MEE v DAWSON question

This Forum is the main messageboard to discuss all things Claret and Blue and beyond
Post Reply
s6t9a2f3f
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 3:29 pm
Been Liked: 82 times

MEE v DAWSON question

Post by s6t9a2f3f » Wed Aug 01, 2018 1:27 pm

If we signed Dawson would he be on the same money or more than what Mee is asking for ? if the answer to that is Dawson will be on more than what Mee is asking for then why not give Mee what he wants ? That also does not count the 15m-20m to sign Dawson.


Brian

MACCA
Posts: 15595
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:10 am
Been Liked: 4360 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by MACCA » Wed Aug 01, 2018 1:30 pm

Its all about squad harmony and our wages ceiling.

It's not a question of can or can't we afford it.
It's whether Ben wants to sign, accepts our wages structure and whether he wants to be paid more or play more

s6t9a2f3f
Posts: 414
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2016 3:29 pm
Been Liked: 82 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by s6t9a2f3f » Wed Aug 01, 2018 1:45 pm

accepted but are you saying if Mee accepted our wage ceiling Burnley would no way on deadline day panicing get the chance of signing Dawson but reject the chance because he wants more than what they had got Mee to sign for ?

Brian

LaLigaClaret
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue May 24, 2016 9:30 pm
Been Liked: 191 times
Has Liked: 34 times
Location: Norfolk

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by LaLigaClaret » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:16 pm

I suspect we bid on Dawson and Mawson because Ben Mee is leaving in this window or will run his contract down so we get nothing. Buying Dawson or Mawson just as cover makes no financial sense. A 4th CB is needed but we could have gone for Flint at £7m if cover was what was needed.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30730
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11062 times
Has Liked: 5667 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:31 pm

Dawson would score a lot more goals than Mee for sure !

BurnleyFC
Posts: 5140
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 11:51 am
Been Liked: 1623 times
Has Liked: 904 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by BurnleyFC » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:34 pm

Vegas Claret wrote:Dawson would score a lot more goals than Mee for sure !
But he isn’t as good at his primary job - defending.

Vegas Claret
Posts: 30730
Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
Been Liked: 11062 times
Has Liked: 5667 times
Location: clue is in the title

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by Vegas Claret » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:40 pm

BurnleyFC wrote:But he isn’t as good at his primary job - defending.
I don't know if he is or isn't tbh, he's been in the PL longer than Mee

mkmel
Posts: 5771
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:37 pm
Been Liked: 1271 times
Has Liked: 2253 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by mkmel » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:47 pm

If Ben Mee leaves then we need to replace him with a LEFT sided centre back

We would also need another centre back who could be right sided like Craig Dawson

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by Diesel » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:54 pm

s6t9a2f3f wrote:That also does not count the 15m-20m to sign Dawson
Counter balanced by the 15m-20m we will get for Mee.

Offer Ben what he's worth, which I think is 50k a week, if he wont sign, sell him.

If anyone is prepared to offer him more, I don't think anybody is/will then they will naturally in accordance with that wage offer be prepared to pay around 18m, so we take it.

...OR, does nobody want him?

boatshed bill
Posts: 15286
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3169 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Aug 01, 2018 5:56 pm

Diesel wrote:Counter balanced by the 15m-20m we will get for Mee.

Offer Ben what he's worth, which I think is 50k a week, if he wont sign, sell him.

If anyone is prepared to offer him more, I don't think anybody is/will then they will naturally in accordance with that wage offer be prepared to pay around 18m, so we take it.

...OR, does nobody want him?
As commented earlier, it may not be about the money

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by Diesel » Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:03 pm

boatshed bill wrote:As commented earlier, it may not be about the money
Of course it's about money but the op is suggesting we pay Ben what we would have to pay Dawson PLUS the fee that it would cost to sign him.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15286
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3169 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:05 pm

Diesel wrote:Of course it's about money but the op is suggesting we pay Ben what we would have to pay Dawson PLUS the fee that it would cost to sign him.
Maybe, maybe not, could be he just wants a new challenge. They're all millionaires so does it really just come down to getting a pay rise?

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by Diesel » Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:14 pm

boatshed bill wrote:Maybe, maybe not, could be he just wants a new challenge. They're all millionaires so does it really just come down to getting a pay rise?
He'll be looking for 80k a week considering he'll be a free agent next year.

Well you won't get it at Burnley, Ben and rightly so.

boatshed bill
Posts: 15286
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
Been Liked: 3169 times
Has Liked: 6770 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by boatshed bill » Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:22 pm

Diesel wrote:He'll be looking for 80k a week considering he'll be a free agent next year.

Well you won't get it at Burnley, Ben and rightly so.
No, he certainly won't. I have to say if he's not happy the sell him, no good having players around who'd rather be elsewhere.

Diesel
Posts: 3089
Joined: Fri Apr 29, 2016 4:56 pm
Been Liked: 1228 times
Has Liked: 391 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by Diesel » Wed Aug 01, 2018 6:31 pm

boatshed bill wrote:No, he certainly won't. I have to say if he's not happy the sell him, no good having players around who'd rather be elsewhere.
I don't think he necessarily wants to be elsewhere, he's 28-29 this is his last big contract deal, he's in a fantastic negotiating position, why would anyone not get every penny they could?

kaptin1
Posts: 1601
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:05 am
Been Liked: 460 times
Has Liked: 109 times

Re: MEE v DAWSON question

Post by kaptin1 » Wed Aug 01, 2018 7:14 pm

mkmel wrote:If Ben Mee leaves then we need to replace him with a LEFT sided centre back

We would also need another centre back who could be right sided like Craig Dawson
Why, plenty of right footers play successfully at LCB? Indeed, didn’t England actually play five right footed players across the back in the World Cup?

Post Reply