Would he improve our team?

Just looks far too lightweight with little end product.

No, his dad ends up at every game

No.

Utter shite

We've got Brady currently playing his role

Seen him play for a few sides now ont' Turf, and he's been crap every time. Even for Blackpool when he was meant to be a good un, he was useless. Not as good as some think he is,.... oh, and his dad's a ****.

If he was as good as Messi as beautiful as Jane Birkin and had an undying love for us Id still wouldn't want his dad anywhere near.

Hit the nail on the head no end product.Also a prima donna to boot.

Never a Premier League player

Apart from the shot in the 2nd half, I can't remember him being on the pitch.

He caused a few more problems when he came central in the second half but did nothing when out wide.

Yes. Good player. At least from the bench would be a brilliant option.

Thought he was more threatening thsn any burnley attacker and he also got through a fair amount of defensive work.

Would give us something different.

Certainly i'd have been very happy to have him to bring on to change the game on our right wing yesterday.

a busted flush.

Annonomous yesterday apart from a shot

No improvement on what we've got.
He'd be an option, but would probably just be sat on his 'arris.

never seen him have a good game...very over rated and light weight......not like his dad " the guvnor ".....who hid on the half way line in his England days if I remember rightly whilst defenders stepped up to take ( miss ) key penalties in penalty shoot outs....not a fan of the pair of em.

happyclaret17 wrote:never seen him have a good game...very over rated and light weight......not like his dad " the guvnor ".....who hid on the half way line in his England days if I remember rightly whilst defenders stepped up to take ( miss ) key penalties in penalty shoot outs....not a fan of the pair of em.

Bit unfair. He was a very good player for england. Would walk into any side of last 30+ years.

my point is that he loved the guvnor tag but when chips were down he hid with his back turned....not sure if it was when southgate missed but it wasnt the actions of a " Guvnor".....unlike pearce who had the balls to take that key pin after his prior miss.....he was the Guvnor for me....a fearsome character and England through and through...utc.

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Bit unfair. He was a very good player for england. Would walk into any side of last 30+ years.

...and yet he hasn't.

an athlete, not a footballer and he's got such a bullish agent (his dad) he obviously feels a top club owes him a living.

he is crap.

The ultimate Journeyman. Flatters to deceive but should never come near t'Turf - unless playing for the position.

Another players son who was knowhere as good as their Dad.Never good enough for top league but fair play to him he keeps getting decent contracts .His agent is a legend ,persuading clubs that Tom is the one they need.

yTib wrote:...and yet he hasn't.

an athlete, not a footballer and he's got such a bullish agent (his dad) he obviously feels a top club owes him a living.

he is crap.

Im on about his dad.

happyclaret17 wrote:my point is that he loved the guvnor tag but when chips were down he hid with his back turned....not sure if it was when southgate missed but it wasnt the actions of a " Guvnor".....unlike pearce who had the balls to take that key pin after his prior miss.....he was the Guvnor for me....a fearsome character and England through and through...utc.

Didn't he miss one in 98?

Greenmile wrote:Didn't he miss one in 98?

He did. And I thought "so that's why you didn't take one in 96"

He plays the Derby way.

It looks all very pretty but there's no end product.

I don't think he has the attitude for Dyche.

Best attacking player on the pitch, his driving run and lovely pass that Depoitre missed was exactly what we lacked.

KRBFC wrote:Best attacking player on the pitch, his driving run and lovely pass that Depoitre missed was exactly what we lacked.

I think Defour is a better player. But to be honest, not sure why we're discussing Ince anyway.

Flatters to deceive.