Page 1 of 1

Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 2:34 pm
by Quickenthetempo
Latvian businessman valeri belokon has won his court case against the owners of Blackpool fc, the Oyston family.

£31m they have to pay him.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:13 pm
by randomclaret2
Blackpool forums making for interesting reading atm !!

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:18 pm
by Sidney1st
Apparently there were some Blackpool fans in the court who cheered when the verdict was announced.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:19 pm
by THEWELLERNUT70
It couldn't have happened to nicer people

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:21 pm
by Sutton-Claret
But does that mean they'll be taking the 31m out of the club (somehow) which can't be good news for the fans.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:22 pm
by martin_p
Sutton-Claret wrote:But does that mean they'll be taking the 31m out of the club (somehow) which can't be good news for the fans.
I think the Blackpool fans are hoping they’ll have to sell the club to help fund the £31m.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 3:32 pm
by cutsy123
Prick list

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:11 pm
by iluva64
You can buy Bolton Wonderers for £25m

Who'll buy the Tangerines for £31m

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 4:23 pm
by conyoviejo
IT couldn't have happened to a nicer family .. What comes round goes round..

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:07 pm
by BigRedrose
No problem with the Seasiders,always had a soft spot for them. This is fantastic news for the long suffering Pool fans in their prolonged battle with the odious Oyston clan.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:10 pm
by Goalposts
even better the judge has said they have no access to appeal

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:19 pm
by bfccrazy
The disheartening thing is looking at the B'pool forums.

A lot of fans saying that since the Oystens ripped heart outa the club and they have been boycotting - they have found other passtimes now and will not likely be supporting the club as they once did.

Even with the Oystens gone from B'pool it seems the damage has already been done.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:25 pm
by TheFamilyCat
bfccrazy wrote:
A lot of fans saying that since the Oystens ripped heart outa the club and they have been boycotting - they have found other passtimes now and will not likely be supporting the club as they once did.
Expect the bastards fans to trot that excuse out as and when the Venky's leave.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:28 pm
by bfccrazy
TheFamilyCat wrote:Expect the bastards fans to trot that excuse out as and when the Venky's leave.
Quite an interesting thread on their forum where someone posed the question.

They won't get near the attendances of a few years ago with the loss of fair weather fans anyway you'd think. They had around 4k on in their past lower league days and it'll probably be around that amount again now I'm guessing - they have around 2k now with the boycott.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 6:53 pm
by charlyt
The slimy and odious Oystons will be wriggling like netted fish to worm their way out of paying.

Let us hope this is the start of their demise.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:33 pm
by Sidney1st
bfccrazy wrote:Quite an interesting thread on their forum where someone posed the question.

They won't get near the attendances of a few years ago with the loss of fair weather fans anyway you'd think. They had around 4k on in their past lower league days and it'll probably be around that amount again now I'm guessing - they have around 2k now with the boycott.
They had 3k on for their fa cup first round game on Saturday.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 7:56 pm
by bfcjg
Blackpool fc is a name with a training ground I understand that the Oystons own Bloomfield road lock stock and barrel. If they want they can turn it into a shopping complex to sell or just sell it now as it is with pp for a shopping complex. An investor might buy it and rent it to Blackpool fc but how much would the rent be ? No winners.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:05 pm
by Cirrus_Minor
Be a good place raise sick and maltreated donkeys. Maybe they already do.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:16 pm
by tim_noone
They own a lot of land in Blackpool.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:24 pm
by Juan Tanamera
Be careful what you say people, you know what the wealthy arsewipes are like for bullying lesser lights who speak out of turn. ;)

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:42 pm
by gawthorpe_view
Could they transfer the £31 million debt to the club?
Borrow against the club's assets?

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:48 pm
by MrTopTier

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:57 pm
by KRBFC
Doesn't one of the Oystons work for the FA?

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 9:56 pm
by bfcjg
KRBFC wrote:Doesn't one of the Oystons work for the FA?
Not quite one of the Oystons does FA work as in sweet FA.(allegedly)

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:32 pm
by Foshiznik
Is there even £31m in the club?

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:56 pm
by brigante
MrTopTier wrote:Excellent result for the fans.

https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comment ... igh_court/
That Reddit thread is very funny

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 7:27 am
by mikeS
Good to see the Oystons on the receiving end. Hope the fans get their club back. Diabolical what's gone on over the past decade there.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 11:10 am
by ClaretTony
It's dreadful what's gone at Blackpool and a number of other clubs in recent years with the owners. Interestingly, the mess at clubs with owners is usually down to foreign owners and not ones who have been in charge of their club for nigh on 20 years.

What the Blackpool fans have had to deal with is absolutely disgraceful and if they get something positive out of this then we should all be really pleased for them.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:35 pm
by Woodleyclaret
Unfortunately a lot of clubs are run by people of dubious reputation .The football league checks about fair and proper owners are a complete joke with a variety of foreign businessman looking to "invest" in football clubs and then sell on for profit.
In Blackpools case it was local owners who caused problems and alienated the fans.
I doubt the ground and it's environs especially in a dump like Blackpool South shore is worth anything like £31m.
It begs the perennial question though.What did the Oystons do with the large amounts earned by Ollie and his promotion winning team.
That's a point that Karl Oyston and his family have not fully answered .
The Lashers deserve better than these chancers running their club but I doubt they'll shift the Oystons.
Who need offshore tax havens when you've got a moneytree growing in Blackpool?

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 12:55 pm
by Overthehill
An interesting read in the Blackpool gazette -

After further discussion in court the judge ruled that a “financial buy-out” was the appropriate course following his findings. The judge ordered the buy-out jointly against Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Ltd, a company with Oyston family links formerly known as Segesta, and Owen Oyston and Karl Oyston, but not against the football club itself. How the Oyston family intend to pay the huge bill remains to be seen. The judge refused the Oystons’ right to appeal but they are likely to take their case to the Court of Appeal instead. Justice Smith ordered the Oystons to pay £10m to Belokon within 28 days; their assets to be frozen while a timetable for the full amount was decided. The Oystons’ £26.77m payments to their own companies was described by the judge as “illegitimate stripping of Blackpool FC”.

Read more at: http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/ ... -1-8844084" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Even more interesting is the judges summing up of the Oystons.

http://www.blackpoolgazette.co.uk/news/ ... -1-8844096" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 1:03 pm
by RalphCoatesComb
Good news for Lashers fans but, what was interesting was Belokon's inability to be associated with the Club now, because of his Money Laundering exploits !

What a Nest of Vipers Bloomfield Road really is !

Who vets these people? BFS and 'Appy 'Arry ?! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 4:07 pm
by IanMcL
bfcjg wrote:Blackpool fc is a name with a training ground I understand that the Oystons own Bloomfield road lock stock and barrel. If they want they can turn it into a shopping complex to sell or just sell it now as it is with pp for a shopping complex. An investor might buy it and rent it to Blackpool fc but how much would the rent be ? No winners.
Nowadays, you cannot just develop on a sports ground/ pitch. A replacement equivalent has to be provided.

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Tue Nov 07, 2017 5:01 pm
by ClaretTony
Overthehill wrote:An interesting read in the Blackpool gazette -

After further discussion in court the judge ruled that a “financial buy-out” was the appropriate course following his findings. The judge ordered the buy-out jointly against Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Ltd, a company with Oyston family links formerly known as Segesta, and Owen Oyston and Karl Oyston, but not against the football club itself.
Doesn't that company 'Blackpool Football Club (Properties) Ltd' actually own the football club?

Re: Oystons lose court case

Posted: Wed Nov 08, 2017 11:48 am
by ClaretTony
David Conn in the Guardian and the ineffective fit and proper persons test

https://www.theguardian.com/football/bl ... all-league" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

One line reads: "The second key provision which disqualifies an owner or director is to have been involved in the insolvency of two clubs. Again, any insolvency before 2004 is not taken into account."

If the 2004 wasn't included, it would disqualify Shaun Harvey the chief exec of the league who was involved in insolvency at both Bradford City and Leeds.