Ground Development
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Ground Development
Found this at the back of The Clarets Chronicles. The corner of JH & JM looks just like what is coming.
When will they get on with the CFS?
As this was published in 2007 it was 11 years ahead so better than Bolton.
When will they get on with the CFS?
As this was published in 2007 it was 11 years ahead so better than Bolton.
-
- Posts: 2786
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2015 12:42 pm
- Been Liked: 951 times
- Has Liked: 288 times
- Location: Bradford
- Contact:
Re: Ground Development
We don’t sell out for the majority of games. There’s no real need to do that work yet. The CFS will only be knocked down if it’s not fit for purpose or we’ve stayed up about 10 seasons in a row.
Re: Ground Development
[quote="MDWat"]The CFS will only be knocked down if it’s not fit for purpose or we’ve stayed up about 10 seasons in a row.[/quote]
You haven't got a clue boy.
You haven't got a clue boy.
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: Ground Development
I think this was Paul Fletcher's doing. Obsolete before it was even published.
-
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 12:37 am
- Been Liked: 1092 times
- Has Liked: 557 times
Re: Ground Development
Spend the money on structure whilst we’ve got it. We could be a long time without it if we go down again.
This user liked this post: tim_noone
-
- Posts: 20610
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
- Been Liked: 4542 times
- Has Liked: 2047 times
Re: Ground Development
The Turf's basic, unwelcoming and hostile.
I like it like that. Visiting teams, apparently, don't like that.
So keep it the same.
I like it like that. Visiting teams, apparently, don't like that.
So keep it the same.
These 2 users liked this post: ontario claret tiger76
Re: Ground Development
He has it spot on.Geoff wrote:
You haven't got a clue boy.
Re: Ground Development
I just want shorter waits for my pie at half time. Surely that should be the first priority?
These 3 users liked this post: simonclaret LeadBelly lesxdp
-
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 749 times
- Has Liked: 395 times
Re: Ground Development
Bring back iPiesox8595 wrote:I just want shorter waits for my pie at half time. Surely that should be the first priority?
-
- Posts: 6845
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:53 am
- Been Liked: 2875 times
- Has Liked: 7065 times
- Location: -90.000000, 0.000000
Re: Ground Development
You’re doing it wrong - buy the pie before kickoff in the first half, by half time the thermonuclear temperature will have reduced enough for you to consume it, and in this weather it can be utilised as a hand warmersox8595 wrote:I just want shorter waits for my pie at half time. Surely that should be the first priority?

These 4 users liked this post: Ashingtonclaret46 evensteadiereddie Colburn_Claret RingoMcCartney
-
- Posts: 77752
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2015 3:07 pm
- Been Liked: 38047 times
- Has Liked: 5774 times
- Location: Burnley
- Contact:
Re: Ground Development
Those plans shown at the top were the first ones put forward by Brendan Flood for a sports village. They were very quickly scrapped.
Re: Ground Development
What?MDWat wrote:We don’t sell out for the majority of games. There’s no real need to do that work yet. The CFS will only be knocked down if it’s not fit for purpose or we’ve stayed up about 10 seasons in a row.
Our gates will improve with time and more away capacity.
Closing off the corners will improve the atmosphere.
Re: Ground Development
Gates probably won’t improve. I suspect that they’d be more likely to drop than increase, for the ‘run of the mill’ games.
Unless we are doing something special (league, cup or perhaps flirting with Europe) the more fickle of our fans will get bored after a few seasons of mid table - even though that in itself would be a great achievement.
Unless we are doing something special (league, cup or perhaps flirting with Europe) the more fickle of our fans will get bored after a few seasons of mid table - even though that in itself would be a great achievement.
-
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 749 times
- Has Liked: 395 times
Re: Ground Development
They really won't. Most PL teams maybe half fill their away allocation now and most games don't sell out. Is it worth spending a lot of money for a few extra thousand ticket sales against Chelsea, City, United and Liverpool?Stayingup wrote: Our gates will improve with time and more away capacity.
Re: Ground Development
We don’t need a bigger capacity. The main reasons for development should be: developing the infrastructure whilst we have the money to do so, improving the experience for home fans, increasing match day / non match day revenue streams if possible.
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4201 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Ground Development
We have argued over this for years and everyone has different views but
if we increase capacity it would be a 2nd tier on the Bob Lord stand that would bring another 3k prime viewing seats into play.
There's not many decent seats available for a walk on and certainly not in two or threes if you want to go with friends or family.
if we increase capacity it would be a 2nd tier on the Bob Lord stand that would bring another 3k prime viewing seats into play.
There's not many decent seats available for a walk on and certainly not in two or threes if you want to go with friends or family.
-
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2016 2:32 pm
- Been Liked: 20 times
- Has Liked: 124 times
Re: Ground Development
What is clear is that there are limited seats for families to sit together which are causing people not to go or to sit apart. We don't sell out is often an argument I see on here but I can say for sure if people are having problem sitting with friends or family they wont go and of course we wont sell out under these conditions, with odd seats dotted around the stadium.
I am sure the club is aware of this and will choose what to do in the best interests of BFC. Increasing capacity or not.
I am sure the club is aware of this and will choose what to do in the best interests of BFC. Increasing capacity or not.
Re: Ground Development
I've heard in the past from sources within the club that a second tier to the Bob Lord is part of Dyche's vision for the ground development, along with the two corner stands. Maybe another season in the Prem will see this come to fruition.
Re: Ground Development
Don't forget the safe standing option as well. We need to maximise creating a better / more hostile atmosphere rather than just focusing on extra seats.
The last thing we need is a ground that holds 25-30k which could become a half empty stadium *cough* Rovers.
Could a new Cricketfield stand incorporate safe standing, for home fans only? And have the corner between the Cricketfield and the James hargreaves a new section for away fans? That would be pretty hostile.
The last thing we need is a ground that holds 25-30k which could become a half empty stadium *cough* Rovers.
Could a new Cricketfield stand incorporate safe standing, for home fans only? And have the corner between the Cricketfield and the James hargreaves a new section for away fans? That would be pretty hostile.
-
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3477 times
- Has Liked: 5722 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Ground Development
If there is any money in the pot for improvements, it would be silly to do anything when the chances of creating safe standing areas is getting nearer.
We don't need extra capacity, but we do need a better stand to accommodate a proper Kop. The CFS do their best, and the JHU is less successful, to have a large mental crowd behind the CF goal would be such a boost to the atmosphere, and the team.
We don't need extra capacity, but we do need a better stand to accommodate a proper Kop. The CFS do their best, and the JHU is less successful, to have a large mental crowd behind the CF goal would be such a boost to the atmosphere, and the team.
-
- Posts: 7844
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2016 5:04 pm
- Been Liked: 3108 times
- Has Liked: 4870 times
Re: Ground Development
If there ISNT any money in the pot for ground improvements some serious questions need asking lol...
-
- Posts: 5548
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 pm
- Been Liked: 1448 times
- Has Liked: 1229 times
- Location: Ferkham Hall
Re: Ground Development
Can't agree with that. Success breeds success. More kids will be asking Dad's to take them on. The catchment area will widen. Just like in the 60s when match specials were coming in from Rawtenstall, Bacup, Accy, Nelson etc., Especially at a time when our surrounding rivals are in lower leagues this is the perfect opportunity to go out and get these kids on board.DCWat wrote:Gates probably won’t improve. I suspect that they’d be more likely to drop than increase, for the ‘run of the mill’ games.
Even Rovers went from their 5k gates in the 70s to 30k in the 90s. Rovers took all the kids in that period, now it is our chance to get the next generation.
-
- Posts: 19787
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4201 times
- Has Liked: 2246 times
Re: Ground Development
You would need more fans that want to sing to create what you want.Colburn_Claret wrote:If there is any money in the pot for improvements, it would be silly to do anything when the chances of creating safe standing areas is getting nearer.
We don't need extra capacity, but we do need a better stand to accommodate a proper Kop. The CFS do their best, and the JHU is less successful, to have a large mental crowd behind the CF goal would be such a boost to the atmosphere, and the team.
We probably only have 500 fans that sing regular the rest when we have scored or winning.
Re: Ground Development
What ever happened to the plans of a new ground being built on the old Padiham Power Station site ?
-
- Posts: 774
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:43 am
- Been Liked: 303 times
- Has Liked: 149 times
Re: Ground Development
Mike Garlick stated on Clarets tv that there would be the need for new stands within 5 years, out of the horses mouth & said it would cost around £30mil.
-
- Posts: 5459
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 12:13 am
- Been Liked: 697 times
- Has Liked: 1725 times
- Location: Brooklin
Re: Ground Development
Until the Cricket Field or the Bob Lord get condemned, keep it the way it is. It won't increase attendance, and it's all about TV money, anyways. Remember, the Chicago Cubs play in the smallest stadium in the baseball big leagues, but are near the top of revenue. Same as Boston.