but it shouldnt be seen as all about Gudmundsson - and whoever should start today, each of these 3 will have an important role to play in deepening our squad this season.
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Is having an opinion about a player slagging him off ?
-
- Posts: 8765
- Joined: Sat Jan 23, 2016 7:13 pm
- Been Liked: 2330 times
- Has Liked: 1293 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Lets hope JBG stays fit-terribly unlucky last year. We need all the players we have available for SD
All I would say about JBG is there are two players-one with sublime skills and one who struggles to get him into the game and gives the ball away
All I would say about JBG is there are two players-one with sublime skills and one who struggles to get him into the game and gives the ball away
-
- Posts: 4928
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:20 pm
- Been Liked: 1252 times
- Has Liked: 1487 times
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
I think JBG is a throwback to old fashioned wingers in his style and on his day delivers a lot for the team. The trick is or him to do the workload expected of him from the way Dyche sets his teams up as well as the creative stuff. He would start in my team today.
Re: The great Gudmundsson debate
Clearly a player that improves after playing regularly. Became excellent last season after a slow start. Shame that we don't have a corresponding fixture today from last season to highlight what he can offer. 100% Dyche will keep him in today.