Vokes
Vokes
Been a loyal servant for Burnley but time moves on and tonight proved why the summer needed to be about an overhaul of the team with no room for sentiment. Not clinical enough and not enough pace for the highest level.
With a heavy heart, it is time to move on.
With a heavy heart, it is time to move on.
-
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3455 times
- Has Liked: 2958 times
Re: Vokes
Not going to replace him this season. Still more to come from the big lad. Other far more expensive strikers have missed similar.
-
- Posts: 5479
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 3227 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: Vokes
Duplicate post.
Last edited by gawthorpe_view on Thu Aug 30, 2018 11:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 5479
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 7:19 am
- Been Liked: 1467 times
- Has Liked: 3227 times
- Location: 'Turf
Re: Vokes
I like Sam Vokes.
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Vokes
No. No he wouldnt. Maybe one on another day but he misses those kind of chances fairly regularly.
Then he'll score 2 or 3 cracjers tbat are harder.
Thinf is do we think if say Jayrod had had tjose chances we would have won?
Then he'll score 2 or 3 cracjers tbat are harder.
Thinf is do we think if say Jayrod had had tjose chances we would have won?
-
- Posts: 5026
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 3455 times
- Has Liked: 2958 times
Re: Vokes
Is your keyboard broken?BabylonClaret wrote:No. No he wouldnt. Maybe one on another day but he misses those kind of chances fairly regularly.
Then he'll score 2 or 3 cracjers tbat are harder.
Thinf is do we think if say Jayrod had had tjose chances we would have won?
These 2 users liked this post: Gandalfs pole CJW
-
- Posts: 17884
- Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2016 1:57 pm
- Been Liked: 6634 times
- Has Liked: 3069 times
- Location: Fife
Re: Vokes
Errrrr yea think so,maybe notBabylonClaret wrote:No. No he wouldnt. Maybe one on another day but he misses those kind of chances fairly regularly.
Then he'll score 2 or 3 cracjers tbat are harder.
Thinf is do we think if say Jayrod had had tjose chances we would have won?

-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4645 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Vokes
Encouraging aspect is Sam is getting in the right areas just needs a goal to get him up and running,bad miss in the 1st half admittedly,in the 2nd half he was unlucky with the effort that struck the post,summed up our night.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Vokes
You win some you lose some. Firstly he got into the position to miss them. Thats half the battle. Secondly due to his stop start appearences theres always more pressure on him to impress when he does start.
Hes a key player. Who is priceless to a team like us. Plays a huge part overall. Has been one of our hardest working,best serving players in years. Deserves our respect and support.
On another night he would have had 3. Played well but for the first header. Possibly the second too.
Hes a key player. Who is priceless to a team like us. Plays a huge part overall. Has been one of our hardest working,best serving players in years. Deserves our respect and support.
On another night he would have had 3. Played well but for the first header. Possibly the second too.
This user liked this post: Wo Didi
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Vokes
I thought Vokes and Barnes were better than Wood and Vydra tonight.
-
- Posts: 4314
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1387 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Vokes
You just need to see his interview after the game. Looked like he’d gone 10 rounds with Anthony Joshua. Top bloke and top professional who gives everything he has.
He missed one sitter tonight and it’s time to get rid. Ridiculous.
Always gives you something particularly from the bench. He could have scored against Watford immediately after coming on and also against Fulham. It’s fine margins but he could be sat on half a dozen goals already this season.
He missed one sitter tonight and it’s time to get rid. Ridiculous.
Always gives you something particularly from the bench. He could have scored against Watford immediately after coming on and also against Fulham. It’s fine margins but he could be sat on half a dozen goals already this season.
These 6 users liked this post: cricketfieldclarets Gandalfs pole Craigyp01 BOYSIE31 ElectroClaret Wo Didi
-
- Posts: 4314
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1387 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Vokes
Papabendi wrote:I’ve always been a fan. I just think to move on quality wise he doesn’t have a role for us. He hasn’t improved and is pushing 30.
Hasn’t improved? really since when?
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Aug 03, 2018 12:54 am
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 4 times
Re: Vokes
I love cracjers
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Vokes
And yet Vydra stuck it in the net. Vokes was decent but he missed some very good chances (which is generally what he does at this level.
I like Sam, dont get me wrong. But tonight he should have had at least 1. If that had been Benteke people woukd be queuing up to take the ****
I like Sam, dont get me wrong. But tonight he should have had at least 1. If that had been Benteke people woukd be queuing up to take the ****
-
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2943 times
- Has Liked: 829 times
-
- Posts: 4314
- Joined: Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:00 pm
- Been Liked: 1387 times
- Has Liked: 509 times
Re: Vokes
Benteke is on over 100k per week and I know who I’d rather have.
-
- Posts: 6585
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1929 times
- Has Liked: 2869 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Vokes
A lot of 'could haves' and 'should haves' regarding Sam Vokes. Could have had 3or 4,should have had at least one. Ended up with none and won't add to that at the weekend as he probably sits out most of another game. It's not as though we are blessed with a plethora of goalscorers.
-
- Posts: 34426
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 4:00 am
- Been Liked: 12536 times
- Has Liked: 6262 times
- Location: clue is in the title
Re: Vokes
Unplayable tonight, everything Chris Wood should be when it comes to winning headers. If he could finish like Ronaldo he wouldn't have ever played for us. At the risk of causing anarchy I'd get rid of Wood long before I got rid of Sam
-
- Posts: 5681
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 2027 times
- Has Liked: 2062 times
Re: Vokes
That's why no other club bought him. Happy to keep him at Burnley, but which other Pl teams would he get into? Cardiff?
-
- Posts: 6585
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2016 6:39 pm
- Been Liked: 1929 times
- Has Liked: 2869 times
- Location: Rawtenstall
Re: Vokes
Neither look like they are going to score goals even on a remotely regular basis. Barnes blows hot and cold and as a consequence there is more and more pressure on the defensive side of the team to keep us in games. It hasn't gone well so far, obviously but it is concerning where the goals are going to come from.
-
- Posts: 25697
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2017 9:43 pm
- Been Liked: 4645 times
- Has Liked: 9849 times
- Location: Glasgow
Re: Vokes
Agree Sam should have bagged,but he cost a fraction of Benteke's fees and wages,it's easy to say Wood would have buried those chances,maybe but he may not have put himself in the position to create the chances in the first place.BabylonClaret wrote:And yet Vydra stuck it in the net. Vokes was decent but he missed some very good chances (which is generally what he does at this level.
I like Sam, dont get me wrong. But tonight he should have had at least 1. If that had been Benteke people woukd be queuing up to take the ****
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Vokes
CardiffVino blanco wrote:That's why no other club bought him. Happy to keep him at Burnley, but which other Pl teams would he get into? Cardiff?
Bournemouth
Huddersfield
Newcastle
Palace
At least
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Vokes
Newcastle? Bournemouth? Palace?
Righhhhht
Righhhhht
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 8:23 pm
- Been Liked: 78 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Vokes
Voles won practically every header tonight and run himself into the ground
Very unfortunate not to score
Well played big fella
Very unfortunate not to score
Well played big fella
These 2 users liked this post: The Enclosure oswyclaret
-
- Posts: 5681
- Joined: Fri Jan 22, 2016 2:42 pm
- Been Liked: 2027 times
- Has Liked: 2062 times
Re: Vokes
Cricketfield, you normally talk shoit but now you've excelled yourself.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
Re: Vokes
For what it is worth, imo his best season was upfront in the first promotion season with Ings. After his injury he lost more mobility and in Premier League terms just cannot get around the park or react quickly enough. What keeps him somewhat in business is an above average aerial threat but that too is often negated depending on who he is up against.Hibsclaret wrote:Hasn’t improved? really since when?
-
- Posts: 17184
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:47 am
- Been Liked: 3525 times
- Has Liked: 7714 times
Re: Vokes
It doesn't really matter who would or would not buy him, he's our player and he worked his guts out up there with Ashley Barnes.
The ball came off Wood and Vydra much easier for Olymiacos to start moving forward than it ever did when Sam and Ash were on.
The ball came off Wood and Vydra much easier for Olymiacos to start moving forward than it ever did when Sam and Ash were on.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Vokes
Newcastles main striker Rondon. Exact same age. Never scored 10 prem goals in a season. Vokes has.BabylonClaret wrote:Newcastle? Bournemouth? Palace?
Righhhhht
Bournemouth Callum wilson. See Rondon.
Palace. Benteke. Exact same age. Awful player these days. Offers zero.
-
- Posts: 21464
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:59 pm
- Been Liked: 8585 times
- Has Liked: 11285 times
Re: Vokes
Well thats that then. End of thread.Papabendi wrote:Thread is about Vokes and what he offers Burnley. Not Rondon, Benteke or anyone else.
Re: Vokes
I disagree. Clinical?????? One some chances, we really should have scored, in fact about 5. I wasn't sure about the massive Galipolli manufactured scarf waving about on the telly in Olympaicos colours. A relative was there, in 1915, I think the year was.
Nevertheless, Vokes clip on to the post was as good as any player on Earth, more or less. Only a milimetres stopped it from going in. We would have won otherwise.
Messi might have given it more pace and that might have worked, but Vokes had no time and space to justify such a clever shot ordinarily.
Nevertheless, Vokes clip on to the post was as good as any player on Earth, more or less. Only a milimetres stopped it from going in. We would have won otherwise.
Messi might have given it more pace and that might have worked, but Vokes had no time and space to justify such a clever shot ordinarily.
This user liked this post: cricketfieldclarets
-
- Posts: 11136
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:38 am
- Been Liked: 5231 times
- Has Liked: 823 times
- Location: On top of a pink elephant riding to the Democratic Republic of Congo
Re: Vokes
quoonbeatz wrote:Still our best centre forward.

I'm not blaming Sam for tonight.
His first header should probably go on target but he gets too clean a head on it. The second one is at an awkward height for the big fella.
He played well tonight, but he's not our best centre forward,
-
- Posts: 3297
- Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:51 pm
- Been Liked: 745 times
- Has Liked: 664 times
Re: Vokes
Rondon and Wilson do more than score goals. They pull defenders around. SM doeant although his hold up and layoff play is decent.
The bottom line though is that thw kind of chances missed tonoght happen regularly.
For all the talk about Wood being poor so far he is still our best striker- he is more mobile, pulls defenders out of positipn and makes runs in behind more often than Sam. In fact he might have had a chance tonight had his great run not been flagged for offside (i thought he had checked before he started so was on not offside)
The bottom line though is that thw kind of chances missed tonoght happen regularly.
For all the talk about Wood being poor so far he is still our best striker- he is more mobile, pulls defenders out of positipn and makes runs in behind more often than Sam. In fact he might have had a chance tonight had his great run not been flagged for offside (i thought he had checked before he started so was on not offside)
-
- Posts: 6382
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 9:13 am
- Been Liked: 3160 times
- Has Liked: 148 times
Re: Vokes
Missed one great chance, did everything right with two hskf chances, and a massive part of why we dominated the game last night.
Still plenty to offer.
Still plenty to offer.
-
- Posts: 11193
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 pm
- Been Liked: 3611 times
- Has Liked: 2229 times
Re: Vokes
Well he clearly didn’t do everything right with the two half chances did he.
-
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 11:03 am
- Been Liked: 2943 times
- Has Liked: 829 times
Re: Vokes
incorrect.Bin Ont Turf wrote:![]()
I'm not blaming Sam for tonight.
His first header should probably go on target but he gets too clean a head on it. The second one is at an awkward height for the big fella.
He played well tonight, but he's not our best centre forward,
of our two centre forwards, vokes is the better.
-
- Posts: 495
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 122 times
- Has Liked: 10 times
Re: Vokes
Papabendi wrote:Been a loyal servant for Burnley but time moves on and tonight proved why the summer needed to be about an overhaul of the team with no room for sentiment. Not clinical enough and not enough pace for the highest level.
With a heavy heart, it is time to move on.
no its not and thank god you're not in charge of Burnley- Vokes was a handful tonight and was a tad unlucky..............we need him this season.
-
- Posts: 12179
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 8:56 pm
- Been Liked: 5987 times
- Has Liked: 226 times
Re: Vokes
A certain poster from the Fylde Coast (I won't name him in case he reports me) will be along soon to claim that Sam clearly missed those chances on purpose last night as an act of revenge for being hawked around other clubs this summer and it is another sign of clear issues between Dyche and the players.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish
-
- Posts: 19683
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:35 am
- Been Liked: 4182 times
- Has Liked: 2239 times
Re: Vokes
He was outstanding tonight, he has limitations but I can't remember many lightening centre forwards built like Sam.
Very unlucky hitting the post and Vydra nicking his goal on the line but that's football. The two headers you would expect him to score. The first the cross just curled back slightly so he makes contact with the left side of his head which means too much contact. The 2nd was just a reaction after the flick on.
He brought players into the game all night which Wood fails to do and Barnes was far quite tonight.
Not the game to call for the end of Vokes.
Very unlucky hitting the post and Vydra nicking his goal on the line but that's football. The two headers you would expect him to score. The first the cross just curled back slightly so he makes contact with the left side of his head which means too much contact. The 2nd was just a reaction after the flick on.
He brought players into the game all night which Wood fails to do and Barnes was far quite tonight.
Not the game to call for the end of Vokes.
This user liked this post: Lord Beamish
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 1:18 pm
- Been Liked: 49 times
- Has Liked: 491 times
Re: Vokes
Agree with quoon on this one, should be starting against Man U on Sunday.
-
- Posts: 1711
- Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2017 10:34 am
- Been Liked: 741 times
- Has Liked: 381 times
Re: Vokes
Second got a deflection before getting to him, might have been different if it hadn'tcricketfieldclarets wrote:
On another night he would have had 3. Played well but for the first header. Possibly the second too.
-
- Posts: 9064
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 4:30 pm
- Been Liked: 3429 times
- Has Liked: 5646 times
- Location: Catterick N.Yorks
Re: Vokes
The only thing he did wrong last night was miss with his 2 headers, on another night they would have gone in and everyone would be marking him 10/10. It's fine margins.
Has no one noticed how many simple goals Salah misses.
The shot that struck the post was sublime and so unlucky. I wad behind it and thought it was heading for the corner flag. It curved and carried on curving. If it had gone in it would have gone down in legend.
Time up for Sam, it should be time up for the OP.
Has no one noticed how many simple goals Salah misses.
The shot that struck the post was sublime and so unlucky. I wad behind it and thought it was heading for the corner flag. It curved and carried on curving. If it had gone in it would have gone down in legend.
Time up for Sam, it should be time up for the OP.