Page 1 of 6
James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:39 pm
by cricketfieldclarets
Hear we are in talks with WBA about signing him.
Think he would be a sensible signing. Knows a lot of the squad. Has experience of this level. Hard worker with some moments if brilliance. Reminds me of an upgrade on Arfield or Boyd. Would be a good signing while Brady recovers.
Would love us to go in for Shaqiiri. Especially with Stoke in peril but cant see that. Very talented player but perhaps too big a risk at this stage given his wages and lack of knowledge on his character.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:42 pm
by jdrobbo
Always liked him. Controversial or not, he is a human being and he has a choice. I love his style of play and I honestly can't think of a better fit for a Dyche player at our sort of price level right now. Would be a terrific signing and Burnley fans would love him.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:44 pm
by SammyBoy
I'd be happy with this signing!
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:46 pm
by bfccrazy
Apparenty our main target for now and would be a great signing.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:47 pm
by cricketfieldclarets
jdrobbo wrote:Always liked him. Controversial or not, he is a human being and he has a choice. I love his style of play and I honestly can't think of a better fit for a Dyche player at our sort of price level right now. Would be a terrific signing and Burnley fans would love him.
Agree 100 percent.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 12:56 pm
by KefkaClaret
Don't rate McClean at all. I don't care about his personal views I just think he isn't very good.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:06 pm
by warksclaret
If SD can do to him what he did to get Joey Barton making a major contribution to our team then he will be terrific. Just what we need and I suspect he is not expecting to play every minute of every game. Feel certain the other Irish players have tapped him up and told SD he would be a great fit.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:09 pm
by HatfieldClaret
Wont be happy to see a burnley shirt in November without the poppy.
Good player but no thanks from me.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:12 pm
by ClaretTony
HatfieldClaret wrote:Wont be happy to see a burnley shirt in November without the poppy.
And there was me thinking people fought to give us the freedom to be able to make our own decisions, one of which is to choose whether or not to wear a poppy. I find it sad that anyone still won't approve of a player who exercises his right to make such a decision.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:14 pm
by whiffa
The new George Boyd - a work horse but a bit inconsistant. A decent signing for this season, if we do manage to finish in the top half I'd be hoping the club could move upwards in terms of targets in the summer though.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:18 pm
by steve1264b
Not for me.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:28 pm
by Woodleyclaret
A good signing I thought we tracked him previously when he played in Ireland .Personally I think he has the right to not wear a poppy .He would be a dedinate fit as a wide left player and has a decent goal and assist record.
Also we've players who know him well so he would settle quickly.Whilst we are in talks at WBA we should enquire about Jay at the same time.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:29 pm
by cricketfieldclarets
The poppy issue for me is that they have it on shirts in the first place. Football and politics and religion and war shouldnt mix.
Thats from someone who has plenty of family and friends who have served.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:33 pm
by Heaton's Gloves
No thanks.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:33 pm
by Quickenthetempo
I was hoping we would set our targets a little higher.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:35 pm
by bfccrazy
Quickenthetempo wrote:I was hoping we would set our targets a little higher.
We are - We signed players from a relegated Championship team .... Then relegated Prem teams ..... And now we're looking at players from established Prem teams.
Constantly higher targets.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:41 pm
by Quickenthetempo
In general yeah, but not in the case of this player it seems.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:46 pm
by CombatClaret
If SD wants him that's enough for me.
Trying to get a feel for him but three seasons at WBA and not a lot of footage. Brady got a 'goals and skills' compilation video just for last season at Norwich.
WBA seems happy to see him go looking at their forum. A little underwhelmed tbh.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:50 pm
by CombatClaret
bfccrazy wrote:We are - We signed players from a relegated Championship team .... Then relegated Prem teams ..... And now we're looking at players from established Prem teams.
But not established Premier League players.
Not sure If I'd rather harvest the best from below eg: Brady, Wood etc. But I suppose you can point to Cork as a counter.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:51 pm
by JPS71
If Sean wants him and he doe's the job & fits in to the squad then I don't have a problem with him
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 1:56 pm
by Corky
Quickenthetempo wrote:I was hoping we would set our targets a little higher.
I agree. Now is the time to be looking at better quality players. To all intents and purposes we are in the premier league for another season, we need to get players in now to strengthen the squad, get them match/Dyche fit and then crack on next season. We may even be in Europe but not necessarily the EU.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:02 pm
by KRBFC
Would be a good addition
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:08 pm
by ElectroClaret
Corky wrote: Now is the time to be looking at better quality players.
But the "better quality players" surely make themselves more available in summer, not January.
We can always identify targets, of course, but more and possibly better players will be available
at season's end.
McClean would be ok for now.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:24 pm
by ashtonlongsider
Not for me, thought the bar would have been set higher. If he's so good, why would WBA want to sell to a potential rival?
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:27 pm
by wickdkewlclaret
WBA have been awful this season, clearly not an organised well drilled team, hence players lose purpose in their roles and become disillusioned and unable to perform.
Give Mclean the purpose and he'd fight for it, another battler in the team is what we need, another player to have that us against them approach!
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:27 pm
by claretspice
If Dyche thinks he can give us an instant impact then im happy enough with that- I can't think of too many realistic targets who I'd expect to really hit the ground running, which is what we need in Brady's absence (Lennon is another who might, not sure any of our other reported targets offer any guarantees in that respect.
I think we'd all want someone a bit more subtle who can take us to the next level over the next 12 months too, though.
I'm not in the least bit interested in his political views personally provided doesn't bring Burnley into disrepute if he comes onto our pay roll for as long as he's on our pay roll.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:32 pm
by ElectroClaret
ashtonlongsider wrote: If he's so good, why would WBA want to sell to a potential rival?
But we're not their rivals, ashton. Not even potentially.
They're involved heavily in the scrap at the bottom.
Whilst we won't be.
So that's not really a factor.
If the boss wants him, it's ok with me.

Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:36 pm
by tim_noone
Welcome aboard James mc Lean.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:44 pm
by Spike
All Burnley players must always wear the same shirt. If we do sign him then he gets dropped when we wear the Poppy
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:48 pm
by CFS
Signed 3.5 yr deal get in!! Sort of signing we need to kick on. We'll done bfc.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:49 pm
by MattBFC
Think this would be a great signing. Always been impressed with him and would definitely improve our first 11. Let’s just hope this isn’t lazy journalism (as he’s Irish) and there is something in this...
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:51 pm
by Wexford_Claret
Yes please.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 2:55 pm
by MACCA
Like I said when poppy gate happened.
Would have him here in a heart beat as a player. Upgrade on Scotty Arf, Dyche type of player, works hard, and the sort of player you want for you not against.
The fact we enquired about him previously makes this link/rumour interesting.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:01 pm
by KRBFC
CFS wrote:Signed 3.5 yr deal get in!! Sort of signing we need to kick on. We'll done bfc.
?
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:02 pm
by Guller Bull
CFS wrote:Signed 3.5 yr deal get in!! Sort of signing we need to kick on. We'll done bfc.
Where are you getting this info from CFS?
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:02 pm
by ElectroClaret
CFS wrote:Signed 3.5 yr deal get in!! Sort of signing we need to kick on. We'll done bfc.
Wheres this come from?
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:02 pm
by tim_noone
Don't question it.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:02 pm
by dermotdermot
Is this official? I haven't had a chance to air my views on this yet.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:04 pm
by ElectroClaret
dermotdermot wrote:Is this official? I haven't had a chance to air my views on this yet.
Why, what's stopping you, dermot.?
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:04 pm
by Guller Bull
Go on quickly then DD - before it's officially confirmed or not!
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:04 pm
by burnley007
Seems a reasonable signing. Fits the bill.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:06 pm
by MACCA
Not confirmed. Not even a rumour on most rumour sites/papers.
Arfields injury might just speed up our usual process when recruiting.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:06 pm
by dermotdermot
ElectroClaret wrote:Why, what's stopping you, dermot.?
Well I'm personally not too keen on the idea but, if it's gone through..................I can't do much about it.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:08 pm
by Blackrod
Not convinced about him as a player for us. Interesting to read why he doesn't wear the poppy. Does he stand still for the minutes silence on Rememberance Day ? I still think the poppy is ultimately about WW1 and 2 which he doesn't have an issue with. I can understand Irish bitterness towards the British army but many Irish died fighting in WW2 and Hitler's thoughts on the Irish and ultimate outlook for them was bleak.
If WBA do not want to keep him and they are pretty awful not sure this is where we should be looking.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:10 pm
by NRC
isn't CFS an ITK kinda figure?
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:11 pm
by ElectroClaret
Just because WBA are "pretty awful" doesn't mean all their players are.
Get him if we can.
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:12 pm
by Wexford_Claret
Blackrod wrote:
If WBA do not want to keep him and they are pretty awful not sure this is where we should be looking.
They do want to keep him:
https://www.expressandstar.com/sport/fo ... s-mcclean/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:13 pm
by Reecey1987
CFS wrote:Signed 3.5 yr deal get in!! Sort of signing we need to kick on. We'll done bfc.
Were have you got this from ?
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:19 pm
by KRBFC
I can confirm that the OP and his pals are fishing again
Re: James McLean
Posted: Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:20 pm
by KRBFC
CFS wrote:Signed 3.5 yr deal get in!! Sort of signing we need to kick on. We'll done bfc.
WE ALL DONE BFC
WHALE DONE BFC