• Which striker would you like to have back?

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:19 am**

With Jayrod's Baggies doomed, and Austin's Saints in serious trouble it got me thinking would anyone want us to re-sign Jay, Charlie or Danny Ings (who's not getting much game time at Liverpool)

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:39 am**

Personally, Austin.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:45 am**

Frank Casper

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:46 am**

John Gayle

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 7:53 am**

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:24 am**

Mike Conroy

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:31 am**

Austin in his pomp
Ings in his pomp ( would suit our system excellently )
J Rod in his pomp

In that order

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:32 am**

Tony Phillishave

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:50 am**

Juke

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 8:52 am**

None of them.

A fit Austin perhaps.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:03 am**

Ray Pointer

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:17 am**

Willie Irvine

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:20 am**

Thanks Herts

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:29 am**

Billy Hamilton

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:36 am**

Rammy1968 wrote:Billy Hamilton

You'd need a big cheque to prise him away from his trophy engraving business in Bangor, Northern Ireland!

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:36 am**

Andy Lochead fantastic header of the Ball makes the Geordie Carroll look like Andy Pandy.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:36 am**

Peter Noble, great header of the ball.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:19 am**

Tommy Lawton

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:25 am**

paulus the woodgnome wrote:Tommy Lawton

My dad used to tell me how good Tommy Lawton was - probably the first young player we had to sell on.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:28 am**

Of the 3, I'd most like to see Ings back. I know not everyone agrees with that but I think he'd be of most value to us and offer something different to our current forwards. However, I generally think that it's best to look forward so I'd be okay with not having any of them coming back.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:33 am**

A young Ian Wright.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:35 am**

Les Lawrence

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:38 am**

Gifton Noel Williams; all three of him.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:38 am**

It would be interesting to see a Dyche fit Andy Payton (probably younger than we got him) in this team.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:46 am**

Another stupid thread turned into a magical comic review

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:49 am**

None of them, all past their best.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:50 am**

Andy Payton. No fannying about like Ings, bang, back of the net.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:51 am**

boatshed bill wrote:None of them, all past their best.

Come on bill it's only a bit of fun

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 10:56 am**

Who the hell is Andy paton?

Nice edit Beddie!

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:10 am**

Bambo

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:13 am**

Another for Frank Casper.

And could i also have Steve Kindon charging down the wing?
Would be fascinating to see how PL defenders would deal with Skippy.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:22 am**

None of them, they all wanted to leave..all had bigger ideas...Gray as well.

No problem with that...tho' once gone stay gone.

The never-ending fascination with ex-Clarets continues..zzzz

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:25 am**

Austin is the better of the 3 but I'd like Jay back, he'd fit us better and has unfinished business. I think he'd be an asset when fully fit and motivated.

It's strange how you ask a question and give 3 options but the majority of the empty head smart arses come up with a completely different answer....

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:28 am**

Austin. JayRod but only when he wants to be back.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:50 am**

KRBFC wrote:Austin is the better of the 3 but I'd like Jay back, he'd fit us better and has unfinished business. I think he'd be an asset when fully fit and motivated.

It's strange how you ask a question and give 3 options but the majority of the empty head smart arses come up with a completely different answer....

My empty head is smart arse enough to know that Austin would be 'the best of the 3'. Better being a comparative, i.e. comparing between two. Best is quite simply the superlative form used for any more than two. I'd offer you an empty heads dictionary definition but thought better not,or is that best knot?

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:15 pm**

Arthur Scargill.

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:34 pm**

KRBFC wrote:Austin is the better of the 3 but I'd like Jay back, he'd fit us better and has unfinished business. I think he'd be an asset when fully fit and motivated.

It's strange how you ask a question and give 3 options but the majority of the empty head smart arses come up with a completely different answer....

Yet they will call you for disrupting a thread and rant how you you always ruin threads by going off topic

Posted: **Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:42 pm**

tim_noone wrote:Come on bill it's only a bit of fun

I can't see the fun in paying big wages to any one of a trio of potential crocks, Tim

.
Chris wood kicks their arses!!!

Posted: **Mon Apr 02, 2018 6:19 am**

Sign them all....

But on a pay as you play basis

Posted: **Mon Apr 02, 2018 6:54 am**

Ray Hankin.

Posted: **Mon Apr 02, 2018 8:12 am**

We shouldnt take anybody back. We should progress with better talent

Posted: **Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:24 am**

Nick Pickering. Realise he's a midfielder but we never did see the best of him and a role further up the pitch could be the catalyst he needs to ignite his career with us.

Posted: **Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:34 am**

I think we've moved on now. Our squad, our team, is considerably stronger when any of Jay Rod, Austin, Ings were with us. Two of those three don't play much either because of injuries.

All three were terrific for us, don't think anyone could question that, but we move on.

Posted: **Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:47 am**

ClaretTony wrote:I think we've moved on now. Our squad, our team, is considerably stronger when any of Jay Rod, Austin, Ings were with us. Two of those three don't play much either because of injuries.

All three were terrific for us, don't think anyone could question that, but we move on.

You are being kind to one of them.
Jay. Since August 12. 134 apps.
Charlie. Since August 13. 120 apps.
Danny. Since August 15. 10 apps.
They have all had their injury problems.

Posted: **Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:50 am**

piston broke wrote:You are being kind to one of them.
Jay. Since August 12. 134 apps.
Charlie. Since August 13. 120 apps.
Danny. Since August 15. 10 apps.
They have all had their injury problems.

Jay's not been troubled by injury for some time though - the other two have.

Posted: **Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:50 am**

ClaretTony wrote:Jay's not been troubled by injury for some time though - the other two have.

Fair point.

Which striker would you like to have back?

Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?

Re: Which striker would you like to have back?