• Barnes

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 3:58 pm**

Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:02 pm**

According to Stelling and Phil Thompson clear penalty and goalkeeper made no contact with the ball and made contact with Barnes.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:03 pm**

DAVETHEVICAR wrote:According to Stelling and Phil Thompson clear penalty and goalkeeper made no contact with the ball and made contact with Barnes.

He's fishing. Without a rod.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 4:05 pm**

To top it off Sam Vokes wins a penalty but he steps up and misses it

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:38 pm**

But Barnes didn't

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:40 pm**

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

Your busy today, you'll have no bait left for tomorrow if you keep it up.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 5:56 pm**

It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:02 pm**

BurnleyFC wrote:It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.

Fair enough. Can you fathom why a yellow card was given?

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:05 pm**

Lord Beamish wrote:Fair enough. Can you fathom why a yellow card was given?

I think it was one of those that can only be one of two things: a foul and therefore penalty or a dive. If he thinks it’s a dive, he’s got to book him.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:08 pm**

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

you are as blatant as Saxo was

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:09 pm**

BurnleyFC wrote:It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.

Heck, which replays have you seen? The ones I have seen show it be a clear penalty. Keeper makes no contact with ball and plenty of contact with Ash.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:10 pm**

Wasn't the yellow for Barnes berating the lino?

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:13 pm**

BBC seems to suggest he got a yellow for diving, folk seem to suggest it was for dissent. Which be it?

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:16 pm**

FactualFrank wrote:He's fishing. Without a rod.

I'd say being a tool

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:17 pm**

Looked like the ref was going to book him before he started slating the linesman so it must've been for simulation.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:18 pm**

Tall Paul wrote:Looked like the ref was going to book him before he started slating the linesman so it must've been for simulation.

If that’s the case then I’m surprised he didn’t give him a second yellow for the dissent

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:19 pm**

1968claret wrote:Heck, which replays have you seen? The ones I have seen show it be a clear penalty. Keeper makes no contact with ball and plenty of contact with Ash.

Another one who has the benefit of a magical TV camera angle that on one else on the planet has seen

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:20 pm**

I haven't seen it, but what was the end result of the incident? If it's a goal kick then it must be for dissent, if it's a free kick then it can only be for diving. No?

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:21 pm**

cricketfieldclarets wrote:Wtf was he thinking?

Clean through. Can take it round the keeper. Can stand still and get clattered. Can dink it over him. Or he cam do what he did and what we grumble about every week and ******* dive. What an absolute joke. And then to top it off tries to get himself sent of!!!!!

No need ffs.

Hope he makes up for it this second half.

BULLSHIT!

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:22 pm**

Taken from a match report

"Burnley were, however, somehow denied a penalty when goalkeeper McCarthy clattered into Barnes in the Southampton penalty area - they were last awarded a spot-kick 67 games ago - and instead referee Anthony Taylor booked the striker for simulation."

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:24 pm**

It was a clear penalty. There really is no debate.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:26 pm**

It certainly wasn’t a clattering. Almost seemed to happen in slow motion.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:27 pm**

BurnleyFC wrote:It certainly wasn’t a clattering. Almost seemed to happen in slow motion.

Buffering?

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:28 pm**

BurnleyFC wrote:Almost seemed to happen in slow motion.

Should have been even ******* easier for Taylor to see it then.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:29 pm**

BurnleyFC wrote:It was weak and having seen the replays I can see why it wasn’t given.

You really don’t like Burnley much do you ?
Blatant penalty.

Why do you think it wasn’t given then ?
Goalkeeper caught Barnes as he took ball past him. Unless you think the keeper did not touch Barnes ?

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:30 pm**

wilks_bfc wrote:If that’s the case then I’m surprised he didn’t give him a second yellow for the dissent

Yeah. I was worried about a second yellow.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:31 pm**

I want some of the drugs the OP is on

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:31 pm**

agreenwood wrote:It was a clear penalty. There really is no debate.

Absolutely.

Thought we would never get a pen all season if he can’t give that. How can the ref or lino not see it. Unbelievable.

The ref was an absolute disgrace all afternoon.

How can he not book their player early on with the worst foul of the game. It felt like he was giving them everything.

Completely different game and potentially scoreline if we get the first pen. Potentially lost 6 points in the last 3 games just from inept officials. Best league in the world. Really....

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:34 pm**

Was Arfield the last player booked for diving? (if memory serves, it was neither a penalty nor a dive....Everton appen, our 24 pass goal game?)

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:37 pm**

Hibsclaret wrote:Absolutely.

Thought we would never get a pen all season if he can’t give that. How can the ref or lino not see it. Unbelievable.

The ref was an absolute disgrace all afternoon.

How can he not book their player early on with the worst foul of the game. It felt like he was giving them everything.

Completely different game and potentially scoreline if we get the first pen. Potentially lost 6 points in the last 3 games just from inept officials. Best league in the world. Really....

With utterly sh!t not up to standard officiating teams for the most part

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:38 pm**

TVC15 wrote:You really don’t like Burnley much do you ?
Blatant penalty.

Why do you think it wasn’t given then ?
Goalkeeper caught Barnes as he took ball past him. Unless you think the keeper did not touch Barnes ?

Yes, I really don’t like Burnley at all

I thought Barnes was looking for it and didn’t need to go down. Have you seen the replays? Fair enough if you think otherwise.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:39 pm**

Thought it was a definite pen but the way Barnes deliberately moved his foot to ensure he caught the keeper had similarities to the Pope against Man City and the Glen Murray (not so much so)pens that a fair few on here were outraged at them being given as pens against us

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:49 pm**

Was nothing like the Bernardo Silva one if that’s what you mean.

Either way they get given against us and not for us. Never mind they even up over the season. Bs

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:52 pm**

Guller Bull wrote:Wasn't the yellow for Barnes berating the lino?

No. The card comes before that.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:53 pm**

Every single report on the game ive read and every pundit I've heard pass comment on the incident have said it was a penalty, yet a couple on here think otherwise

Absolutely hilarious

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:55 pm**

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Every single report on the game and every pundit I've heard pass comment on the incident have said it was a penalty, yet a couple on here think otherwise

Absolutely hilarious

Apart from the OP who was obviously on the wind up (very successfully) who on this thread has said it wasnt a penalty?

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:55 pm**

Lord Beamish wrote:No. The card comes before that.

Fair play LB, didn't see that. in which case it needs appealing.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:56 pm**

Guller Bull wrote:Fair play LB, didn't see that. in which case it needs appealing.

You can’t appeal a yellow. The utterly abysmal Ref has got away scot free.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:56 pm**

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Every single report on the game and every pundit I've heard pass comment on the incident have said it was a penalty, yet a couple on here think otherwise

Absolutely hilarious

Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:57 pm**

Guller Bull wrote:Fair play LB, didn't see that. in which case it needs appealing.

Not sure yellow cards can be appealed.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:57 pm**

Devils_Advocate wrote:Apart from the OP who was obviously on the wind up (very successfully) who on this thread has said it wasnt a penalty?

"A couple on here"

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:58 pm**

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

BBC Reporter thought it was. I forget her name - the fit one. She said it was a penalty and 1-1 was about right.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 6:58 pm**

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Oh right that's where you got your viewpoint from. I get you now

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:00 pm**

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:Oh right that's where you got your viewpoint from. I get you now

Not quite.

I was on the game. My lad was on the pitch at half time.

Is it really that strange to want to get an opinion from journalists that have access to replays?

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:00 pm**

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.

You're talking absolute shite. Stone wall penalty. Clueless if you think otherwise.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:02 pm**

BurnleyFC wrote:Sky Sports reporter didn’t think it was.

Again, I can see why it wasn’t given. The second penalty appeal we had (and won) was blatant. The first, not so much in my opinion.

The card came out before the tantrum. I seriously thought Barnes was going to talk himself into a red.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:04 pm**

https://www.facebook.com/95899604080401 ... 676173139/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:05 pm**

Lord Beamish wrote:The card came out before the tantrum. I seriously thought Barnes was going to talk himself into a red.

Yep it was definitely coming out before but when someone gets booked for a foul or diving they can get away with a fair bit of dissent without getting the red. Means if youre getting booked anyway you might as well have a good old shout and moan about it

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:08 pm**

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:https://www.facebook.com/95899604080401 ... 676173139/

That clip is sped up. Looks like something out of a Benny Hill sketch.

Posted: **Sat Feb 02, 2019 7:09 pm**

THEWELLERNUT70 wrote:https://www.facebook.com/95899604080401 ... 676173139/

Penalty all day long, whether it's 1819, 1919 or 2019! It's so silly we didn't get a penalty for that. It might still have ended up one all, but crikey!

Barnes

Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes

Re: Barnes