Page 1 of 2

I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:06 pm
by ontario claret
Yesterday's referee, some 40-something who still calls himself Bobby, not only contributed to the tying goal, he CAUSED it, by body-checking Westwood near the centre dot, and then ignoring an obvious foul on Kevin Long in the penalty area, and allowing the tying goal by Southampton. I'm ready to put on a gorilla suit and appearing on "It's Not the 9 O'Clock News". This goes way beyond coincidence and into active conspiracy theory. I hate playing against 12 men every week. :evil:

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:13 pm
by ClaretAndJew
There is no conspiracy theory, these things are part of the game, can't be helped.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:24 pm
by Cornwallclaret
Im more dissapointed our lads weren't more ruthless..would have been better to defend their attack regardless how it started then argue the toss after the final whistle with a 1-0 scruffy win and 3 pts

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:31 pm
by SussexDon1inIreland
Agree with Ontario
Am tired of always playing 12 - playing against 11 is hard enough.
How many penalties have we won this season?? its none

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:36 pm
by ontario claret
I'm actually surprised that they allowed Barnes's goal. After all, he did brush the keeper after the ball was already in the goal.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 7:38 pm
by ontario claret
And "can't be helped"? When did you ever see any of the Big 6 undergo these circumstances?

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:11 pm
by Erasmus
It's just another example of the bad luck we seem to experiencing this year.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:16 pm
by ClaretTony
ontario claret wrote:I'm actually surprised that they allowed Barnes's goal. After all, he did brush the keeper after the ball was already in the goal.
ontario claret wrote:And "can't be helped"? When did you ever see any of the Big 6 undergo these circumstances?

He actually put the ball into the net with his hand, albeit not deliberately.

I do Rate the Ref before seeing any footage back, but when I did, the only decision he got wrong was the goalkeeper coming out of the box handling the ball. But he couldn't see it from the angle he had so couldn't give it.

He's a poor referee, in my view, but nothing wrong with his performance at all.

Interestingly, Martin Atkinson did exactly the same today, blocking a player, in the Man U v Chelsea game. It prompted the commentator to mention Madley & Burnley. It's happened for years, it's not anyone's fault.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:22 pm
by Walton
Some Burnley fans wouldn't look out of place on Arsenal TV or Infowars with their loony conspiracy theories.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:25 pm
by Dark Cloud
Westwood should have decked their player and taken the card.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:27 pm
by Belial
Can't do anything about the ref getting in the way - it's part of it sometimes and that's one we were unlucky with.

We can say something about the quick free kick we took in the first half though that was called back - because when Man City did that to us, it was allowed to carry on and they directly scored from it

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:29 pm
by IanMcL
Dark Cloud wrote:Westwood should have decked their player and taken the card.
Should have decked the player and may not have got a card, as it was restoring the balance! Ha!

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:32 pm
by claret57
ClaretTony wrote:He actually put the ball into the net with his hand, albeit not deliberately.

I do Rate the Ref before seeing any footage back, but when I did, the only decision he got wrong was the goalkeeper coming out of the box handling the ball. But he couldn't see it from the angle he had so couldn't give it.

He's a poor referee, in my view, but nothing wrong with his performance at all.

Interestingly, Martin Atkinson did exactly the same today, blocking a player, in the Man U v Chelsea game. It prompted the commentator to mention Madley & Burnley. It's happened for years, it's not anyone's fault.



If you look at the refs position he was on a direct line with the penalty area and had a good view of the goalkeepers hand ball. Also the linesman was on the right side to help him. In my view he bottled it

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:35 pm
by ontario claret
With all due respect, Tony, isn't the correct call for direct referee interference, inadvertent or not, causing direct change in outcome in a game, a dropped ball? Maybe The_Referee can answer this.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:36 pm
by Dark Cloud
IanMcL wrote:Should have decked the player and may not have got a card, as it was restoring the balance! Ha!
You might be right there! Madley might have felt bad and let him off. And I couldn't help thinking Joey B wouldn't have hesitated!! He'd have taken out Madley AND their player :?

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:45 pm
by dushanbe
The ref is part of the field of play. It’s just tough luck.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:50 pm
by Andreshotboots
As I've said on other threads if we played keep ball from our corner on about 87 mins none of the above would have happened..

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 8:53 pm
by ClaretTony
claret57 wrote:If you look at the refs position he was on a direct line with the penalty area and had a good view of the goalkeepers hand ball. Also the linesman was on the right side to help him. In my view he bottled it
I saw it on the Sky programme. He has a clear view but the ball isn’t visible so he can’t give anything. The lino at that end is on the other side of the pitch.

It’s not even that easy to see from the best camera angle at slow motion.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 9:05 pm
by thatdberight
Belial wrote:Can't do anything about the ref getting in the way - it's part of it sometimes and that's one we were unlucky with.

We can say something about the quick free kick we took in the first half though that was called back - because when Man City did that to us, it was allowed to carry on and they directly scored from it
Taking it 15 yards from where it was given while it was still moving may have been the problem. Says something about our players sometimes that even second time around when we weren't trying to take it quickly, we still couldn't be arsed to stop the ball first. So we needed a 3rd go. You have to wonder what they have for brains sometimes.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 9:59 pm
by Rowls
dushanbe wrote:The ref is part of the field of play. It’s just tough luck.
It's bad refereeing too. The referee's job is to get out of the way and in that he failed.

He failed as badly as a referee can do in this instance as he directly contributed in favour of one side.

It's as poor a refereeing you'll see without witnessing a blatantly wrong decision or deliberate mistake.

Those who say it's just "part of the game" are akin to those saying players who mess up are just "doing their best".

It's a mistake. An error. A f&*k up.

He needs to be marked down for it.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 10:37 pm
by tim_noone
SussexDon1inIreland wrote:Agree with Ontario
Am tired of always playing 12 - playing against 11 is hard enough.
How many penalties have we won this season?? its none
I admired his honesty of staying on his feet and letting the game flow.makes a Change from all that diving! Pity about the goal though.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 11:18 pm
by scouseclaret
I don’t think Madley made enough of an attempt to get out of the way.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Sun Feb 25, 2018 11:23 pm
by tim_noone
scouseclaret wrote:I don’t think Madley made enough of an attempt to get out of the way.
If he'd dived they wouldn't have scored.but your damned if you dive and damned if you don't!

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:01 am
by THEWELLERNUT70
The thing that perhaps Westwood got wrong,Was not the taking one for the team, but he should have carried on into Madley and shoved him over. If he was too knackered or not nimble enough to get his flabby ar5e out of the way that's his look out, and it would have halted play

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:23 am
by beddie
Talking about the hand ball by the keeper, the Lino on the JH side was right up to the half way line and was clearly looking (imo) at the incident. With our players protesting to Madley all he had to do was ask the Lino on the head phones if he saw it. I think we're clutching at straws trying to blame Maley for the collision, he couldn't get out of the way.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 10:55 am
by aggi
Dark Cloud wrote:You might be right there! Madley might have felt bad and let him off. And I couldn't help thinking Joey B wouldn't have hesitated!! He'd have taken out Madley AND their player :?
On the podcast he did with Dyche, Barton made reference to the last game he played for us against Man Utd where he should have taken out their player in the build up to their goal but didn't.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 12:25 pm
by evensteadiereddie
I thought Long's rather feeble, inexperienced attempt at challenging Gabbiadini was the main cause of the goal.
Still, onwards and upwards, eh ?

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:00 pm
by dermotdermot
I made the suggestion on Saturday that he not only didn’t get out of the way but that it LOOKED as if he was deliberately obstructing him. This drew hoots of derision from Fidel Castrol who saw signs of paranoia creeping in. It was just that the referee seemed determined to stand his ground.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:02 pm
by fidelcastro
dermotdermot wrote:I made the suggestion on Saturday that he not only didn’t get out of the way but that it LOOKED as if he was deliberately obstructing him. This drew hoots of derision from Fidel Castrol who saw signs of paranoia creeping in. It was just that the referee seemed determined to stand his ground.
What did you expect him to do? Dance a jig?

:roll:

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm
by Rowls
I expect referees to get out of the way.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:03 pm
by Rowls
I've nearly calmed down about this incident.

But not quite.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:05 pm
by dermotdermot
My god, you seem to be stalking me. Is it lunch time or something? You really must be part of a “plan”.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:06 pm
by Rowls
Me?

I'm having my lunch, yes.

I promise you're not at all important to me.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:07 pm
by dermotdermot
Not you, Rowls. Fidel Castrol.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:08 pm
by fidelcastro
dermotdermot wrote:My god, you seem to be stalking me. Is it lunch time or something? You really must be part of a “plan”.
No. I'm just responding to your daft comment where you mentioned me.

Rowls - Get over it. It happens. How does a ref know that trying to get out of the way won't make matters worse? Standing his ground is about all he can do.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:16 pm
by Rowls
fidelcastro wrote:No. I'm just responding to your daft comment where you mentioned me.

Rowls - Get over it. It happens. How does a ref know that trying to get out of the way won't make matters worse? Standing his ground is about all he can do.
I don't see any of Madley's defenders applying the same argument to our player - get over it! What else can Westwood do? Long can't be expected to put in a better challenge!

Madley should have done better.

He was in the way.

You get over it.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:17 pm
by 4:20
The only time I wished Clattenburg was back reffing in a Burnley match. He would've slithered out of the way like a snake no problem.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:18 pm
by TopCat
I am still livid at the **** poor tactics.
Wingers on wrong wings and no substitutions.
Kevin Long was never fouled.
Once again we have defended a cross badly in injury time and been punished.

As for subs, I am actually glad he didn't take Hendrick off, as it would certainly been the biggest cheer of the game, and wrecked what little confidence he retains.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:21 pm
by fidelcastro
Rowls wrote:I don't see any of Madley's defenders applying the same argument to our player - get over it! What else can Westwood do? Long can't be expected to put in a better challenge!

Madley should have done better.

He was in the way.

You get over it.
The ref is part of the field of play, so get over it!

As for Long, he needed to be stronger when the ball finally arrived in the area, several seconds after the 'collision' between the ref and Westwood.

Stop looking for excuses and accept that we didn't kill the game off when we had the chance.

Unless it's a different view entirely on your laptop? :roll:

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:29 pm
by Devils_Advocate
Being reported that a large selection of the Premier League refs run a prediction competition between themselves worth a lot of money. Seems we were picked for bottom 3 by a lot of them and the report suggests its the reason why certain clubs like Burnley get refs doing their upmost to see that we lose.

Apparently Madley is up at the top and Burnley and Southampton are two of his picks that are doing the worst so looks like the body check may have been deliberate after all

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:31 pm
by Rowls
Slow day Devils_Advocate?

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:31 pm
by fidelcastro
Devils_Advocate wrote:Being reported that a large selection of the Premier League refs run a prediction competition between themselves worth a lot of money. Seems we were picked for bottom 3 by a lot of them and the report suggests its the reason why certain clubs like Burnley get refs doing their upmost to see that we lose.

Apparently Madley is up at the top and Burnley and Southampton are two of his picks that are doing the worst so looks like the body check may have been deliberate after all
Even for you that's pathetic.

:lol:

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:33 pm
by Devils_Advocate
Rowls wrote:Slow day Devils_Advocate?
Seems its always a slow day in that head of yours Rowls

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:33 pm
by jlup1980
1. Westwood should have taken their player out as soon as they broke.
2. We should have defended the attack better.
3. It wasn't a foul on Long. Never been a foul. SD is wrong saying they get given every week. There was no contact, that's why it wasn't given.
4. Everyone is clutching at straws.
5. We were poor and didn't deserve to win the match.
6. These things happen. Move on.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:35 pm
by Devils_Advocate
fidelcastro wrote:Even for you that's pathetic.

:lol:
To be fair to me though its not even close to being the most silliest far fetched post on this thread

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 1:41 pm
by fidelcastro
Devils_Advocate wrote:To be fair to me though its not even close to being the most silliest far fetched post on this thread
On balance, I reckon it is.

Where are these reports of a 'Ref's Club' where they try and influence League standings then?

:?: :?

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:01 pm
by evensteadiereddie
Barmy.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:15 pm
by FCBurnley
Keeper handled ball outside of penalty area FACT
Westwood was taken out by the Ref FACT
Longs defending for goal was awful FACT
Game was draw FACT
We did not deserve to win.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 2:55 pm
by Ashingtonclaret46
FCBurnley wrote:Keeper handled ball outside of penalty area FACT
Westwood was taken out by the Ref FACT
Longs defending for goal was awful FACT
Game was draw FACT
We did not deserve to win.
Keeper handled ball outside of penalty area FACT --this can't be FACT because the referee saw no offence.

Re: I'm Not Mad-ley, I'm Livid

Posted: Mon Feb 26, 2018 3:11 pm
by Rowls
Devils_Advocate wrote:Seems its always a slow day in that head of yours Rowls
Some days slower than others but so far today I've done my shopping, fixed a sign for the pub, fixed and re-fitted a pair of wooden shutters and also fixed a faulty fire door.

All before actually starting my shift so I'm feeling productive today.

Still found time to post a remark in reply to your post above too. In truth, it was a poor effort on your behalf. You're normally more subtle than that.

Anyway, I'm back off to work in a minute or two - what a trooper I am. :)