Nakhi Wells

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
Safron
Posts: 1688
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2017 12:47 pm
Been Liked: 275 times
Has Liked: 201 times

Nakhi Wells

Post by Safron » Sat Mar 10, 2018 3:00 pm

As this lad been abducted?

boiledclaret
Posts: 1592
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:56 am
Been Liked: 389 times
Has Liked: 1022 times
Location: Dnipropetrovsk

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by boiledclaret » Sat Mar 10, 2018 3:03 pm

It's been an odd signing, by the look of things.

IndigoLake
Been Liked: 1 time
Has Liked: 950 times

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by IndigoLake » Sat Mar 10, 2018 3:17 pm

I think a lot of people thought it was an odd signing at the time and I don't think anything has changed opinion on that. Was unsure he had the quality to improve the team (aside from having some pace) and he's just not had a look in. Hope we move him on this summer.

IanMcL
Posts: 34805
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 5:27 pm
Been Liked: 6949 times
Has Liked: 10368 times

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by IanMcL » Sat Mar 10, 2018 3:51 pm

You never know.
This user liked this post: tim_noone

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by FactualFrank » Sat Mar 10, 2018 4:13 pm

You'd still have a fire extinguisher in a building, even though there was little chance of ever needing it.

It seems to me that he was bought as an emergency - just in case. Because he's better than bringing someone through the Youth team. It's only been an odd signing, because we haven't needed him. Had we needed him, we'd have then been glad of the signing.
These 6 users liked this post: CombatClaret burnley007 BertiesBeehole Buxtonclaret PaintYorkClaretnBlue blackburnturfite

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 295 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by SkiptonClaret » Sat Mar 10, 2018 5:08 pm

FactualFrank wrote:You'd still have a fire extinguisher in a building, even though there was little chance of ever needing it.

It seems to me that he was bought as an emergency - just in case. Because he's better than bringing someone through the Youth team. It's only been an odd signing, because we haven't needed him. Had we needed him, we'd have then been glad of the signing.
Bringing someone through the youth team ? Imagine that. Strange signing, not the only one last summer to be fair though.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by FactualFrank » Sat Mar 10, 2018 5:20 pm

SkiptonClaret wrote:Bringing someone through the youth team ? Imagine that. Strange signing, not the only one last summer to be fair though.
So you'd rather have a youth player on the bench who has no League experience whatsoever, is no doubt not as good as Wells, whilst still chasing Premier League survival?

Fair enough. I wouldn't.

Socrates
Posts: 960
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:45 pm
Been Liked: 1025 times
Has Liked: 5 times

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by Socrates » Sat Mar 10, 2018 5:23 pm

FactualFrank wrote:So you'd rather have a youth player on the bench who has no League experience whatsoever
How much Premier League experience did Wells have when we signed him?

I think Dan Agyei still has more Premier League minutes than him.

SkiptonClaret
Posts: 1382
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 pm
Been Liked: 295 times
Has Liked: 96 times

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by SkiptonClaret » Sat Mar 10, 2018 5:26 pm

FactualFrank wrote:So you'd rather have a youth player on the bench who has no Premier League experience whatsoever, is no doubt not as good as Wells, whilst still chasing Premier League survival?

Fair enough. I wouldn't.
I think you’ve misunderstood. What I meant was that it appears there’s very little chance of us ever bringing through a youth team player that is considered good enough for the Premier League. Pretty sure that not a single youth team product has started a league game under Sean Dyche’s management. So, yes, filling the squad out with signings such as Wells and Walters can perhaps be considered not strange, however that certainly doesn’t make them good signings.
As I said, some poor signings last summer.

ElectroClaret
Posts: 20610
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:07 pm
Been Liked: 4541 times
Has Liked: 2047 times

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by ElectroClaret » Sat Mar 10, 2018 5:30 pm

Fair enough, maybe he has made some poor signings.
He's not perfect and not many managers get em all right.

But I think SDs got enough credit in the bank now to accommodate that, don't you?
This user liked this post: BennyD

BennyD
Posts: 3603
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 1338 times
Has Liked: 757 times
Location: Nantwich

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by BennyD » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:46 pm

SC, not really; very few transfers have gone straight in the first 11; we are holding him back for ‘strength in depth’. He will come good if SD requires it.

FactualFrank
Posts: 25445
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
Been Liked: 6930 times
Has Liked: 11660 times
Location: Leeds

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by FactualFrank » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:53 pm

BennyD wrote:Not really; very few transfers have gone straight in the first 11; we are holding him back for ‘strength in depth’. He will come good if SD requires it.
That was my point. I think it's strange that people think the transfer was strange. I see it as very very easy thing to understand.
We wanted somebody here who was going to be the last option - but the last option can sometimes be needed in football. If you get down to your bare bones, with the window closed, it's too late, so what do you do then? For the sake of a few million, which we can afford, it made perfect sense to bring someone in who can do a job, if needed. Why aren't more people understanding that?

So no - it wasn't a strange transfer. It was a cheap transfer (when talking relatively), for somebody who was better than we had in the youth. It was also quite clearly the best we could have got in SD's and the board's mind, otherwise we'd have signed better.
These 3 users liked this post: BennyD boatshed bill halfmanhalfbiscuit

BennyD
Posts: 3603
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:10 am
Been Liked: 1338 times
Has Liked: 757 times
Location: Nantwich

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by BennyD » Sat Mar 10, 2018 6:59 pm

I agree with everything you say. Maybe you are as perceptive as me and SD are. :)
These 3 users liked this post: FactualFrank halfmanhalfbiscuit boiledclaret

halfmanhalfbiscuit
Posts: 581
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:20 am
Been Liked: 130 times
Has Liked: 352 times

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by halfmanhalfbiscuit » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:15 pm

FactualFrank wrote:That was my point. I think it's strange that people think the transfer was strange. I see it as very very easy thing to understand.
We wanted somebody here who was going to be the last option - but the last option can sometimes be needed in football. If you get down to your bare bones, with the window closed, it's too late, so what do you do then? For the sake of a few million, which we can afford, it made perfect sense to bring someone in who can do a job, if needed. Why aren't more people understanding that?

So no - it wasn't a strange transfer. It was a cheap transfer (when talking relatively), for somebody who was better than we had in the youth. It was also quite clearly the best we could have got in SD's and the board's mind, otherwise we'd have signed better.
And who's to say he doesn't pop up with a goal this season?
One goal to claim a couple of points would far outweigh his transfer fee and wages.
This user liked this post: FactualFrank

Garforth Claret
Posts: 214
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 11:19 pm
Been Liked: 141 times
Has Liked: 95 times
Location: Garforth doh!

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by Garforth Claret » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:28 pm

He’s injured, got splints in his arse from sitting on bench

Whitgord
Posts: 1096
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 285 times
Has Liked: 767 times
Location: Clitheroe

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by Whitgord » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:31 pm

Splinters maybe, but surely not splints!!

cricketfieldclarets
Posts: 21464
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
Been Liked: 8585 times
Has Liked: 11285 times

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by cricketfieldclarets » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:39 pm

FactualFrank wrote:You'd still have a fire extinguisher in a building, even though there was little chance of ever needing it.

It seems to me that he was bought as an emergency - just in case. Because he's better than bringing someone through the Youth team. It's only been an odd signing, because we haven't needed him. Had we needed him, we'd have then been glad of the signing.
If you bought a fire extinguisher you would at least make sure it had water in. He wasnt able to play for the first half of the seson!

Anyway todays not the day to pick signings apart.

taio
Posts: 12828
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:17 am
Been Liked: 3589 times
Has Liked: 406 times

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by taio » Sat Mar 10, 2018 7:42 pm

SkiptonClaret wrote:I think you’ve misunderstood. What I meant was that it appears there’s very little chance of us ever bringing through a youth team player that is considered good enough for the Premier League. Pretty sure that not a single youth team product has started a league game under Sean Dyche’s management. So, yes, filling the squad out with signings such as Wells and Walters can perhaps be considered not strange, however that certainly doesn’t make them good signings.
As I said, some poor signings last summer.
Incredible post.

BleedingClaret
Posts: 4024
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:06 am
Been Liked: 1187 times
Has Liked: 1925 times
Location: Burnley Boy exiled in Nelson

Re: Nakhi Wells

Post by BleedingClaret » Sat Mar 10, 2018 9:17 pm

It’s called a Squad
This user liked this post: FactualFrank

Post Reply