Woods v Mickelson
Woods v Mickelson
$9 million challenge tonight, I think Woods will win
$200,000 side bet Mickleson says he will birdie the first .
$200,000 side bet Mickleson says he will birdie the first .
Re: Woods v Mickelson
Think the side bet is for charity - can’t see it listed anywhere on sky.
-
- Posts: 25445
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:46 am
- Been Liked: 6930 times
- Has Liked: 11660 times
- Location: Leeds
-
- Posts: 5018
- Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2017 8:55 pm
- Been Liked: 1251 times
- Has Liked: 217 times
Re: Woods v Mickelson
How are they getting away with these two old houndogs playing a few shots and scripted banter for $9m dollars ? I’m guessing it’s part funded by the bookies ? Sounds like a PPV uber mug fest . Is this what Fred Trueman and indoor league died for !? I’m off for a cold beer to wash down my fried chicken and collared greens anyway
-
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2018 4:08 pm
- Been Liked: 326 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Woods v Mickelson
This sham may have been viable 10-15 years ago, not now though, that boat has sailed. I wonder how much fun it would be if the two players were playing with their own money!
From what I read, customers aren’t exactly breaking down the doors to pay the PPV fee.
From what I read, customers aren’t exactly breaking down the doors to pay the PPV fee.
Re: Woods v Mickelson
It’s on Sky golf channel at 8pmTVC15 wrote:Think the side bet is for charity - can’t see it listed anywhere on sky.
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: Woods v Mickelson
I’m not a golf fan and that bollock head on talk sport Darren Gough was saying it’s not aimed at your ardent golf fan, they are aiming at non golf fans in an attempt to get them interested in the game !
So the way to attract non golf fans is to charge then $20 to watch it? I can’t see this one taking off Darren ! Or your just chatting shite again as usual..
So the way to attract non golf fans is to charge then $20 to watch it? I can’t see this one taking off Darren ! Or your just chatting shite again as usual..
Re: Woods v Mickelson
I'm a golf fan and I couldn't care any less about this. The yanks are a strange breed though wouldn't surprise me if it was a big hit out there!
Re: Woods v Mickelson
It's on sky sports......RocketLawnChair wrote:
So the way to attract non golf fans is to charge then $20 to watch it? I can’t see this one taking off Darren ! Or your just chatting shite again as usual..
-
- Been Liked: 1 time
- Has Liked: 950 times
Re: Woods v Mickelson
It’s PPV in the USA hence my use of the dollar sign ............................bedfords wrote:It's on sky sports......
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
Re: Woods v Mickelson
Will Chris be back for the game Monday night?
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
Re: Woods v Mickelson
Vokes starts , Chris will be on bench with jet lagBosscat wrote:Will Chris be back for the game Monday night?
This user liked this post: FactualFrank
-
- Posts: 7742
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2585 times
- Has Liked: 4175 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Woods v Mickelson
It's a bit of a joke really but they have maintained a competetive edge at the highest level.
The USA love this legend stuff.
I hope the winner donates the money to various charities though.
The USA love this legend stuff.
I hope the winner donates the money to various charities though.
Re: Woods v Mickelson
It's either him or Vokes for me
Re: Woods v Mickelson
Can’t believe how unfit Mickleson is , heavy breathing walking up the first
Re: Woods v Mickelson
With Mickelson’s tax issues I doubt that very muchJohnMac wrote: I hope the winner donates the money to various charities though.
This user liked this post: JohnMac
-
- Posts: 1294
- Joined: Sat May 12, 2018 4:08 pm
- Been Liked: 326 times
- Has Liked: 52 times
Re: Woods v Mickelson
joey13 wrote:Can’t believe how unfit Mickleson is, heavy breathing walking up the first
Leave the guy alone, he’s probably dragging around a virtual wheelbarrow full of virtual $$$

-
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Tue Sep 12, 2017 7:38 pm
- Been Liked: 146 times
- Has Liked: 94 times
Re: Woods v Mickelson
Looked like Phil had it on 17 but Tiger chipped in. Phil missed the putt so it's all square going up the last. Enjoyed this more than I thought. Doubt id of paid if it was ppv here though.
This user liked this post: Quickenthetempo
-
- Posts: 7742
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:11 pm
- Been Liked: 2585 times
- Has Liked: 4175 times
- Location: Padiham
Re: Woods v Mickelson
Don't keep up to speed with this stuff, I take it he is a naughty boy?TVC15 wrote:With Mickelson’s tax issues I doubt that very much
Why they bother when they will never run out of money regardless of how much tax they pay is baffling.