It makes a change from Morse, Inspector George Gently, Foyle's War, etc

Richard Hall

"When the Jo Cox assassination occurred in June 2016, many questions were raised over the veracity of the official version of events. Some say the trial was staged and the outcome preordained by mainstream media. Richard has met with first hand witnesses to the events and has met with friends of the alleged perpetrator Tommy Mair. In this lecture Richard presents the findings of his independent investigation to date. He is appealing for viewers to go to their MP and show them his lecture on Jo Cox's murder. Richard clearly demonstrates that the trial was at the very least a farce, and quite possibly 100% fraudulent. The mainstream media (as usual) were used to sell to the public an entirely false motive for the murder. Anyone with more information please contact Richard in confidence via the contact page on the Richplanet website."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... EIoLftYYLM" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Comments are disabled for this video......quelle surprise

Was it the Jews? Were Mossad involved?

You will have to watch to find out, I wouldn't want to spoil it for you!

I bet it was the Joos, right Blue Lab?

Everyone knows Mossad use known far right, non Jewish, non-military trained loners to carry out assassinations with home made guns and ammunition these days.

Honestly, its so common its just never mentioned.

Any news on the self confessed sex pest of a husband of hers?

I watched the video and it was pretty scary. However it is not independent. He makes a living with conspiracy theories. He does make a strong case but surely unless they have bumped the guy off then the patsy would be screaming about being set up.

Gosh, within 5 minutes of my post, three of our resident "exceptional anti-racists" arrive. The hasbara trolls fearful of any criticism of the "zionazi" state of Israel:

White Nationalists, Racism, Supremacism, and Aparthied

The film about "The Jo Cox Assassination" doesn't mention anything about the entity you are so vigilant to defend.

Back to the film, I found it quite an interesting watch.

There's a new book out about the assassination of Robert Kennedy.

Listened to an interview with the author. Fascinating.

Mossad e-mails me when you post bluelab.

You know how it is

bluelabrador16 wrote:Gosh, within 5 minutes of my post, three of our resident "exceptional anti-racists" arrive. The hasbara trolls fearful of any criticism of the "zionazi" state of Israel:

Nothing that complicated, actually. They're just pointing out what a bellend you are.

Some interesting questions.

How did the police know his name?

If the witnesses are to be believed, the couple who filmed the arrest on the cul-de-sac said ‘100%’ the police shouted his name to get his attention, and he fully co-operated before the police rugby tackled him.

Either, he’s on to something, or the witness were wrong, misrembered or have fabricated it, or Tommy Mier was identified at the scene of the crime before his arrest...

Or, far more likely, he was already known to the police....

using the murder of jo cox to further his bizarre agenda.

a new low for this misfit.

It's not a new low.

sleeperclaret wrote:Or, far more likely, he was already known to the police....

which he wasn't, i take it you haven't watched it ?

claptrappers_union wrote:Some interesting questions.

How did the police know his name?

If the witnesses are to be believed, the couple who filmed the arrest on the cul-de-sac said ‘100%’ the police shouted his name to get his attention, and he fully co-operated before the police rugby tackled him.

Either, he’s on to something, or the witness were wrong, misrembered or have fabricated it, or Tommy Mier was identified at the scene of the crime before his arrest...

What do you reckon is more likely. That the police either knew his name or spoke to someone who knew his name before calling him by his name, or that it's all a massive government conspiracy to kill an MP for no known reason?

yTib

using the murder of jo cox to further his bizarre agenda.

a new low for this misfit

.

Why post when you haven't watched the video!

Watch the video, and then tell me what my "agenda" is.

Imploding Turtle....the same applies to you!

The following might have given posters a clue;

"It makes a change from Morse, Inspector George Gently, Foyle's War, etc"

Lancasterclaret wrote:Everyone knows Mossad use known far right, non Jewish, non-military trained loners to carry out assassinations with home made guns and ammunition these days.

Honestly, its so common its just never mentioned.

Everyone knows? Really do they?

Whoosh !!

Watched the whole thing and if i wasn't 100% sure of Mair's guilt, then I am now. It comes up with things like "why was he carrying a shopping bag?" and absolutely insanely "he used to teach English as a foreign language to muslims" LOL. The police search that found the Nazi memorabilia etc "did they have a police warrant?"LOL "All his neighbours say he was a nice guy, liked gardening" If you can't watch the whole thing, this crap is nearly an hour long, then please everyone just watch 5 minutes at random. The whole thing seems to be based on him carrying 2 caps. Why they ask?
It's laughable, it really is.
Normally, I feel a bit angry after watching this sort of vile rubbish, but this one just made me laugh out loud on many occasions.
At one point they even question the guilt of Anders Brevik FFS!!
Comedy gold!!

Maybe because it is an hour of self serving conspiracy wobble that you will never get back?

bluelabrador16 wrote:yTib

.

Why post when you haven't watched the video!

Watch the video, and then tell me what my "agenda" is.

Imploding Turtle....the same applies to you!

The following might have given posters a clue;

"It makes a change from Morse, Inspector George Gently, Foyle's War, etc"

bluelabrador16 wrote:yTib

.

Why post when you haven't watched the video!

Watch the video, and then tell me what my "agenda" is.

Imploding Turtle....the same applies to you!

The following might have given posters a clue;

"It makes a change from Morse, Inspector George Gently, Foyle's War, etc"

the day i let you dictate what i do for an entire hour of my life is the day i hang myself.

i don't watch any of your crackpot videos. i've got better things to do like picking my arse.

i imagine you'd deny the nose on your face if it meant otherwise admitting that your warped world view, where everyone except you is a fool, just might be wrong.

conspiracy theorists: not so much interested in the truth as the conspiracy.

Herts Clarets wrote:Any news on the self confessed sex pest of a husband of hers?

How is this relevant ?

Herts Clarets wrote:Any news on the self confessed sex pest of a husband of hers?

He has made a right bell end of himself. Typical lefty hypocrite who is totally up himself.

Top Claret wrote:He has made a right bell end of himself. Typical lefty hypocrite who is totally up himself.

I doubt you're in a position to call other people hypocrites.

Top Claret wrote:Typical lefty hypocrite who is totally up himself.

what? did you actually type that?

if you think being 'up one's self' is restricted by political leanings i point you to nigel farage.

sometimes the idiocy on this board defies my imagination.

evensteadiereddie wrote:How is this relevant ?

He was married to her. He portrayed himself as the grieving widower, the national conscience, the bereaved husband. He was actually none of these. Things aren't always what they seem. Totally relevant to the crap the OP infests this board with. He/she has a bizarre agenda.

he wasn't a bereaved husband?

do you honestly live your life with this tabloid, soap-opera mindset or are you a comedy turn?

you don't know him and you don't know how he feels so stop pretending you do.

He was a grieving widower, I don't know about the national conscience bit and he certainly was a bereaved husband so two of the roles he played were genuine.
I hate the snide implication that because of his failings, he deserved the death of his wife.
The OP, and other spiteful arseholes like him, are ruining this board.

Herts Clarets wrote:He was married to her. He portrayed himself as the grieving widower, the national conscience, the bereaved husband. He was actually none of these. Things aren't always what they seem. Totally relevant to the crap the OP infests this board with. He/she has a bizarre agenda.

Wait. Are you saying his wife WASN'T killed?

You lot are all killjoys, like my wife who always reminds me that a good thriller is not plausible when I'm well into it. I'm currently watching the Bridge on I player, absolutely brilliant, I know it's fiction but when I watch it, I like to feel its real and not have the flaws pointed out, thank you Mrs T. I love a conspiracy theory especially if it's just possible. So why can't you all go along with it just for the fun

How is this relevant ?

Not in the slightest

yTib wrote:what? did you actually type that?

if you think being 'up one's self' is restricted by political leanings i point you to nigel farage.

sometimes the idiocy on this board defies my imagination.

And I point you to Imploding Turtle and more than likely yourself.

Worth remembering that Brendan Cox lost his wife, and Jo Cox kids lost their mother because a far right extremist believed all the crap he read in leaflets from "British First" (and others)

Worth thinking about that next time you praise Tommy ******* Robinson and people like him.

Top Claret wrote:And I point you to Imploding Turtle and more than likely yourself.

point away you silly sod.

What is it with you lefties, you can't take any flak and always think you know best

Now calm down and take a chill pill

everyone thinks they know best. it's human nature.

i think you think that left and right minded people are real phenomena.

they are phantasmic tools utilised by the weak.

It must be difficulty for them not to think they know best when they are forever dealing with morons like you

yTib wrote:everyone thinks they know best. it's human nature.

i think you think that left and right minded people are real phenomena.

they are phantasmic tools utilised by the weak.

Say that again in English love

left, right.

dog shyte.

If any evidence that has the slightest chance of changing the verdict that was not considered at the trial would be grounds for appeal. That should be the aim of any campaign

would you encourage such a campaign, gtclaret?

I don't anything about this other this video. But if someone feels that there has been a miscarriage of justice, which is the point of the video, to obtain leave for appeal must be the first step. It's a very small hurdle to get over as it only requires minimal doubt about the original verdict

Just bear in mind, the shooting of Jill Dando, the original Guilty verdict was overturned on appeal

to equate the jill dando case to this is obscene.

i repeat my question gtclaret - would you encourage such a campaign?

No obscenity intended. My sister is a retired criminal lawyer so may be I look at this in a different way. I am saying that if there is evidence that the original verdict may be unsafe, there is a remedy. I would encourage anyone to take this route if they feel this way

gtclaret

you are a ghoulish apologist for a cowardly murderer.

i wonder if you'd be so smug if that particular terrorist had been a muslim.

You are completely wrong, I am most definitely not saying that the perpetrator should not be punished. Anybody who commits a crime like this should rot. Legally the Jill Dando and Jo Cox murders are exactly the same, both executed. Let me explain, leave for appeal does not mean that the accused walks free. That rarely happens. The judge decides whether there are grounds for appeal, nothing else, at this point the hurdle is quite low. If an appeal goes ahead, the court will decide either to quash the original verdict (very rare) in this case the accused walks free, order a retrial (most common) or turn the appeal down (very common)
Most appeals fail. All I am saying, and I fail to understand what you find so offensive, is that if anyone is in jail for a crime they say they DIY not commit, that is the way forward

gtclaret wrote:I don't anything about this other this video. But if someone feels that there has been a miscarriage of justice, which is the point of the video, to obtain leave for appeal must be the first step. It's a very small hurdle to get over as it only requires minimal doubt about the original verdict

Has Thomas Mair made any claims that there has been a miscarriage of justice?
I'm not aware that he has, in which case, - there's no case.