Page 1 of 1

FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:25 am
by Spiral
"Will Brexit ever happen", page two. Any chance this could be settled?

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 12:49 am
by If it be your will
.

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:34 am
by Spiral
My cheat sheet (not fool-proof, but just about reliable enough to get me through life without folk thinking I'm home-schooled) for was/were:

Was=first & third person singular past tense; I was acting like a tw@t/he was acting like a tw@t/it was a tw@ttish thing to do.

Were=second person/third person past tense, or plural (this is a cheat sheet, remember); you were being a tw@t/they were acting like tw@ts. erm...

...were also=1st/2nd/3rd person present tense singular/plural hypothetical; If I were a unicorn/if you were a unicorn/if he were a unicorn!

erm...

er...hang on a minute, most of what I've just posted is correct but also at the same time nonsense depending on context.

In fact, ignore everything I've just said.

Good luck, anyway, IIBTW!

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:45 am
by spadesclaret
It grieves me to say it, Spiral, but I'm afraid you are wrong regarding is and are.

upanatem has it right when he says,

"None of them: 'none' is the subject of the sentence and I believe this is singular. 'of them' is a phrase, and, although 'them' is plural, it is not the subject of the sentence, and hence does not dictate that the ensuing verb be plural. The subject of the sentence dictates whether the verb be singular or plural. Eg. 'one of the boys was lagging behind'. 'one' is the subject, and hence the verb 'was' is singular irrespective of the ensuing phrase 'of the boys'."

None = not one (singular). It is correct to say, "Not one of them is...", therefore it is correct to say, "None of them is..."

Many(plural). It is correct to say, "Not many of them are..."

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:53 am
by Spiral
Thank you! Wasn't expecting a reply!

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:53 am
by spadesclaret
If it be your will, a complicated subject but Spiral's response above will do to be going on with.

I'm delighted to agree with Spiral on one thing this evening :lol:

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:53 am
by Damo
Get a life. It's a football messageboard and it's Saturday night

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:56 am
by Spiral
No offence, Damo, but why are you here, then?

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 1:58 am
by Damo
Spiral wrote:No offence, Damo, but why are you here, then?
I'm at work pal. It's the busiest night of the week for me

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:00 am
by Spiral
Gigolo?

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:07 am
by FactualFrank
What I am surprised at is that spadesclaret can actually be bothered? This is just me, but I'd be way too lazy to do much. No doubt see them again later.

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:09 am
by Damo
Spiral wrote:Gigolo?
Glory hole attendant

Re: FAO Spades

Posted: Sun Jul 01, 2018 2:12 am
by Spiral
Damo wrote:Glory hole attendant
Ha! That's your real job! Ha! I bet it is! HA!













































Erm, what's the hourly rate like, mate? Asking for a friend.