• Clarets after Mooy

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 9:54 pm**

Reports suggesting that Burnley are amongst a group of clubs, including West Ham and Southampton, who are interested in Aaron Mooy at Huddersfield, presently playing for Australia. 20m is figure quoted.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 9:55 pm**

Ever heard of the '3 club rule'?

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:00 pm**

Excellent player. Be happy with him. Liked him for a few years Although similar to defour.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:04 pm**

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Although similar to defour.

But not quite as good as Defour, or Hendrick, Cork and Westwood.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:05 pm**

Not quite as good as Hendrick ?

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:06 pm**

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Excellent player. Be happy with him. Liked him for a few years Although similar to defour.

Yeah I remember you bringing up his name on here, he looks very good, the game v Huddersfield at home was the Defour v Mooy show.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:06 pm**

randomclaret2 wrote:Not quite as good as Hendrick ?

Ignore him, he smokes crack.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:08 pm**

No chance of this.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:08 pm**

Exactly the player that we....don't really need.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:09 pm**

Can't see how he fits into our system tbh

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:13 pm**

randomclaret2 wrote:Not quite as good as Hendrick ?

Yes

It doesn't matter anyway, because I'll bet a pound to a bucket of sh1t that we aren't after him.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:16 pm**

Sounds like he is from Birmingham bragging to his mates. The Clarets are after Mooy our kid.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:17 pm**

Bin Ont Turf wrote:But not quite as good as Defour, or Hendrick, Cork and Westwood.

You were doing really well then....

Then you used the “H” word... and lost ALL credibility.

Cork, and possibly Westwood I’d go along with, but ffs...

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:18 pm**

We've got Defour and Westwood who do exactly the same job, and play only one of them at a time.

Why would we sign him?

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:20 pm**

Possibly to bolster our options ahead of a busy campaign with a player who will slot into the system. Especially when defour has such a record of niggles etc.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:23 pm**

Lancasterclaret wrote:We've got Defour and Westwood who do exactly the same job, and play only one of them at a time.

Why would we sign him?

Get him primed for when defour moves to the china garden.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:27 pm**

bobinho wrote:You were doing really well then....

Then you used the “H” word... and lost ALL credibility.

Cork, and possibly Westwood I’d go along with, but ffs...

Glad to know that I had 'credibility' before this.

You'll never see Mooy beat a man with close footwork.

27 year old Mooy did very well last season, his first season at any decent level.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:32 pm**

Why on earth would Udders even consider letting him go, at pretty much any price? They don't need the cash and he's a massive player for them. I really can't see this tbh.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:49 pm**

Same reason we might sell our best players to say West Ham or Leicester....players want to go to bigger clubs

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:50 pm**

Dark Cloud wrote:Why on earth would Udders even consider letting him go, at pretty much any price? They don't need the cash and he's a massive player for them. I really can't see this tbh.

He is contracted till 2020 with the option of an additional year beyond this,totally agree,certainly they won't do business at 20 million.
Championship players are being quoted at that sort of figure Joe Worrall for one,they would be

to sell,if one of the big six or maybe Wolves or Everton offered silly money 40-50 million it might be a gooer.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:52 pm**

Devils_Advocate wrote:Same reason we might sell our best players to say West Ham or Leicester....players want to go to bigger clubs

The act is coming along quite nicely.

Boring like, but there you go.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:54 pm**

^^^^^drunk^^^^^

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:56 pm**

Bin Ont Turf wrote:The act is coming along quite nicely.

Boring like, but there you go.

''posting for the sake of it''

Hypocrite but I expect nothing less.

Posted: **Sat Jun 16, 2018 10:58 pm**

KRBFC wrote:''posting for the sake of it''

Hypocrite but I expect nothing less.

I don't expect a black and white thick un like you to understand.

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 12:25 am**

Not dissing him, but he would had a step backwards to what we already have . More journalistic bullshit.

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:14 am**

Id have hendrick over him especially in CM.

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:30 am**

Bin Ont Turf wrote:But not quite as good as Defour, or Hendrick, Cork and Westwood.

Hendrick? What games you been watching bot! Mooy is a miles better player than jeff.. if can we do a player swap plus some cash then I'm happy..

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 1:52 am**

Claretuk wrote:Hendrick? What games you been watching bot! Mooy is a miles better player than jeff.. if can we do a player swap plus some cash then I'm happy..

Well according to the votes on this board, the best game this season at home was against Man City.

Jeff played the whole game at centre midfield, and that's the sort of games I've been watching.

Don't let your brain make your eyes deceive you.

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 5:28 am**

Mooy was excellent in the championship for hudds and won player of the season for them. He struggled at times last season which is why Schindler won player of the season.

I’d say he would be a squad player for us and hudds value him too highly for us to pay that much for a squad player

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 8:11 am**

Since George Boyd left, I feel we've been let down in the long locks department. Mooy doesn't address that so it's a no from me.

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 4:40 pm**

kindonyes wrote:Reports suggesting that Burnley are amongst a group of clubs, including West Ham and Southampton, who are interested in Aaron Mooy at Huddersfield, presently playing for Australia. 20m is figure quoted.

Which reports? Where have you got this from?

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 5:53 pm**

IndigoLake wrote:Since George Boyd left, I feel we've been let down in the long locks department. Mooy doesn't address that so it's a no from me.

similar to Arthur Gnohere!

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 5:56 pm**

Bin Ont Turf wrote:But not quite as good as Defour, or Hendrick, Cork and Westwood.

He’s better than 3 of them. Obviously wouldn’t replace Cork though as his role is different.

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 7:30 pm**

Really ? I would say he's definitely not better than Cork or Defour and possibly not better than the other two either.

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 7:37 pm**

Stalbansclaret wrote:Really ? I would say he's definitely not better than Cork or Defour and possibly not better than the other two either.

Definitely better than Hendrick, better than Westwood and Cork. Cork used very effectively by Dyche but doesn’t make him a better player overall.

Posted: **Sun Jun 17, 2018 7:39 pm**

Totally agree he is not better than Cork,probably not better than Defour,the issue with Defour is how many minutes will he play each season,and if any centre-mids are out long-term we need bodies even just to replace Marney and Scotty,i'm sure we can get a likely squad player for less than 20 million.

Clarets after Mooy

Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy

Re: Clarets after Mooy