The jocks already 1 down in the first 15 minutes.They could be at full time.

in these enlightened times, surely "jocks" is inappropriate, especially from a gloating nondescript english , white, pot bellied , shaven headed, pit bull walking , beer swilling , fan of dross overseen by southgate.

just saying

As long as mulgrew comes through fit and well I couldn't care less..

Sweaty socks is acceptable.

To be disparaging of mexicans is another matter...


https://youtu.be/_3iaiGKz0iU" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Wile E Coyote wrote:in these enlightened times, surely "jocks" is inappropriate, ...

We don't give a ****.

The Black Watch would see it as a term of endearment.
Rock on Tommy!

When you look at the quality of Scotland it makes you wonder why Arfield was never selected before getting the chance to play for Canada. Boyd could also consider himself a bit unlucky.

quality ? but for kane scoring in 93 minutes to earn an undeserved draw against scotland, there's not much seperating them.
England may well qualify more often, but in real terms they are a comedic international team. one tournament win in their entire history .